Disaster Boeing "Overwrote" Camera Footage Of Work On MAX Jet Door That Blew Out, Can Not Identify Employee Who Worked On It - First whistleblower getting suicided with two shots in the back of the head now this

Just when you thought it couldn't get any more bizarre or surreal, the Boeing story did just that.

As previously reported, the aerospace giant has been under regulatory scrutiny following a string of safety-related incidents since the beginning of the year (really, since 2019 when two of its 737 MAXes fell out of the sky like overpriced deadly paperweight, but let's just skip to the latest snafu), starting with a door blowing off a flight and continuing with multiple other incidents, including a cracked cockpit window, bolts missing on a wing, various wheels falling off during takeoff in at least two incidents and several engine fires/failures.

And as the pressure ratchets up on Boeing, it's becoming increasingly obvious that management is running the same type of interference it did during the infamous MCAS scandal and ensuing cover-up attempt which cost former CEO Muilenburg his job. Sure enough, on Wednesday we learned that Boeing - in a pure coincidence that Jeffrey Epstein would approve of - "overwrote", i.e. deleted, security camera footage showing work being done on a door that blew out on the Alaska Airlines MAX jet in January

It's not just the footage however: NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy said it is unclear "who performed the work to open, reinstall, and close the door plug on the accident aircraft," as Boeing is "unable to find the records documenting this work." In Homendy's letter, she writes that despite requests to Boeing and interviews at the Renton, Washington factory where the panel was removed, the identity of the crew member that worked on the panel remains unknown and has would be unable to "provide a statement or interview to NTSB due to medical issues."

It gets crazier: in her letter, NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy said she directly appealed to Boeing CEO Dave Calhoun for information on who worked on the faulty door plug, expressing frustration over Boeing's claim of missing records and security footage. Even then, Boeing merely stonewalled and said it was "unable to provide that information and maintained that Boeing has no records of the work being performed."

Finally, the epic culmination - at least so far - of the shitstorm that has engulfed Boeing, we noted yesterday that a key whistleblower, a former quality control manager at the company who raised concerns about the firm's production standards, was found dead from an apparent suicide.

John Barnett, a former veteran Boeing employee of 32 years, passed away from a self-inflicted wound on March 9, the BBC reported on Monday evening. Barnett was involved in a whistleblower lawsuit against Boeing, alleging serious safety concerns at the North Charleston plant, where he managed quality for the 787 Dreamliner production. Boeing was in Charleston for legal interviews related to the lawsuit when he was found dead.

He claimed the push for speed compromised safety, with sub-standard parts being used and a significant failure rate in emergency oxygen systems. Despite raising these issues, he felt his concerns were disregarded, leading to legal action against Boeing, alleging career damage due to his whistleblowing

Meanwhile, what would a catastrophe in a company near and dear to the government - and of course, the deep state - be without questionable trading surrounding the incident in Congress? In filings reported on Wednesday, it was revealed that Congressman William R. Keating sold somewhere between $1,001 and $15,000 worth of Boeing shares on February 28

He's the latest Congress critter to have "excellent timing" when it comes to stock trades: while it isn't Fed Governor Raphael Bostic selling massive S&P futures lots ahead of Fed minutes dropping, the sale took place the day before it was announced that the DOJ was investigating Boeing. Recall, on February 29, Bloomberg wrote that the DOJ was "looking into" the Boeing door plug blowout that took place earlier that month. Since his sale, Boeing's stock value has tumbled by about 11%.

In any case, between Barnett who "suicided" himself, and now the video footage which also also apparently was "accidentally" snuffed out, we wonder just who is next on the Epstein escalator of "not suiciding themselves" at Boeing

He's the latest Congress critter to have "excellent timing" when it comes to stock trades: while it isn't Fed Governor Raphael Bostic selling massive S&P futures lots ahead of Fed minutes dropping, the sale took place the day before it was announced that the DOJ was investigating Boeing. Recall, on February 29, Bloomberg wrote that the DOJ was "looking into" the Boeing door plug blowout that took place earlier that month. Since his sale, Boeing's stock value has tumbled by about 11%.

In any case, between Barnett who "suicided" himself, and now the video footage which also also apparently was "accidentally" snuffed out, we wonder just who is next on the Epstein escalator of "not suiciding themselves" at Boeing


 
I was under the impression that any work carried out on a plane wasn’t just recorded with a camera, it was logged appropriately with paperwork. Bob on this date replaced this serial number part with this one, notes and observations, signed Bob, countersigned supervisor.
Is that not the case? Surely the plane needs detailed maintenance records?
I now believe the door blow-out story is the story of a deliberate act on the part of the government to bring down a plane, which ended in failure.
They certainly don’t inspire confidence
 
If this government had balls and wasn't totally subverted by regulatory capture they'd order every 737 MAX grounded until the individuals involved were found and the footage recovered.

I guarantee you Boeing would have that data over to the FAA within hours.
That's implying the FAA isn't directly responsible. You will not fly. You will not travel. STAY IN YOUR POD PEASANTS.
 
I now believe the door blow-out story is the story of a deliberate act on the part of the government to bring down a plane, which ended in failure.
Do we have a list of passengers?
Maybe a free energy fed employee that has been abducted was on board, on his way to sign us into the gold standard
 
The fact that there is obviously some Serious Shit going down in Boeing's internal workings, yet the planes are not grounded, makes me feel that the US indeed is a shell country masking the fact that it's 3 corporations in a trenchcoat. Theres been hella corruption in govt for years but I felt like there was at least some part of government that wasnt bought out yet. Maybe not anymore. This whole thing is incredibly disturbing.
Absolutely. What's even more disturbing to me is they allegedly have no records whatsoever about this plane besides security camera footage. You're seriously telling me the only evidence the company has regarding who worked on this $140 million dollar plane is from a security camera?

There's no documentation at all about where this plane was at any time in the production process, when it was completed, when the parts and components were delivered and installed, when final QC inspections were performed and by whom, and retains no payroll records showing what employees were involved in its construction, how much, and when? I could see this if it was built in 1955 but not a few years ago.

How does Boeing even know how much it costs to produce a plane if they don't have this documentation? They're not only liars, they're bad liars. Or just mocking us to our faces because they can.

That's implying the FAA isn't directly responsible. You will not fly. You will not travel. STAY IN YOUR POD PEASANTS.
That's got nothing to do with it, the dogshit MAX is only a tiny percentage of the total air fleet operated by private carriers. This is all about corporate corruption and the revolving door between these unaccountable oligopolies and the federal government.
 
I was under the impression that any work carried out on a plane wasn’t just recorded with a camera, it was logged appropriately with paperwork. Bob on this date replaced this serial number part with this one, notes and observations, signed Bob, countersigned supervisor.
Is that not the case? Surely the plane needs detailed maintenance records?

They certainly don’t inspire confidence
It should be. I'm almost certain the pilots have to read through at least some of the service log before take off, if the work was scheduled it should have been in the log as completed and inspected and the pilots would/should not take off if it was not signed off.
 
I was under the impression that any work carried out on a plane wasn’t just recorded with a camera, it was logged appropriately with paperwork. Bob on this date replaced this serial number part with this one, notes and observations, signed Bob, countersigned supervisor.
Is that not the case? Surely the plane needs detailed maintenance records?

They certainly don’t inspire confidence
Yeah if I understand correctly, every single bolt and wrench is catalogued meticulously. If joe blow leaves his wrench somewhere in the plane, then the weight calculations get thrown off. Its like a surgeon having a bar code scanned and accounted for on every instrument in order to reduce the risk of instruments being left behind...though sometimes horror stories seep through the cracks. I feel like if Boeing is more willing to say 'we dont have the records' than to give them records that show incompetence in this one scenario, there might be hundreds of Joe Blows losing bolts, screws, hammers, leaving crushed energy drink cans, that random shoe on the side of the highway, and god knows what in those planes. One bolt adding an ounce of weight to the plane isnt a huge deal I am sure, but if there are problems at every step of the way I would assume that adds up and the flight metrics may be operating on bad data
 
The fact that they're trying to hide who did it tells me everything I need to know about who did it.

Probably some third world shithole "refugee" "independent contractor" that they hired on the cheap instead of a local worker with the union that they would actually have to pay.
 
If this government had balls and wasn't totally subverted by regulatory capture they'd order every 737 MAX grounded until the individuals involved were found and the footage recovered.

I guarantee you Boeing would have that data over to the FAA within hours.
That's the problem though, it's really hard to tell where the FAA ends and Boeing begins. If it wasn't for the NTSB investigating air accidents instead of the FAA, you can bet that nearly 100% of Boeing airframe accidents would be pilot error. Nothing will ever be done about Boeing, because they are the last US commercial aircraft manufacturer and a de facto monopoly, so Boeing gets to do whatever they want. Hell, at this point I'd probably trust a Tupolev over a Boeing airframe, between the diversity hiring and corruption, Tupolev would probably be safer.
 
That's the problem though, it's really hard to tell where the FAA ends and Boeing begins. If it wasn't for the NTSB investigating air accidents instead of the FAA, you can bet that nearly 100% of Boeing airframe accidents would be pilot error. Nothing will ever be done about Boeing, because they are the last US commercial aircraft manufacturer and a de facto monopoly, so Boeing gets to do whatever they want.
And there's no real domestic competition on top of it. The whole idea that the entire commercial air industry worldwide basically rides on an unassailable oligopoly of two manufactures is insane.

Sure there are smaller players like Embrarer or Bombardier but those are regional and business jets. Incidentally they have a very, very good safety record compared to Boeing across the board.
Hell, at this point I'd probably trust a Tupolev over a Boeing airframe, between the diversity hiring and corruption, Tupolev would probably be safer.
Soviet-era Tupolev, especially pre-80s, I'd agree, not so much what has been built in the oligarch era. But then again it's just the same sickness and corruption repeated in another country.
 
That's the problem though, it's really hard to tell where the FAA ends and Boeing begins. If it wasn't for the NTSB investigating air accidents instead of the FAA, you can bet that nearly 100% of Boeing airframe accidents would be pilot error. Nothing will ever be done about Boeing, because they are the last US commercial aircraft manufacturer and a de facto monopoly, so Boeing gets to do whatever they want. Hell, at this point I'd probably trust a Tupolev over a Boeing airframe, between the diversity hiring and corruption, Tupolev would probably be safer.
And though it's going back to either the early 2000s or the 90s (I'd have to track it down) there was that incident where EU leaders were pretty upset because the USA had used its intelligence agencies to engage in corporate espionage against Airbus allowing Boeing to undercut a secret negotiation and take it away from Airbus.

Boeing/FAA/US Intelligence - no hard lines here.
 
That's implying the FAA isn't directly responsible. You will not fly. You will not travel. STAY IN YOUR POD PEASANTS.
Doesn't even have to be that. They hired a bunch of melinated individuals for Positive Representation™️ (and DEI funds) for super important technical work. Who cares if they can't answer the breakfast question? It'll defeat racism and Donald Trump forever! So what if a few planes full of wh*te devils fall out of the sky?
 
Doesn't even have to be that. They hired a bunch of melinated individuals for Positive Representation™️ (and DEI funds) for super important technical work. Who cares if they can't answer the breakfast question? It'll defeat racism and Donald Trump forever! So what if a few planes full of wh*te devils fall out of the sky?
Maybe we should have a new rule that a senior member of Boeing management os in the jump seat on all flights. That might sharpen some minds
 
Doesn't even have to be that. They hired a bunch of melinated individuals for Positive Representation™️ (and DEI funds) for super important technical work. Who cares if they can't answer the breakfast question? It'll defeat racism and Donald Trump forever! So what if a few planes full of wh*te devils fall out of the sky?
They're brazen about their DEI incompetence. They wouldn't go through this much trouble to hide it if it were just a nog not doing his job. They'd let it be plastered front and certain everywhere and shrug their shoulders. This is clearly a Fed looking to down a plane.
 
Yeah if I understand correctly, every single bolt and wrench is catalogued meticulously. If joe blow leaves his wrench somewhere in the plane, then the weight calculations get thrown off. Its like a surgeon having a bar code scanned and accounted for on every instrument in order to reduce the risk of instruments being left behind...though sometimes horror stories seep through the cracks. I feel like if Boeing is more willing to say 'we dont have the records' than to give them records that show incompetence in this one scenario, there might be hundreds of Joe Blows losing bolts, screws, hammers, leaving crushed energy drink cans, that random shoe on the side of the highway, and god knows what in those planes. One bolt adding an ounce of weight to the plane isnt a huge deal I am sure, but if there are problems at every step of the way I would assume that adds up and the flight metrics may be operating on bad data
It's less about weight calculations and more about foreign object damage (FOD). It might just rattle around and make a bad noise, it could knock hoses/electrical connections loose, or it could grenade one of the engine turbines.
Years ago I had to do QC on returned truck parts, a turbocharger comes in. Similar to a jet it has a small turbine in it but in comparison it is subjected to significantly less forces. Some genius inadvertently dropped a single small bolt into the inlet. It went unnoticed and they started the truck up. I was able to pour every bit of the turbo's internals out on the table before me. It had been absolutely shredded. An expensive/inconvenient problem parked in the shop, but no lives were at risk. Imagine similar happening to a jet engine when operating.
 
The fact that they're trying to hide who did it tells me everything I need to know about who did it.

Probably some third world shithole "refugee" "independent contractor" that they hired on the cheap instead of a local worker with the union that they would actually have to pay.
I recall something about dawn dish soap being used as a door hinge lubricant, so I'm also leaning heavily in this direction. That and possibly more extreme cost cutting than previously thought. Which could very well facilitate this comedy of errors every step of the way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatsuit Shinji
Yeah if I understand correctly, every single bolt and wrench is catalogued meticulously. If joe blow leaves his wrench somewhere in the plane, then the weight calculations get thrown off. Its like a surgeon having a bar code scanned and accounted for on every instrument in order to reduce the risk of instruments being left behind...though sometimes horror stories seep through the cracks. I feel like if Boeing is more willing to say 'we dont have the records' than to give them records that show incompetence in this one scenario, there might be hundreds of Joe Blows losing bolts, screws, hammers, leaving crushed energy drink cans, that random shoe on the side of the highway, and god knows what in those planes. One bolt adding an ounce of weight to the plane isnt a huge deal I am sure, but if there are problems at every step of the way I would assume that adds up and the flight metrics may be operating on bad data
Foreign object debris is a big deal that can bring down an aircraft and a reason why manufacturers of aircraft and engines are (or should be) very strict with making certain these kinds of items that could potentially damage the aircraft are not present in the components received or in the final product delivered to the customer.

Just a customary Google News search for "Boeing FOD" will turn up some pretty disturbing articles about the reckless lack of quality control at this Company in recent years up until the present. Even the Air Force had to halt delivery of new KC-46s in 2019 because of debris found in the aircraft.

If you haven't been involved with government contracting I can't overemphasize how bad it is if your product produced for defense purposes was rejected due to flagrant quality control issues. That's always the best of the best product when it comes to QC due to how valuable those contracts are, and if they're fucking that up what do you think is happening with the regular commercial line?
 
Back