Bob Chipman / Robert Lewis Chipman / MovieBob / Game OverThinker - "Coastal Elite Thinker" who wants conservatives, Christians and manual workers eradicated. Universally ignorant; cannot tell reality from sci-fi. Sore loser with short fuse. Odious Disney shill. Tranny chaser and general creep. Fat and diabetic.

[REGENDarySumanai]

Companies have been bleeding employees and Bob sits here clapping like a seal. It's typical NPC behavior.

 

[Mr Processor]

And Bobby commented how Jones has injured more stunts on set than anyone else, as if that were a badge of honor.

Aha, Bobby is extra-retarded, as usual. Hopefully Jones at least felt bad about that.

Who are "we"? When I say Bobby is neither a Thinker nor Believer, but a Follower, I mean it. He is just a piece of iron pulled hither and thither by a magnet.

The worst thing about this video is Bob, a man who spends as much of his life as possible spewing incoherent and extreme rage on Twitter, claiming that he is above making rage videos.

 

[Vida]

The latest Bob's video is a somewhat interesting watch
Nothing too funny or outrageous like in previous videos. Nothing really worth clipping either.

The video covers some drama about youtuber Chris Stuckmann non review of Madam Web and the negative reaction to that video from other online reviewrs, like Mauler and yellow flash. Haven't seen the Stuckmann video but from the clips that Bob shows in the video he seems to cuck himself on saying the movie is bad and instead blames studio interferance and the bad working eviroment in Hollywood
This is just a springobard for Bob to say that he's "Superior" to all other reactionary right wing youtubers and that Marvel and Starwars are doing just fine. He also uses this to make his trademark "Do they even qualify as humans?" comments
He blames these reviewers for turning the internet into "your with us or agaisnt us" Despite the fact that Bob and his ilk do the same every second on X.

He moves on to jerk his own dick by saying that he never capitalize on the succes of his Pixels movie review and that he is truly amazing for not taking the angry reviewer route.
He compares himself to James Rolfe by metioning Rolfe's video on not covering the Female GhostBuster remake.
That just like him Bob takes the road of non anger and chooses to focus on more interesting topics. Even though Bob's best gal Lindsay Ellis gave James a lot of crap for that one video.

I recommendwatching to anyone interested if you have the time or while doing something else.

 

[Koby_Fish]

Who are "we"? When I say Bobby is neither a Thinker nor Believer, but a Follower, I mean it. He is just a piece of iron pulled hither and thither by a magnet.

This has to be one of the most hypocritical videos Bob has ever put out. Plus this idea of his "THIS MOVIE EXISTS", sounds like him trying to be clever but I doubt that will pan out.

Bobby jams in someone's Twitter thread, yet he accuses of the OP for randomly tumbling into his feed.

So, Bob thinks Jared Leto is a crime against TONE? Couldn't possibly be, oh, IDK, the guy likes Jared Leto's version of the Joker for some reason? Or wait, it is the simple fact of liking Jared Leto Joker that makes the other guy guilty of WrongThink and Wrongbelief and Wrongfact? Bob truly is The Kwisatz Tarderach.

Marvel Theorem: Good writing = pile as many non-sequitur as you can, multiply them with nostalgia bait, and index everything with "so it happened".

See, this is why I think Bob doesn't actually understand writing, semi-illiterate slob that he is, who is easily distracted by special effects, explosions, lesbicans, and CGI. Any form of scissoring is "good writing" in his book! If something makes no sense, Bob can just handwave it as "It's Space Wizards for Children with Impossible Magic Light Swords, Canon/Continuity doesn't Matter, It doesn't HAVE to make sense, friendo!" (Man, what does he have against Children, seriously?), unless he doesn't for something completely different that he'll complain doesn't make sense. I'm sure there's an example out there but it's slipped my brain.

I cannot figure out the connection between Coyote and the homeless problem. Can you? And if Coyote were a "labor of love" and if they were so sure that it would make money, why didn't someone buy it from WB, just as Angel Studio bought Sound of Freedom from The Rat?

apparently writing off Coyote vs Acme will mean some poor underpaid peons at WBD will never be paid and will become one of many meth/fentanyl-addled zombies on the streets of L.A.

How would that prostitute Azealia Banks kill Zaslav? With Monkeypox?

Here's a thought. What if Coyote vs Acme was canned because it wasn't "woke" ENOUGH?

This reminded me of an interview I saw with Danny Trejo of all people, nearly 10 years ago, and he made a comment, that while he said it in a much kinder way, people doing their own stunts were insecure idiots.

He pointed out, not only are the stunt people literally better at doing stunts, as they do it for a living, but God forbid, if someone gets hurt, and put out of commission, the movie can still go on, and not ruin the livelihood of everyone else on the production. They even have insurance, specifically for this reason. Beating the shit out of some rando hollywood stunt man isn't something you should be proud of, and seems like a definite sign that they should get a professional fighter to double you in those scenes.

Although, probably the funniest part of that interview was Danny Trejo apologizing to his stunt man for saying that they looked like him.

I think the situation with Grace Jones is she's such a GIANT, it'd be hard to find a stunt double for her.

If Robert and Fat Rick are any indication, therapy doesn't work.

For therapy to work on an autist AND narcissist, the therapist would have to 1) be versed in autism treatment, because regular therapy DOES NOT work for autists and 2) be able to recognize and treat narcissistic behaviors (even if they can't call it that in childhood). Bob's complex set of disorders meant the "therapy" (most likely "counselling" which is one grade down), was doomed to fail from the start.

 

[Positron]

I think the situation with Grace Jones is she's such a GIANT, it'd be hard to find a stunt double for her.

According to IMDB Jones is just 5'8". Wikipedia says 5'10½" (citation needed). Just get her a male stunt.

02Mar#01
DeSantis attempts to make U of Florida great again.


02Mar#02
In the other aisle, Musk gets cucked.

The "hate speech".


02Mar#03
Did someone mention Dylan Mulvaney? A caller just brought him a bunch of roses, some old bloke called Harry Turtledove.

My ideology, my choice, Harry.

02Mar#04
Oliver Lennard is transitioning into Jay Leno.

As if Ollie were stanger to luxury flats.

02Mar#05

The vast majority of transsexuals report they are actually the opposite sex. Doesn't mean that is true.

---

02Mar#06
Katt Williams recognizes that Hollywood is the Church of Baphomet, and that transsexualism is that church's warfare against the good.

Given Hollywood is overrun by ((())), what Williams said checks out.

02Mar#07
SJWs are loath to see their heroes grow old and problematic.

I cannot find anyone notable called "Emma Corwin", but there is one Emma Corrin in showbiz who goes by they/them.

02Mar#08

Not being familiar with the whole array of The Rat's live-action releases is not an indication of stupidity, and live-action remakes are live-action, and none of them has a reason to exist.

02Mar#09
Capeshit.


02Mar#10

Villeneuve's interview.

02Mar#11


02Mar#12

So refreshing to hear such adult conversation.

02Mar#13


02Mar#14
Today's ugly Cal-Arts cartoon.


02Mar#15

Jet Li wins hands down. Chan has no discipline and his physique was eroded by decades of womanizing.

 

[Mr Processor]

2024 is a very good year. Someone argues whether "game journalists" have more blood on their hands. Bobby's answer is typical.

That car Bob is complaining about has a standard PS5 installed in it. It isn't "the next Playstation" it's the same Playstation that is already out that you could buy for your room, Bob. I play most of my games on a $500 mini PC that has a decent AMD CPU with integrated graphics processing, it can run most modern games decently. I could probably have gotten away even cheaper than that if I had looked.

As to the games themselves. If you want to buy the latest big title at full price, yeah it'll cost you. If you wait long enough it'll go on sale. Wait even longer and it will get a permanent price drop. There's also indie games that sell for much cheaper, like Palworld.

As to games like Suicide Squad? Well, it was expensive, had a predatory pricing model and was complete trash as a game also. It deserves all the hate it got, and everyone who worked on it deserved to be fired and forced to change careers. Part of game shopping is avoiding games that are predatory. Avoiding games that have bad plots, graphics and gameplay is a good idea too.

 

[Arthur Morgan]

And Bobby commented how Jones has injured more stunts on set than anyone else, as if that were a badge of honor.

I'm glad Bob never got it in his head to try and get some local hopefuls to appear in his Game Overthinker 'action scenes'. He'd probably punch a guy for real and think that just meant he was so tough.

And I know this was almost nine years ago, but I doubt Bob knows this: Stunt people only get hurt when something goes wrong. If the stunt man got punched, someone was in the wrong place. If the car wrecks, it was either faulty or the driver fucked up. If Vic Morrow and two kids die, it does not mean John Landis did an awesome scene. By pointing out Grace Jones injured people on Conan, you are calling her a fuck up, not claiming she's a bad ass. You dumbass.

 

[King Dead]

Before I get into the latest round of Bob tweets, I found this segment from @Vida's description of Bob's latest vid entertaining:

He blames these reviewers for turning the internet into "your with us or agaisnt us" Despite the fact that Bob and his ilk do the same every second on X.

He moves on to jerk his own dick by saying that he never capitalize on the succes of his Pixels movie review and that he is truly amazing for not taking the angry reviewer route.

Who does he think he's fooling, honestly? Bob is probably one of the angriest, most hateful people I have ever seen, and he will waste no time in telling you why something he hates is the worst thing ever. Just because he isn't titling his videos with "[x] IS OVER NOW!" in all caps with a crying Mickey in the thumbnail doesn't mean he doesn't live off of hyperbole.

The only time that Bob has been genuine is when he posted shit like the Pixels review. True, unfiltered Bob is what you get when you scroll his Twitter feed for more than five seconds. Pretending to be above the teeming masses of reactionary YouTube critics is utterly laughable.

02Mar#05

The vast majority of transsexuals report they are actually the opposite sex. Doesn't mean that is true.

There's lies, there's damned lies, and there's statistics. Trannies don't want to make transitioning look like anything other than sunshine and roses, so of course the ones that actually respond to this survey aren't going to say that they're feeling worse afterward!

You want the truth, scroll through the Trannies Posting Their L's thread. When they're in their safe spaces, it's nothing but depression, anxiety, and abject misery.

02Mar#08

Not being familiar with the whole array of The Rat's live-action releases is not an indication of stupidity, and live-action remakes are live-action, and none of them has a reason to exist.

Can you really blame someone for thinking that Disney only produces live-action remakes of their animated movies, when those are the only movies that get promoted to hell and back? Sure, there are a lot of studios under the Rat's umbrella now, but note that Greenbaum is only the president of Walt Disney Pictures specifically, so he isn't responsible for anything that 20th Century produces, for instance.

But let's do an experiment. (Warning: this gets long.) How many of WDP's movies are live-action, and how many are live-action remakes? I'm not gonna go to the trouble of looking at their entire output, but let's just look solely at the last few years (and also because the Wikipedia article starts at 2020 so that's a convenient place to begin). Here's how it breaks down:

	Theatrical	Disney+
Animated	7	9
Live-Action (remake)	2	3
Live-Action (other)	4	21

A couple notes about this table:

1. Any movie that had a simultaneous release in theaters and on D+ I counted solely as a theatrical release.
2. Two of the Live-Action (other) movies were Jungle Cruise and Haunted Mansion, so depending on how you treat a movie based on a theme park ride, the numbers could be 4 and 2 for theatrical releases.
3. Of the two remaining, one was The Beatles: Get Back - The Rooftop Concert, which was just the concert footage that was given a very limited theatrical release. If you decide not to include that, then it becomes 4 and 1.
4. The only other movie was Indiana Jones 5, which is merely a sequel nobody wanted to a series that should have stayed dead.

At a glance, Bob's correct, there are way more Disney live-action movies than just remakes. Herein lies the rub, though: the overwhelming majority of them are low-budget films that are D+ fodder. That's not to say that there isn't a place for such things; these sorts of movies made up a lot of direct-to-video releases back in the day, or would have been dropped onto Disney Channel in the 90s or 00s. But those aren't the kind of movies that get advertising, they're just things you find while scrolling through the listings (in much the same way as you used to browse a video store). Going through the list, practically every live-action movie that wasn't a remake I had simply never heard of.

Conversely, if you release a movie in theaters, you're generally going to want to put out some advertising for it. A lot, in fact, because you need to convince people to take the time to leave the house and spend extra money on a movie ticket. Thus, it's actually quite easy to assume that Disney is only doing live-action remakes when they make up a significant proportion of their theatrical releases (the majority, depending on how you count the aforementioned movies based on theme park rides).

And what about future releases? Of the eight listed on that page, four are animated movies, two are live-action remakes (Snow White and Moana), one is a prequel to the Lion King 2019 (which isn't exactly live-action, but the intent was to animate it as such and most people refer to LK2019 that way), and only one is live-action but not a remake. I'm sure there will continue to be a bunch of movies dropped onto D+ that nobody will ever hear about, but the fact remains that WDP still puts the bulk of their live-action efforts on remaking their old shit.

And all of that is a long and roundabout way of saying that I'm pretty sure Greenbaum wasn't referring to those low-budget efforts in his statement. Those are rounding errors in the grand scheme of Hollywood accounting.

02Mar#10

Villeneuve's interview.

How is Josh Brolin using the word "pretense/pretentious" wrong? Bob says that he was surprised that Villeneuve was more self-aware than he thought, which means that Brolin would be correct in saying he lacks pretense because he's being genuine in his work. And in the latter quote, Brolin was calling himself and his friends pretentious for acting like they could film Dune themselves.

Methinks Bob just wanted to dunk on something because he hates how filmbros love Villeneuve, but he couldn't decide what, so he just flailed about at random in a desperate attempt to appear smart.

 

[The Fatriarchy]

02Mar#05

The vast majority of transsexuals report they are actually the opposite sex. Doesn't mean that is true.

Statements are worthless compared to actual hard evidence.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

02Mar#05

The vast majority of transsexuals report they are actually the opposite sex. Doesn't mean that is true.

This again?

02Mar#02
In the other aisle, Musk gets cucked.

The "hate speech".

Musk is probably getting bored with his new toy, and if I recall he has problems with Tesla that he's trying to address. That's letting the censors sneak back in.

 

[Koby_Fish]

How is Josh Brolin using the word "pretense/pretentious" wrong? Bob says that he was surprised that Villeneuve was more self-aware than he thought, which means that Brolin would be correct in saying he lacks pretense because he's being genuine in his work. And in the latter quote, Brolin was calling himself and his friends pretentious for acting like they could film Dune themselves.

Methinks Bob just wanted to dunk on something because he hates how filmbros love Villeneuve, but he couldn't decide what, so he just flailed about at random in a desperate attempt to appear smart.

Honestly, it sounds like Bob is the one that doesn't know the actual definition of pretense:

It's either that, or Bob believes that Villeneuve uses plenty of false reasons to hide the actual purpose of things, and isn't being genuine, particularly when making a movie.

If Bob thinks this word is in any way related to or a version of pretentious, he is wrong:

For all I know, Villeneuve may very well be pretentious, but that does not mean he engages in pretense. Bob on the other hand...

 

[WelperHelper99]

Can you really blame someone for thinking that Disney only produces live-action remakes of their animated movies, when those are the only movies that get promoted to hell and back? Sure, there are a lot of studios under the Rat's umbrella now, but note that Greenbaum is only the president of Walt Disney Pictures specifically, so he isn't responsible for anything that 20th Century produces, for instance.

But let's do an experiment. (Warning: this gets long.) How many of WDP's movies are live-action, and how many are live-action remakes? I'm not gonna go to the trouble of looking at their entire output, but let's just look solely at the last few years (and also because the Wikipedia article starts at 2020 so that's a convenient place to begin). Here's how it breaks down:

Theatrical	Disney+
Animated	7	9
Live-Action (remake)	2	3
Live-Action (other)	4	21

A couple notes about this table:

1. Any movie that had a simultaneous release in theaters and on D+ I counted solely as a theatrical release.
2. Two of the Live-Action (other) movies were Jungle Cruise and Haunted Mansion, so depending on how you treat a movie based on a theme park ride, the numbers could be 4 and 2 for theatrical releases.
3. Of the two remaining, one was The Beatles: Get Back - The Rooftop Concert, which was just the concert footage that was given a very limited theatrical release. If you decide not to include that, then it becomes 4 and 1.
4. The only other movie was Indiana Jones 5, which is merely a sequel nobody wanted to a series that should have stayed dead.

At a glance, Bob's correct, there are way more Disney live-action movies than just remakes. Herein lies the rub, though: the overwhelming majority of them are low-budget films that are D+ fodder. That's not to say that there isn't a place for such things; these sorts of movies made up a lot of direct-to-video releases back in the day, or would have been dropped onto Disney Channel in the 90s or 00s. But those aren't the kind of movies that get advertising, they're just things you find while scrolling through the listings (in much the same way as you used to browse a video store). Going through the list, practically every live-action movie that wasn't a remake I had simply never heard of.

Conversely, if you release a movie in theaters, you're generally going to want to put out some advertising for it. A lot, in fact, because you need to convince people to take the time to leave the house and spend extra money on a movie ticket. Thus, it's actually quite easy to assume that Disney is only doing live-action remakes when they make up a significant proportion of their theatrical releases (the majority, depending on how you count the aforementioned movies based on theme park rides).

And what about future releases? Of the eight listed on that page, four are animated movies, two are live-action remakes (Snow White and Moana), one is a prequel to the Lion King 2019 (which isn't exactly live-action, but the intent was to animate it as such and most people refer to LK2019 that way), and only one is live-action but not a remake. I'm sure there will continue to be a bunch of movies dropped onto D+ that nobody will ever hear about, but the fact remains that WDP still puts the bulk of their live-action efforts on remaking their old shit.

And all of that is a long and roundabout way of saying that I'm pretty sure Greenbaum wasn't referring to those low-budget efforts in his statement. Those are rounding errors in the grand scheme of Hollywood accounting.

I only really know about Disney's animated movies because of my nephews. They really aren't big, not like they used to be. You might get one or maybe two big animated features from them a year that gets a proper advertising budget. It's easy to think Disney has gone all in on live action anymore

 

[Ravana]

Checking in to see if Robert has died yet and leaving disappointed.

 

[Arthur Morgan]

If Bob thinks this word is in any way related to or a version of pretentious, he is wrong:

For all I know, Villeneuve may very well be pretentious, but that does not mean he engages in pretense. Bob on the other hand...

It is hilarious when Bob accidentally describes himself when trying to insult someone else. Though knowing him, I doubt he even knows the definition of the word, he just knows it's bad. I mean, this is a guy who tried to claim anyone who says the Adam West Batman is campy is an idiot, because all he knows about the word camp is it's usually used negatively.

Checking in to see if Robert has died yet and leaving disappointed.

Well his Patreon is dying, if that helps.

Not quit a new low yet, last year when that Europe error happened he got down to $2454, but only being $10 above that is not something to celebrate on his end. And I doubt he'll have the recovery he did last time.

 

[LaughJoke2.0]

The funny thing the troon survey is if they redo it in a year, they'll probably only get a response back from 53,100 of the 90,000 surveyed.

 

[Positron]

03Mar#01
The forum of child abusers and disinfo terrorists rose to the occasion, clarified someone's misconception about Bobby-lore

The KF post in the screencap.

---

03Mar#02
Cenk Uygur states the obvious -- at least something obvious to everyone who isn't a Democrat -- "You can't argue for the rule of law and then not follow the rule of law".


03Mar#03


03Mar#04
Harry Turtledove is at it again.


03Mar#05


03Mar#06
An illegal killed a young white nursing student. The mainstream press tried to suppress it, probably under the behest of the likes of Chris Murphy.


03Mar#07

Archive of article.

---

03Mar#08
As he gets old, Joe Rogan realizes that people need a divine structure in their lives, a belief in the sanctity of love and truth. He also believes (as I do) that the moral compass and guidelines of a lot of people come from religion. He deplores the facts that "very intelligent" people (e.g. Bobby) regard religion as superstition and fairytales that have no place in the modern world. These same people believe that human beings have an inbuilt moral compass and are inherently good, but that, observes Rogan, is not necessarily true.

What does Bobby means by "The line to tell me I was right forms over by the sign"?

03Mar#09


03Mar#10

I don't think Aaron Bushnell, US serviceman who self-immolated in protest of the heinous, disgusting ways of jews, has made Peter Coffin "completely miserable", but unlike Bobby, I'm not stalking Coffin so I'm bound to miss things.

03Mar#11

I don't know who is "James", and I know Peter Coffin's axe to grind with Breadtubers. but I have zero doubt that Donkey Kong Guy is really a cunt.

---

03Mar#12
Another person wastes his time explaining something that doesn't exist.


03Mar#13


03Mar#14


03Mar#15
If you point out James Gunn's pedophilic tendencies, you belong to a cult.

I thought jokes are literally genocide?

03Mar#16
Must defend James Gunn against "cultists".


03Mar#17


03Mar#18
More on Peter Parker x Frank Castle.

How far has Marvel gone: from "nobody ever gets killed" to "everything goes because jurisdiction doesn't apply to interstellar supernatural beings, and a man is being turned into pasta by psychotic woman because there is no law against spaghettification"!

03Mar#19

---

03Mar#20


03Mar#21
Kathleen Kennedy.


03Mar#22
Dune is a story of colonization, and Chalamet's character is the colonial exploiter masqueraded as the White Messiah.


03Mar#23

Why is Bobby upset? Didn't the last episode of the cartoon has two girls kissing, for which Andrew Dobson had busted his nuts?

03Mar#24
Jap craziness: sexy woman uses a ground-to-air missile launcher to blow up one dude.


03Mar#25
Jap cartoon.


03Mar#26


03Mar#27
Someone has her granite kitchen top turned into a knife stand.

A little home renovation won't give you silicosis, stupid though it is.

03Mar#28

This one has a thread in Stinkditch.

03Mar#29

Imagine the smell.

 

[The Fatriarchy]

03Mar#03


03Mar#04
Harry Turtledove is at it again.

For the first pic: Didn't Democrats push something til after the election too?

Second pic: Neither were the Nazis a "movement", nor is what happened to them "impeachment". But again, Nazibob wants to kill his enemies with a war, with no evidence of Nazi activity. Because that's what good guys do.

 

[Dr. Jaime Reyes]

How does this man have an audience? If I want to be told Marvel is awesome and Republicans should all be gassed I could go to any number of retards on YouTube with better production value and room-temperature IQ.

 

[Lou's Sentient Backfat]

How does this man have an audience? If I want to be told Marvel is awesome and Republicans should all be gassed I could go to any number of retards on YouTube with better production value and room-temperature IQ.

I think a lot of it is the early adopter luck. Blob has been producing "content" since before YouTube was a thing.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

03Mar#03

"How DARE the bad orange man have due process!"

What does Bobby means by "The line to tell me I was right forms over by the sign"?

Robert thinks people will line up to tell him he was right, as always. Except Robert's worldview is childish. Someone could become religious after a great deal of thinking (like C. S. Lewis.) The big thing about religion, Christianity in particular, is it requires you to humble yourself before God. Robert's pride will never allow him to do that.

Imagine the smell.

No.