Artcow Blobby and Friends / The new adventures of Blobby the Blobfish, Monkey and Lily - When the exploded dead fish makes political statements, has underwear merch for everyday social injustice

What will the new Blobby comic be about?

  • Abortion is queer people's issue

    Votes: 281 38.4%
  • Nigger lives matter

    Votes: 233 31.9%
  • Fish corpse with a knife to fight against injustice and oppression

    Votes: 270 36.9%
  • Go grrrl

    Votes: 150 20.5%
  • Yaoi bait

    Votes: 178 24.4%
  • Dyke bait

    Votes: 163 22.3%
  • Immigration

    Votes: 116 15.9%
  • Tranny rights

    Votes: 325 44.5%

  • Total voters
    731
blobby pls come back
blobby my morality is a mess without your childish condescending lefty preaching thinly veiled as Tumblr humor from 2007
i almost went to church the other day blobby
the world needs you more than ever blobby you disgusting pink decompressed fish
i almost held the door open for a white person blobby
blobby pls
 
Instead they made Sam&Max things
1000006508.png
I am not sure what freelance husbands are
 
Instead they made Sam&Max things
View attachment 6644063
I am not sure what freelance husbands are
I think they're saying Sam & Max are married to each other?

After all they were named "Freelance Detectives" in the game.

Beyond that I got nothing. But they need to be careful or George Lucas is gonna sue somebody.
 
I think they're saying Sam & Max are married to each other?

After all they were named "Freelance Detectives" in the game.

Beyond that I got nothing. But they need to be careful or George Lucas is gonna sue somebody.
There was a gag in the show where they got married and people obsessively use it to justify their ships
 
There was a gag in the show where they got married and people obsessively use it to justify their ships
There was a TV show? I just remember the game.

But you don't even need stuff like that for people to justify their shipping. Two male characters exist in the same franchise and have a good relationship? Suddenly all the fujioshis show up and claim they're totally yaoi for each other and start making art about the two of them.
 
I am not sure what freelance husbands are
Just another attempt to gay-ify a property (Sam & Max game and cartoon). They're "Freelance Detectives" but some jackass is headcanoning the gay into it, thus "Freelance Husbands".
There was a gag in the show where they got married and people obsessively use it to justify their ships
ohhhh that explains it. I missed that (didn't watch that much of it anyway).

There was a TV show? I just remember the game.

But you don't even need stuff like that for people to justify their shipping. Two male characters exist in the same franchise and have a good relationship? Suddenly all the fujioshis show up and claim they're totally yaoi for each other and start making art about the two of them.
heh, I mostly remember the TV show over the game (although I barely remember the game existed). But yeah, this trend of Reading the Blue Curtains (a Moviebob specialty) to find things that aren't there especially amongst the lefty Tumblr/Bluesky crowd, is annoying. It's kind of understandable, as most English/Literature teachers teach all students how to Read The Blue Curtains. I know because I was taught to read the Blue Curtains, and I thought it was bullshit then, and it's definitely bullshit now.
 
But yeah, this trend of Reading the Blue Curtains (a Moviebob specialty) to find things that aren't there especially amongst the lefty Tumblr/Bluesky crowd, is annoying. It's kind of understandable, as most English/Literature teachers teach all students how to Read The Blue Curtains. I know because I was taught to read the Blue Curtains, and I thought it was bullshit then, and it's definitely bullshit now.
Subtext is a thing. I don't think anybody is going to argue that point as there's some works that are nothing but subtext. I think Tennessee Williams built his entire career on subtext alone. But there's a difference in saying that the curtains are blue because they're blue and they're blue because they represent the... hold on lemme pull out my box of bullshit... "the necessary incompleteness of human awareness and the hiding of the main character's homosexuality behind a facade of heterosexuality as blue is typically a masculine color".

I mean you can make up shit about anything. Doesn't make it true.
 
Subtext is a thing. I don't think anybody is going to argue that point as there's some works that are nothing but subtext. I think Tennessee Williams built his entire career on subtext alone. But there's a difference in saying that the curtains are blue because they're blue and they're blue because they represent the... hold on lemme pull out my box of bullshit... "the necessary incompleteness of human awareness and the hiding of the main character's homosexuality behind a facade of heterosexuality as blue is typically a masculine color".

I mean you can make up shit about anything. Doesn't make it true.
yeah, there's a difference between subtext, and forcing subtext that isn't there. The TV Trope "Death of the Author" contains a component called "The Curtains Were Blue" where English/Lit majors will say bullshit like "The Curtains Were Blue Because The Author Was Sad" when the author indicated no such fucking thing and even denied it. I swear to cripes, the english lit teachers had us reading the blue curtains all the damn time. Teaching us to make up bullshit that wasn't there, so half the class couldn't tell the difference between legit subtext, and bullshit.
 
yeah, there's a difference between subtext, and forcing subtext that isn't there. The TV Trope "Death of the Author" contains a component called "The Curtains Were Blue" where English/Lit majors will say bullshit like "The Curtains Were Blue Because The Author Was Sad" when the author indicated no such fucking thing and even denied it. I swear to cripes, the english lit teachers had us reading the blue curtains all the damn time. Teaching us to make up bullshit that wasn't there, so half the class couldn't tell the difference between legit subtext, and bullshit.
English majors are the worst when it comes to this because they read so much into what they're reading.

I'm reminded of a video essay once by some guy who went on about "Twin Peaks" and what David Lynch meant when he said this or that or what this scene meant. While his take was interesting he was wrong on a lot of things because he was looking for meaning when David Lynch famously just included things that he felt were interesting. They had no meaning, or originally had no meaning, and instead were just cool scenes.

Like he was going on about Killer Bob from the original series and what he represented and what he was all about and it was bullshit because Bob was never originally part of the show. He was never part of the plan. It was one of those things David came up with. The write-up on how the character was created is here: https://www.digitalspy.com/tv/ustv/a831806/twin-peaks-killer-bob-origin/

tl;dr: Unless you're the creator or you've spoken about it the best thing that anybody can do when interpreting your work is guess.
 
Back