BBC to start charging US-based consumers for news and TV coverage - ‘Premium experience’ for US users will include BBC News livestream as broadcaster looks overseas for income boost

Link: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2025/jun/26/bbc-usa-paid-subscription-news
Credit: Michael Savage Media editor for The Guardian, Thu 26 Jun 2025 05.00 EDT
Archive: https://archive.ph/uvS4J

New_Broadcasting_House__14561681425_.webp

The BBC is to begin charging US-based users for unlimited access to its news content and rolling televised coverage, as it searches for new ways to ease the pressure on its finances.

In the first scheme asking users outside the UK to pay a direct subscription for its news content, US users will be offered the chance to pay for a “premium experience”, including unlimited news and feature articles and a livestream of the BBC News channel.

Ad-free documentary series, films, early access to podcasts and exclusive newsletters will be tested as part of the deal, which launches on Thursday and will be targeted at those who are already heavy users of the BBC’s content.

It comes after the Guardian revealed earlier this month that BBC bosses were considering the idea. The initial phase of the launch will offer the premium package for $49.99 (£37) a year, or $8.99 (£6.60) a month.

Senior BBC figures believe there is a real opportunity to raise far more commercial income in the US. They believe there could be an appetite to pay for its brand of journalism, given the politically partisan reputation of some US television networks.

It will see the BBC compete directly with the likes of CNN, headed by the former BBC director general Mark Thompson, which is launching a streaming subscription service later this year.

Currently, users in the US can access BBC journalism for free through BBC.com, which is overseen by the corporation’s commercial arm, BBC Studios. Unlike in Britain, where users pay for content through the licence fee, BBC.com already carries advertising.

The search for subscribers in the US is a sign of the BBC’s desperation to boost its ailing coffers. Income from the licence fee has fallen significantly over the last 15 years, while it has also had to contend with the inflated costs of making television after the arrival of the big streamers.

The move also demonstrates the BBC’s willingness to explore new revenue streams to ministers as talks begin over the renewal of its royal charter – a process that will decide the immediate future of its funding model.

Rebecca Glashow, the chief executive of BBC global media and streaming, said: “We see the BBC as the world’s most trusted global news brand, and we have heard that time and time again. We provide incredibly distinctive global news reporting in this market and we have a distinct relationship with our audiences, where they trust us. And I don’t have to tell you how incredibly valuable and hard it is to create that relationship with consumers in this moment.”

While this is the furthest the corporation has gone in terms of charging overseas audiences for its news coverage, it does already charge for other content. In the US market, consumers pay to access the BBC Select documentary service via Prime Video, Apple TV and Roku. The BBC also owns the BritBox streaming service.

The corporation has been targeting the US for some time, recently relaunching its overseas website and app. BBC.com now reaches 139 million visitors globally, including nearly 60 million in the US.

US consumers who opt not to pay for the premium service will still have access to some free BBC content, including selected breaking news stories, podcasts, newsletters and radio livestreams. Licence fee payers travelling to the US will still have access to the BBC’s content through its updated app.
 
Every single fucking news site has a fucking paywall now and I wonder if any of the news sites wonder why less and less people care.
I can't even read local news because everything is paywalled.
I have a simple policy.

Every time I click on an article on Google News, if it's pay walled, I go back and click "Hide All Stories From this source"

I imagine my excluded list is a mile long, but I get less and less clicks on stories asking me for money.

So I guess I won't be reading any more BBC stories.
 
Nigga I don't even pay for ABC coverage of News and or Sports (mostly live Sports), what makes the BBC think that it can charge people outside of GB for their garbage programming?
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Made In Wales
Nigga I don't even pay for ABC coverage of News and or Sports (mostly live Sports), what makes the BBC think that it can charged people outside of GB for their garbage programming?
BBC Boss: 'I have a great idea - if the racist Working Class Poors won't give us money, we'll just ask the USA to give us money instead.'

What could possibly go wrong err... right.
 
Wouldn't you just spend money on a VPN. Also just read The Guardian or the Daily Mail or something. You'd have to be mental to pay cash money for this.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Made In Wales
249 years and nine days ago we officially told the UK to fuck off. Seeing how the BBC is an outgrowth of the British government, I say as a red-blooded, hamburger-eating white American male, we STILL tell the British government to fuck off.
Could not agree more!

This is what we all need to tell the UK Government (esp. Starmer) to do:

1fc162f995585dbda07dab9e026008151a647f8a0dc02864d60fa637c3064f41_1.webp
 
Americans like Jeremy Clarkson, which is why Amazon produces his programs now.
The BBC has also disowned the stuff which used to make it the world's best.

Take the examples of the following which are now deemed as 'unsafe' or 'in need of a trigger warning':

It Ain't Half Hot Mum


Last Of The Summer Wine

Keeping Up Appearances

Nothing at all offensive, yet some little 'boo hoo bugger' got all upset and wet his/her nappy.

I was told that even 'Goodnight Sweetheart' 'All Quiet On The Preston Front', 'Trainer', 'Howard's Way' and '2 Point 4 Children' are somehow offensive...

Next thing, farting will be deemed as blasphemy against Trans Muslims.
 
How is Howard's Way offensive. It was just a bunch of tories cutting about on ships.

Unless that skinny bald guy with the white shirt started calling everyone wogs one episode, maybe I missed that.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Made In Wales
Every single fucking news site has a fucking paywall now and I wonder if any of the news sites wonder why less and less people care.
I can't even read local news because everything is paywalled.
Just archive it. Nine times out of ten their paywalls are so shit a simple archive is all that's required to get around them
 
I bet they'll do this the exact same way they did it in canada - make deals with all the network cable and satellite providers to include BBC as part of all standard package deals, make it so you can't opt out and jack the price up to pay for it. Nobody will watch it but they will end up paying for it to keep their packages
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Just_Somebody
Senior BBC figures believe there is a real opportunity to raise far more commercial income in the US.
The corporation has been targeting the US for some time, recently relaunching its overseas website and app. BBC.com now reaches 139 million visitors globally, including nearly 60 million in the US.

1750992271978.webp

It will see the BBC compete directly with the likes of CNN, headed by the former BBC director general Mark Thompson, which is launching a streaming subscription service later this year.
:story: Because that went so well the last time.

Tell 'em Donald:

 
As a Bong the only BBC content I use is the "Sounds" (because they have to infantalise everything) website for effectively archive radio content (with sanctimonious triiger warnings) that they put out on BBC4extra. (Their security is comical - you have to provide a UK postcode but it can be any so just pick one for a major UK city landmark and an email but as long as it's in basic email format it doesn't have to be real - bbcp3doscum@f4gg0t.com should work fine!)

The news content is far less than it was even 5 to 10 years ago and weather offers nothing the met office website doesn't. I can't think of entertainment content they've produced in the last 10 years that I have any interest in. The lack of substance together with the undisclosed editorialising have made their content not merely worthless but worse than worthless - as I don't want it even without payment.

And that's the core problem. Why would people pay for something that has no value to them? And the real elephant in the room. The BBC knows this - that's why they are so desperate to keep the license system.
 
How is Howard's Way offensive. It was just a bunch of tories cutting about on ships.

Unless that skinny bald guy with the white shirt started calling everyone wogs one episode, maybe I missed that.
There's nothing at all offensive in Howard's Way, it's just that the wokes use the fact that because the 1980s weren't 'as woke' and 'morally pure' they must therefore come with a trigger warning.

I think that the USSR did the same thing with Western music in the 1970s-early 1990s - certainly Queen and Elton John were considered 'verboten' by the leaders.

God help the wokes if they ever find out about Robin Askwith and his bouncing bottom!
 
Back