Biblical Mandela Effect - New Update dropped. It's the Wolf with the Lamb now.

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Getting tard comed

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Dec 17, 2019
So apparently *something* has happened where the Bible, and every translation of the Bible including the dead sea scrolls(apparently) have the "wolf will lie down with the lamb". I know that's incorrect as it was "The lion will lie down with the lamb". From Sunday school since I was a kid it was always a lion. Today is the first time I've ever heard of wolf. If you look at non religious references to the passage like G.K Chesterson they mention a lion. So it was a lion. If you check you Bible, physical or otherwise the relevant verses will say wolf. Which is really fucking freaky! The implication being everyone for centuries have been mistaken, that churches across the world have images of a lion and a lamb laying together somehow being wrong or, and this is the case, Satan(or something not God) has the power to either a)alter history or b) the power to make the world see something that isn't there but cannot change your memory. Tbh I'm not sure which is more threatening but it does raise a question for me. Assuming this change has occured, which I am because it was always a lion and lamb and not a wolf and a lamb and if you ask any Christian they will tell you they remember it as lion(seriously go try it, ask a Christian you know what animal lays down with a lamb) how can anyone be sure that what they are reading is the word of God? You still have to read it and maybe the point of this is to sow that doubt in it.. idk kiwis help me out here.

Granted this convo is really for any other Christian kiwis on here but if you find this interesting you can chime in too.
 
This is probably because lion and lamb are used together in lots of other places. Jesus is referred to as both a lion and a lamb. There is a Christian worship song that has the lyrics "The lion and the lamb" There is a saying that March weather is "in like a lamb out like a lion" So you and others have likely conflated them together in your mind.
 
What's more likely? That every single record of note and every inscription has suddenly changed, or you just conflated the fuller verse with a paraphrase?

The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, The leopard shall lie down with the young goat, The calf and the young lion and the fatling together; And a little child shall lead them.
Isaiah 11:6
 
This is probably because lion and lamb are used together in lots of other places. Jesus is referred to as both a lion and a lamb. There is a Christian worship song that has the lyrics "The lion and the lamb" There is a saying that March weather is "in like a lamb out like a lion" So you and others have likely conflated them together in your mind.
What's more likely? That every single record of note and every inscription has suddenly changed, or you just conflated the fuller verse with a paraphrase?


Isaiah 11:6
Yeah, if it was just me so be it, but it isn't. Ask any Christian what animal lays with a lamb and they will say lion. Hell non biblical references to it specify lion. G.K. Chesterton in Orthodoxy which was published in 1908 specifically references a lion laying with a lamb.

Look, I hope I'm wrong and it was wolf and literally EVERYONE confused it for all time. I doubt it but I hope thats the case. The alternative is borderline frightening.
 
The mandela effect isn't real and just because people misremember something doesn't mean CERN did another oopsy and dropped you into another timeline. People misremember exact wording of stuff all the time.
 
Often folklore gets the Bible wrong.

Another example Jonah and the whale. The Bible very clearly says a big fish.

And nowhere in Genesis does it say the serpent who tempted Eve was the (borrowed from Zoroastrianism) Devil. In the story (as currently cobbled together) it's just a talking snake with no particular explanation.
 
Often folklore gets the Bible wrong.

Another example Jonah and the whale. The Bible very clearly says a big fish.

And nowhere in Genesis does it say the serpent who tempted Eve was the (borrowed from Zoroastrianism) Devil. In the story (as currently cobbled together) it's just a talking snake with no particular explanation.
The idea that the serpent was Satan was very clearly implied in Revelation. It's not a misremembrance, it's the fact Christianity is a different religion than Judaism.
 
Or it could just be the fact the lion is looked at as a noble animal and, given the positive connotation of a predator laying peacefully with prey, it would be easy to subconsciously alter the imagery of a sheep laying with a wolf with that of a sheep laying with a lion…

…but, nah! It’s probably holy intervention that literally rewrote every instance of the Bible at one time for some epic heavenly trolling.
 
The mandela effect isn't real and just because people misremember something doesn't mean CERN did another oopsy and dropped you into another timeline. People misremember exact wording of stuff all the time.

It's more fun to think that it's true and one day everyone will misremember that it isn't real and it will become real.
 
Retarded faggot.

1. The wolf and the lamb thing isn't a new Mandela Effect, I've heard people sperging about this since 2016.

2. The Bible has always said this. I remember wolf and lamb since I was a little kid because I was an autist who would make retarded comparisons to the Big Bad Wolf and that Bible passage reminded me of it.

3. People mix it up because it mentions a lion in a later scripture near this one.
 
Yeah, if it was just me so be it, but it isn't. Ask any Christian what animal lays with a lamb and they will say lion. Hell non biblical references to it specify lion. G.K. Chesterton in Orthodoxy which was published in 1908 specifically references a lion laying with a lamb.

Look, I hope I'm wrong and it was wolf and literally EVERYONE confused it for all time. I doubt it but I hope thats the case. The alternative is borderline frightening.
The process that happened inside your head to cause this misconception is the exact same one that happens in others as well. It's an easy mistake to make, given the lion-to-lamb proximity in other verses, so it's an often made mistake.
 
The idea that the serpent was Satan was very clearly implied in Revelation. It's not a misremembrance, it's the fact Christianity is a different religion than Judaism.
Uh oh. Christianity == massive Mendela effect in the Roman Empire. :cool:

"Mendela" is the correct spelling in my universe. There's even a mnemonic about "Mendelism". :wink:
 
Yeah, if it was just me so be it, but it isn't. Ask any Christian what animal lays with a lamb and they will say lion. Hell non biblical references to it specify lion. G.K. Chesterton in Orthodoxy which was published in 1908 specifically references a lion laying with a lamb.

Look, I hope I'm wrong and it was wolf and literally EVERYONE confused it for all time. I doubt it but I hope thats the case. The alternative is borderline frightening.
It doesn’t require EVERYONE to be wrong, it just requires a couple notable misattributions early on in the chain that gain a lot of traction. After enough time, more people will be familiar with the incorrect source and things that reference the incorrect source, rather than the original source material.

Like, do you ever actually remember READING the actual words “lion and lamb” in the Bible, or do you just remember that every auxiliary source refers to “lion and lamb” and you assumed that they must be right because you had no reason to assume it was incorrect?
 
I'll leave this here in lieu of Mandela Effects getting their own thread, but in the Koran (Sunan ibn Majah, Sahih Muslim) it used to say
The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him," {and the tree will say, "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."} <-appoximate
but now says
The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him." – But the tree Gharqad will not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.
Oh, and what others:
Jaws' girlfriend's braces
Cornucopia FotL

Oh, and what others:
Jaws' girlfriend's braces
Cornucopia FotL
Rodin
BB Stein
Chartreuse
JFK'scar
Liberty Statue
 
My (Protestant) Sunday school teacher when I was 13 once spent half a day in early September going over biblical misconceptions, including how popular culture and media could influence your conceptions of the Bible. The point of that lesson was to only trust the Bible or something.

Examples:
- Jesus being born in a stable ("the manger was in a house!")
- There were animals at Jesus' birth
- Jesus being born on December 25
- There being 3 wise men
- Jesus doesn't cry

It was one of those Asian churches but the Sunday school teacher that year was white, and for that year only
 
Oh, and what others:
Jaws' girlfriend's braces
Cornucopia FotL
The James Bond Moonraker thing with the braces girl gets me.

Minor PL but I used to be obsessed with James Bond and basically had the movies memorized. Besides which, "Jaws falls in love with a girl because she has braces, just like he has metal teeth" is EXACTLY the kind of stupid shit the Roger Moore era movies would pull.

So them being gone now... yeah no, I ain't accepting that I "just misremembered." If you could convince me of that, you could convince me I'm a giant goose from outer space too.
 
only trust the Bible
Fill in the blank: "You mustn't put new wine in old (blank;)"
So them being gone now... yeah no, I ain't accepting that I "just misremembered."
There are numerous overlapping causes of M.E. and according to Miles Mathis, Jaws' girlfriend's braces is a CIA gay op (for what purpose, to what end? 1. obfuscate M.E.? 2. test creating M.E. 3. they're scared of another "unlikely" but "undisproven" cause of M.E.) to find and edit all copies of the James Bond movie. (If one assumes a third of the population works for central intelligence, this is plausible. (Note: in East Berlin more than half the population worked as spies.))
Rodin
BB Stein
Chartreuse
JFK'scar
Liberty Statue
New Wine
Henry VIII
Tidy 😼
Center/Centralville
The Holocaust
Roadhouse 2: Electric Boogaloo
Publishers Clearinghouse
Sinbad Genie Movie
Monocle Monopoly Man
 
Back
Top Bottom