Bob Chipman / Robert Lewis Chipman / MovieBob / Game OverThinker - "Coastal Elite Thinker" who wants conservatives, Christians and manual workers eradicated. Universally ignorant; cannot tell reality from sci-fi. Sore loser with short fuse. Odious Disney shill. Tranny chaser and general creep. Fat and diabetic.

It also doesn't help that some of these nimrods believe Zelensky's BS off "If Ukraine falls, than Russia totally gonna take over all of Europe guyz! Gimme mo money and guns, plz!"
My question is why aren't they working harder on their own programs they had before the war. Blob and friends think that they're Africans. They were working on cruise and ballistic missiles, building ships, cargo jets, tanks, etc. Britan never stopped building tanks during the Blitz, nor the Soviets, yet Ukraine cant make shit. Then again that goes against Bob's "robots should make everything " sthick.
 
My question is why aren't they working harder on their own programs they had before the war. Blob and friends think that they're Africans. They were working on cruise and ballistic missiles, building ships, cargo jets, tanks, etc. Britan never stopped building tanks during the Blitz, nor the Soviets, yet Ukraine cant make shit. Then again that goes against Bob's "robots should make everything " sthick.
Because they pretty much scrapped and sold off everything the moment Poroshenko came to power, every factory they had, every military stuff they had was sold off or scrapped and all they were left was old AA rockets from the USSR days.
 
Because they pretty much scrapped and sold off everything the moment Poroshenko came to power, every factory they had, every military stuff they had was sold off or scrapped and all they were left was old AA rockets from the USSR days.
What I'm talking about was being worked on right before the war. The missiles that took out the Moskava even was Ukrainian made not a year before, and their aerospace industry was pumping our cargo jets with indigenous engines like nuts. They were re arming. Now they act like they had none of that and people like Bob think they're idiots that know nothing. They're just ripping the world off, not that Blob minds, as he bums with his mom in his 40s
 
1673045220844.png

What the fuck?
Believe it or not, yes this is completely accurate to Foucult's communism theory. (I think i got the name right) You basically must always be revolutionary because otherwise if you stop, the last revolution becomes the new status quo, ergo fascist.

I'm not even lying, this is quite literally their literature.

I do think Blobbo was the victim of a few rounds of "kick the retard."
I only disagree because if he was, we would be hearing about it non stop whenever he feels aggrieved. (recall how he LOVES to bring up other people's wrongs and mistakes) The fact that his complaints about being bullied are always very vague is why I'm convinced he was probably just ignored or probably called names a few times.

maybe? I remember it was outside next to a highway
edit: thanks I found it, its 18 min in
OMG... Bob really deserves to be meme'd more than he has...
1673291330492.png


Can someone teach me how to GIF? Because I'm getting all kinds of ideas for new torture devices...
1673291417980.png
 
Luke Lockhart is a PhD (and of course he put on his Twitter handle). If I have to talk to a lot of people that sound like Luke I too would be envious of those who don't.

All work is real work -- except truck-driving and coal mining.
View attachment 4222800

And no work is more important than drawing cartoon.
View attachment 4222984

"Heartbreak"
View attachment 4222951

View attachment 4223008
To use a simile that I'm sure even Bobby can understand, studios scrapping finished movies and cartoon shows is exactly like McD throwing away fried McNuggets that they couldn't sell at the end of the day.

We are not done with cartoon yet, but let's entertain ourselves with adult matters first.


Glenn Greenwald on Brazil's own Jan6.
View attachment 4223032

Lula the CIA plant thinks he is big shit.
View attachment 4223019
How many sets of missile systems will Biden gift to another country this time?

Brazilians are staging an "insurrection", because they obey whatever King Musk says.
View attachment 4222875

Some also blames the riot on Musk getting rid of non-workers that previously infested Twitter.
View attachment 4222847

Big Al chimes in.
View attachment 4222859

View attachment 4222970
Archive of NBC article.

View attachment 4223052


View attachment 4223038

Some litterbox liner called Washington Post claims the GOP has "year after year, systematically destroys the norms and institutions of democracy"
View attachment 4223183

CRT
View attachment 4222976
Tell me why children, or for that matter anyone who aren't interested in the history of that era, has to learn about Emmett Till. I don't insist math teachers teach that Évariste Galois died at the age of 20 in a duel.

Glinner.
View attachment 4222926

Big Al again.
View attachment 4222992

Oh Jesus Christ! The Pope of Atheism has created another scandal!
View attachment 4223092

Bobby think all mythical giants are from the Bible. WTF.
View attachment 4222855


View attachment 4223172

"Youtube grifters" like The Critical Drinker should learn about Wikipedia.
View attachment 4223158
Bobby should make a movie called Like Kurosawa. I'm sure it will be on The Oscar's shortlist.

Drinker's haters come out in droves.
View attachment 4223176

View attachment 4223160
Perhaps this is why his movies appeal to the likes of Bobby?

Peter Coffin continues to do Bobby's "job". I don't understand the tweet that Bobby quoted.
View attachment 4222999

" LaRoucheite scum" aren't supposed to share their thoughts on movies. Thus sayeth Gatekeeper Robert.
View attachment 4223086

More on artists' rights. Bobby is in favor of "discussion" rather than "fuck you we are going to shut it down".
View attachment 4223098

View attachment 4223012

View attachment 4223014


View attachment 4223015

Capeshit.
View attachment 4222940

View attachment 4222988
Someone help me parse this mother of run-on sentences.

Capeshit cartoon:
View attachment 4223139

View attachment 4222920
I say let the boulder roll along and demolish the dyke.

View attachment 4222948
I call it roid-induced consumptive encephalopathy.
1673290442628.png

But wait! I thought Twitter usage was only 6% That means hardly anyone uses it! How could it POSSIBLY be responsible for "Brazilian Jan 6" then, Bobby and Big Al?

Blaming "Reagan" on the fact people can't generally "make it" on one income anymore is very shortsighted and actually, really really dumb. For starters, Carter made mistakes that predated Reagan that helped cause the problem. Y'know, what with gasoline shortages and idiotic policies. Some people like to blame NAFTA for some of it and I'm sure there's something to that, but in Canada we didn't have a Reagan. We had a Mulroney. He was, and is, a Red Tory for the simple fact of him letting that red tory witch and then "Justice Minister" Kim Campbell Order-in-Council a shitload of gun bans. This stupid bitch also made Mace and Tasers illegal, and pretty much kneecapped self defense for women entirely. I wouldn't say Mulroney cut taxes, as he's the one that brought in the hated federal Goods and Services Tax. This tax was meant to help balance the budget. At least Mulroney was more fiscally responsible than his Liberal predecessors or those that came after him. Hell, the smoothbrains in Liberal Chretien's caucus, like his idiot finance minister Paul Martin, cut funding for the training of doctors and also cut the number of doctors being trained. Surprise surprise, now we have an extreme doctor shortage now.

If Bob thinks "cutting taxes" is why people can't afford shit on a single income any more, he's an idiot. There are a multitude of factors. More women in the workforce drove down the cost of labor, due to how economics works. Higher taxes actually make it necessary to have two incomes just to get ahead. ESPECIALLY in Canada. We're so overtaxed it's not even funny, and we have a stupid Carbon Tax that is "a price on pollution" when even after having it, emissions are STILL going up, and EVERYTHING is more expensive. Including Food.

I love how these idiots try to gaslight us on what CRT ackshually is. As if the non-CRT option is "sanitizing history". Uh, NO. CRT is NOT "showing beaten up victim of racism Emmett Till from a gazillion years ago in an open casket, bruises and all" and not using CRT is NOT the equivalent of putting a smiley face sticker on a CLOSED coffin of racism victim Emmett Till. Using CRT in schools today is like putting a big sticker on the open casket that says, "ALL WHITE PEOPLE LIVING TODAY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS DESPITE THIS HAPPENING IN LITERAL 1955 BEFORE MOST OF YOUR PARENTS WERE EVEN BORN" and non-CRT, doesn't. CRT treats being non-PeeOhCee as some sort of Original Sin that cannot be absolved. Bob, despite hating Communism, can't see a blatant COMMUNIST tactic that's staring him right in the face, because he's a smoothbrained crayon-eating blue curtain analyst, Lard of Lynn, Last of his Line, Kwisatz Tarderach.

I would like to add that even Wikipedia says Emmett Till's father was a real piece of shit who was executed in Italy for raping a bunch of women. But do you think the CRT education style would even bother to bring that up, showing history warts and all, like they claim that's all they're doing? Oh HELL NO. I mean, just because the father is a rapist doesn't necessarily mean his son would be, but damn son that's hella sus. Apples falling from trees and all that.
Ah yes the guy that fixes your pipes, repairs the electrical in your house and runs power plants , and builds the vehicles that keep the world moving is "not a person". Bob you wouldn't last a week if every tradesman said fuck it and went on strike.

Brazil going nuclear isn't a surprise, the country as we know it hasn't existed long, they aren't afraid to start again nor be a banana republic. Bob of course hates this fight for freedom in the 3rd world.

Listen I can get feisty over my animu, but I don't actively self censor myself. He mad lol.
Bob thinks: 1) Robots can fix your pipes etc in the Soopeeryah Fyootchah and 2) in the meantime, get Blue voters to do those jobs even if said blue voters are soy-enhanced bundles of sticks that couldn't bench 100, let alone 300. And I don't see Bob or any of his kin taking up the ackshually extremely lucrative profession of plumbing. After all, isn't Mario the Plumber his Hero?

@Flexo Yeah you were close, Alex Foucault. And that bullshit is why I hate Postmodernism.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps Bob had superior longevity genetics that'll force him to keep going, even as he destroys his own body with booze, small amounts of McDonalds, and angrily tweeting every vile thought he has. What a cruel irony that would be.
At this point I assume Bob survives because not even the Grim Reaper wants to touch him.

Disney is now "Blood Mouse", stifling the development of neural networks by threatening to shut down AI art tools (video, 15:30 minutes). Bobby cannot stand his religion being disrespected, especially by filthy anime bros.
ai1.png
EDIT: Whoops! Forgot to put what I discovered here since this looked like a juicy tweet chain.
1673295039989.png


1673295140437.png


1673295194080.png


What's funny are all the people on twitter going "that's cringe" to CYBERGEM - whereas I dunno if he knows the moviebob deep lore or not, but it is hilarious to see him hitting moviebob right where it hurts. Like challenging a muslim to a koran trivia challenge, he's hitting the poor guy right in the holy text.

Don't like it? Just go work for a private company, bro!
But they expect results!

1673293948077.png


*eye twitch*

Justice League is one of my favorite shows so I'm fighting the urge not to just flip out here. I'll just say: "even THIS SHOW knew the best course was to retool itself into a whole different thing after"

NO YOU DUMB MORON! The story arc of Cadmus was concluded by this episode. So the next season (the final one) had a different story arc.

Also on freakin' wikipedia so I know you have no excuse: "According to Stephen Harber, the episode was originally intended to be the series finale for Justice League Unlimited and the DCAU in general." That it got unexpectedly picked up for a 3rd season by cartoon network is pretty damn common knowledge!

(also fuck off blue guy with that homo bullshit - if anything the elements to the scene are more about forcefully detransitioning someone so back away before I really try triggering you)
 
Last edited:
"Youtube grifters" like The Critical Drinker should learn about Wikipedia.
drinker.png
YOU SIMPLE FOOLS! I INTENDED TO MAKE A STUPID MOVIE ALL ALONG! Is the weirdest cope I have ever seen. It's just a dumb movie, written by a dumb man. For some reason people defend Rian Johnson and it has to be a political thing. Like he makes bad movies, they look nice, but he's a shit writer. But it's this weird cultural thing where this man has to be defended from the evil CHUDs. If a story can't hold up after even a cursory thought, like Rian Johnson's films often do. Then it's just got poor writing and a bad story. Acknowledging these things doesn't detract from a person liking it.

After all that, the Lard of Lynn shouldn't throw stones at over-analyzing. He's a shitty blue curtain reviewer who has probably espoused death of the author as a source of valid interpretations of media.
 
YOU SIMPLE FOOLS! I INTENDED TO MAKE A STUPID MOVIE ALL ALONG! Is the weirdest cope I have ever seen. It's just a dumb movie, written by a dumb man. For some reason people defend Rian Johnson and it has to be a political thing. Like he makes bad movies, they look nice, but he's a shit writer. But it's this weird cultural thing where this man has to be defended from the evil CHUDs. If a story can't hold up after even a cursory thought, like Rian Johnson's films often do. Then it's just got poor writing and a bad story. Acknowledging these things doesn't detract from a person liking it.
You really should click on the drinker's tweet and just scroll down.

it is amazing how much the replies are split between "what he said" and "bro, how dumb are you? way to prove the point!"

Every day just strengthens my resolve to kill all humans... (Rian Johnson just makes it seem like a good idea)
 
YOU SIMPLE FOOLS! I INTENDED TO MAKE A STUPID MOVIE ALL ALONG! Is the weirdest cope I have ever seen. It's just a dumb movie, written by a dumb man. For some reason people defend Rian Johnson and it has to be a political thing. Like he makes bad movies, they look nice, but he's a shit writer. But it's this weird cultural thing where this man has to be defended from the evil CHUDs. If a story can't hold up after even a cursory thought, like Rian Johnson's films often do. Then it's just got poor writing and a bad story. Acknowledging these things doesn't detract from a person liking it.

After all that, the Lard of Lynn shouldn't throw stones at over-analyzing. He's a shitty blue curtain reviewer who has probably espoused death of the author as a source of valid interpretations of media.
It really is retarded and sums up Roundhead's MO. He seems obsessed with trying to come off as smarter than he is, always trying and failing to effectively subvert expectations. In this latest attempt, he made a dumb movie but dressed it up as a smart one, only to pull the rug out from under the audience at the last minute and say "haha, no, it was actually a dumb movie all along!" That doesn't automatically make it smart just because you were self-aware about it. A movie made intentionally dumb is still dumb.

Worse still, you've wasted your audience's time and money for a lackluster eleventh hour "twist," basically telling them that their investment in the story was for nothing. If it were a five minute short, that would be one thing, but for a whole movie, you need to have the twist be a damn good one or you're just going to piss the audience off.

If the RT scores are anything to go by, either general audiences and critics found it entertaining despite being stupid, or they really are that dumb and thought it was actually clever. Or maybe they're more forgiving because it's on Netflix and they didn't have to buy a ticket, I dunno.
 
All work is real work -- except truck-driving and coal mining.
View attachment 4222800
I stand firmly behind this opinion:
ChangeMyMind-MVB_Nazi.jpg

Think about it: How would Moviebob's statement read if you replaced "MAGA-Trash™" with any random racial profile, any random religious profile, or any random political profile?

And no work is more important than drawing cartoon.
View attachment 4222984

"Heartbreak"
View attachment 4222951

View attachment 4223008
To use a simile that I'm sure even Bobby can understand...
Assuming Moviebob is smart enough to do so, of course.
...studios scrapping finished movies and cartoon shows is exactly like McD throwing away fried McNuggets that they couldn't sell at the end of the day.
Good point. Though, in contrast, a finished cartoon differs from Chicken McNuggets in that the former can be purchased and given a second life; once the McNuggets are thrown out, they're gone forever (then again, maybe not, given the McNuggets' ingredient listing).



Moviebob: "Republicans."

Reality: "Judges?"



Some litterbox liner called Washington Post claims the GOP has "year after year, systematically destroys the norms and institutions of democracy"
View attachment 4223183
And yet Moviebob wants all those who dared deny Führer Hillary her rightful place in D.C. six years ago to be exiled, enslaved, or executed.



CRT
View attachment 4222976
Tell me why children, or for that matter anyone who aren't interested in the history of that era, has to learn about Emmett Till. I don't insist math teachers teach that Évariste Galois died at the age of 20 in a duel.
Remind me again: Which party is the one actively trying to cover up its own racist history, as well as its own current strain of virulent racism? (Hint: It's the party whose mascot is a jackass.)



Oh Jesus Christ! The Pope of Atheism has created another scandal!
View attachment 4223092
Unlike Moviebob, the Babylon Bee's jokes are actually funny.



You know why nobody mourns the loss of Moviebob's brain cells? You can't mourn what never existed in the first place.



" LaRoucheite scum" aren't supposed to share their thoughts on movies. Thus sayeth Gatekeeper Robert.
View attachment 4223086
There aren't any adults in the room, nor are there teenages, nor are there elementary school students. Guess you're stuck with a preschooler named Moviebob.



More on artists' rights. Bobby is in favor of "discussion" rather than "fuck you we are going to shut it down".
View attachment 4223098
Unless, of course, you're an artist who refused to bend the knee for Führer Hillary. In which case...
And I repeat:
ChangeMyMind-MVB_Nazi.jpg

And, no, I do not regret making this statement of opinion.
 
At this point I assume Bob survives because not even the Grim Reaper wants to touch him.


EDIT: Whoops! Forgot to put what I discovered here since this looked like a juicy tweet chain.
View attachment 4225343

View attachment 4225352

View attachment 4225356

What's funny are all the people on twitter going "that's cringe" to CYBERGEM - whereas I dunno if he knows the moviebob deep lore or not, but it is hilarious to see him hitting moviebob right where it hurts. Like challenging a muslim to a koran trivia challenge, he's hitting the poor guy right in the holy text.


But they expect results!

View attachment 4225234

*eye twitch*

Justice League is one of my favorite shows so I'm fighting the urge not to just flip out here. I'll just say: "even THIS SHOW knew the best course was to retool itself into a whole different thing after"

NO YOU DUMB MORON! The story arc of Cadmus was concluded by this episode. So the next season (the final one) had a different story arc.

Also on freakin' wikipedia so I know you have no excuse: "According to Stephen Harber, the episode was originally intended to be the series finale for Justice League Unlimited and the DCAU in general." That it got unexpectedly picked up for a 3rd season by cartoon network is pretty damn common knowledge!

(also fuck off blue guy with that homo bullshit - if anything the elements to the scene are more about forcefully detransitioning someone so back away before I really try triggering you)
1673307053453.png


I think it's obvious cybergem doesn't know who moviebob is. Nor does the person know the Deep Moviebob lore. It's simply a case of Moviebob being moviebob, replying to shit out of nowhere.

Funny thing about the warp potion thing that cybergem mentioned earlier. I didn't NEED nintendo power to find those. I took a potion, opened it over a pot, and hopped in because "I WONDER WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF I DO THIS!" because duh, we knew the deep lore of SMB1, where a certain kind of weird crouching jump near the exit of world 1-2 underground would send you to a warp zone that led to world -1 which was a glitch of endless swimming levels. Or the million extra men using a stair and a turtle. I knew Nintendo Power was out there, but we didn't get it. After all, half the fun was figuring out the tricks/secrets/cheats yourself.

I bet moviebob doesn't even know about the teleporting tanks in Atari's Combat.

Also, does Bob really not remember how Justice League/Justice League Unlimited panned out?! Homoerotic scene? My dude in christ on twitter, that's BRAINIAC. A LITERAL COMPUTER. Computers can't be bundles of sticks.
 
Regarding Glass Onion, I have no desire to watch it, mostly because it didn't sound that good, and if I wanted to watch Daniel Craig walking around talking like a hick for a couple hours, I'd rewatch Logan Lucky.

One thing from what I've seen, it sounds like by the old definition of Fair-Play detective stories, I'm pretty sure that the plot of Glass Onion actually fails. To my thinking, just from seeing some reviews, it fails the spirit of rule 5, 6, and 10.

For those who didn't have my high school literature curriculum, and if you did, hello fellow alumni, the 10 rules were a set of rules to try and ensure that mystery authors were writing stories that could reasonably solved by the reader if they were paying attention, and avoiding stupid bullshit i.e. Rule 2, you can't have the mystery resolved via the supernatural, though the general exception is if you actually set it up in the story.

Though as for the rules it breaks, I'm going to just list what I know off the top of my head, though take it more or less with a grain of salt, as I haven't watched it, and have no intention to. The rules were created in 1928 by Father Ronald Knox.

5: No Chimaman must figure in the story: Basically, the idea was, the villain shouldn't be identifiable by just being the obvious ethnic target with no deeper motivation, in Knox's time, that was the Chineese. Personally, at this point, I'm pretty sure the fact that everyone guessed that the straight white guy was the villain, which means you may as well not have even concealed the fact.

6: No accident must ever help the detective, nor must he ever have an unaccountable intuition which proves to be correct: From what I heard, the vast majority of clues are gathered more or less by Daniel Craig stumbling onto people to eavesdrop on, and they just unintentionally feed him necessary information.

10. Twin brothers, and doubles generally, must not appear unless we have been duly prepared for them: From what I understand, Andy is impersonating her dead twin sister, which characters should reasonably know, but don't. Not as sure on this one, but it sounded retarded when I heard it, and it sounds like the plot would shatter into about a billion pieces if she didn't have a twin. This also breaks Rule 8 which means that when the detective finds a clue, the viewer should be aware as well, when the film does flashbacks and literally adds more characters into the scene, and Andy had evidence that she doesn't reveal until later, because of breaking rule 10.

Anyway, enough Lit 101 autism. The whole subverting expectations is so nonsensical when people do it for its own sake. Its literally the "I was just pretending to be a retard" meme.

"Do you promise that your detectives shall well and truly detect the crimes presented to them using those wits which it may please you to bestow upon them and not placing reliance on nor making use of Divine Revelation, Feminine Intuition, Mumbo Jumbo, Jiggery-Pokery, Coincidence, or Act of God?"
-GK Chesterton British Detection Club Oath
 
Some litterbox liner called Washington Post claims the GOP has "year after year, systematically destroys the norms and institutions of democracy"
View attachment 4223183
All the Founders did not own slaves. As a proud Thinker in Massachusetts Bob would know that slavery was abolished there in 1783 and there was not a single slave in the state during the first Census. Both John Adams and John Quincy Adams were notable opponents of slavery from the Founding era (and Massachusetts) who rose to the Presidency. Other Founders, including some slave owners, had more complex views about slavery than blind approval. Opposition to the international slave trade was so mainstream that the Founders only wrote a temporary pause on banning it into the Constitution and it was then banned immediately (as called for by the slave owner President Jefferson) without much complaint. Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Vermont all began gradual emancipation before the Founding. The Northwest Territory also notably banned slavery which led to Ohio being the first state to ban slavery in its state constitution.

This is aside from the fact that slavery was generally not tenable in what Bob now considers the Thinker states so without even checking we can presume it unlikely that many of the Founders from those states would have owned slaves since they would have needed to build their wealth in other ways. We can consider it doubly unlikely for those who lived in NYC, Boston, Philadelphia, etc. because they probably did not own the land to do it even if we could hypothesize a possible house slave despite this also running against the culture of those areas.

View attachment 4222988
Someone help me parse this mother of run-on sentences.
Blankzilla (and Bob) does not understand how large "a bit in their year end finances" for a multi-billion dollar corporation can be when they realize the tax savings for a "whole ass 67 million dollar superhero movie" that looked like shit they dumped.

View attachment 4223434
If only Bob had abandoned his self-censorship policy for Inside Job earlier, he might have saved this no doubt brilliant cartoon that for some reason I've never seen anything about anywhere. To quote Dr. Ron Paul, "If only you had cared, when it actually mattered."
Just wanted to again point out how Bob says he missed a TV show because he "work for a living" despite spending all day on Twitter and his job being to watch shit in the first place.

Believe it or not, yes this is completely accurate to Foucult's communism theory. (I think i got the name right) You basically must always be revolutionary because otherwise if you stop, the last revolution becomes the new status quo, ergo fascist.

I'm not even lying, this is quite literally their literature.
Not just Foucault, a very common theory among communists as the revolutionary class is never defined. Mao independently developed the same idea and was his justification for the Cultural Revolution.

This, of course, makes complete logical and rational sense if you look at the basic assumptions of communism. The Party rules under the dictatorship of the proletariat in which there is a single class interest as defined by whatever The Party wants, therefore any opposition of any kind to The Party (including making mistakes or failing to achieve goals which only happens because of not adhering to theory properly) aligns you with the reactionary counterrevolutionary forces that are always secretly conspiring to overthrow the revolution and restore capitalism. Communism as enacted by The Party through the revolution is completely perfect so if utopia has not yet occurred, which will always be the case, this means someone is undermining The Party and the revolution and who would do that other than fascists/capitalists? Never is the theory or The Party to be questioned, it's perfect after all as the proletariat is perfect and cannot make errors and The Party is the proletariat embodied, so the focus needs to be placed on finding the enemies of the revolution/people, especially those who have infiltrated The Party to carry out their schemes.

The Cultural Revolution, like most other purges, helped show the completely predictable obvious thing that would happen. Everybody accused everybody else of being counterrevolutionaries and claiming that they most perfectly adhered to theory. Which only re-enforced that fact that all of this would be decided by the state and The Party (aka Mao since he was the embodiment of Mao Zedong Thought, the perfect theory of the proletariat) based on who it personally favored. (Something that of course mandated the creation of actual secret conspiracies, especially since public disagreement was not allowed, which would then be used to justify the purges of the losers while ignoring the secret conspiracies of the winners.)

It helps you read the sinister intent behind the "personal is the political" and "everything is political" slogans, they aren't observations they're the goal. When everything is political then the political institutions are the ones that decide for you. In a constitutional liberal democracy with free speech this might be acceptable in some respects, in a totalitarian state based on a black and white Good/Thinkers/Marvel vs. Evil/Believers/DC struggle theory it goes the only way it can go: where people sit and when people clap and what people watch/read and all disputes become political acts that the state resolves solely based on its interests. And good sons send their mom to be executed for saying toxic things in private conversations:
1673328147106.png
 
Regarding Glass Onion, I have no desire to watch it, mostly because it didn't sound that good, and if I wanted to watch Daniel Craig walking around talking like a hick for a couple hours, I'd rewatch Logan Lucky.

One thing from what I've seen, it sounds like by the old definition of Fair-Play detective stories, I'm pretty sure that the plot of Glass Onion actually fails. To my thinking, just from seeing some reviews, it fails the spirit of rule 5, 6, and 10.

For those who didn't have my high school literature curriculum, and if you did, hello fellow alumni, the 10 rules were a set of rules to try and ensure that mystery authors were writing stories that could reasonably solved by the reader if they were paying attention, and avoiding stupid bullshit i.e. Rule 2, you can't have the mystery resolved via the supernatural, though the general exception is if you actually set it up in the story.

Though as for the rules it breaks, I'm going to just list what I know off the top of my head, though take it more or less with a grain of salt, as I haven't watched it, and have no intention to. The rules were created in 1928 by Father Ronald Knox.

5: No Chimaman must figure in the story: Basically, the idea was, the villain shouldn't be identifiable by just being the obvious ethnic target with no deeper motivation, in Knox's time, that was the Chineese. Personally, at this point, I'm pretty sure the fact that everyone guessed that the straight white guy was the villain, which means you may as well not have even concealed the fact.

6: No accident must ever help the detective, nor must he ever have an unaccountable intuition which proves to be correct: From what I heard, the vast majority of clues are gathered more or less by Daniel Craig stumbling onto people to eavesdrop on, and they just unintentionally feed him necessary information.

10. Twin brothers, and doubles generally, must not appear unless we have been duly prepared for them: From what I understand, Andy is impersonating her dead twin sister, which characters should reasonably know, but don't. Not as sure on this one, but it sounded retarded when I heard it, and it sounds like the plot would shatter into about a billion pieces if she didn't have a twin. This also breaks Rule 8 which means that when the detective finds a clue, the viewer should be aware as well, when the film does flashbacks and literally adds more characters into the scene, and Andy had evidence that she doesn't reveal until later, because of breaking rule 10.

Anyway, enough Lit 101 autism. The whole subverting expectations is so nonsensical when people do it for its own sake. Its literally the "I was just pretending to be a retard" meme.

"Do you promise that your detectives shall well and truly detect the crimes presented to them using those wits which it may please you to bestow upon them and not placing reliance on nor making use of Divine Revelation, Feminine Intuition, Mumbo Jumbo, Jiggery-Pokery, Coincidence, or Act of God?"
-GK Chesterton British Detection Club Oath
Glass Onions failure as an actual detective story is simpler than that. Rian Johnson is a first year film student that never experienced or accepted the crushing failure that every first year film student that actually SHOULD succeed in the industry has to go through in order to get over themselves and create something better.

The industry has become so political, nepotistic and narcissistic though that retards like Rian Johnson only ever "succeed" and never "fail" when they are confronted by brain dead hollywood execs who actually hold the money purse. The only people who hold the same opinions are luddites like Bob.
 
Regarding Glass Onion, I have no desire to watch it, mostly because it didn't sound that good, and if I wanted to watch Daniel Craig walking around talking like a hick for a couple hours, I'd rewatch Logan Lucky.

One thing from what I've seen, it sounds like by the old definition of Fair-Play detective stories, I'm pretty sure that the plot of Glass Onion actually fails. To my thinking, just from seeing some reviews, it fails the spirit of rule 5, 6, and 10.

For those who didn't have my high school literature curriculum, and if you did, hello fellow alumni, the 10 rules were a set of rules to try and ensure that mystery authors were writing stories that could reasonably solved by the reader if they were paying attention, and avoiding stupid bullshit i.e. Rule 2, you can't have the mystery resolved via the supernatural, though the general exception is if you actually set it up in the story.

Though as for the rules it breaks, I'm going to just list what I know off the top of my head, though take it more or less with a grain of salt, as I haven't watched it, and have no intention to. The rules were created in 1928 by Father Ronald Knox.

5: No Chimaman must figure in the story: Basically, the idea was, the villain shouldn't be identifiable by just being the obvious ethnic target with no deeper motivation, in Knox's time, that was the Chineese. Personally, at this point, I'm pretty sure the fact that everyone guessed that the straight white guy was the villain, which means you may as well not have even concealed the fact.

6: No accident must ever help the detective, nor must he ever have an unaccountable intuition which proves to be correct: From what I heard, the vast majority of clues are gathered more or less by Daniel Craig stumbling onto people to eavesdrop on, and they just unintentionally feed him necessary information.

10. Twin brothers, and doubles generally, must not appear unless we have been duly prepared for them: From what I understand, Andy is impersonating her dead twin sister, which characters should reasonably know, but don't. Not as sure on this one, but it sounded retarded when I heard it, and it sounds like the plot would shatter into about a billion pieces if she didn't have a twin. This also breaks Rule 8 which means that when the detective finds a clue, the viewer should be aware as well, when the film does flashbacks and literally adds more characters into the scene, and Andy had evidence that she doesn't reveal until later, because of breaking rule 10.

Anyway, enough Lit 101 autism. The whole subverting expectations is so nonsensical when people do it for its own sake. Its literally the "I was just pretending to be a retard" meme.

"Do you promise that your detectives shall well and truly detect the crimes presented to them using those wits which it may please you to bestow upon them and not placing reliance on nor making use of Divine Revelation, Feminine Intuition, Mumbo Jumbo, Jiggery-Pokery, Coincidence, or Act of God?"
-GK Chesterton British Detection Club Oath
Having looked through the twitter threads about this shit, it really does seem like Drinker could've avoided spawning all this autism if he had just posted the review and left it at that. People really don't like to be told they're wrong for enjoying something, especially when it comes to subversive media. If you give them an inch to be a victim, they'll take a mile.
 
Back