Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

[Brad Watson_Miami]

@KookiesNKreem,

I agree. Numerology is very subjective and as a scientist, I avoid it completely. The observations of patterns in Nature and global culture and being able to express them as mathematical equations is the basis of science. GOD=7_4 Theory is thee mathematical model/thee fundamental constant/program #174/thee algorithm/thee initial condition/thee 'fractal'. See http://GOD704.wikia.com .

@thinking,

What do you call someone who ignores/dismisses scientific theory - repeated patterns in Nature and global culture? What's the fancy word for that besides confirmation bias and cherry-picking?

 

[RadicalCentrist]

Anyone know if this dudes music is any good? Also schizophrenia or just garden variety looney-tunes?

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

@thinking,

What do you call someone who ignores/dismisses scientific theory - repeated patterns in Nature and global culture? What's the fancy word for that besides confirmation bias and cherry-picking?

Answer: "Brad"

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

Too bad there's a lot of papers out there explaining that the universe is finite.

If you read Seal#1 The Conglomerate of Universes, then you'd know that it explains how this Universe is finite.

Also Brad your information for the "big bang" reads like some science fiction novel for grade schoolers.

You're an 9,4,9,15,20. The Big Bang-Bit Bang is briefly explained at http://BigBangBitBang.blogspot.com .

@RadicalCentrist,

For the record...

Do you believe in GOD?
Jesus son of Joseph was God-incarnate?
The Christ returns to "Judge everyone according to their actions"?

 

[:thinking:]

@thinking,

What do you call someone who ignores/dismisses scientific theory - repeated patterns in Nature and global culture? What's the fancy word for that besides confirmation bias and cherry-picking?

Please define “scientific theory.”

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

@thinking,

Google: scientific theory. Again, what do you call someone who ignores/dismisses scientific theory - repeated patterns in Nature and global culture? What's the fancy word for that besides confirmation bias and cherry-picking?

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

@thinking,

Google: scientific theory.

You'll find the definition of scientific theory doesn't resemble What Brad does, which is neither scientific nor a theory.

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

GOD=7_4 Theory or FOD=6_4 on Planet Nestor; FIG=6|7 (Design Worlds Theory) is scientific theory. It has a large amount of evidence to support the hypothesis, it's been expressed mathematically, and it makes the BIGGEST prediction in the history of science: All New Worlds Are Built On GOD=7_4 Like Earth Or FOD=6_4 Like Planet Nestor. Now we sit back and wait for the data to come in. If this were to be proven false sometime in the future, then this would obviously no longer be scientific theory.

 

[:thinking:]

@thinking,

Again, what do you call someone who ignores/dismisses scientific theory - repeated patterns in Nature and global culture? What's the fancy word for that besides confirmation bias and cherry-picking?

Can your attempts to find meaningful patterns in meaningless noise be proven to be either true or false?

 

[RomanesEuntDomus]

thee mathematical model/thee fundamental constant/program #174/thee algorithm/thee initial condition/thee 'fractal'.

What's up with writing "the" with 2 e?

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

GOD=7_4 Theory or FOD=6_4 on Planet Nestor; FIG=6|7 (Design Worlds Theory) is scientific theory.

No, it isn't. We've given you the criteria for "scientific theory" many times, and you've ignored it.

It has a large amount of evidence to support the hypothesis, it's been expressed mathematically,

There is no evidence, and you don't know enough math to calculate a proper tip, much less describe the universe.

and it makes the BIGGEST prediction in the history of science: All New Worlds Are Built On GOD=7_4 Like Earth Or FOD=6_4 Like Planet Nestor. Now we sit back and wait for the data to come in. If this were to be proven false sometime in the future, then this would obviously no longer be scientific theory.

It's a prediction that cannot be falsified and for which you are the only arbiter of its validity. Completely unscientific and, frankly, pretty stupid.

Most telling is that your idea of a rebuttal is to mash the "ignore" button, champ.

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

On 7/4/1795 - the 19 year anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence - Paul Revere as Deputy Grand Master of the Massachusetts Grand Lodge of Freemasonry laid the cornerstone of the MA State House. This combines Seal #2: GOD=7_4 Theory and Seal #4: S=19 Theory.

@thinking,

You're using a premise of "meaningless noise" which by definition* means there are no** patterns in your sample. If you were open-minded (had no confirmation bias), you wouldn't hamper your understanding by beginning with a false premise.


Synchronism: 9:52 "7 is a very likely number when ruling two dice... 7 is the most likely number. 9:54 "This is how scientists make predictions." - Bill Nye the Science Guy, Probability (S4/Ep8, 1996) on MeTV

What's up with writing "the" with 2 e?

That is thee question!*


*Synchronism: 10:05 "Here's a question..." - Zoo Clues, Hop, Skip, and a Jump (S3/Ep21, 2017) on H&I

 

[Monolith]

Anyone know if this dudes music is any good? Also schizophrenia or just garden variety looney-tunes?

If he actually plays music, I'm gonna start calling him Bard Watson.

 

[Mr. X]

Numerology is very subjective and as a scientist, I avoid it completely.

Numerology is what you do, and you are not a scientist. You're just a delusional liar who thinks his TV is talking to him.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

If you read Seal#1 The Conglomerate of Universes, then you'd know that it explains how this Universe is finite.

You're an 9,4,9,15,20. The Big Bang-Bit Bang is briefly explained at http://BigBangBitBang.blogspot.com .

@RadicalCentrist,

For the record...

Do you believe in GOD?
Jesus son of Joseph was God-incarnate?
The Christ returns to "Judge everyone according to their actions"?

Your own writings Brad are just penned ramblings of a schizophrenic mind so mean nothing in the face of actual science.

@thinking,

Google: scientific theory. Again, what do you call someone who ignores/dismisses scientific theory - repeated patterns in Nature and global culture? What's the fancy word for that besides confirmation bias and cherry-picking?

Brad you constantly ignore scientific theories.

No, it isn't. We've given you the criteria for "scientific theory" many times, and you've ignored it.



There is no evidence, and you don't know enough math to calculate a proper tip, much less describe the universe.


It's a prediction that cannot be falsified and for which you are the only arbiter of its validity. Completely unscientific and, frankly, pretty stupid.

Most telling is that your idea of a rebuttal is to mash the "ignore" button, champ.

I'd like to see Brad try and explain parallel axis theorem

 

[LoverofPi]

Going to correct you before Brad disregards your statement: He added 44 miles.

Let's just pretend I was being generous and measuring from the Southernmost part of the base to the northernmost part of Roswell, which is about 10 miles.

Incidentally, after a weekend refresher on the Roswell crash and resultant mania, I am fairly certain I know more about Roswell than Brad ever has.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Let's just pretend I was being generous and measuring from the Southernmost part of the base to the northernmost part of Roswell, which is about 10 miles.

Incidentally, after a weekend refresher on the Roswell crash and resultant mania, I am fairly certain I know more about Roswell than Brad ever has.

You can pick any topic Brad claims to know and you're for certain going to know more about it than he is.

 

[LoverofPi]

You can pick any topic Brad claims to know and you're for certain going to know more about it than he is.

Up to and including the nature of the universe, numerology, gematria, hippotomi, reincarnation, coincidences, and especially drums.

But yes, my comment was not meant as any sort of brag.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Up to and including the nature of the universe, numerology, gematria, hippotomi, reincarnation, coincidences, and especially drums.

But yes, my comment was not meant as any sort of brag.

You forgot good hygiene

 

[BILLY MAYS]

Gematria is a Kabbalistic way of showing how two ideas are related on a conceptual level; [Gematria] is using numerology as a basis to confirm (not create) the connection."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gematria

you are welcome, @Brad Watson_Miami .