- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Because Bob keeps bitching about it, I decided to look into the Twitter rules to see if the Moviebob Fan Club account is actually breaking any. I checked their pages on abuse and harassment and on misleading and deceptive identities.
For abusive content, I can't see anywhere that the fan club is in violation. The worst he's doing is also calling other users "not a person," but if Bob won't get banned for that, then that account won't either. Although the fan club tags Bob's account constantly, it's not doing so in a harassing manner, merely expressing adulation for Bob or yelling at others that they're harassing Bob. And if that gets under Bob's skin, he should be able to just block them and move on. He probably already has, but he keeps tabs on them to keep reporting in the hopes they get banned.
For misleading identities, again, it's not in violation. Specifically, it's managed to stick to the guidelines to show that it's a parody account, by including "fan" in the account name and clearly stating it's not affiliated with Bob in the bio.
Now, to you and me, it's obvious that this is a troll, but whoever it is, he's a smart one. He's playing everything by the book to avoid getting banned but still doing things to annoy Bobbo. By Twitter's own policies, nothing he's doing can get him terminated from the service, and that's what makes it even funnier. Bob's whining is more impotent than usual.
Well gee, I'm sure the intersection between "black female artists" and "climate justice" is really fucking huge. Never mind that it's already going to be hard to find works that fit that theme, but to go and bitch about low representation in an already tiny field is the peak of first world problems.Speaking of "art and knowledge work", here is an example. I'm sure the person who made it suffered her way to the bank.
![]()
Citation needed for cultures that thought there were more than two sexes. Don't give me that "two-spirit" bullshit either. Literally everyone knew that there are men and there are women, and it's only in the modern age that we have people trying to push the idea that there's anything else. Case in point:
Imagine trying to spin the David Reimer tragedy as anything but a horrific incident that should never have occurred. Imagine trying to spin it as a positive. Troons are psychopaths.
Candace Owen's 30-minute video. I think Chadjaw Drennen is the one who twist the story to serve his goal.
Yeah, as @Ralph Barnhardt said, "I thought it was AI" isn't an excuse. But furthermore, there's an easy way to prove whether an image is AI-generated. By default, every image produced by Stable Diffusion has a watermark that shows it was created by an AI. There's an option in the settings to turn this off, though the popup does warn you that you may be behaving in an unethical manner by doing so. (Tor's being a bitch and not letting me upload a screenshot, but you can find it yourself if you have SD installed. Settings -> Saving images/grids -> "Do not add watermark to images" at the bottom of the page.)
However, if a pedo was trying to use "it was just AI" as an excuse, they wouldn't want to turn off that setting anyway because it would remove the evidence they needed. Not like it would help because it's still not a good excuse, but yeah. If there's no watermark, then either the image is legit or someone turned that setting off, both of which would be bad for a pedo. Bob is once again talking out of his ass because he doesn't understand shit about the things he's railing against.
Remember how he was excusing the Rat for using AI for the latest capeshit TV show's opening credits? I guess anything's fair game as long as it's the Good Guys doing it.