birthrates - and how do we improve it?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Lol Sped Xing likes fucking trannies.

My draconian proposal is that we limit internet and television usage. Then people will be forced to interact with eachother face-to-face more often. As people look to eachother for entertainment, oppertunities for romance and procreation will flourish.

Also, normalise the concept of children as helpers around the house and workplace. People had lots of babies back in the ol' days because they needed extra farmhands and future security in their old age. It seems cold to view children in such a utilitarian manner but it served as an incentive to breed.
 
Panty Shroom said:
Lol Sped Xing likes fucking trannies.

My draconian proposal is that we limit internet and television usage. Then people will be forced to interact with eachother face-to-face more often. As people look to eachother for entertainment, oppertunities for romance and procreation will flourish.

Also, normalise the concept of children as helpers around the house and workplace. People had lots of babies back in the ol' days because they needed extra farmhands and future security in their old age. It seems cold to view children in such a utilitarian manner but it served as an incentive to breed.
Click to expand...
Someone's gotta do it.

As for deep-sixing freedom to encourage more reproduction, wouldn't it be simpler to open the borders? Beaners don't give a shit about liberty, and they breed like flies.
 
Zero population growth. Destroy us all. :biggrin:

Idiotron said:
Do we really need to?
Aren't there enough people on this planet?
We're approaching 8 billion, maybe it's a good thing if the birthrates are low for a few years.
Click to expand...

There aren't enough resources to go around. Especially for low income families. Affordable housing has become a pipe dream. We should be prioritizing improving the lives of the people who need it most. Less people more resources. Make things better for everyone who is already here rather than encouraging more babies many people can't afford.

If you want a higher birthrate then you need a higher standard of living to go along with it. That's why we have ghettos full of addicts and gangbangers. The people having the most babies have the worst quality of life and it becomes a generational epidemic.

The people who live with the highest quality of life tend to have less children. But they often contribute in other ways. Maybe a top brain surgeon never has time to push out rugrats. But she may be pioneering techniques that save lives. She is contributing far more to society than more babies. Her legacy lives on in other ways and I think we need to start looking at things a little more differently. You don't need blood descendants to pass on something important.
 
Dysnomia said:
The people who live with the highest quality of life tend to have less children. But they often contribute in other ways. Maybe a top brain surgeon never has time to push out rugrats. But she may be pioneering techniques that save lives. She is contributing far more to society than more babies. Her legacy lives on in other ways and I think we need to start looking at things a little more differently. You don't need blood descendants to pass on something important.
Click to expand...
Based

I sure hope all the low IQ descendants of humanity will end up appreciating her hard work and pointless sacrifice.

_20210101_185710.JPG
 
I find other men in their 30s that haven't gotten married by now and had children bizarre and off-putting.
 
Maybe if dating and finding a mate could be a much more organic process like it used to be, people would be marrying more and having children. The internet and online dating presents the illusion that an individual has unlimited dating choices, so they'll be able to find that perfect someone eventually. The problem is, no one is perfect, and people will reject others on first dates over the smallest issues they would have otherwise not back when online dating wasn't a thing because there is that illusion of unlimited options. Years pass and the individual is still single wondering where it all went wrong, and the cat/dog as taken the role of child.
 
Mr. Bung said:
Maybe if dating and finding a mate could be a much more organic process like it used to be, people would be marrying more and having children. The internet and online dating presents the illusion that an individual has unlimited dating choices, so they'll be able to find that perfect someone eventually. The problem is, no one is perfect, and people will reject others on first dates over the smallest issues they would have otherwise not back when online dating wasn't a thing because there is that illusion of unlimited options. Years pass and the individual is still single wondering where it all went wrong, and the cat/dog as taken the role of child.
Click to expand...

Fuck that. Women are the same as they've been for a hundred thousand years. They want a man who acts as opposed to being acted upon and can turn her into a house bitch and put babies in her and doesn't overthink shit. It doesn't matter how you meet them.
 
Spike the drinking water with sexual enhancement drugs and knock out the internet.

Sped Xing said:
It seems to me that what y'all are really looking for is not more huwite babies, but fewer alive darkies.

If you aren't clear on what you want, how.can you get it?
Click to expand...
It's not strictly a matter of huwites and darkies.
 
Last edited:
Bring back arranged marriages. It's just a simple medical fact that humans' peak reproductive ages range between their late teens to mid-20s. It's also a simple medical fact that humans don't reach neurological maturity until they're about 25, with some research suggesting they don't actually reach full mental maturity until they're almost 30. This means that barring a few outliers, the overwhelming majority of the population will be well past their ideal breeding age before deciding to seek partners based on considerations of long term prospects.

Throughout history, about the only times and places where you've seen unstable birth rates (both too high and low) are in times and places where you've seen more libertine views on relationships. Aside from them being niggers, the unsustainably high birth rates in Africa and the unsustainably low birth rates in the west are really the results of the same problem which is people not concerning themselves with long-term considerations for the sake of short term pleasure. The only reason it manifests itself differently is because one society has birth control and legally enforced child support, and the other doesn't.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom