Bob Chipman / Robert Lewis Chipman / MovieBob / Game OverThinker - "Coastal Elite Thinker" who wants conservatives, Christians and manual workers eradicated. Universally ignorant; cannot tell reality from sci-fi. Sore loser with short fuse. Odious Disney shill. Tranny chaser and general creep. Fat and diabetic.

  • 🩹 Drafts should no longer appear after submitting a post. If they do, please report the issue here.
19Feb#01
Someone e-begs on behalf of Trump.
trump1.png

19Feb#02
Musk, Biden, and Superbowl. In case you care.
musk1.png

19Feb#03
OC.png


19Feb#04
urges.png
I don't know where Bobby got this from but it is fake.
urges2.png


19Feb#05
A "happy fan" praises Guardians for not having woke politics shit.
woke.png

19Feb#06
No fucking idea.
cake.png

19Feb#07
Joe Russo and Sean McLaggan are eager to protect the rep of Madame Web's writer, who is also responsible for the much-loved classic Morbius.
web1.png

19Feb#08
Chris Stuckmann sympathizes the director of Madame Web, telling his audience it must not have been easy working under Sony's studio system -- basically what Joe Rosso said above in a more diplomatic manner, yet somehow Stuckmann is a bad guy.
web2.png
The subhumanoid's pfp
111.jpg
BTW I didn't know the director is a woman, which explains why the usual suspects are so protective.


19Feb#09
Someone compares on-demand AI-generated video with the Beatific Vision Kevin Feige so magnanimously grants us; Bobby reacts predictably. Note how JigenD changes his alternate title after being confronted by Bobby.
AI-mcu.png
"...as if the purpose of art is just to give us what we already know we want." This is exactly what political ideologues from both ends of the spectrum demand.

19Feb#10
Sean McLaggan does not fear being replaced by AI.
sean.png

19Feb#11
AI2.png

19Feb#12
AI1.png
AI can do both you know?

19Feb#13
Human creativity at its zenith.
lego.png

19Feb#14
AI prompt-writer is jealous that another prompter has more views than he does.
prompt.png

19Feb#15
I don't realize Trump, Putin, Xi et al are nerds.
nerds.png
It is always cool to hate nerds; the lego shit shown above is motivation enough.

19Feb#16
CaptN2.png

P.S. Can anyone check for me if Lesser Brother is on Blue Sky? His handle is likely "TheChippa" or similar.
 
He will never live that picture down.

9Feb#10
Sean McLaggan does not fear being replaced by AI.
sean.png
Banning AI won't stop scammers. There's a reason the scammer motto is, "There's a sucker born every minute."

Not sure why Bob would retweet this; no woman will let him touch her, let alone fuck her. Either he's a true Believer, or he thinks he can convince a woman to let him touch her.

For being a Disney shill and having a binary conflict between thinkers and believers, Bob would hate Walt Disney.

"First, think. Second, believe. Third, dream. And finally, dare." - Walt Disney​

If you've ever read a self-help book, something they emphasize is believing in yourself- that by having faith in yourself you can achieve the result you want. Maybe there's some truth to this. Bob is utterly faithless, and look where he's ended up.
 
18Feb#13
Lon Harris vents at some critics that are not Chris Stuckmann. Bobby excuses Stuckmann because he thinks Stuckmann is above harassing some poor, poor film maker. Bobby also tells us he has been approached by agents, but he turned them down in order to keep his conscience clean.
agents.jpg
Bob pivoted into losing gainful employment and growing irrelevancy. I obviously don't buy that Bob was consciously worried about becoming an angry reviewer. He probably thought that there was no reason to use an agency since he was doing so well at the time. Impossible to know what really went down, but I don't see how being an angry reviewer is much better than sucking disney cock in terms of self respect.
19Feb#07
Joe Russo and Sean McLaggan are eager to protect the rep of Madame Web's writer, who is also responsible for the much-loved classic Morbius.
web1.png
So what I should take away from this Joe Russo faggot is that most writers and directors are just stooges who carry out the whims of execs. I could see why a guy known for putting out marvel slop would hold this opinion and have an issue with auteur theory.
Look, executive meddling is a tale as old as time. But it being a scapegoat for every productions failure is getting really tired. So unless someone starts naming names or gives concrete examples I'm not gonna give you the benefit of the doubt.
Alternatively we could collectively stop attributing successes to writers and directors and just assume it was some nameless exec who is to be praised.
 
Chris Stuckmann sympathizes the director of Madame Web, telling his audience it must not have been easy working under Sony's studio system -- basically what Joe Rosso said above in a more diplomatic manner, yet somehow Stuckmann is a bad guy.

That Joe Russo guy Robert has been re-tweeting is a massive faggot, to the point that if he keeps that way, he can easily get a spot on this website.

But I'll be damned if Chris Stuckmann didn't came across as bitch on this shit.

At first I was surprised, plank of wood Stuckmann doing internet drama? Since when he has personality for that? Then I watched the video and I got it.

Look, if the guy doesn't want the bash the movie for being an obvious turkey, fine, no one is holding a gun to your head, and I even get the point he was making about coorporate cinema and production bloat suffocating creativity, yeah that happens.

But man, the whole "As a filmmaker, now I understand how hard is to make a movie, and these poor filmmakers under the thumb of a opressive studio, oh how I weep for them" came across as Struckmann being stuck up thinking now he is "part of the club". And yes, it does fee like Chris here wants to make good with fellow "creatives" to chum up with them.

And another thing that has been bothering is that whenever these blockbusters fail, no one is willing to hold the potato. Directors and screenwriters always rush to blame the studio for meddling, as if they didn't know that a 200+ million dollar production wouldn't be a "do whatever you want" fest, and yet I never see them single out a producer or even a name when it comes to the "meddling".

And yes, I know the reasons, no one wants to be blacklisted, but to put the blame on "corporate" has been such a easy scapegoat for any sort movie blunder for the "creatives", that then why even bother having the movie have credits? Ah, because if the movie is a hit, then everybody wants to part of it right? Does production bloat also takes part when the blockbuster does well?

Its the having the cake and wanting to eat it. If you gonna put your name on something, at least have the balls to stick by it, even if it is to take the lumps. Artists that do so get a lot more respect than people who just whine and pass blame around.
 
Its the having the cake and wanting to eat it. If you gonna put your name on something, at least have the balls to stick by it, even if it is to take the lumps. Artists that do so get a lot more respect than people who just whine and pass blame around.

Yet another reason directors and actors blaming the audience for poor film performance is en vogue right now- the shit rolls downhill, and nobody is willing to point out the problem might be internal. They might lose a job, or worse, cost another person their job, who will do their best to get revenge.....
 
From what I recall, I don't think X-Men TAS ever conflicted timeslot-wise with Captain N: The Gamemaster.
Captain N: The Game Master ended its run in October 1991, a full year before X-Men: TAS debuted on Fox. NBC completely ditched Saturday morning cartoons around that time as well so the two series never shared a time slot.
 
At the risk of derailing, know the phrase, "the left can't meme"? Well... I think a parallel to it is "the left can't satire" (or parody but we can quibble over definitions).

I mean remember when Velma came out and it was so bad, folks thought it was a right-wing attempt to parody and mock liberals? Or how religious folks are depicted in... any Stephen King work? Even though it's pretty much not like any religious person anybody has ever encountered? (remember the Christian from the Mist that was all about human sacrifice?)

I think Veerhoeven INTENDED satire, but he's bad at it - hence why his stuff often backfires.
Apologies for the lateness. I think that the main difference between parody and satire is a certain good-natured respect and appreciation for the source material. Good satire isn't looking to shit on the source material and tear it down. I believe that Verhoeven intended his Starship Troopers to be a satire of the book, but he isn't skilled enough to pull it off, so it ended up being a badly-executed parody instead. Proper satire also requires a certain degree of subtlety and subtle is something that Verhoeven is utterly incapable of being. Pretty sad how the retards on Xitter slobbering about "media literacy" can't understand this.

Back to the main topic. It genuinely cracks me up how Slobbert is constantly whining about AI taking the jobs of the "creative class" that he wishes would rule over the rest of us plebs with an iron fist. Obsolescence is supposed to be for those blue collar MAGA-chuds dammit, not the exalted Philosopher Kings that he imagines himself to stand alongside.

The Kwisatz Tarderach is a fat cretin who will die a virgin.
 
funniest part about this is watching it work on Ya Boi Zack, just like it did with Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny. He went on a multi-video rant about how "everyone was just haters" and that "you shouldn't be rooting for it to fail." Then he actually saw Dial of Destiny, had to admit it was terrible, and quieted down about it. He's doing the same thing with the new X-Men cartoon. However, this isn't a Ya Boi Zack thread, this is a MovieBob thread
Is that thread around? I remember when even some on the right were taking a few shots at Zack. I have appreciation for the guy but.... yeah sometimes he's hilariously naïve.
 
Is that thread around? I remember when even some on the right were taking a few shots at Zack. I have appreciation for the guy but.... yeah sometimes he's hilariously naïve.
I think he has a thread but it isn't very active. I like him enough to keep up with his channel on Youtube, even when he acts like Charlie Brown when Lucy is really going to let him kick the football this time.

It seems like the most recent mentions of him are in the ComicsGate thread:

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/comicsgate.38138/page-2196

As a fellow middle-age American man, I can appreciate that he likes the old stuff that was great when he was younger and doesn't want to let it go. However, as a person who is aware of modern Hollywood, I find him way too optimistic (and sometimes, way to forgiving) about the current state of it. His little comic book business seems to be doing decently with the Rambo and Expendable licenses.
 
[2024.02.19-01] Someone e-begs on behalf of Trump.
When it comes to financial contributing to political candidates, there's an applicable statement regarding fools and their money.

We know, Nazibob. We know.



[2024.02.19-02] Musk, Biden, and Superbowl. In case you care.
Nope, nope, and nope.



[2024.02.19-04]
urges.png
We know Moviebob doesn't suppress those feelings. Moviebob's feelings are shoutout out atop the Holyokes.



[2024.02.19-15] I don't realize Trump, Putin, Xi et al are nerds.
But Trump can't possibly be a nerd. As per Moviebob, Trump's too stupid to be a nerd...

nerds.png
It is always cool to hate nerds; the lego shit shown above is motivation enough.
I stand by my opinion that Moviebob is not a nerd, has never been a nerd, and will never be a nerd. Moviebob was, is, and will forever be a dork.
 
19Feb#06
No fucking idea.
cake.png
Remember how Bob was decrying people for mocking Madame Web's obvious girlboss characters because "don't you wanna see hot chicks in spandex?" And here he is acting holier-than-thou because a chud mentions the same thing. Classic hypocrisy.

(According to reviews, said spandex-wearing only lasts for a few seconds in a dream sequence, so Bobby didn't even get what he truly wanted out of it.)
I'm pretty sure anyone who's tried entering a creative field knows full well how bullshit this sentiment is. Some will try to build you up, but plenty will also try to tear you down. Acting like it's a hippie love commune full of positive vibes and rainbows is just disingenuous.
19Feb#15
I don't realize Trump, Putin, Xi et al are nerds.
nerds.png
It is always cool to hate nerds; the lego shit shown above is motivation enough.
I'll remind you once more that over a decade ago, Bob was drooling over the idea of nerds taking over the world, mostly due to the idea of getting more capeshit slop to consoom. How's that monkey's paw working out for ya, fatass?

500 more pages down, here's to another 500. There may not be many spectacular flameouts like other cows, but I don't think there are many others that can compete with his constant, steady stream of stupidity and delusion.
 
P.S. Can anyone check for me if Lesser Brother is on Blue Sky? His handle is likely "TheChippa" or similar.
Nope. I looked for Chippa, Chris Chipman and just Chipman. Only found this. Don't think it's him but I have been wrong in the past.

Screenshot 2024-02-20 190851.png


Which is hilarious because accounts get an invite code every week, which means Bob never used one to bring his own brother into the exclusive club.
Bob chipman wasn't shoved into lockers enough when he was in highschool.
He was overweight even then so they probably couldn't fit him in.
Just in time for Bobby's balloon day in my time zone!
View attachment 5738843
Happy birthday to Cinema Roberto. He's finally 43. And what a wonderful start to this new lap around the sun. Why, just look at how well his channel is doing:

Screenshot 2024-02-20 191234.png


Spectacular! And of course, his Patreon is bringing in the big bucks:

Screenshot 2024-02-20 191324.png


Yes my friends, this is truly the year of the Bob.
 
Back