Bob Chipman / Robert Lewis Chipman / MovieBob / Game OverThinker - "Coastal Elite Thinker" who wants conservatives, Christians and manual workers eradicated. Universally ignorant; cannot tell reality from sci-fi. Sore loser with short fuse. Odious Disney shill. Tranny chaser and general creep. Fat and diabetic.

Oh please almighty Gods of Twitter, call Bob out on his shit like you did with Patrick. It would be glorious.
It's highly probable that Bob is even more inconsequential than Fatrick, and so his dumb Twitter diarrhea doesn't even merit enough attention for people to report it for "fact checking."

Remember his massively retarded take that the Sistine Chapel ceiling was the equivalent to Infinity War, yet it only managed to draw in two other people on the whole of Twitter who called him out for being such a Disney/Marvel dick-sucker? I think that tweet earned more attention and criticism here than on Twitter.
bob is a super retard.JPG
"My position has nothing to do with consistency" doesn't make you sound as badass and edgy and intelligent as you think it does. It makes you sound like an immature, nihilistic teenager or a gutless loser who doesn't have the moral and mental fortitude required to stand behind a concept larger than himself. It makes you sound like a slimy hypocrite who can't be trusted.
In other words, it makes a person sound like MovieBob.
 
Moviebob has the uncanny ability to be the biggest retard in the room no matter who he's talking to. He's talking to insufferable commies who call people "my friend" the way Patrick Tomlinson calls people "child," and he still makes them look halfway intelligent and likable by comparison. Even the worthless pinkos at least know it's possible to find value and wisdom in thoughts from the past. By Bob's logic, we should dismiss the words of Martin Luther King, Jr., because he's no longer alive. According to Bob's logic, that "I have a dream" shit only has value if the person saying it has the correct morals. If one of Bob's Angels quotes MLK to justify judging people by the content of their character, that's fine. If a right-wing chud quotes the exact same thing for the exact same reason, it's wrong, it has no value, it's being twisted somehow, and Bob will probably explain that MLK was a misogynist commie anyway. What a profoundly fucking stupid world view.

Speaking of profoundly stupid, I can't think of a more vapid, meaningless way to say, "I have no moral principles." We know, Bob, you have no guiding principles except maybe for "Whatever hurts the people I hate is good." "My position is what makes the most sense according to me" is the most common position in the world, applicable to everyone from red commie scum to the fucking Amish. Very few people take up moral, philosophical, or political positions that make no sense to them. "My position has nothing to do with consistency" doesn't make you sound as badass and edgy and intelligent as you think it does. It makes you sound like an immature, nihilistic teenager or a gutless loser who doesn't have the moral and mental fortitude required to stand behind a concept larger than himself. It makes you sound like a slimy hypocrite who can't be trusted. Why should anyone listen to anything you have to say about LGBT shit or professional victims' issues if your position could change tomorrow based on which way the wind is blowing, like your opinion on the coof vaccine did? "I'm with who I'm not against" sounds like a line that would've been cut from the Star Wars prequels for being too fucking stupid. None of this is cool, none of this is wise or profound, none of this makes you sound unique or special. It's all just so many empty, stupid words to say, "I'm an overgrown child."
Our boy really going to openly admit to being a self serving hypocrite with no ideological rudder and try to make it sound profound. This is the take of a particularly unselfware teenager.
 
Screenshot 2022-11-28 154626.png

Bob's idea of an own is to admit he likes to get plastered on beer, and that he's definitely not drinking it for the taste. He probably thinks saying so is edgy, but it's actually pathetic.
Screenshot 2022-11-28 154544.png

Screenshot 2022-11-28 154828.png

Bob apparently likes The Last Jedi (or more likely pretends to, I don't think he likes Star Wars). I seem to recall a line from The Last Jedi

"That's how we're gonna win. Not fighting what we hate, but saving what we love" - Rose Tico

I'm not sure how well that goes along with Bob's Billion Dollar movie idea, "What if there were a good Death Star?"
 
It's highly probable that Bob is even more inconsequential than Fatrick, and so his dumb Twitter diarrhea doesn't even merit enough attention for people to report it for "fact checking."

I think that's indisputable. Tomlinson is a ridiculous joke, but I'm pretty sure he has scored actual publishing contracts and probably still has an agent. Neither tradpub nor any agent with an ounce of sense would touch Bob with a ten foot pole. It's not even his odious views and near-complete lack of any sort of filter; it's that he has the writing talent of a half-bright teenager and has demonstrated precisely zero improvement in over a decade of producing video scripts and written reviews.
 
Bragging about butt chugging all day is never a W, but then Brainless Bob cannot understand that sometimes you just have to take an L. All because his careless Ma and drunken lout of a Pa made TV raise him and he latched on to "nerd" characters since the movies and the shows made them win.

Imagine still being that delusional child, rocking back and forth watching whatever horseshit was on public access, today.
 
It astounds me that Bob could even think there's even the possibility of a thing such as a "good" Death Star. How could "moon sized battlestation with the power to commit mass planetary genocide" ever possibly be a good thing? The whole point of the Death Star is that it was the embodiment of Palpatine and the Empire's abject lack of value of life and desire to ground any and all opposition into literal dust in their quest for absolute power.

Besides being retarded and really showing how this fat diabetic really does believe in "no bad tactics, only bad targets," I also think it shows that one of our most common criticisms of him - that he has the mentality and morality of Saturday Morning Cartoons - is also incorrect. Because like Bobby, I too grew up watching those simplistic 30 minute toy commercials where it was never more complicated than "the good guys are good, and the bad guys are bad." However, I distinctly remember that one of the things that made it where "the good guys are good" is that there were things that the good guys would never stoop too, even if it would make their fight with the bad guys easier, precisely because the lesson always was "good guys don't do that."
 
Brainless Bob also doesn't get that it also shows the Empire's propensity to waste resources on failures. The Death Star can do with one shot what a small fleet needs an entire set of ordinance to do true. But you can build an entire Imperial fleet for the price of one of them and get much more tactical flexibility. It's most demonstrated by how a kid with force powers in a fighter plane blew it up. Sure he needed space magic to make it work, but this still happened. Palpy then wanted another one despite that.

I could argue for a smaller version of the thing to use in the event of say a rogue object like an asteroid about to hit a planet and that'd be considered a "good use" of it. But that's not what this chicken eyed brainlet meant. He wants a retarded and stupid explosion battle between two of them because he thinks it'd be cool rather than just visual wank.
 
It astounds me that Bob could even think there's even the possibility of a thing such as a "good" Death Star. How could "moon sized battlestation with the power to commit mass planetary genocide" ever possibly be a good thing? The whole point of the Death Star is that it was the embodiment of Palpatine and the Empire's abject lack of value of life and desire to ground any and all opposition into literal dust in their quest for absolute power.

Some of Bob's thought experiments (and I use that term generously) reveal a frighteningly depraved mindset. If he could burn a building full of Trump voters to death and be assured of facing no legal consequences, I think he'd do it in a cholesterol-clogged heartbeat. With a smile. Part of that, I'm sure, is that being a fortysomething manchild who's never had to grapple with an ounce of real responsibility, Bob has never actually had to weigh the moral and ethical burdens of making genuinely tough or unpleasant decisions. If it were otherwise, he might be more circumspect.

But really, why take the chance? It's better for everyone that he be left to seethe in his impotence until he croaks.
 
Some of Bob's thought experiments (and I use that term generously) reveal a frighteningly depraved mindset. If he could burn a building full of Trump voters to death and be assured of facing no legal consequences, I think he'd do it in a cholesterol-clogged heartbeat. With a smile. Part of that, I'm sure, is that being a fortysomething manchild who's never had to grapple with an ounce of real responsibility, Bob has never actually had to weigh the moral and ethical burdens of making genuinely tough or unpleasant decisions. If it were otherwise, he might be more circumspect.

But really, why take the chance? It's better for everyone that he be left to seethe in his impotence until he croaks.
Bob really is a case where the phrase "ontologically evil" applies.
 
Hershel Walker says what everyone thinks aloud. "If you think there is a place better than America, why don't you go there?". Walker thinks you have to earn your rights to change America.
View attachment 3953708
Bobby knows a place that is better than America, unfortunately Princess Peach refused to sign the visa.
...Immediately before Bowser launced Bob out of a cannon.



View attachment 3953848
I wonder what is the correlation between gun laws and property crimes.
I wonder if Moviebob knows (LOL!) that the Second Amendment is America's most important gun law...



American news anchors are literally interchanagble meat puppets. Check this out.
View attachment 3953896
I see that, once again, Moviebob's tonguing its own uvula from behind.

Bobby is very upset by that video.
View attachment 3954100
Given that the NPC meme's been around for a few years, I am thoroughly surprised that nobody's taken the time to replace Moviebob's face the NPC makeover, as Moviebob may be the ultimate in NPC personification (look at how many times Bob repeats "Thinkers™ and Believers™").



Bobby Chinksplains a Chink.
View attachment 3953484
So... if Baizuobob's the "least anti-China American"... does that mean Bob's adamantly pro-China?



Kanye West reminds Bobby of a bully who has traumatized him 30 years ago.
View attachment 3954192
I have to wonder why Moviebob felt good. Prob'ly because the person Moviebob refers to is an alpha male and the closest Moviebob could ever come to that level is tau.



Jealous, Bob?


Couple points to address here:

First off, Ben Shapiro did not support Donald Trump in 2016 (I know this because I was a regular listener of Shapiro's that year, and Ben would often have a "Good Trump, Bad Trump" segment on his show). Shapiro, like every self-respecting American voter, knew that Trump was a better/less evil candidate that Führer Hillary.

Secondly, Moviebob does not drink beer for the taste; Moviebob drinks beer because it thins out its sausage-gravy-thick blood.

And, lastly, with apologies to Shapiro, a good way not to dine with a vile racist you don't know is by not accepting any dinner invitations offered to you by Moviebob.



And having tasted success, these nutters are going after you-know-whom.
View attachment 3954156
View attachment 3953632
Bobby must be referring how LibsOfTikTok was doxed by groomers and allies, and how Alex Caraballo of Harvard University wishes to harass six SCOTUS judges.
Again, tactics and targets. As per Moviebob's standards, doxxing is unacceptable... so long as the dox target is a Democrat/Leftist/"Progressive", but if the target is Republican/Conservative/a worthless troglodyte who stole the fyuuchaa Bob had EARNED, then go right ahead.



And Elon's past actions are bad... why, exactly?



So? Moviebob worships the unholy trinity of Führer Hillary, Fauxcahontas, and Occasional-Cortex all the freakin' time.



Nor is grifting Patreon subscribers for money to live sustainably.



Bobby thinks watching Peacemaker can save lives.
View attachment 3953776
Why the fuck would Moviebob ever want to save lives? Moviebob has repeatedly expressed a desire to destroy the lives of those who have never directly threatened Bob's (rather valueless and malevolent) life because they man Bob's scapegoating for the theft of Halloween, 2020.
 
Why the fuck would Moviebob ever want to save lives? Moviebob has repeatedly expressed a desire to destroy the lives of those who have never directly threatened Bob's (rather valueless and malevolent) life because they man Bob's scapegoating for the theft of Halloween, 2020.
It's a ruse, the same ruse that trannies pull when they say chopping off your dick will save your life.
 
It astounds me that Bob could even think there's even the possibility of a thing such as a "good" Death Star. How could "moon sized battlestation with the power to commit mass planetary genocide" ever possibly be a good thing? The whole point of the Death Star is that it was the embodiment of Palpatine and the Empire's abject lack of value of life and desire to ground any and all opposition into literal dust in their quest for absolute power.

Besides being retarded and really showing how this fat diabetic really does believe in "no bad tactics, only bad targets," I also think it shows that one of our most common criticisms of him - that he has the mentality and morality of Saturday Morning Cartoons - is also incorrect. Because like Bobby, I too grew up watching those simplistic 30 minute toy commercials where it was never more complicated than "the good guys are good, and the bad guys are bad." However, I distinctly remember that one of the things that made it where "the good guys are good" is that there were things that the good guys would never stoop too, even if it would make their fight with the bad guys easier, precisely because the lesson always was "good guys don't do that."
I think he's coming from the angle of just wanting the spectacle of Death Stars fighting but it's not really much better.
 
Holding grudges against childhood bullies is peak moviebob for me. I don't see how anyone can see him seriously after he says shit like this. It's both hysterical and downright vile.
Even funnier - if this was done "30 odd years ago" then this means Bob was... 10.

TEN!

Save something horrible (which I doubt because otherwise Bob would be blasting tweets about how his victimizer finally perished) what could this guy have possibly done when Bob (and probably the bully) were 10 years old?

Also, if it's kosher to hold grudges, then... well it's a-ok to keep holding Bob to his eugenics, invading poland, etc tweets because he's already established - no excuses. No forgiveness.

I think that's indisputable. Tomlinson is a ridiculous joke, but I'm pretty sure he has scored actual publishing contracts and probably still has an agent. Neither tradpub nor any agent with an ounce of sense would touch Bob with a ten foot pole. It's not even his odious views and near-complete lack of any sort of filter; it's that he has the writing talent of a half-bright teenager and has demonstrated precisely zero improvement in over a decade of producing video scripts and written reviews.
Oh that reminds me! Did we ever ask @Boston Brand how much Bob's books have sold? Do you need a title, Mr. Brand? Or can you do a search by author?

EDIT: Oh yeah, this was also found on the Kyle Kallgren thread.
I want to lament that Kallgren and others would have a poor understanding of film if they continue to approach these films as totally political objects. But then, I watched another video essay of his that’s centred around the auteur theory, but the subject is Tommy Wiseau. The angle is that Wiseau, the director of his only effort The Room, and why he is underappreciated as an auteur, because of the limitations in the discussion, which would involve championing problematic men, while others like Chantal Akerman and Paul WS Anderson are underutilized because his movies do not match that image. This video essay would have been good if the premise wasn’t lofty as it is on the surface. Kallgren makes the same unforced errors as Moviebob when he wrote about the Marvel movies being good enough to discard the theory itself. These claims - that directors are underappreciated compared to the capital F filmmakers like Nolan and Tarantino - are really subjective, and it risks stretching the criteria to somewhere it doesn’t deserve it.
 
Last edited:
Good Death Star. That's right up there with a "good cancer diagnosis" or a "good sucking chest wound".

OK, so follow me here: What if there was a GOOD death camp for all the people who liked the BAD one?

Ah, what am I saying, he's convinced eugenics is a great idea with a bad rep. Of course he'd look at any historical or fictional engine of horror and atrocity and say "I could do some real nice work if I had that."
 
Good Death Star. That's right up there with a "good cancer diagnosis" or a "good sucking chest wound".

OK, so follow me here: What if there was a GOOD death camp for all the people who liked the BAD one?

Ah, what am I saying, he's convinced eugenics is a great idea with a bad rep. Of course he'd look at any historical or fictional engine of horror and atrocity and say "I could do some real nice work if I had that."

"Bob, just what would you consider a good genocide?"

"The Holodomor, friendo!"`
 
Brainless Bob also doesn't get that it also shows the Empire's propensity to waste resources on failures. The Death Star can do with one shot what a small fleet needs an entire set of ordinance to do true. But you can build an entire Imperial fleet for the price of one of them and get much more tactical flexibility. It's most demonstrated by how a kid with force powers in a fighter plane blew it up. Sure he needed space magic to make it work, but this still happened. Palpy then wanted another one despite that.

I could argue for a smaller version of the thing to use in the event of say a rogue object like an asteroid about to hit a planet and that'd be considered a "good use" of it. But that's not what this chicken eyed brainlet meant. He wants a retarded and stupid explosion battle between two of them because he thinks it'd be cool rather than just visual wank.
The (old) EU, funnily enough, examined both these topics: the OG Darksaber was the Death Star stripped down to essentially a self-propelled gun, with just the core, drive, and super laser. The (infamous) Jedi Academy trilogy had the harebrained scientist who worked on the reactor and super laser design rationalize her work as something that would be used to break up dead planets to allow the mining of heavy metals contained in the core. As usual, Bob is years late and millions of braincells short.

I think he's coming from the angle of just wanting the spectacle of Death Stars fighting but it's not really much better.
I, too, enjoy 3.5 high level spellcaster combat. Nothing is more engaging than the first successful hit ending the fight.
 
I think he's coming from the angle of just wanting the spectacle of Death Stars fighting but it's not really much better.
I, too, enjoy 3.5 high level spellcaster combat. Nothing is more engaging than the first successful hit ending the fight.
I also enjoy beam struggles in Dragon Ball. Nothing makes me more engaged and excited at seeing two massive beams hitting each other and watching as each side vies to overpower the other.
 
Regarding the Death Star, I think its biggest flaw is that its like building a single nuke instead of raising an entire army. Sure, it will do damage and has tactical usage, but unless you really think that you need to remove all trace that your enemy ever existed from the face of the galaxy, you'd be better off just building Star Destroyers/Capital Ships.

In Rogue One, they showed that the Death Star was capable of doing more than just planet busting shots, though it suffers from being just one massive space station, that I'd imagine is resource intensive to move, and you'd probably have to worry about gravity a lot more than with any other type of ship.

I cannot fucking imagine how awful taxes would be in the Empire having to pay for all this shit.
 
Back