Bluesky - "Decentralized" Twitter Alternative. Leftist Tranny Hugbox. "Answer" to Elon Musk's "Fascist" Takeover of 𝕏 (Formerly Twitter).

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Vic Viper T301 said:
Morrissey, the boomer singer? What have they got against him? Also funny to me that the guy seems to have gone out of his way to make a threat that would be legally prosecutable by including specific details like the time, location, and weapon he will use. 100% on purpose as some kind of false flag / attempted martyrdom.
Click to expand...
Uber driver reviewer said:
lol wtf why does anyone want to kill Morrisey?

That’s like wanting to kill carrot top
Click to expand...
Morrisey came out as pro-British many years ago, meaning he doesn't like rape gangs and he thinks that Queen Victoria was a white woman, and not a black man in drag. This has marked him for death and I can fully believe he's getting threats, especially from white Canadians who take such fatwahs seriously:

1758469814667.webpScreenshot 2025-09-21 114756.webp
Morrisey was known as a vegan, PETA-boosting emo boy for decades, which I think is part of the reason why people are surprised to learn that he's "far right" now, but the Revolution continues its march and Morrisey (like Elon, Sargon, Rowling, and several million others) has fallen at least twenty years behind the curve.

I mean, who would have thought that a sensitive, dog-loving, vegetarian artist could be literally Hitler?!
 
Last edited:
Cuckoman said:
It is not a theory.
Advertisers generally do not want their brand to show up next to pictures of children being raped and similar imagery.

I think they also recently went through another round of financing and I suspect it did not go exactly splendid so they know they need to clean shit up and become advertiser friendly or else there will be no next round of funding. People invest because they hope to make money at the final IPO not because of philanthropy. If you can not monetize your product then your business case is dead.
Click to expand...
Completely agree. To clarify my earlier post, I was theorizing that their finances were doing shit or they were finally making the switch to relying on advertiser revenue that they previously mentioned (despite how much their userbase hates that). Maybe they thought the uptick in users from the 2024 election would be enough to let them coast by a little longer but in reality their private funds dried up faster than they expected. No advertisers will want a platform that's full of zoophiles, MAPs and rape porn.
 
Caesare said:
I'm not much into Morrisey, but I can remember hearing that he's patriotic and loves his country so he might as well be Hitler at this point. Also, I think he's against importing unlimited stone age ppl that the country will have to pay to support 100% of their needs from the time they're born until the day they die while recieving nothing in return besides utter contempt and ultra violent criminal acts. So really, he's worse than Hitler. He's President Trump.
Click to expand...
The press has called him a nazi since at least 1986, when they pretended that "Panic" (the "hang the DJ" song) was about murderous rage at hearing black music on the radio. Really it was a standard anti-corporate punk localism song.

Since then there's been at least one "Morrissey in racist outrage!" media hysteria per year, and he's become increasingly right-wing (hasn't changed at all).

His true sin is "fetishizing" (singing lovingly of) working-class Englishmen. The British left has been on a crusade against "workerism" for decades. American libs have copied the attitude.
 
What I don't get is why these "people" have to do this shit on popular public websites, same public websites that are extremely accessible to minors. There is no "age verification" beyond "You pinky promise you're 18+, right?" on Bluesky

There are thousands of porn websites on the internet. I would assume there are also thousands of rape and other fetish animated porn sites out there. Of course, this is rhetorical. I know exactly why they want minors to be able to easily access their slop porn, instead of sitting in their dark corners of the internet. For a bunch of faggots who want to be "left alone" they sure as hell don't want to leave the rest of the non-degenerate world alone.

What's wrong with Furaffinity for example? (genuine question, since I've never touched the fur fag site even out of curiosity. Do they ban rape porn there?)
 
Last edited:
ZeCommissar said:
What I don't get is why these "people" have to do this shit on popular public websites
Click to expand...
Their ideology basically requires that there is no greater moral value assigned to sex over anything else. Otherwise maybe prostitute isn't just another job like cashier, or maybe having frequent anonymous sex with many people could devalue and impair your ability to bond to one mate.
 
Abella said:
what’s the likelihood of them joining fediverse instances that are accepting of their taste in pornographic material? I can see them going back to X because they’re so chronically online and it’s accessible, but I wouldn’t put it past them to make a furry porn gooning instance.
Click to expand...

Unironically the best option for everyone, but sadly also the least likely.

It's easy for an instance owner (any of the random domain names you see on a Fediverse network) to outright ban other instances, so an owner of any decent server will ban troon furry rape fetish instances from showing up in your timeline, and you can ask them to if they aren't proactive about it.
Most decent Fedi software has tools so you can do so yourself, too.
 
Pimozide said:
Unironically the best option for everyone, but sadly also the least likely.

It's easy for an instance owner (any of the random domain names you see on a Fediverse network) to outright ban other instances, so an owner of any decent server will ban troon furry rape fetish instances from showing up in your timeline, and you can ask them to if they aren't proactive about it.
Most decent Fedi software has tools so you can do so yourself, too.
Click to expand...
Pixiv's fediverse instance will permit it.
 
BlueSpark said:
Scum-sucking leftist faggot Frank Cifaldi has a little cry about people other than him getting attention for preserving videogames, orders people to not support piracy despite admitting to engaging in it himself:

View attachment 7943446

Yes I, Frank Soyfaggot, am capable of making the judgement call over whether piracy is justified to preserve videogames, but you lowlife plebs should never dare to! DO NOT ENGAGE WITH THIS FUNDRAISER! THAT'S AN ORDER!
Click to expand...
That's typical behavior from Frank Cifaldi; he even has his own dedicated effortpost in the Video Game Archival Autism thread:
NoonmanR

Post in thread 'Video Game Archival Autism / TCRF / Jul / Sonic Retro / And More'

Hrafn said:
Absolutely, yes.


TL;DR they are ignoring one of the most core and important rules of preservation which basically boils down to "FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, DO NOT FUCK WITH THE ARCHIVES" and as a result are shit at it and should be criticised, which they ain't as they have protected status and most of them have no fucking idea what they're doing. As well, if you control the archive, you control the narrative so naturally certain types of people would get a kick out of this kind of thing, hence some of their gay ass drama/noncery/general habit of sucking as people.

Respect des...
Click to expand...
Reactions:Informative x 5 Winner x 7 Like x 4
 
ZeCommissar said:
What's wrong with Furaffinity for example? (genuine question, since I've never touched the fur fag site even out of curiosity. Do they ban rape porn there?)
Click to expand...
As far as I know FA does not ban noncon, but they did draw the line at CP some years back, to the great reluctance of Neer. But I'm pretty sure they don't want to go there because of "muh engagement" and "muh furries" (for the weeb degenerates who somehow think they're better than the furfags). The former is probably the more practical concern because a lot of them feed off social media attention and the occasional dollar that gets thrown their way because of it.
 
>Ban pedophiles
"Transphobic!"
>Ban depictions of rape
"Anti-LGBTQ!"
urr13 account said:
It's called epi / early porn introduction, it's a primary component of sexual fetishists such as these, the public display is the point.
Click to expand...
Furries (and just about every zoomer community at this point) in a nutshell. Talk to kissless, isolated loser. Introduce flirting, lovebombing, and porn. All 3 will be associated as positive things; other people of same depravity dump onto them in kind: 10-30 years of emotional damage.
 
You know I'd actually be somewhat sympathetic if it was all born/nsfw content in general, because regardless of my feelings toward it sex sells and thats how alot of these folks make their bread...

But these people are dying on the hill of Rape and CSAM.

Do lefties literally never take one second to consider the optics of their actions?

They do shit like this and then act confused as to why the pendulum is so rapidly swinging back the other direction. Fucking retards.
 
i suggest for a bit of fun to search Troonsky for "Kiwifarms" or "nazi fruit ranch" (for the more paranoid faggots) and every furfag and troon have kiwi derangement syndrome and when a faggot or troon is accused of rape they whinge and say its from the Farms and fake news. Without proof of course :story:

Every degenerate whinging about rape porn being banned deserve to lose their "safe space"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom