Blue sky when rape games get removed of steam: ha take that chud, stop being such evil gooners.
Blue sky when rape drawings are banned from their site: NOOO this is fascism, how dare they take away my rape porn nooooo.
I was confused on the hypocrisy, bu then I realised that gamers are stereotypically considered 'enemies of wokeness' because they oppose Sweet Baby Inc and 'Body Type A/B'.
I then realised that Steam would have a lot of people who would use use the 'BUT MY COPING MECHANISM' excuse.
If you consider this projection, I say that is a slightly exaggerated view on how they see the Farms, mainly on how dox-happy the Farms are.
Magic Pickle said:
People are talking about explicitly not tagging NSFW content, especially rape porn, as a form of rebellion against staff."
They talk about BlueSky worrying abou the feelings o fictional characters but wan to victimise real children (one of those 'real world issues' they tell BlueSky to prioritise) who would be browsing BlueSky.
To those reading my comment, sto pretending that children are not being motivated into engaging in BlueSky.
The sad thing is that, according to reports I read on LifeSiteNews, a lot of pornography is objectively violent and has dehumanisation b explicitly part of the content. That would be one big reason why they think that a ban on rape pornography would be a ban against all pornography... though the main issues would be them chasing orgasms and them being rabidly agains the 'slippery slope of censorship'.
Also, I feel that Game of Thrones is overrated.
To that troon, I say:
Care to put your money where your mouth is, faggot?
2200 EST, 08/31/2026, 4210 Wolfetown Rd, Cherokee, NC 28719
Bring as many of your cowardly friends as you want; I'll go to prison, but all of you will go to the morgue.
...I actually had to look up the address before I ge the complete joke, though, even if that was your eal address, that would have been brave and amazingly audacious.
Someone can help me add to the list if need be but all blusky users seem to be...
- Troons
- Left-wing schizos
- fugly-style artists
I add furries. This leads to the next quotes:
> Visa and Mastercard say Twitter can't do that
> Twitter sucks, I'm going to Gab
> Visa and Mastercard say Gab can't do anything
> Gab sucks, I'm going to Mastodon
> Visa and Mastercard say Mastadon can't do that
> Mastadon Sucks, I'm going to Threads
> Visa and Mastercard say Threads can't do that
> Threads sucks, I'm going to Bluesky
> Visa and Mastercard say they can't do that
> I wonder if there's a pattern, nope, back to Twitter
That is actually why FurAffinity prohibited cub (pædo furry): AlertPay prohibited that stuff, which made Dragoneer stop.
Since AlertPay wa subjec to a scam bust and Ragoneer is dead, I wonder how long would cub will take in returning officially to the platform.
The grosser it is, the better: nothing says "we rule this space" better than posting things that would get you into big trouble anywhere else. If you can get away with that, you can get away with anything. It doesn't matter if the kind of porn they are trying to ban relates to their particular kinks or not: any attempt to enforce rules for the underground Bluesky "elite" is going to be seen as a way to take power away from them, and they are not going to take it gently. All of this puts Bluesky in a catch-22 situation: keep the site poisonous to normal users and keep the die-hard veterans that are the only thing holding your site together, or try to sanitize it for a wider audience that may or may not even exist.
The above is the reasoning behind 'keep furry weird', too.
Musk has stated that he despises the amount of porn on Twitter/X but has not done anything to remove it because any ban would result in the thing that would kill the site. Leading to a"don't ask don't tell" truce on the issue
He should remove it, since chasing ou the pornographers always made platforms a lot safer and clientele a lot more chill.
The only way for sites to protect themselves is to state outright that they don't welcome nastiness like that from the outset, but these users are also essentially acting as honey to attract flies, which is why websites keep falling into cycles of "start up site" > "let the whores and perverts populate to make it look like a popular new place to go" > "get big enough to attract normies" > "cut off the gangrenous limb once its use has been served."
The attraction of perverts because of them being the 'honey' is the Horrifying part.
>"Charlie Kirk's neck consented to doing that!"
Why is it that everyone on the Internet is always in the biggest rush to be the most tasteless faggot imaginable?
If your opponent is Hitler/Epstein/Slaweel Ryam, then literally nothing else you can do would eve reach th evil of your opponent. In fact, doing literally everything you can in taking down your opponent would be a Fard.
- let's see how quick we can tank that!
