Better PrEP Adherence Linked to More Bone Loss - People who took daily Truvada 90% to 100% of the time were more likely to develop osteopenia or osteoporosis.

A small proportion of people developed bone loss after they started using daily tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (Truvada or generic equivalents) for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), and the more they took it, the greater the effect, according to a study presented at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2022).

It is well known that tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is associated with bone loss in HIV-positive people using it for treatment, but there is less evidence about its effects on HIV-negative people taking it for prevention. Some prior studies showed people on PrEP experience mild bone loss, which usually resolves after stopping Truvada. The newer tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine (Descovy) is easier on the bones and kidneys but more associated with weight gain and elevated lipids; with no generic equivalent, it is also a more expensive option.

Joseph Chang, MD, of Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in Los Angeles, and colleagues conducted a retrospective analysis to look at the link between Truvada PrEP and bone loss.

The study included 7,698 adults in Southern California who used Truvada for PrEP between 2012 and 2020. Data were extracted from the Kaiser Permanente HealthConnect System. Nearly all were men, and about a third each were in the 18 to 29 and 30 to 39 age groups. About a third were white, 40% were Latino, 10% were Asian and 7% were Black. About 40% had good adherence, as indicated by a “proportion of days covered” (PDC) by PrEP in the 90% to 100% range, while about 60% had suboptimal adherence below 90%.

The participants had no prior history of osteoporosis (substantial bone loss) or osteopenia (mild bone loss) as indicated by a T-score of -1 or less. However, they had all undergone a DEXA bone scan at some point during the study. Chang said DEXA scans were not part of routine PrEP monitoring and the researchers did not look at the reasons why people had the scans, leaving open the possibility that this group may have been at higher risks for bone problems than the overall population using PrEP.

Over an average follow-up period of 502 days, 217 participants (3%) developed osteopenia or osteoporosis. The researchers noted that this is similar to the rate among HIV-positive people using treatment regimens that contain tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

An initial analysis found that people with hepatitis B, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, impaired kidney function or hypertension were more likely to experience bone loss, but these factors were not statistically significant in an adjusted analysis that controlled for multiple variables.

However, people with better adherence to PrEP remained at greater risk for bone loss in the fully adjusted analysis. People in the 90% to 100% PDC category were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with osteopenia or osteoporosis compared to those with lower PDC adherence levels. In fact, more than 90% of those with osteopenia or osteoporosis were in the 90% to 100% PDC category compared with 9% in the below 90% adherence category. Obesity and younger age were associated with a lower risk of osteopenia or osteoporosis.

Reassuringly, no new cases of HIV were detected during the study period, even among participants with less than 90% adherence.

Based on these findings, the researchers suggested that counseling on the incidence of osteoporosis and osteopenia as well as routine screening should be considered for people starting daily Truvada for PrEP. “Annual to every other year DEXA may be advisable,” Chang said.

Because the amount of time spent on Truvada was the strongest risk factor for bone loss, they also suggested that future studies should explore whether on-demand PrEP, or “PrEP 2-1-1”—in which the pills are taken before and after sex rather than daily—might mitigate the risk of serious adverse effects.

 
Straight men are just as big as coomers as gays through
Maybe. But when straight men are horny, sometimes they think about reproducing and starting a family, because they have sex with women, and women generally can gestate. So there's reason to worry about things like the physical and mental state of the women you're having sex with, venereal disease and immediate risk of being murdered aside.

Gay men have sex with other men, usually anally. That's the wrong sex, and the wrong hole. And for some reason (really, it's sexual dysfunction for the lot of them on account of being molested into homosexuality) HIV/AIDS is prevalent among them to a degree substantially higher than with straight men, even though a penis glove condom would all but solve the issue of transmission.
 
Osteoporosic Truvada Whores. Sounds like the name of a Sweedish death metal band.
 
It's ridiculous how normalized taking PrEP has become among gay men. Not being a gigantic gutter sloot is simply not an option, or at least using condoms instead.

You only want to use medication as a last resort, and PrEP isn't that kind of medication. Big pharma and LGBT do have an enduring symbiotic relationship though.
PrEP was originally meant as a preventative drug, and it was sold among monogamous gay couples. In recent times, as the gay subculture has returned to 70's era free sex, they pop PrEP pills like skittles. No shocker that it has side effects like this. It will be devastating to gay men.
Yeah, why are gays so hypersexual? I don't get it.
Unrestricted male sexuality. Women are the gatekeepers of sex, even though we can have repeat orgasms at a quicker rate than men. We aren't interesting in fucking in bathroom stalls or random bushes at night (unless you're a junkie or really kinky). Men, however, can really fuck anything and everything.
This isn't actually the case anymore; there has been more infections of heterosexual people in Europe with HIV than gay men for the past few years.

Cases have declined in all groups, and I suspect a big part of it is that some gay men take as many precautions possible where straight people generally aren't targeted by HIV awareness campaigns, but there's a 5-6% difference in the numbers of cases now between gay men vs straight men.

Supposedly straight women have it higher too, though I've not seen as much about that.

Lesbians, as ever, are unloved and have the lowest infection rate of all.
Not really. As for their share of the population, gay men continue to be overrepresented in HIV/AIDS. But AIDS isn't the only problem anymore. Antibiotic resistant syphilis is mainly spread by gay men, and THAT is a real son of a bitch to beat. Tertiary syphilis rots your face like you are a zombie in Resident Evil. It's horrifying. We are also not discussing the shigella and other parasites found among gay men. Transwomen are the only group that has it higher.
 
Back