Business Big Tech Layoffs Megathread - Techbros... we got too cocky...

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Since my previous thread kinda-sorta turned into a soft megathread, and the tech layoffs will continue until morale improves, I think it's better to group them all together.

For those who want a QRD:


Just this week we've had these going on:

1706112535506.png

1706112610401.png

1706112702576.png

But it's not just Big Tech, the vidya industry is also cleaning house bigly:

1706112854585.png

All in all, rough seas ahead for the techbros.
 
Techbros... are we back?
No.

1776322918603.png
https://www.businessinsider.com/snap-layoffs-ai-read-memo-snapchat-2026-4

Snap has become the latest tech company to announce sweeping layoffs.

In a memo to employees released in a regulatory filing on Wednesday, CEO Evan Spiegel said Snap would cut 1,000 employees, about 16% of its global workforce, citing "rapid advancements" in AI and "small squads" using the technology to be more efficient.

"While these changes are necessary to realize Snap's long-term potential, we believe that rapid advancements in artificial intelligence enable our teams to reduce repetitive work, increase velocity, and better support our community, partners, and advertisers," Spiegel wrote.

The Snap CEO said the company would also close more than 300 open roles, and that US-based employees would receive four months of severance, healthcare coverage, and equity vesting. Spiegel also wrote that employees based in North America should work from home on Wednesday.

Snap joins a wave of tech companies cutting staff this year. Oracle and Meta announced layoffs last month, while Amazon slashed 16,000 corporate roles in January, citing a need to chop bureaucracy. In some cases, leaders are citing AI. The CEOs of Atlassian and Block both said AI was changing the needs of their workforce when they trimmed staff earlier this year.

In an investor update included in Snap's regulatory filing, the company said the layoffs would result in estimated annualized cost savings of $500 million.

"Snap faces a crucible moment — squeezed between giants with enormous resources and nimble startups moving fast," the company wrote in the investor presentation. "To meet this moment, we are pivoting toward profitable growth."

Snap said this new strategy would include scaling its subscription business and higher-margin ad placements.

The company said it also plans to transform its internal business model to spread critical work across both human teams and "increasingly capable AI agents." Under Snap's new operating model, at least 65% of new code was generated by AI, the company said in its investor presentation.

Read Spiegel's memo below:
Dear Team,

Today we are announcing changes that will impact approximately 1,000 team members at Snap, including 16% of our full time employees, in addition to closing more than 300 open roles. This is an incredibly difficult decision, and I am deeply sorry to the colleagues who will be leaving us. You have made important contributions to Snap, and we are committed to supporting you through this transition.

Last fall, I described Snap as facing a crucible moment, requiring a new way of working that is faster and more efficient, while pivoting towards profitable growth. Over the past several months, we have carefully reviewed the work required to best serve our community and partners, and made tough choices to prioritize the investments we believe are most likely to create long-term value. As a result of these changes, we expect to reduce our annualized cost base by more than $500 million by the second half of 2026, helping to establish a clearer path to net-income profitability.

While these changes are necessary to realize Snap's long-term potential, we believe that rapid advancements in artificial intelligence enable our teams to reduce repetitive work, increase velocity, and better support our community, partners, and advertisers. We have already witnessed small squads leveraging AI tools to drive meaningful progress across several important initiatives, including Snapchat+, enhanced ad platform performance, and efficiency improvements in our Snap Lite infrastructure.

If you are part of our North America team, please work from home today. In the US, impacted team members will receive an email notification within the next hour, including information about next steps. For non-US locations, you will receive additional details about next steps from leadership and HR.

To our departing colleagues: thank you. Your hard work has helped shape Snap, and we are deeply grateful for your contributions. For U.S.-based team members who are leaving, we will provide four months of severance, healthcare coverage, and equity vesting, along with career transition support.

Outside the U.S., we will follow local processes and seek to provide comparable support aligned with local norms.

To everyone continuing on this journey: change of this magnitude and at this speed is never easy and it will not be seamless. Thank you for your resilience, compassion, and commitment to one another, and to the community and partners we serve. Our responsibility is to move forward with clarity, empathy, and determination as we build a faster, stronger, and more durable Snap for the long term.

Evan
 
Tech bros would never unionize anyways though
Yup, because it pretty much kills the high mobility job hopping strat. You can't realistically parlay a 2 year resume stacker stint into a five figure raise at the next company if any sizeable percentage of the employers are unionized and controlling salaries and brackets by their own means. At the same time, the offered job security is moot when you don't plan to stay anywhere long. Not to mention the high profile retardation of hollywood unions has a lot of people very aware of the fact that unions only work when there's actually hiring to be done, and can't just magic work out of the ether.

While I'm sure there's some tech bro's that do it anyway for the social clout, the reality is that the Techbro version of the Union is the Consultancy Company. More internal stability as your theoretically under one employer long term, while retaining the networking and resume building of flitting around from employer to employer. You can still increase your take home with each contract jump as you get onto a new and higher paying client job and get a higher cut of the billable hours, and get a more meaningful direct benefit to overtime and crunch as you're ostensibly hourly, if the client is willing to authorize the extra hours. Similar stability in benefits, leadership and hierarchy as a Union as well.
 
I have no idea why these predictions are constantly center staged.

It's literally just "CEO of company says his upcoming product will be amazing, you should invest in it, and will change the landscape of the world when it's fully realized and will be better than every other version of the product that already exists".

I think on some level AI is here to stay, but, just like every other tool that "changed the entire landscape" it largely depends on an understanding of what it can and cannot do - and the companies that have been pushing it for a few years still can't make it do anything all that great and it's core problems still aren't being addressed and likely never will. AI will never get to a stage where a serious person will use it and then not spend a huge amount of time double/triple checking the output - just the same as if an underling did it today.
 
I have no idea why these predictions are constantly center staged.

It's literally just "CEO of company says his upcoming product will be amazing, you should invest in it, and will change the landscape of the world when it's fully realized and will be better than every other version of the product that already exists".

I think on some level AI is here to stay, but, just like every other tool that "changed the entire landscape" it largely depends on an understanding of what it can and cannot do - and the companies that have been pushing it for a few years still can't make it do anything all that great and it's core problems still aren't being addressed and likely never will. AI will never get to a stage where a serious person will use it and then not spend a huge amount of time double/triple checking the output - just the same as if an underling did it today.
So from.where i sit real software engineering is dead. Im pretty blackpilled at this point. But lets sy these tech bros are right.


Do they not see the violence that will come when enough of the world is impovershed and starving? Pathetic lone idiot attempts are starting, and warehouses are burning.

They keep this path up and im convinced they will, its going to get very very ugly. My personal bet is under 3 years for tech to be dead, everything yo be worse and the real violence to start.
 
So from.where i sit real software engineering is dead. Im pretty blackpilled at this point. But lets sy these tech bros are right.


Do they not see the violence that will come when enough of the world is impovershed and starving? Pathetic lone idiot attempts are starting, and warehouses are burning.

They keep this path up and im convinced they will, its going to get very very ugly. My personal bet is under 3 years for tech to be dead, everything yo be worse and the real violence to start.
They are trying to get investors in by making wild promises, a factor of tech that has been happening for decades. So much of the industry is just hyping the latest and greatest thing that never ends up being the revolution it was sold as. Before anyone notices, they then pivot to the next thing, and so on.

A.I. is the current investment capital, along with the back door smoothing out of the industry. Tech got too bloated over the course of the 2010s, largely due to the economy being shit and options being lessened for successful career paths for Millennials and now Zoomers. Add in all the Larry Fink / Obummer think tank cash that went into selling tech companies on filling their ranks with a random assortment of low skilled minorities, and the bubble was primed to burst.

Even past hiring, the 2010s saw a slow burn of cash as their hiring went too high, projects became too costly and time consuming, and they saw lesser return on products. Take a studio like RockSteady which went all in on hiring a rainbow flavoring, only for the new hires to spend roughly 10 years on a project, blowing through billions, yet making it so unappealing no one bought the Suicide Squad game. They couldn’t even keep their mouths shut and actively went on Twitter tirades to push even more people away. Productions and teams like these are unsustainable without some sugar daddy in the background, yet so much of gaming/tech was built like this.

2020 saw a massive leap in job creation from investment capital over Covid, followed by a long burn when the money dried and left them with massive flop debt. First they tried to pivot to India for that cheap labor, but India scammed them. Now A.I. is the new hopium of tech executives to cut costs and revitalize an industry after so much decay. I highly doubt it will work and the real conclusion will be that they need to go back to smaller teams and productions. This will have negative effects on fresh starts, but I also feel that those who actually give a shit will be given a better chance as time goes on, in comparison to the bloat of the 2010s where the average techie is some 30 year old women with the job of “check her email once a day.” My main hope is Orange man fixes the wider economy so the usual do-nothings go down more fitting career paths than clog up the tech sphere, allowing for more chances.
 
I guess this is worth posting even if it hasn't happened yet.

1776655989763.png
https://www.reuters.com/world/meta-...ayoffs-additional-cuts-later-2026-2026-04-17/

NEW YORK/SAN FRANCISCO, April 17 (Reuters) - Meta (META.O) intends to conduct a first wave of sweeping layoffs planned for this year on May 20, with more ‌coming later, three sources familiar with the plans told Reuters.
The Facebook and Instagram owner will lay off about 10% of its global workforce, or close to 8,000 employees, in that initial round, one of the sources said.

The company is planning further layoffs in the second half of the year, the three sources said, although details of those cuts, including date and size, were not yet settled. Executives may adjust their plans as they observe developments in artificial intelligence capabilities, the sources added.

Reuters ⁠reported last month that the company was planning to lay off 20% or more of its global workforce.
Meta declined to comment on the timing or scope of planned cuts.
CEO Mark Zuckerberg is pumping hundreds of billions of dollars into AI as he seeks to dramatically reshape his company’s inner workings around the technology, reflecting a broader pattern among major U.S. companies this year, particularly in the tech sector.
Amazon.com (AMZN.O) similarly has trimmed 30,000 corporate employees in recent months, representing nearly 10% of its white-collar workers, while in February the fintech company Block (XYZ.N) chopped nearly half of its staff.

In both of those cases, executives tied the cuts to efficiency gains from artificial intelligence.
Layoffs.fyi, a website tracking tech job cuts around the world, reported that 73,212 employees have lost their jobs so far this year. For all of 2024, the figure was 153,000.
Meta's ‌layoffs this ⁠year will be the social media giant's most significant since a restructuring in late 2022 and early 2023 that it dubbed the "year of efficiency," when it eliminated about 21,000 jobs. At that time, Meta's stock was in freefall and the company was struggling to correct for COVID-era growth assumptions that ultimately proved unsustainable.
The company is in a more comfortable financial position this time, but executives envision a future of fewer management layers and greater efficiency ⁠brought about by AI-assisted workers.

Meta's shares are up 3.68% since the start of the year, although they are down from a record high achieved last summer. Last year, it generated more than $200 billion of revenue and achieved a $60 billion profit despite outsized spending on artificial intelligence.
Menlo Park, California-based Meta ⁠employed nearly 79,000 people as of December 31, according to its latest filing.
In recent weeks, Meta has reorganized teams in its Reality Labs division and transferred engineers from throughout the company into a new “Applied AI” organization tasked with accelerating the development of AI agents ⁠that can write code and carry out complex tasks autonomously.
One of the sources said some staffers also would be transferred into Meta Small Business, a unit set up last month, as part of the restructuring.
 
I'm in data analytics and considering just saying fuck it and doing a master's in bioinformatics at my alma mater since it's a relatively cheap public university. Not sure if this is anywhere close to the right idea to ask about career advice pertaining to bioinformatics though.
 
I'm in data analytics and considering just saying fuck it and doing a master's in bioinformatics at my alma mater since it's a relatively cheap public university. Not sure if this is anywhere close to the right idea to ask about career advice pertaining to bioinformatics though.
Your mileage will vary. From anecdotal experience (I've got a couple friends doing PhDs in biomedical engineering and biochem) it can be a bitch getting a position as the jobs are limited and there's a lot of competition courtesy of biology kids treating it as a backup when their medical school aspirations fall through. Like a lot of biotech/healthcare location and your project/research experience are also going to be huge factors in what's available. It's basically like any degree these days, do your research and don't jump in blind expecting an easy ride.
 
Your mileage will vary. From anecdotal experience (I've got a couple friends doing PhDs in biomedical engineering and biochem) it can be a bitch getting a position as the jobs are limited and there's a lot of competition courtesy of biology kids treating it as a backup when their medical school aspirations fall through. Like a lot of biotech/healthcare location and your project/research experience are also going to be huge factors in what's available. It's basically like any degree these days, do your research and don't jump in blind expecting an easy ride.
Fair enough, I'd like to pursue bioinformatics because I'm tired of working in banking and finance and want something in research that'll provide me with some sense of purpose beyond inflating KPIs for kikes and jeets; my current manager is a jeet woman and it's made me swear off working in banking and finance and for jeets for the rest of my career.

I'll be going into this with a BS in data science, my university offered "concentrations" for this major and mine was bioinformatics, so I took a few biology classes (including genetics) and 2 about bioinformatics (there was also an elective on biostatistics which was literally just working with MATLAB). I don't plan on going for anything more than a master's for the time being.
 
I'll be going into this with a BS in data science, my university offered "concentrations" for this major and mine was bioinformatics, so I took a few biology classes (including genetics) and 2 about bioinformatics (there was also an elective on biostatistics which was literally just working with MATLAB). I don't plan on going for anything more than a master's for the time being.
Good, sa'ar, you will be joining the pool of sa'ars, sa'ar.

Masters in data science, and masters degrees in general, are a festering pool of H1B jeets looking for the fastest route possible to shit up the US labor market. You should be prepared to do a phd if you want to avoid getting lumped in with a million jeets. It's where those infinite jeets you dealt with in banking and finance came from. They are a plague and I truly wish masters' degrees would be legally considered to be a certificate and not a college degree.
 
Alternative title: Man discovers that magic lamp was in fact, not a magic lamp.
He reposted the same thread on r/claude, fishing for sympathy, but got just as roasted.


1776745961625.png

It doesn't help that Vercel and Supabase are basically the most that they can handle. It's no wonder Vercel shot to the moon especially with vibecoders.

:story:
 
Part of the 'fuck consumers' approach was also how Epic approached games on its platform.

Epic doesn't have any real games to speak of, with Fortnite costing $0 and largely being a meme if you're over the age of 20 - where as Valve has Half-Life 1 and 2, Portal 1 and 2, Team Fortress 2, and Counter Strike to get people into Steam on top of the huge libraries they've built up over time. Epic needed games to get people into the platform and decided to do it in the worst ways possible.

Instead of buying a studios and then making games (aka Sony and Microsoft, who are reviled for it) they decided to pay huge money to existing developers with popular games (Fall Guys, Rocket League) and then delisted those titles on Steam - which made people really angry. They also paid gigantic money for timed exclusivity deals just to try and fuck with Steam users, culminating with a hilarious overspend of ~$150,000,000 dollars for 6-months of exclusivity for the smash hit Borderlands 3 (which was garbage), but also tens of millions for various other titles also. They poured millions upon millions into this in such a way that made players just hate them even more.
Did it ever come out how much they bribed Rockstar and Take-Two with for RDR2 exclusivity?
 
Most of these tech giants are in for a rough time, since it's only a matter of when, not if, the jeets fuck up something so critical heads start rolling, forcing them to scramble to hire White contractors to fix the problem, and then try to hire back the White workers they fired as the jeet biomass keeps sabotaging everything the company is doing.

From what I've been seeing in the startup space, some Whites/Asians are already carefully self-segregating into companies with low Indian content. Usually after being burned by jeetification at past employers. For the average shitlib tech worker this requires multiple rounds of exposure treatment. I can't speak to the rate this is happening, only that it exists out there.

Indian status-flaunting works in your favor here, it's easier to check the list of executives and board members at a potential employer since they tend to brag about it.
 
it largely depends on an understanding of what it can and cannot do
This lack of understanding of the technology's limits is a large part of the problem. This tendency for people to anthropomorphize chat bots into believing they are machines capable of understanding and feeling has a specific name, the ELIZA effect, from an early chat bot developed at MIT in the 60s named ELIZA who would take a sentence from a user and then repeat the sentence in the form of a question, like a therapist. If MIT undergrads could believe that a printout of something they just typed was actual sentience, it's easy to see how easily people get one-shotted by what we have today, even if the people should know better.
 
Back
Top Bottom