He starts talking about it at 2:35. Here's a good quote from four minutes in:
"I knew it was a potential game of the year. So when they were willing, I was going to stream that anyway, when they offered to pay me to stream it, to produce a gameplay video, of a game I already knew I was going to love because I'd looked into it, of course I took paid promotion [condescending glare], why wouldn't I? It's absurd to think I wouldn't. And some people [spits] would say 'because it ruins your credibility'. I don't really think so, but I see how they arrive at that, because many versions of that contract that people signed said 'You cannot speak ill of those games'. Now my contract said that too, but my contract also said that I could back out at any time. So once I got the game, if I didn't like something about it, and I didn't want to produce those gameplay videos, I could walk away no harm no foul. I would have to give them some money in damages, but obviously I'd be more than glad to do that. More than glad to do that, because I don't want to ruin my credibility."
He then goes on to say that the reviews are in and everyone loves it, further attempting to exonerate himself. I love how he in no way demonstrated that his contract was different. Being allowed to back out of something is not the same as being allowed to criticize something. Even if it was, you would have been financially penalized for it, so you weren't really
allowed to, were you?
He deleted this one, by the way. I remembered seeing it a very long time ago but I had to find it in the archive of his YouTube channel:
https://archive.org/details/boogie2988-Youtube