Bluesky - "Decentralized" Twitter Alternative. Leftist Tranny Hugbox. "Answer" to Elon Musk's "Fascist" Takeover of 𝕏 (Formerly Twitter).

  • Happy Easter!
Next Highlight
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Dumb
Reactions: Pee Cola, Sexy Peach Emoji, Randy Facalding and 29 others
Magicat said:
Nigger, you had to dig through decade-old posts of outdated old shit Joshua said when the forum was in its infancy to try to make a point. Are you a retard?
Click to expand...
Also the rule wasn't even in place at that time. Only after negative experiences did it become a rule. And the rule was never no trolling itself. It was no trolling plans.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Pee Cola, Randy Facalding, lolcow yoghurt and 20 others
Montenegro supremacist said:
Why is bluesky bad? I thought it was good to have more options on the internet
Click to expand...
Montenegro supremacist said:
Literally who? And also it's just twitter but left wing? I thought that was good because then you'll get your containment site.
Click to expand...
This is bait lol.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Pee Cola, Absolute-Despair, Glowing In The Streets and 38 others
This is old news, from two weeks ago, but I haven't seen it posted in this thread yet and it's interesting.

(archive: https://archive.is/ESkHc)

I Was Canceled by Bluesky. And I Still Don’t Know Why.
The liberal alternative to Elon Musk’s X platform reinstated me but never explained what my original offense was. That’s a bad message.
Click to expand...

Tl;dr:

- Michael Kruse, Politico journalist, linked on his BlueSky account to an article and quoted a single sentence he found interesting: "Leaving X because you don’t like Elon is the kind of purity politics that landed Democrats in this mess to begin with."

- BlueSky users in response did a BlueSky:
GduX7SqXoAAArh9.jpg

At last check, my post elicited more than 2,100 quote-posts and some 3,700 responses, a tally of interactions easily surpassing my number of followers. Almost all of the feedback was angry, and no shortage was directed not toward Nancy’s piece in general or the quote in particular but … me. Trigger warning here for readers with an aversion to gratuitous profanity and faceless aggression, but I was, in the words of Bluesky users, among many, many other things, a “fucking dork,” a “fucking wanker,” a “fucking moron,” a “dumb fuck” and a “bitch.”

It went on this way for days.
Click to expand...

- Kruse's account was soon banned for no particular reason, probably via report-dogpiling from the BlueSky piranha school.

Welcome to BlueSky, Michael Kruse!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Feels
Reactions: Sexy Peach Emoji, Miriam Margoyles, Harvey Danger and 24 others
Montenegro supremacist said:
Why is bluesky bad? I thought it was good to have more options on the internet
Click to expand...
Calm down faglord. Its existence is good since these dumb microblogging sites apparently have to exist, and it's better to have alternatives than not to have them.

Its population absolutely blows though.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Wright, AMHOLIO and 9 others
Montenegro supremacist said:
Why is bluesky bad? I thought it was good to have more options on the internet
Click to expand...
Guessing this is bait but for those who may fall for the question, bad does not mean it shouldn't exist or shouldn't be an option. Or in other words, just because I call you a retard and laugh at you for your retarded takes, doesn't mean I want KF to shutdown.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Kosher Nazi, Pimozide, Corette and 5 others
Retink Retunk said:
Guessing this is bait but for those who may fall for the question, bad does not mean it shouldn't exist or shouldn't be an option. Or in other words, just because I call you a retard and laugh at you for your retarded takes, doesn't mean I want KF to shutdown.
Click to expand...
Bluesky, the mental asylum, wants to shutdown Kiwifarms.
Kiwifarms doesn't want to shut down the mental asylum.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Pee Cola, Kosher Nazi, Sexy Peach Emoji and 27 others
DickMain said:
Dems and libs give them everything they want for the better part of a decade and now the trannies decide it's not good enough. It's never enough for them. I'm convinced they won't stop until it's legal to fuck kids, and that femboy hentai melted their brains. The very second you're not good enough for them they'll turn and eat you alive. It does not matter what you do for these freaks, each man in the cult is in it only for himself and will sell anybody and everybody up the river to save his own skin or further his own position. All for the sake of busting a nut jesus christ.
Click to expand...

Selfish, whiny complaining dipshits will never ever be happy with any concession you make for them.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Sexy Peach Emoji, spiritofamermaid, TaimuRadiu and 6 others
Montenegro supremacist said:
Why is bluesky bad? I thought it was good to have more options on the internet
Click to expand...
I think the issue people take with BlueSky is they’ll ban accounts just by their association alone. This is the first social media website where I’ve heard about them banning a person from joining, instead of enacting a ban if the content the person is posting violates their community guidelines or ToS. It sets a bad precedent.

The people that harped on Elon for banning accounts that unironically used the term “cisgender” are now the same users on BlueSky gloating that their platform doesn’t allow “Nazi’s” (paraphrasing ofc). The old adage “Two wrongs don’t make a right” is lost on them.

Also it’s being astroturfed on major websites such as Reddit and is being crowned as the successor to Twitter, so people have a reason to exercise caution and scrutiny with it.

To be frank I am glad BlueSky exists because the whole drama with it and X are hilarious and the reactions on both sides are sending me into orbit. I just hope it doesn’t become the dominant social media platform considering its association with Jack Dorsey and its overly-censorious nature.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Pee Cola, spiritofamermaid, Kane Lives and 10 others
Cherry Eyed Hamster said:
I think the issue people take with BlueSky is they’ll ban accounts just by their association alone. This is the first social media website where I’ve heard about them banning a person from joining, instead of enacting a ban if the content the person is posting violates their community guidelines or ToS. It sets a bad precedent.

The people that harped on Elon for banning accounts that unironically used the term “cisgender” are now the same users on BlueSky gloating that their platform doesn’t allow “Nazi’s” (paraphrasing ofc). The old adage “Two wrongs don’t make a right” is lost on them.

Also it’s being astroturfed on major websites such as Reddit and is being crowned as the successor to Twitter, so people have a reason to exercise caution and scrutiny with it.

To be frank I am glad BlueSky exists because the whole drama with it and X are hilarious and the reactions on both sides are sending me into orbit. I just hope it doesn’t become the dominant social media platform considering its association with Jack Dorsey and its overly-censorious nature.
Click to expand...
The thing is, the leftist want their echo chamber and clout back. But it took them over 10 years to get to their most powerful, where they could influence elections and hurt people IRL.
Trump, Elon and the incoming US admin. Will be long over by the time they get even a small amount of their powers back.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Corette, Wright and 11 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back