Bob Chipman / Robert Lewis Chipman / MovieBob / Game OverThinker - "Coastal Elite Thinker" who wants conservatives, Christians and manual workers eradicated. Universally ignorant; cannot tell reality from sci-fi. Sore loser with short fuse. Odious Disney shill. Tranny chaser and general creep. Fat and diabetic.

Next Highlight
Mr Processor said:
Oh, ok, Bob must think she's faking being a Christian. This just tells me he doesn't know very many women, at least not many women who aren't blood relatives. Or maybe he thinks she's faking her interest in Lara Croft. Anyway, let's see...
1667597398300-png.3796068
View attachment 3796132
If she was a breadtuber, Bob would be hovering around her Twitter account and liking all her tweets.
Click to expand...
Melonie brings up her faith a lot in her videos and tweets. I even remember her sharing pictures of her and her family at Church on her Twitter. It is no doubt Jesus is important in her life and not some angle in some con of hers.
I joked in my previous post about maybe Melonie is so good at her con and Bob was right but it is clear he just can't comprened she is genuine or because she has wrong think he can talk bad about her.
It is just another example of how nasty Bob can be towards women when he can get a way with it.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Flexo, Mr Processor, Mola Ram and 5 others
So, as I mentioned before, I decided to go see Black Adam this week because I hadn't been to the movies in a bit and felt like wiling away an afternoon, and I wanted to see what Bob had gotten himself so worked up over.

For the life of me, I can't figure it out.

I pretty much agree with Drinker's take that it was a perfectly okay movie, and it says a lot that that's a sign of quality these days. Yeah, it does a lot of stuff by the numbers, but it executed in a way that didn't make that feel tiresome or obnoxious. The characters were all well-written and entertaining, the plot was simple but had a few nice little curveballs thrown in (especially with regards to Black Adam's origins, multiple times no less), and the CGI didn't look like an absolute joke.

Speaking of jokes, the screenwriters also knew where a joke was needed for levity without deflating tension, something that Marvel has gotten wrong in nearly every movie since the first Avengers (thanks again, Joss). Not much laugh-out-loud funny, but enough to be amusing. Black Adam provides a few good "fish out of water" moments himself, though most of it keeps him serious, which is its own source of humor I suppose.

I also enjoyed the Justice Society, despite this being their literal first appearance movie-wise. The camaraderie between Hawkman and Doctor Fate felt genuine even if they were referencing things that we haven't seen, which I attribute to Aldis Hodge and Pierce Brosnan's acting skills. Atom Smasher and Cyclone also had a nice little arc together as the newbies to the team, and neither of them were obnoxious, rather heartfelt instead.

If I had to guess what got Bob's panties in a bunch, it'd be the mid-credits scene where Waller tells Black Adam to stay in Kahndaq or else, he tells her nobody on Earth can stop him, and then Superman shows up and says they need to have a talk. Presumably, this is because Bob has a hate-boner for Henry Cavill, and his appearance means that he's not going anywhere as the character, which runs contrary to Bob's desires to see the DCEU wiped clean.

Overall, it's a decent flick that kept me entertained for a couple hours, and I really wasn't asking for anything more. They also had the first trailer for the Shazam! sequel which looked fun, so I'm looking forward to that next year. Bob's a retard, but you don't need to take my word for that.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Lizard Pope, Flexo, Mr Processor and 8 others
Twitter scum loves conspiracy theories, and they can't logic.
logic.png
"A cow doesn't eat meat, so a rabbit is a cow".

simp.png

musk.png

drop.png

"It is not 'woke' wight trash; it is what the market wants".
market.png
According to CNBC, Nintendo has been advised by their agency to boycott Twitter.

Everyone knows how to run Twitter but Musk.
drop2.png

Bobby answers the big question: If Twitter is unreal, they why would someone claim he got his news from Twitter? Why would anyone be mad that someone is wrecking something unreal?
unreal.png
1) If Bobby were honest (humor me); he'd have to confess that his career and connections are unreal as well.
2) If you use Twitter to further your career (again, humor me), it is only fair you pay a subscription.

And if Twitter weren't real, why do the Dems and their journoroaches so intent to control it? A woman who points this out get called a "thing":
woman1.png

woman2.png

Anthony.png
Anthony means 30K (actually it is 28-something-K), not 30M.

antony2.png

cloud.png
So that'd be in the Dem's favor?

Meanwhile Greenwald gets mobbed because he speaks against the Dem-led economic injunctions against Twitter.
glenn.png

BLUE.png

Bobby continues to harbor the delusion that TikTok is bigger than Twitter.
Tiktok.png

Some sheboon is terminated by MSNBC because she "did not adhere to MSNBC’s standards". "The source said she was repeatedly told this by the network." -- reminds you of anyone? (Article archive)
cross.png

PPG.png

activism.png

Kanye West. Racist Bob Chipman continues to be racist.
west.png

Cal-Art avatar gives a 65-step guide of writing for cartoons. Bobby retweets all.
cartoon.png

Bobby speaks in favor of the radio DJ
DJ.png
The problem is that most radio DJs no longer plays music; they just talk and talk and talk and play some top 40 slutpop trash in between.

Creep
creep.png
 
  • Lunacy
  • Informative
Reactions: Mola Ram, Zaryiu2, A Hot Potato and 2 others
Something I find frustrating, but also humorous, is at this point its impossible to deny the corruption in the US' democratic establishment. Even prominent members of the party, like "the squad", say there's corruption within their leadership, albeit without naming names. Nobody can deny it... except people like Bob. Because Bob has a child's understanding of politics.

If you saw a kid playing with Transformers and said to him "What if Bumblebee was getting money from insider trading, and Optimus Prime had dementia and was only propped up as the leader of the autobots to keep the Cybertron Lobby in power?" The kid would look at you like you're an idiot and then toss one of his recolored Starscreams at your head. The Autobots are the good guys, the Decepticons are the bad guys. The Autobots want to save the world and the Decepticons want to destroy it. The Autobots would never do anything bad, it would have to be for a good reason, or a misunderstanding. Any claims of misdeeds by the Autobots can be easily dismissed, because overall, even if they were doing a bunch of things wrong, they will always be the good guys and have the better end goal, and because of that, everything they do is justified.

The concept that maybe it isn't as simple as an 80s action figure line never occurs to Bob. Politicians on both sides might not have any "end-goal" at all, and simply view politics as a career to make money from. Their might not be any ideological reason for their actions. Or worse yet, they might have the right ideology but their actions could contradict it, or maybe be so bad that they can't justify the end goals anymore. All of these subtle nuances never occur to Bob, because he doesn't have any emotional maturity. You're either an Autobot or a Decepticon.
 
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Agree
Reactions: Lizard Pope, Flexo, Mola Ram and 5 others
Henri Barbusse said:
There's a more important question to answer first: does Bob have money to spare to afford paying for the checkmark?
Click to expand...
Well if he does pay for it, at least we know he had to give up 1 meal a day as a sacrfice to furthering the fight for the superior future. Think about it. He has to choose between stuffing his face for a day or continuing to pwn the mayo ghouls with his hot takes on Marvel movies.
 
  • DRINK!
  • Like
Reactions: ChampFantana, A Hot Potato and Koby_Fish
Therealhomor said:
Something I find frustrating, but also humorous, is at this point its impossible to deny the corruption in the US' democratic establishment. Even prominent members of the party, like "the squad", say there's corruption within their leadership, albeit without naming names. Nobody can deny it... except people like Bob. Because Bob has a child's understanding of politics.

If you saw a kid playing with Transformers and said to him "What if Bumblebee was getting money from insider trading, and Optimus Prime had dementia and was only propped up as the leader of the autobots to keep the Cybertron Lobby in power?" The kid would look at you like you're an idiot and then toss one of his recolored Starscreams at your head. The Autobots are the good guys, the Decepticons are the bad guys. The Autobots want to save the world and the Decepticons want to destroy it. The Autobots would never do anything bad, it would have to be for a good reason, or a misunderstanding. Any claims of misdeeds by the Autobots can be easily dismissed, because overall, even if they were doing a bunch of things wrong, they will always be the good guys and have the better end goal, and because of that, everything they do is justified.

The concept that maybe it isn't as simple as an 80s action figure line never occurs to Bob. Politicians on both sides might not have any "end-goal" at all, and simply view politics as a career to make money from. Their might not be any ideological reason for their actions. Or worse yet, they might have the right ideology but their actions could contradict it, or maybe be so bad that they can't justify the end goals anymore. All of these subtle nuances never occur to Bob, because he doesn't have any emotional maturity. You're either an Autobot or a Decepticon.
Click to expand...
www.youtube.com

John Cleese vs Extremism

John Cleese shows the pathology of extremism
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com

This short 2 minute video perfectly explains blob-adjacent mentality.
It has probably been posted in old thread I think, even by me I think.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Lizard Pope, Flexo, Imposteroak and 5 others
Bobvember 5th, 2022

My shower turned out to be successful tho my skin feels weird now that it is free of debris. Tomorrow is a big day for me (I need to look my best and that is why I fought to get to the shower). I preparation I drink three Heinekens and practice the best debate tactics in the mirror: Pointing, towering over, and shouting.
bob points.PNG
I will succeed and science is my guide, Bobshallah.


Null's big gay site isn't allowing me to quote anyone right now but I still wanna comment on something @Positron posted
archive.ph

Like Kurosawa, I Make Mad on Twitter: "No, it isn't. Twitter has a pa…

archived 5 Nov 2022 03:52:30 UTC
archive.ph archive.ph
11-5-22 Bobtarded.PNG
The fact that we now have proof positive of the federal government censoring speech through a third party, because they cannot legally do it themselves, should horrify and enrage any American paying attention. What they are doing is abhorrent and an affront to The Constitution that they all claim to love and care about. What's bob response now that it's undeniable? "uhhhhh ackshoeally! Twitter's not that big IN FACT facebook is bigger!" First off, fucking facebook was told to censor and ban people on behalf of the feds and they goddamned did it. Secondly, if bird app is so irrelevant, as Bob is trying to claim here, then why the fuck does he care what gets posted on it?
1667658041898.png
This is just a few scroll wheels down and AFTER his fail dunk on the rando. BUT WAIT! There's more!
1667658234012.png
THIS is just a few more wheel scrolls down from the previous one and is still AFTER the fail dunk. Why is Bob worried about election misinformation from a website that only has a "6% global user base - not 6% of America, of THE PLANET"? It couldn't be because that we now even more proof that the feds fucked with the 2020 election to save America from cheeto hittler and Bob's upset that that's now at risk and this is all some sort of shitty cope?

Fuck me running...as I was writing this a memory can rushing back to me of how we already knew all of this shit, for a fucking fact, back in 2021. How did we know? Because the smug fucking faggots told us to our goddamned faces in an article with Time magazine.
time.com

The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election

For more than a year, a loosely organized coalition of operatives scrambled to shore up America’s institutions
time.com time.com
archive.ph

The Secret Bipartisan Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election | Time

archived 3 Nov 2022 09:21:28 UTC
archive.ph archive.ph
THIS is where the term "election fortification" originates from.

People like Bob do not care that they're being manipulated because "their" side won. It is a little surprising, however, that Bob is so open and willing into getting fucked over. It might be the only action he ever gets.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Instant_Pot_User, Blatant hypocrite, Lizard Pope and 13 others
Sexy Senior Citizen said:
Assuming he doesn't pay his mom rent, yes. He may need to cut down the fairly small amount of McDonalds for the average sized person he eats.
Click to expand...
Speaking of, how's inflation treating the Boston-area McDonalds? (I've heard pricing horror stories out LA way, though I haven't checked for veracity.) Can Bob still afford a small amount of McDonalds, or is he going to be forced to only buy an actual small amount of McDonalds?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Jackisnotaname, Positron, A Hot Potato and 3 others
Hey! It's working.
Woe-B-Gon (TM) said:
Speaking of, how's inflation treating the Boston-area McDonalds? (I've heard pricing horror stories out LA way, though I haven't checked for veracity.) Can Bob still afford a small amount of McDonalds, or is he going to be forced to only buy an actual small amount of McDonalds?
Click to expand...
Can he afford McDonald's AND a checkmark?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Jackisnotaname, ChampFantana, A Hot Potato and 3 others
The only good thing about the government censoring speech through third parties is that its blatantly, unambiguously unconstitutional. It isn't even a close call. If the order came down from the government, its a government order. They don't even have the "its a private company!" defense anymore.

Even if you downplay it by arguing that the government is just "advising" them what's potential misinformation and what's not, it still can't pass the "but for" test: but for the government flagging it as problematic, it would not be removed. You couldn't "advise" some kind of HOA to use a security firm to confiscate firearms from its residents.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Lensherr, He's Ronald McDonald, A Hot Potato and 6 others
Therealhomor said:
The only good thing about the government censoring speech through third parties is that its blatantly, unambiguously unconstitutional. It isn't even a close call. If the order came down from the government, its a government order. They don't even have the "its a private company!" defense anymore.

Even if you downplay it by arguing that the government is just "advising" them what's potential misinformation and what's not, it still can't pass the "but for" test: but for the government flagging it as problematic, it would not be removed. You couldn't "advise" some kind of HOA to use a security firm to confiscate firearms from its residents.
Click to expand...
Remember Bob's logic: When the Republicans do it, it's bad. When the Democrats do it, especially if it's to censor Republicans, then it's good.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Smithfield Ham, Sexy Senior Citizen, Positron and 4 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back