Bluesky - "Decentralized" Twitter Alternative. Leftist Tranny Hugbox. "Answer" to Elon Musk's "Fascist" Takeover of 𝕏 (Formerly Twitter).

There is a noticeable hypocrisy, you detect when observing these creatures. That being their HATRED of the objectification of women in fiction, but at the same time drawing and consuming some of the hardest of hardcore porn. Porn that turns said women into objects of objectification. I am reminded of Andrew Dobson, once a famous lolcow now a disappeared ghost, once cited the same. Would go on rants upon rants about quiet from MGS, but would also draw inflation porn of various characters. They call you a gooner for not wanting women to look like soggy apes, but at the same time get off to gore porn and rape.
 
Why don't all these great artists and super talented individuals just pay for the platform themselves? Let Bluesky charge them a fair price to host their content, and it wouldn't need to be advertiser friendly!

Because they're all useless sacks of garbage with a pen tablet doing the equivalent of a middle schooler doodling during math class. The reason they have to sell their porn on a fucking social media site is because nobody outside of brainrotted cultheads and kids would buy it. And despite being allowed to sell it to kids and the mentally ill, they're still broke. Get a job losers.
 
mr. testicular torsion said:
View attachment 7945781
...
Click to expand...
They are so brain broken by porn that they can't even do a Blooski blackout for a week.

Solid Snek said:
I'm sure the tranny rape enthusiasts will love Twitter now, post-Charlie Kirk, especially with takes like this:
1758467363712.webp
Click to expand...
"horny thoughts"? That's how they call "rape", now?

scatterbrain said:
I don't understand the issue here, aren't there plenty of Mastodon instances that are specifically made for these kind of people? Aethy, baraag, etc. Why are they acting like Twitter is the only other social media platform to exist? Does using the same platform as normal people who are disgusted by rape fuel their "non-con" fetish lmfao?
Click to expand...
Do they get any interaction there?
 
Yamaha YM2612 said:
I don't get it
Click to expand...
Wow, tranny who named himself after his favourite sound chip doesn't even know what's inside a sound chip. What a surprise.
Lingering butter taste said:
I genuinely cannot fathom getting off to someone actually screaming and crying and thrashing to get out of someone’s grasp, like I almost don’t believe it and feel like I have to see it to believe it.
Click to expand...
Why do you think so many troons use panels from "the morning visitor" as avatars and banners?
 
Levitcus prime24 said:
There is a noticeable hypocrisy, you detect when observing these creatures. That being their HATRED of the objectification of women in fiction, but at the same time drawing and consuming some of the hardest of hardcore porn. Porn that turns said women into objects of objectification. I am reminded of Andrew Dobson, once a famous lolcow now a disappeared ghost, once cited the same. Would go on rants upon rants about quiet from MGS, but would also draw inflation porn of various characters. They call you a gooner for not wanting women to look like soggy apes, but at the same time get off to gore porn and rape.
Click to expand...
I don't think I've ever seen a single trans person (mtf or ftm) care about objectification of women. Definitely not trans women. (Which makes up much of Bluesky's userbase.)

Andrew Dobson is a funny example because he larped as a lesbian to draw porn before it was cool. I think the modern trans crowd skips the whole male feminist stuff and goes straight to gooning.
 
Dread First said:
Yet the gooner tranny yiffers on BlueSky are more interested in getting their rocks off
Click to expand...
I still don't understand why they need to do this on Bluesky and can't look at their porn pictures on desktop or toonporn.com or something. Nothing's been banned, you just can't show it to everyone on a publicly accessible all-ages website.
Frog Master said:
Of course, what I stated is an ideal, ideally you should allow degenerate harmless fiction without allowing illegal or harmful things through, it may not be possible, but it's what I think we should strive for in an ideal world, unfortunately we don't live in one.
Click to expand...
Shut up, rapist. Stop sucking dick and pretending you're that girl who sat in front of you in second grade.
ArgonianVoter said:
Sometimes employees and even companies just need to suck it up. bluesky was pretty much founded for a specific user base and if they do not serve that userbase they're fucked and they will lose their shirts. they invited the crazies in and now they need to cater to them; you can go a very long time with a decent enough sized userbase with a platform that doesn't follow social norms because either A those people agree with you or B your userbase doesn't care.
Click to expand...
"Giving up is the best course of action when things get difficult". Whoever started bluesky can still be a slimy penny-pinching front-end-programming suckup to VCs without letting people post baby animal rape cartoons.
Levitcus prime24 said:
their HATRED of the objectification of women in fiction
Click to expand...
What they hate isn't when a woman is objectified in fiction, it's when a writer seems to have attraction to a woman who is a full human with personality traits, and free will. It's the depiction of women as full people that someone might love that enrages them.
Pooners have internalized misogyny and thus are threatened by evidence that other women are people. Troons will never be women so portraying women as more than cock-slots creates a completely unattainable goal for them.
 
Last edited:
Not At All A Lizard said:
Why don't all these great artists and super talented individuals just pay for the platform themselves?
Click to expand...
A lot of these people are petty bourgeoisie, despite being leftist, and wish to keep as much as their wealth as possible. This is the "rich kid socialist" dilemma where the commons apply to everyone but themselves.
 
harbringer883 said:
View attachment 7952689
Yarp.
Click to expand...
the funny thing is they're not wrong factually. they're just wrong morally. yes, bluesky became a safe haven for all manner of leftist lunacy including tranny rape fetishists with the correct politics. but now the rape is no longer needed for business reasons. you love to see it.

i wonder what'll be funnier: watching these worthless deviants implode into irrelevancy as their ridiculous "blackout" fails to have even the slightest impact on saner (sic) users of bluesky, or having the tranny cabal actually kneecap bluesky and usher in its failure over the next couple of years. i'll laugh either way.
 
By “survivors” you mean “muh dik” I assume
IMG_7521.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not At All A Lizard said:
Why don't all these great artists and super talented individuals just pay for the platform themselves? Let Bluesky charge them a fair price to host their content, and it wouldn't need to be advertiser friendly!

Because they're all useless sacks of garbage with a pen tablet doing the equivalent of a middle schooler doodling during math class. The reason they have to sell their porn on a fucking social media site is because nobody outside of brainrotted cultheads and kids would buy it. And despite being allowed to sell it to kids and the mentally ill, they're still broke. Get a job losers.
Click to expand...
They can't help that most of their money goes to buying unregulated HRT to mail to underaged femboys they groomed on discord. Those Otokonoko pharma orders add up real quick.

1000011415.webp1000011413.webp1000011414.webp
 
The Noise said:
They want investors and advertisers because the site runs completely at a loss right now.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately this type of rationality is completely useless to explain to the impervious mindset of manchildren/mantroons who believe high trafficked internet sites - let alone ones meant to be massive competitors to sites like fucking twitter - should be treated like hippy communes where its self maintained through encouraged donations.
 
Dr. Butt said:
I still don't understand why they need to do this on Bluesky and can't look at their porn pictures on desktop or toonporn.com or something.
Click to expand...
It's not (only) a matter of porn. Of course they know a dozen other sites where they can get their fix. Being able to openly post awful stuff in public is the actual goal. It's a matter of power.
I'm not very deep into the truly despicable kink world, but indulging in your fetish in a discreet manner without hurting anyone sounds like a lousy time when your fetish is literally hurting unwilling people.
Getting (for a lack of a better word) "normal" people tolerating your awful smut while trying to hide their disgust must feel good if you are into Nonconsensual stuff. Getting the same people to clap and celebrate about how brave and valid you are for being so disgusting must feel like a constant flow of heroin to those people.
Nonconsensual doesn't stop at sexual stuff.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom