Bluesky - "Decentralized" Twitter Alternative. Leftist Tranny Hugbox. "Answer" to Elon Musk's "Fascist" Takeover of 𝕏 (Formerly Twitter).

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
This is cope. Bluesky is bigger than Kiwifarms. It is not in any way an inconsequential site.

Bluesky saw a surge of users around the election and again during Trumps inauguration (though likely a large number of those were bots). While it's true it has failed to grow beyond it's die-hard userbase, the same could be said of Kiwifarms. Competing against an established site like Twitter is extremely difficult. That Bluesky has reached the level of use that it has is impressive.

What we can hope for is that Bluesky create the perfect breeding ground for their mental illness to fester. They'll continue to isolate themselves from broader society and become that much more insufferable and eventually everyone will say they're sick of this tranny bullshit.
Rubbish. Bluesky is "consequential" in the same way Voat, Gab, and a variety of other Reddit alternatives are/were consequential. Using it is a political statement, first and foremost. The difference between Bluesky and said Reddit alternatives is that Bluesky was funded and pushed by Big Tech and certain political factions, whereas Voat and the others were suppressed and targeted as enemies of the Powers That Be.

You are massively understating the magnitude of Bluesky's failure. It failed in spite of having every opportunity to succeed. You're making it out to be some kind of organic success story. Bluesky was coursing with money, talent, and political influence from the very start, with the explicit intent of killing Twitter and restoring popular social media discourse to a venue that the elites can still reliably control.

That has always been Bluesky's sole reason to exist. It was never about "competing with Twitter." The intent was always to kill and replace Twitter, and the Powers That Be threw their full weight behind it. In this regard - as with almost every other - it has been an abject failure. It will never be anything more than what it is right now. If it wasn't for botting and Reddit being forced from the top down to adopt it as the People's Platform, it would be even more crushingly irrelevant. It is a site with absolutely zero social currency, zero sway, zero influence on popular discourse.

It's Facebook for insane, insufferable Leftists, and that's all she wrote.

For comparison's sake, Facebook has around 2.1 million daily users. Bluesky has around 4.1 million. Facebook is twenty-one years old and widely regarded as being exclusively for boomers. Those are not good numbers.
 
Last edited:
I love the purity spirals and circular firing squads that result from such a space.
Very much so - a community that holds righteous violence as its highest tenet will, when it has no enemies left to attack, find enemies within and schismatize.

Always be wary of people who seek to define themselves in terms of their enemies.
 
Turns out this guy CAN actually draw,he just chooses to make awful art willfully.
IMG_6645.webpbafkreifujjqq37toezo7hxyvcrye2g4yg5x53boi4j5hq353kleocfkfvm.webp
Meanwhile...
IMG_6640.webp
IMG_6641.webpIMG_6642.webpIMG_6644.webpIMG_6646.webpIMG_6647.webpIMG_6648.webpIMG_6649.webpIMG_6650.webp
 
More TOSeething:
“ I’m not here for the politics, I’m only here for the porn..”
BOY HOWDY DO I HAVE NEWS FOR YOU.
(By the by, Donryu's BlueSky has a lot of thread-worthy content.)

Bsky community guidelines got updated
Please see the posts in the thread for context abt our concerns because the devil is always in how these rules are enforced. Rampant overcorrection that stifles art and gets people deplatformed who have done nothing wrong is a result we've seen over and over.

I’d appreciate if you all used this form to ask for the things we asked for in the open letter regarding Palestinians on here
We believe Bluesky owes Gazans, and the entire community who benefits from their voices, a greater duty of care especially in the context of the horrors they are enduring. We ask Bluesky to implement the following changes:
  • Provide information on all Bluesky-affiliated websites in Arabic that explains the rules and expectations of the site in clear language.
  • Investigate the accounts that are mass-reporting Palestinians on Bluesky. The mass reporting of Palestinians on Bluesky is a group effort to render the platform a hostile place for a community based on their ethnicity. As such, it is racism, and should be understood as such. Reports against Palestinians who have broken no community guidelines must be understood as racism, and the accounts that submit those reports should be disregarded in the future.
  • Many Bluesky users encourage Gazans to tag or reply to them, and this is not always understood as unwelcome behavior. If an account is reported as Spam for tagging or replying to others, treat only reports from the tagged/mentioned account as legitimate, seeing as they were the only ones who received a notification.
  • Send emails regarding disciplinary action every time it is taken. Gazans do not always get an email explaining what they did wrong, and those that do are required to parse a language they do not speak in order to understand their violation. Have these emails contain an easily visible link to information about their violations in Arabic.
  • Respond to appeals in a timely fashion, many Gazans simply never hear back from Bluesky after they appeal a decision.
  • In addition to removing Gazans for alleged spam behavior, Bluesky has also sometimes indicated that they are deleting an account for being a scam or acting in a fraudulent manner. If Bluesky is removing someone for an alleged fraud or scam violation, evidence of how they have done this needs to be provided to the user. Many Gazans have been suspended on these grounds with absolutely no justification.
  • Prioritize temporary penalties for rule violations as a warning instead of permanently suspending accounts. This could include: Temporarily limiting their ability to post, reply, or DM on Bluesky, or giving temporary suspensions after communicating clear expectations for future behavior.
  • End IP bans on any account from Gaza and allow them to make new accounts where they can comply with Bluesky rules and continue to be valued members of the community.
 
Generic complaint I know. But holy fuck would it fucking kill these assholes to shut the fuck up about palestine. If they care so much why not do what the redditors did for ukraine and volunteer to go be canon fodder to shoot at jews.
My god they literally want the website to give sand people special privileges because they just so happen to be brown.
Surely this won't cause any infighting if they started follow through with the demands.

If not then it'd be really funny (or fucked up) if they started phonebooking the Bluesky staff and harass them, which leads to a bunch of bluesky users getting visits from the police.
 
nah, I'm betting that the deleted accounts went back to sperging on twitter. There aren't any "yatzees" to crucify when you're in a sanitized echochamber.

twitter has become the manosphere
bluesky is the its-MAAM’o-sphere

i think this figure includes people who were suspended, and after a quick recalc , its “41%
of its current userbase, but not 41% of every single person who ever signed up.

i think theyll get to that milestone and when they do, for real, lets find a fun way to announce it and community happening it.
Generic complaint I know. But holy fuck would it fucking kill these assholes to shut the fuck up about palestine. If they care so much why not do what the redditors did for ukraine and volunteer to go be canon fodder to shoot at jews.
My god they literally want the website to give sand people special privileges because they just so happen to be brown.
Surely this won't cause any infighting if they started follow through with the demands.
i think theyhad a few pests/spammers mass following thousands of people. , purporting to be a gazan in urgent need of cash , replying to every single poster with a givesendgo link or whatever.

. “here are some pictures of some shoes and a dead baby, please be sad and give me money”

i cant blame bluesky for being exasperated at this.

i have some sympathy for someone unable to tell people what theyre really experiencing on any other platform w/ “meta leaks” suggesting israel gets people mass censored for criticizing them or discussing this elsewhere
https://bsky.app/profile/icw-nru.bsky.social
https://bsky.app/profile/icw-nru.bsky.social

https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/leaked-data-israeli-censorship-meta [A]

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43655603

so, do these people applaud and stand behind censorship or nah?

im not able to tell you theyre finally kicking spammers and atrocity propagandists in the dick, or actually isolating anyone who cant share their story. id agree with the former case.

If not then it'd be really funny (or fucked up) if they started phonebooking the Bluesky staff and harass them, which leads to a bunch of bluesky users getting visits from the police.

inevitable. this is common where anyone anywhere in the world commits the egregious sin of running a free public service.

at the end of the day, thats who they chose to conduct business with. and it is a userbase that will eventually bite the hand that feeds it.
 
Last edited:
For comparison's sake, Facebook has around 2.1 million daily users. Bluesky has around 4.1 million. Facebook is twenty-one years old and widely regarded as being exclusively for boomers. Those are not good numbers.
I dunno where you got your numbers from but there's no way this is correct. Facebook has something like 3-4billion users monthly. Even if we assume each user only checks their facebook once a month, that still averages out to ~100million+ users daily. Facebook is a hulking giant compared to bluesky. Facebook probably has more accounts deleted daily than bluesky has active daily users.
 
Bluesky sucks but it's actually really funny if you treat it like People of Walmart.

There's also the black humor that comes from seeing a dead middle eastern child posted in the middle of a timeline full of troons' moob pics, if morbid humor is more your thing.
 
I dunno where you got your numbers from but there's no way this is correct. Facebook has something like 3-4billion users monthly.

correct. its 2.11 billion, with a “b” per day

put another way:

68.73% of facebooks 3.07 billion monthly active users , use facebook every single god damn day of their life , on average

vs

11.45%
of blueskys total users, active or not, use bluesky every single god damn day , on average

explanation: facebook doesnt count you if you havent logged in >30 days. bluesky does.

why? facebook has a metric for Average Revenue Per User. if youre not logging in, youre not consuming bandwidth or costing facebook anything to be there for you, you have a flat monthly cost to them and its not offset by ads. its only active users where they have to TRY to make $8-9 per month off of every single one of you, thats impossible if you deleted the app and or dont log in. when your website has accounts for 1/3 of the entire world population , you only give a shit about whos actually logged in and using it at some point.


IMG_9955.webp

IMG_9953.webp
 
Last edited:
correct. its 2.11 billion, with a “b” per day

put another way:

68.73% of facebooks 3.07 billion monthly active users , use facebook every single god damn day of their life , on average

vs

11.45%
of blueskys total users, active or not, use bluesky every single god damn day , on average

explanation: facebook doesnt count you if you havent logged in >30 days. bluesky does.

why? facebook has a metric for Average Revenue Per User. if youre not logging in, youre not consuming bandwidth or costing facebook anything to be there for you, you have a flat monthly cost to them and its not offset by ads. its only active users where they have to TRY to make $8-9 per month off of every single one of you, thats impossible if you deleted the app and or dont log in. when your website has accounts for 1/3 of the entire world population , you only give a shit about whos actually logged in and using it at some point.


View attachment 7790849

View attachment 7790837
The worst part about this is finding out that Facebook is basically an indian social media platform that other people sometimes use.
 
I love the purity spirals and circular firing squads that result from such a space.
nah, I'm betting that the deleted accounts went back to sperging on twitter. There aren't any "yatzees" to crucify when you're in a sanitized echochamber.
If only we had susinct screenshots of a serial skeeter spazing and sperging before deleting their account and returning to "the Nazi site"
 
Very much so - a community that holds righteous violence as its highest tenet will, when it has no enemies left to attack, find enemies within and schismatize.

Always be wary of people who seek to define themselves in terms of their enemies.

The problem with the leftist tenet "by any means necessary" is that that sort of sentiment attracts the worst sort of people that want any excuse to justify their criminal impulses. And by empowering people like that you end up with the worst possible version of your movement, should it succeed.

That's one of the reasons why they always end up with the worst most murderous version of communism every time it takes over a country.
 
But... Isn't that an assertion? You're asserting something right now.
That's not even exactly true. Agnosticism asserts nothing (except in a strong form that perhaps the answer to the question is epistemologically unknowable), but at least some forms of atheism quite specifically do assert the nonexistence of God, or at least the extreme unlikelihood of it according to the atheists (like Dawkins) who take this partially agnostic view.

Atheism simply means lack of the belief in the existence of God, but some atheists (and plebbit and BS houses a lot of these) actively insist God certainly does not exist and on top of that, anyone who believes God does exist is an evil moron.
 
SPEAK UP!!! WE DON'T NEED ANOTHER FRICKIN SOCIAL TO NUKE NSFW CONTENT ONCE THEY GOT ENOUGH USERS! CENSORSHIP ALWAYS LEAD TO BANNING QUEER, BPOC, DISABLED PPL IMPORTANT CONTENT NEXT!

Me, you are definitely throwing random group words in an attempt of giving your argument more strength.
I also noticed that you omitted the 'I' n 'BIPOC'. I also fail to see how disabled people are being negatively affected by these new terms.
 
That's not even exactly true. Agnosticism asserts nothing (except in a strong form that perhaps the answer to the question is epistemologically unknowable), but at least some forms of atheism quite specifically do assert the nonexistence of God, or at least the extreme unlikelihood of it according to the atheists (like Dawkins) who take this partially agnostic view.

Atheism simply means lack of the belief in the existence of God, but some atheists (and plebbit and BS houses a lot of these) actively insist God certainly does not exist and on top of that, anyone who believes God does exist is an evil moron.
So there's different denominations of atheism with differing dogma like any other religion,got it!
 
Back
Top Bottom