Bob Chipman / Robert Lewis Chipman / MovieBob / Game OverThinker - "Coastal Elite Thinker" who wants conservatives, Christians and manual workers eradicated. Universally ignorant; cannot tell reality from sci-fi. Sore loser with short fuse. Odious Disney shill. Tranny chaser and general creep. Fat and diabetic.

First some good news: WB has Youtube blocking Bobby's BvS masterpiece, citing copyrights violation.
View attachment 4338800


Another thing that gives Bobby dopamine hits are Whedonesque dialogue: smartass, mood-discordant quips, which shows how the protag is quick-witted and unflappable, just like, you know, Bobby himself! Bobby continues the media-literate treatise on such quips:
View attachment 4338242

The other participants might be "media illiterate", but they understands writing much better than Bobby does.
View attachment 4338830
You are not much of a screenwriter if you rely on a kid with cancer to write your dialogue.

View attachment 4338824

View attachment 4338317
"Ain't broke, don't fix". What if it is broke?

View attachment 4338471
And that is terrible writing that has since become Obsolete. Fix screenwriting. Please.

View attachment 4338328

Those who can, do; those who can't, tweet.
View attachment 4338286

View attachment 4338834

View attachment 4338440

Let's turn to another form of bad writing concerning wisecracks: anachronism.
View attachment 4338483
I don't know what is GnG but Bobby sure is fixated with Snyder.


Don't pay attention to Trump. Pay attention to us because we are being deplatformed on social media!
View attachment 4338360

Meanwhile the government of some CIA-propped shithole country censors the internet.
View attachment 4338487

View attachment 4338491

If you remind trannies how much they love Harry Potter, you are making them feel unsafe, while Bobby continue to dream of Rowling going broke and selling the franchise.
View attachment 4338808
Future generations of kids will have their own fads. Terf or not, Rowling's books are designed to be entertainment ephemeria.

They are coming for your kids, not us! (Because we are cuming for your kids).
View attachment 4338331

View attachment 4338372

View attachment 4338356

I presume Bobby tried "no white supremacy" at home, and this is the result: behold a world without white supremacy!
View attachment 4338343


An actor appearing in more than one film = crossover! I admit I'm media illiterate.
View attachment 4338392

View attachment 4338436

Jet Li recognized that Hollywood scum want to motion-capture his moves and keep them as their "intellectual property", and he refused to give them the chance.
View attachment 4338456

View attachment 4338460

The Razzies are not woke enough for Bobby.
View attachment 4338443

Cartoon:
View attachment 4338295

View attachment 4338395


View attachment 4338396


View attachment 4338407

View attachment 4338273

Creep
View attachment 4338368

Soon Seth Rogen will learn about the rotund wonder from Boston.
View attachment 4338415
GnG = the Geeks + Gamers youtube channel, btw.


Bob is being exceptional here with the "X actor plays this and if they go on Other Show, there will be a [inspiration/demand for a] "crossover!" NO, Bob. That's NOT how crossovers work. That's not even how most crossovers START. Crossovers happen because the company or companies involved WANT it to happen. Like that time there was a crossover between Magnum, P.I. and Murder, She Wrote, way back in the 1980s. Both shows are products of Universal Studios. The first part of the crossover occurred on Magnum, P.I., and the second part occurred on Murder, She Wrote during the same week. (IIRC the Magnum P.I. episode was on either the night before, or two nights before the Murder, She Wrote.

There was also a crossover with Magnum, P.I. and Simon & Simon, done in a similar manner. However, the reruns of Simon & Simon didn't contain the conclusion episode to the Magnum, P.I. crossover until the DVD release. They wanted to do a Quantum Leap crossover with Scott Bakula's Dr. Sam Beckett leaps into Thomas Magnum's body, in 1992, after Magnum, P.I. had been cancelled, but there is little but test footage including Sam Beckett mimicking Magnum's eyebrow-raising bit.
Then there was the New Scooby-Doo Movies, which were often multi-part affairs with 1 hour episodes instead of the usual 30 min, that had guest stars including The Addams Family (animated version already existed), Phyllis Diller, Dick Van Dyke, Don Knotts, Batman and Robin twice (Superfriends style with Olan Soule and Casey Kasem voices since this was Hanna-Barbera), Josie and the Pussycats (another concurrent Hanna-Barbera series that made all of the sense to cross over with), Speed Buggy, Johnathan Winters, Don Adams, the Harlem Globetrotters, Tim Conway, The Three Stooges, Laurel & Hardy, Mama Cass, Sonny & Cher, Davy Jones from the Monkees, etc.

As you can imagine, negotiating the rights for crossover characters to include on DVD can be a nightmare, and it was no less so for The New Scooby Doo Movies, although Warner got its act together and finally included most of the missing episodes (minus the Addams Family one "Wednesday is Missing" for some reason).

Despite being in the same "universe", there were really only two minor crossover points between the animated series of G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero, and The Transformers. Of course the comics did crossovers with the two series all the damn time (see ANY "GI Joe vs Transformers" comic EVER), but the only real sign of it in Transformers was evident in Season 3, owing to the fact that 1) Marissa Faireborn was the daughter of Flint AKA Dashiel Faireborne (and Lady Jaye), and a Quintesson mock-up of Flint was used in the Transformers episode "The Killing Jar". It even had Flint's voice (Bill Ratner). The second point of crossover was in the episode "Only Human" which contained "Old Snake" AKA Cobra Commander. The entire plot of the episode revolved around a previous Cobra technology developed by Zartan, the Synthoids. But this version of Synthoid tech didn't work the same as it had in the G.I. Joe episode 2 parterThe Synthoid Conspiracy - in the G.I. Joe episode, Synthoids could be destroyed by a self-destruct button on a device that controlled them. If it had worked the same way, it probably would have been the end of Springer, Arcee, Rodimus Prime, and Ultra Magnus, LOL.
Now I am an absolute crossover addict - dopamine hits after all lol - plus being much older than Bob I'm pretty sure that despite lacking bullshit "media/film studies" credentials, I understand a hell of a lot better about how crossovers come to be and actually work, than Bob does. You don't need years of college to become a media sperg. You just need to watch lots of television.

NEITHER of those women are 10's. The first one is a 7 at best, the second one, less than that.

LOL stomped his balls for the whole world to see, that's the best description of Bob getting cucked by Lindsay Ellis that I've ever seen.

I don't even think he like Marvel movies, I think the only thing Robert likes is twitter and the politics of it, because outside of that lens, what else does Robert has to say about Movies besides the "teh-he I'm a silly boy that likes munkey movies" bullshit that Robert posts as if he is a 15 year old girl trying to be cute.

And even this defending of "Marvel movies", comes from that. It is a jerk reaction, as much Robert claims to not "defend the mouse", whenever someones bitches about Marvel shit, here comes Robert with the same "Oh please, whatch other movies and learn media literacy" (and I hate this new concept of media literacy, but that's for another day). And that is because Robert perceives Marvel criticism coming from the other political side.

And I agree somewhat that marvel criticsm is getting tiresomes, at this point I just don't see a reason to be even bothered by the sausage factory movie making from Disney, or even they politics, if you haven't moved on from the fucking "go woke, go broke" talks, then I feel that is on you now. I don't like the "watch other movies" shit, because that is condescending dick talk, but we do like in a golden age of acess, you can watch anything anywhere, so, you know, give it a break from the capeshit eh?

Said that, Jesus, Robert goes on this shit in the worst way possible, dismissing any criticism people might have with the Marvel capeshit with "well, it has been done before, and it wasn't bad then, but it bad now, huhhhh???" which is a fucking dishonest argument, if the "it has been done before" is worth anything, why stop at 80's movies, why not go, I dunno, to fucking Jane Austen in the 18ths and quo the quippy banter from Elizabeth and Mr.Darcy, or even further. The point isn't the fucking Dialogue per si, it is the factory rancid smell that stinks up these marvel Movies making them feel stale and played out, but Robert pretents it is just about the dialogue.

And then he does dishonest shit like this:

View attachment 4339030

And as a last fuck you, we have this gem:

View attachment 4339036

I refuse to believe that in 1991 people on theather were chuckling at the "meta gag" riffing on one liners, thisa meta shit and other "moviemaking" lingo people use on social media now is from watching some crappy video essays on youtube and coming out talking as if they just came out from their "cinema 101" class.

Even if James Cameron thought of this as a "meta joke" as Robert described while jerking off a dolphin, who the fuck would "get" that besides droks like Robert who think they know every intention from movie makers.
Eh, that's just Bob giving his Blue Curtain Analyst side time to shine.
 
I looked up this Pajit (Ramanujan) and as a matter of fact he was some sort of math genius but he was so advanced that it seems that most who looked upon his formulas like they were hieroglyphics.
This is not quite true. Ramanujan did not have knowledge the state-of-the-art Math of the time but derived much of the same result on his own. So when he sent his results to Cambridge -- how would he be able to do it had India not a British colony at that time? -- his work was dismissed as old hat. Yet one mathematician, Littlewood, saw something very original in it so he fetched Ramanujan out of the shithole.

Brother Alpha is retarded to imagine Ramanujan being born in England. The given fact is that he was born in India, and it was exactly the colonial link that allowed him to at least stake a claim in the mathematician circle. Ramanujan is also a Believer (Hinduism).

It's the most consistently astonishing thing about Positron's updates: they arrive at least once a day, sometimes more, and they're always gigantic. I'm frankly amazed Bob gets anything else done at all; he lives on Twitter.
Bobby was not the worse Twitter addict by far. Luke Lockhart and the late Arthur Chu tweeted far more.
 
Last edited:
It's true, while they were useful allies, they didn't exactly turn the tide for the rebellion in that battle.
Also spinning off of this whole thing I want to point outside the movies because the brilliance of The Thrawn Trilogy is that it operates from the premise that The Empire isn't defeated after Return of the Jedi and can still win if someone can fill the gap of Palpatine and Vader being gone. Obviously the "good guys" still win (though not a complete victory which is what makes the EU better than the Disney reboot) but Bob misses the point that it's not fun if the good guys win just because they're the good guys, we want to see them struggle against great, maybe even impossible, odds before they win. Everyone loves Empire because the Rebellion isn't winning at all, The Empire basically outsmarts and overpowers them at every turn. The Last Jedi similarly shows the neo-Rebellion being all but wiped out and their savior dying alone on a distant planet. It's yet another instance where Bob's own example works against the argument he's trying to make but he doesn't seem aware of it at all because he seems to not even understand what a plot is let alone what happens in them.

First some good news: WB has Youtube blocking Bobby's BvS masterpiece, citing copyrights violation.
View attachment 4338800
YouTube did not "previously approve" or "pass the entire video upon upload and let it stand for several days without issue" because this isn't how copyright works. YouTube has added technology to try and automatically detect things it has a database of to block them at the upload point (including things like child porn) but this says nothing about copyright it's merely a convenience for YouTube and copyright holders are still required to actively enforce their own copyrights. YouTube is not empowered to make determinations about copyright, this is why they strike your video and require you to respond, you responding and the video staying up is not YouTube deciding you're not violating copyright it's the claimant refusing to enforce. The only alternative under the DMCA is YouTube ignoring your response not ignoring the original claim because doing that would make them liable if it's actual infringement. (Yes, of course YouTube is absolutely full of copyright infringement (something I personally contribute to occasionally) this doesn't make all those videos "fair use" it just means the holders aren't enforcing them, often deliberately because they see more value in stuff like clips of scenes being available to possibly convince someone to pay for the product than enforcing against these.)
 
Last edited:
Not only is MovieBob's job vulnerable to automation, it could be replaced today with tools that are 100% free.

First you open you ChatGPT and enter a prompt like "write a script for a nevative review of the movie Violent Night with jokes and wraparound sketches." After it's done, you go in manually to clean it up and fix any errors or inaccuracies. You don't even have to watch the movie, you can just cross reference other reviews for talking points.

Next, you get a free puppet-animation program. Something like Source Filmmaker if you're willing to put in a little effort, or something like GoAnimate if you wanna be lazy. Both programs automate lip sync based on whatever dialogue you enter. Film your reviewsona in front of a greenscreen. Even better: if you don't care about character's lip movements matching the words, you can make a set of canned animations for stock footage to use in every review.

Finally, now that you have a character speaking in front of a greenscreen, insert b-roll footage of a movie behind them, or a fake set with the video playing in a small screen.

In a single afternoon I'll have made a video on the exact same level of value and quality as Bob at a fraction of the time or effort.
 
To add onto the growing pile of "Drinker is the anti-Bob" sentiments, check out what his latest video happens to be: a succint 17-minute summation of pretty much all the various fuckups over the DCEU's tumultuous existence, including a section on BvS, of course.

Now, due to Bob's BvS compilation video being reviewed for copyright infringement (I suspect it'll come out the other side fine if the originals are still up, which they are), I can't check the viewcount for it, but I can compare it to the original uploads. Over the course of five years, just over 300k people actually managed to sit through the whole four hours, instead of doing literally anything else with their time.
1674812686871.png

Drinker's video, meanwhile, has nearly 400k views less than a day after being posted, and will easily pass the 626k needed to pass part 1 of Bobby's magnum opus.
1674812808775.png

Is this an entirely fair comparison? No, not really. People are more likely to want to watch shorter videos than epic movie-length video essays, so it's only logical that Drinker's upload gets more views in a shorter amount of time. But of course, I don't need to do a comparison of their normal outputs to show Drinker trouncing him there too, as you all well know. This was mostly just an amusing coincidence that I felt like pointing out.

I also have nothing against an autistic takedown of everything that caused a particular movie to fail, as long as it's entertaining and you're not just repeating yourself over and over, and without watching it I'm sure that Bob fails on both counts. It always felt like his BvS videos were created out of anger and rage that anyone would dare assail his precious MCU, not out of disappointment at something good being lost or amusement at how bad something turned out. Most of those "angry reviewers" from back in the day were playing a part, but Bob has always been genuinely angry at anything he isn't supporting, and I think the length is a testament to how mad he was about this movie's existence. Just doing a cursory search of BvS videos on Youtube, nothing else comes anywhere close in length to Bob ranting about it for four fucking hours. And then his hateboner for Snyder compels him to reupload the whole fucking thing again as one video.

Bob, buddy, friendo: do what you keep telling everyone else on Twitter to do and go fucking touch grass. It's capeshit. None of it is worth getting this mad over. Like @Bolo_the_Second said, it's simply tiresome to keep getting so worked up over this meaningless pablum, positive or negative. Move on.
 
Not only is MovieBob's job vulnerable to automation, it could be replaced today with tools that are 100% free.

First you open you ChatGPT and enter a prompt like "write a script for a nevative review of the movie Violent Night with jokes and wraparound sketches." After it's done, you go in manually to clean it up and fix any errors or inaccuracies. You don't even have to watch the movie, you can just cross reference other reviews for talking points.

Next, you get a free puppet-animation program. Something like Source Filmmaker if you're willing to put in a little effort, or something like GoAnimate if you wanna be lazy. Both programs automate lip sync based on whatever dialogue you enter. Film your reviewsona in front of a greenscreen. Even better: if you don't care about character's lip movements matching the words, you can make a set of canned animations for stock footage to use in every review.

Finally, now that you have a character speaking in front of a greenscreen, insert b-roll footage of a movie behind them, or a fake set with the video playing in a small screen.

In a single afternoon I'll have made a video on the exact same level of value and quality as Bob at a fraction of the time or effort.
Is it weird that I'm actually considering doing this just to see what the final result would be?

Here's the first review for Iron Man,

Prompt: Write a critical review of the movie Iron Man with jokes and trivia inserted throughout, 300 words

Response:
Iron Man, released in 2008, was a groundbreaking film that kickstarted the Marvel Cinematic Universe and solidified Robert Downey Jr.'s comeback as a leading man. But let's be real, it's not just the performances and special effects that make this movie so great - it's the clever quips and Easter eggs sprinkled throughout.

First off, let's talk about the man behind the iron mask, Tony Stark. Downey Jr. brings a level of charm and wit to the role that is unmatched. His one-liners and comebacks are enough to make even the most uptight Avenger crack a smile. And let's not forget about the iconic "I am Iron Man" reveal at the end of the film. That moment still gives me chills to this day.

The film also manages to balance action and humor in a way that most superhero movies struggle to do. The fight scenes are intense and visually stunning, but they're also punctuated by Stark's snarky commentary. And let's not forget about the iconic "I am Iron Man" reveal at the end of the film. That moment still gives me chills to this day.

But Iron Man isn't just about the laughs, it also raises some thought-provoking questions about the consequences of weapon manufacturing and the responsibility that comes with creating powerful technology. Stark's arc from selfish arms dealer to a true hero is one of the most compelling in the MCU.

One of the best things about the film is the inclusion of several nods to the comics, such as Stark's grey suit, which is a nod to the first Iron Man comics, and the appearance of Stan Lee as Hugh Hefner. Speaking of Stan Lee, his cameo in this film is one of my personal favorites and it still makes me smile every time I see it.

Overall, Iron Man is a fantastic film that set the bar high for the superhero genre and established the Marvel Cinematic Universe as a force to be reckoned with. It's a must-watch for any Marvel fan and even for those who aren't particularly fond of superhero movies. With its blend of humor, action, and emotional depth, Iron Man is a film that still holds up after all these years.

Wonder how long it would take for Bob to start screeching about the robots taking his jerbs!
 
Is it weird that I'm actually considering doing this just to see what the final result would be?

Here's the first review for Iron Man,

Prompt: Write a critical review of the movie Iron Man with jokes and trivia inserted throughout, 300 words

Response:
Iron Man, released in 2008, was a groundbreaking film that kickstarted the Marvel Cinematic Universe and solidified Robert Downey Jr.'s comeback as a leading man. But let's be real, it's not just the performances and special effects that make this movie so great - it's the clever quips and Easter eggs sprinkled throughout.

First off, let's talk about the man behind the iron mask, Tony Stark. Downey Jr. brings a level of charm and wit to the role that is unmatched. His one-liners and comebacks are enough to make even the most uptight Avenger crack a smile. And let's not forget about the iconic "I am Iron Man" reveal at the end of the film. That moment still gives me chills to this day.

The film also manages to balance action and humor in a way that most superhero movies struggle to do. The fight scenes are intense and visually stunning, but they're also punctuated by Stark's snarky commentary. And let's not forget about the iconic "I am Iron Man" reveal at the end of the film. That moment still gives me chills to this day.

But Iron Man isn't just about the laughs, it also raises some thought-provoking questions about the consequences of weapon manufacturing and the responsibility that comes with creating powerful technology. Stark's arc from selfish arms dealer to a true hero is one of the most compelling in the MCU.

One of the best things about the film is the inclusion of several nods to the comics, such as Stark's grey suit, which is a nod to the first Iron Man comics, and the appearance of Stan Lee as Hugh Hefner. Speaking of Stan Lee, his cameo in this film is one of my personal favorites and it still makes me smile every time I see it.

Overall, Iron Man is a fantastic film that set the bar high for the superhero genre and established the Marvel Cinematic Universe as a force to be reckoned with. It's a must-watch for any Marvel fan and even for those who aren't particularly fond of superhero movies. With its blend of humor, action, and emotional depth, Iron Man is a film that still holds up after all these years.

Wonder how long it would take for Bob to start screeching about the robots taking his jerbs!
That's astonishing. Now, for extra points, prompt it to write "in the style of MovieBob" and see what comes back.
 
Is it weird that I'm actually considering doing this just to see what the final result would be?

Here's the first review for Iron Man,

Prompt: Write a critical review of the movie Iron Man with jokes and trivia inserted throughout, 300 words

Response:
Iron Man, released in 2008, was a groundbreaking film that kickstarted the Marvel Cinematic Universe and solidified Robert Downey Jr.'s comeback as a leading man. But let's be real, it's not just the performances and special effects that make this movie so great - it's the clever quips and Easter eggs sprinkled throughout.

First off, let's talk about the man behind the iron mask, Tony Stark. Downey Jr. brings a level of charm and wit to the role that is unmatched. His one-liners and comebacks are enough to make even the most uptight Avenger crack a smile. And let's not forget about the iconic "I am Iron Man" reveal at the end of the film. That moment still gives me chills to this day.

The film also manages to balance action and humor in a way that most superhero movies struggle to do. The fight scenes are intense and visually stunning, but they're also punctuated by Stark's snarky commentary. And let's not forget about the iconic "I am Iron Man" reveal at the end of the film. That moment still gives me chills to this day.

But Iron Man isn't just about the laughs, it also raises some thought-provoking questions about the consequences of weapon manufacturing and the responsibility that comes with creating powerful technology. Stark's arc from selfish arms dealer to a true hero is one of the most compelling in the MCU.

One of the best things about the film is the inclusion of several nods to the comics, such as Stark's grey suit, which is a nod to the first Iron Man comics, and the appearance of Stan Lee as Hugh Hefner. Speaking of Stan Lee, his cameo in this film is one of my personal favorites and it still makes me smile every time I see it.

Overall, Iron Man is a fantastic film that set the bar high for the superhero genre and established the Marvel Cinematic Universe as a force to be reckoned with. It's a must-watch for any Marvel fan and even for those who aren't particularly fond of superhero movies. With its blend of humor, action, and emotional depth, Iron Man is a film that still holds up after all these years.

Wonder how long it would take for Bob to start screeching about the robots taking his jerbs!
That's the irony. Bob thinks a robot CAN'T take his Jerb. Because he's a Thinker ™️ and Robots are for Manual Labor, not Thinking Labor.

And if it does start happening, well, Bob can always Think ™️ about something else.
 
Didn't work out how I thought it would. Though it is vague and doesn't say much so it kind of resembles Bob.

Prompt: Write a critical review of Avengers in the style of Moviebob

Response: "Avengers: Endgame" is a fitting conclusion to a decade-long, 22-film narrative experiment - one that has proven to be an unprecedented success for Marvel Studios and the Walt Disney Company. While it may not be a perfect film, it's an immensely satisfying one that delivers on the promise of its gargantuan marketing campaign and years of buildup.

The film picks up where "Infinity War" left off, with the villainous Thanos having wiped out half of all life in the universe with the snap of his fingers. The remaining Avengers, along with a host of other heroes, set out to undo the damage and bring back their fallen comrades.

The film's first act is a bit of a slog, as the characters all deal with their grief and loss in various ways. But once the plot gets going, the film becomes an epic, time-traveling adventure that is both thrilling and emotionally resonant. The film is also filled with fan service and Easter eggs that will delight long-time Marvel fans.

The performances are all solid, with Robert Downey Jr. and Chris Evans delivering particularly strong turns as Iron Man and Captain America, respectively. The film also has some of the best visual effects and action scenes in the entire Marvel Cinematic Universe.

However, the film is not without its flaws. The film's pacing is uneven, and some of the humor falls flat. Additionally, the film's resolution feels a bit rushed, and some of the character arcs are left unresolved.

Overall, "Avengers: Endgame" is a fitting end to an ambitious and groundbreaking cinematic endeavor. While it may not be a perfect film, it's an immensely satisfying one that delivers on the promise of its gargantuan marketing campaign and years of buildup."
 
And like most addicts, he probably doesn't even realize he's doing it. Like an alcoholic who says their eighth drink is actually their third because they don't count them, Bob throws his ignorant opinions out into the wind and then immediately forgets he made them. But then again he is an idiot so we can't expect him to have a good memory.

Because he ties his success and self-worth to other properties instead of trying to accomplish goals himself. So if people say they're losing interest in the MCU, or have any criticisms against it, that's a direct attack against Bob.
Tying your self worth to a franchise is the sign you either have failed at life or have too much time on your hands. Blob has both. Some part of him knows this I reckon, which is why he defends it so hard; its all he has, like a wife, except you can't have sex with a DVD of Endgame.... well I guess you can try lol ;)
 
Didn't work out how I thought it would. Though it is vague and doesn't say much so it kind of resembles Bob.

Prompt: Write a critical review of Avengers in the style of Moviebob

Response: "Avengers: Endgame" is a fitting conclusion to a decade-long, 22-film narrative experiment - one that has proven to be an unprecedented success for Marvel Studios and the Walt Disney Company. While it may not be a perfect film, it's an immensely satisfying one that delivers on the promise of its gargantuan marketing campaign and years of buildup.

The film picks up where "Infinity War" left off, with the villainous Thanos having wiped out half of all life in the universe with the snap of his fingers. The remaining Avengers, along with a host of other heroes, set out to undo the damage and bring back their fallen comrades.

The film's first act is a bit of a slog, as the characters all deal with their grief and loss in various ways. But once the plot gets going, the film becomes an epic, time-traveling adventure that is both thrilling and emotionally resonant. The film is also filled with fan service and Easter eggs that will delight long-time Marvel fans.

The performances are all solid, with Robert Downey Jr. and Chris Evans delivering particularly strong turns as Iron Man and Captain America, respectively. The film also has some of the best visual effects and action scenes in the entire Marvel Cinematic Universe.

However, the film is not without its flaws. The film's pacing is uneven, and some of the humor falls flat. Additionally, the film's resolution feels a bit rushed, and some of the character arcs are left unresolved.

Overall, "Avengers: Endgame" is a fitting end to an ambitious and groundbreaking cinematic endeavor. While it may not be a perfect film, it's an immensely satisfying one that delivers on the promise of its gargantuan marketing campaign and years of buildup."
It's much more verbose so it fits perfectly.
 
That's the irony. Bob thinks a robot CAN'T take his Jerb. Because he's a Thinker ™️ and Robots are for Manual Labor, not Thinking Labor.

And if it does start happening, well, Bob can always Think ™️ about something else.
A.I. is taking a lot of Thinking jerbs already. Take engineering. Say you want a new engine for a jumbo jet with say...50% more effencicy and 20% more thrust. Engineers can eventually figure that out, but the AI doesn't get bored, doesn't sleep, and doesn't care about things like breaks or eating. Give it all the data of every engine you made before, and it'll figure it out, possibly exceeding expectations. People will still have to put that monster together, and things might have to be changed for ease of manufacturing, but AI is going to take care of a significant amount of grunt work. To say it can't write reviews as basic as Blob's is underestimating it to the extreme.
 
Not only is MovieBob's job vulnerable to automation, it could be replaced today with tools that are 100% free.
It is high time someone designed a busty GGI anime waifu and have it read out movie reviews generated by AI. If that doesn't outperform Bobby's channel I'll eat my kalimavkion.

As expected, the Laptop Class dreads being genocided by AI. Archive of the article that spilled a thousand cups of Lychee Oolong Frappuccinos on an equal number of Apple devices.
mad.png
No Bobby you are not being a snob, you are just being a dunce.

AI2.jpg

ai3.png

ap.png
We recommend throwing the AP Stylebook in the recycle bin.


Musk is an idiot; he wants to be fair to non-people.
people.png

nuts.png

white.png

Whatever science that goes against The Narrative automatically becomes "pseudoscience"
thiel.png

Someone hired Colin Kaepernick
nig.png

Something called "Casa Bonita".
casa.png


law.jpg
To be fair Roe v Wade is far worse than either in terms of the number of lives that mistake has costed, but it only won second place.

scott.jpg

green.png
Fox G. Green might be nutty but this time he is on the money: both American parties spare no effort vilifying the potential competitors of the jewish masterclass.

cia.jpg

groomers.jpg
OK groomers.

Bobby denies the incel-to-troon pipeline
transmax.png

hot2.png

mistake.png

"You're the most frightened things on Earth", says the man who begged The Escapist to buy him a blue checkmark because he and his family was "under threat"
vax.png
No one is talking about the shirt Bobby, and RL isn't some high-class brand.


Another non-person, Stephen Dorff, goes mask-off (archive) against capeshit.
dorff.png

His saving grace, though, is that he is hostile to Christopher Nolan.
dorff2.png

Bobby complains that non-people don't really want a serious Thor; they just want to shit on MCU.
thor.jpg

cheap.png

shield.png

gunn.png

shit1.png
No one gives a fuck about that Asian monkey cheese. Stop astroturfing.

Films have always been as political as they are now.
political.png


Space marine + girl + n(dinosaurs) = 65
65.png

simp.jpg

bro.png
He ain't heavy; he's my brother!
 
Last edited:
This is not quite true. Ramanujan did not have knowledge the state-of-the-art Math of the time but derived much of the same result on his own. So when he sent his results to Cambridge -- how would he be able to do it had India not a British colony at that time? -- his work was dismissed as old hat. Yet one mathematician, Littlewood, saw something very original in it so he fetched Ramanujan out of the shithole.

Brother Alpha is retarded to imagine Ramanujan being born in England. The given fact is that he was born in India, and it was exactly the colonial link that allowed him to at least stake a claim in the mathematician circle. Ramanujan is also a Believer (Hinduism).
I'll take your word on this. I just scanned the wiki article to get a run down of someone I've never heard of and don't care about, more or less just to confirm if he was someone who's work wasn't discovered until after his death.
TV show is a generous way of saying 2 part special that no one remembers
and the one clip I could be bothered to find of the troon talking which is also where the screen cap comes from
Take that W, tranny, I guess.
It's nice to see Lass Library pop back up and unchanged.
 
This:
First some good news: WB has Youtube blocking Bobby's BvS masterpiece, citing copyrights violation.
View attachment 4338800
Followed by this:
If you remind trannies how much they love Harry Potter, you are making them feel unsafe, while Bobby continue to dream of Rowling going broke and selling the franchise.

View attachment 4338808
Future generations of kids will have their own fads. Terf or not, Rowling's books are designed to be entertainment ephemeria.

Blob cries about big corp overreach while also celebrating the idea of big corp overreach. In what dystopia where big corps can just seize any IP they want from small creators would they not also try to destroy fair use of that IP?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Koby_Fish
I'll take your word on this. I just scanned the wiki article to get a run down of someone I've never heard of and don't care about, more or less just to confirm if he was someone who's work wasn't discovered until after his death.

TV show is a generous way of saying 2 part special that no one remembers
and the one clip I could be bothered to find of the troon talking which is also where the screen cap comes from
Take that W, tranny, I guess.

It's nice to see Lass Library pop back up and unchanged.
God almighty, when they showed Hawkman and he just poses and screeched like a lunatic, I nearly fell out of my chair laughing. Also, the alleged troon barely talks, and I wouldn't say they had all that convincing of a woman's voice, but its hard for me to say if I'd assume they were a troon if someone hadn't said so beforehand, or if I'd just have thought she had a weird voice.
Has anyone fed all of Bob's tweets into an AI to create the perfect mistake?
I'd rather not give the future AI overlord a justifiable reason to kill me.
 
People are more likely to want to watch shorter videos than epic movie-length video essays,
Though on that front Bobby's also getting blown out of the water as Mauler's five hour and fifty minute (or, as Bob says "five and a half hour" because he forgot an hour has 60 minutes) Multiverse of Madness breakdown is about to pass 2.5 million views.
 
Back