Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

[LoverofPi]

He thinks Jesus was born on April 17th. He bases this on a book by another crackpot, and the fact that it satisfies his numberwang.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

He thinks Jesus was born on April 17th. He bases this on a book by another crackpot, and the fact that it satisfies his numberwang.

Asking Brad to properly fact-check is like asking a raccoon to wash cotton candy.

 

[LoverofPi]

Asking Brad to properly fact-check is like asking a raccoon to wash cotton candy.

At least the Racoon will attempt it, and maybe realize the consequences after the first time. Brad is incapable of both.

 

[RomanesEuntDomus]

x=3 or -5

I'll admit, if you hadn't have said there were two solutions, I would have just said x=3.

Thanks for answering... though I have to ask, are you sure this is correct?

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

It's actually between 14.2 and 14.9 psi but fuck facts I guess.

Thanks for answering... though I have to ask, are you sure this is correct?

There's a website I found that he could have used to get this. It managed to get a few of the questions I put in wrong.

Brad, we really need to cut to the chase... just say that every number is magic and be done with it. You've been gradually expanding beyond 7 and 4 for a while now.

My daughter can count to 10 now, I'm glad Richard is finally catching up.

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

is like asking a raccoon to wash cotton candy.

Your brain is like cotton candy and you've been brain-washed.

​

 

[[V A P O R W A V E]]

Your brain is like cotton candy and you've been brain-washed.

​

You never answer then new Math question. I think we've proved you suck a math and everything at this point. You are a Coward Richard.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

Your brain is like cotton candy and you've been brain-washed.

​

That was *almost* a comeback. Keep trying, homeboy. The only thing that gets cleaned here is your Ignore List.

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

I guy who hides behind the screen name of @[V A P O R W A V E] just called me "Coward" - only on the Farms.

"Normal tire pressure is 30-33 psi. We describe that as 'Gauge' pressure. The 'Absolute' pressure would be 30-33 + 14.7 psi, which is the pressure in the tire and the pressure of the atmosphere. Therefore the pressure in the tire is 44.7-47.7 psi."
https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/5c443k/atmospheric_pressure_is_147_psi_does_that_mean/

 

[[V A P O R W A V E]]

I guy who hides behind the screen name of @[V A P O R W A V E] just called me "Coward" - only on the Farms.

Yes. I did. You are a coward. You hid behind your own schizophrenic delusion and lie about everything and we've proved it.

You are a coward.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Let's see what the professionals have to say
https://info.kaltire.com/the-right-tire-pressure-why-the-maximum-isnt-the-best/

Richard is also forgetting things like tire size, temperature. Please read up on Gay Lussac's Law.

 

[LoverofPi]

Yes, this is why I AM here - to* answer 7th Grade Pre-Algebra questions.

x=3 or -5

I'll admit, if you hadn't have said there were two solutions, I would have just said x=3.

Not showing your math, huh Dickie?

Because you've definitely made a mistake.

Let's take this long form.

(3+x)²+(2x-4)² = 40

(3+x)*(3+x) + (2x-4)*(2x-4)= 40

(3-5)*(3-5) + (2*(-5)-4)*(2*(-5)-4) = ?

I think some of you see where Dickie went wrong here, but just so our little puddle understands his mistake, let's go further

(3-5)*(3-5) + (-10-4)*(-10-4) =?

(-2)*(-2) + (-14)*(-14) =?

4 + 196 = 200.

Dickieboy made the very silly error that multiplying a negative number by a positive number does not make the negative number positive. He thought 2*(-5) got him 10, from which he could subtract 4 to get 6 and square that. In reality, it gets him -10, from which you subtract 4 to get -14, square that, and get 196.

This is why we check out math and don't rely on the internet to solve math problems for us, little Dickie.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Not showing your math, huh Dickie?

Because you've definitely made a mistake.

Let's take this long form.

(3+x)²+(2x-4)² = 40

(3+x)*(3+x) + (2x-4)*(2x-4)= 40

(3-5)*(3-5) + (2*(-5)-4)*(2*(-5)-4) = ?

I think some of you see where Dickie went wrong here, but just so our little puddle understands his mistake, let's go further

(3-5)*(3-5) + (-10-4)*(-10-4) =?

(-2)*(-2) + (-14)*(-14) =?

4 + 196 = 200.

Dickieboy made the very silly error that multiplying a negative number by a positive number does not make the negative number positive. He thought 2*(-5) got him 10, from which he could subtract 4 to get 6 and square that. In reality, it gets him -10, from which you subtract 4 to get -14, square that, and get 196.

This is why we check out math and don't rely on the internet to solve math problems for us, little Dickie.

How dare you! He'll have you know he took college math in grade 9!

By the way...Why is Richard so racist? And why hasn't he heard of the CNSA? They don't have a lot of astronauts but their budget isn't very large. They also have a branch that designs all of their vehicles called the CASC.

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

I just posted the following in the Facebook group 'Space-Time'...

Thought (information) outside the brain has no mass, therefore, it can travel faster-than-light thus going back in time. There it will create a new event with its own corresponding chain-of-events appearing in the present as a 'coincidence'.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

I just posted the following in the Facebook group 'Space-Time'...

Thought (information) outside the brain has no mass, therefore, it can travel faster-than-light thus going back in time. There it will create a new event with its own corresponding chain-of-events appearing in the present as a 'coincidence'.

I love how you completely glossed over the invitation we sent to your girlfriend.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I just posted the following in the Facebook group 'Space-Time'...

Thought (information) outside the brain has no mass, therefore, it can travel faster-than-light thus going back in time. There it will create a new event with its own corresponding chain-of-events appearing in the present as a 'coincidence'.

Prove it.
Also people on that page are just as bad as Richard when it comes to science.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1427094857543795/

 

[LoverofPi]

I just posted the following in the Facebook group 'Space-Time'...

Thought (information) outside the brain has no mass, therefore, it can travel faster-than-light thus going back in time. There it will create a new event with its own corresponding chain-of-events appearing in the present as a 'coincidence'.

No comment on your failing to correctly answer a basic algebra equation?

Prove it.
Also people on that page are just as bad as Richard when it comes to science.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1427094857543795/

He can't. He can neither prove that he posted it (I checked, not there), and he can't prove his cockamamie delusion that thought is a massless particle.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

No comment on your failing to correctly answer a basic algebra equation?



He can't. He can neither prove that he posted it (I checked, not there), and he can't prove his cockamamie delusion that thought is a massless particle.

It's there, it's under Altamash Bm post. Don't get me started on the posts there.

In theory it could happen, can it? Probably not.

 

[Adamska]

This is why we check out math and don't rely on the internet to solve math problems for us, little Dickie.

I was suspicious myself given the napkin math I did got something more along the lines of x^2 - 2x = 3 when simplified down. The work shown to get there was this:

Spoiler: Napkin Math

(3+x)²+(2x-4)² = 40
(3+x)*(3+x) + (2x-4)*(2x-4)= 40

Which using the FOIL method results in
(9+3x+3x+x^2)+(4x^2-8x-8x+16) = 40

Which then gets simplified:
(9+6x+x^2)+(4x^2-16x+16)= 40
5x^2-10x+25= 40
x^2-2x+5= 8
x^2-2x= 3

This was entirely done so that my life became easier (and also because I remember more the step to this point than solving most of these). So Dick was spot on when he mentioned (due to googling it) that x = 3 is one of the right answers, since using my simplified equation I'd be getting the following:

3^2-2(3)=3
9-6= 3

Which plays out with reality. Dick's second answer is demonstrably wrong and you already did the math to show why. The second answer, based solely on my own rusty napkin math, should be that x = -1. How?

(-1)^2-2(-1)= 3
1-(-2)= 3
1+2= 3

Essentially, the negatives cancel out due to multiplying by themselves or the operation being used. Squaring negatives automatically make them positive, and subtracting a negative integer is addition.

So in conclusion, math can be cool when you do it right and Dickie got a 50% on his response, which means:

Though really I should be grading lower than that given that he didn't show his work to show where he got things wrong (which is a big no-no in math classes) and he likely cribbed the answer too.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

I was suspicious myself given the napkin math I did got something more along the lines of x^2 - 2x = 3 when simplified down. The work shown to get there was this:

Spoiler: Napkin Math

(3+x)²+(2x-4)² = 40
(3+x)*(3+x) + (2x-4)*(2x-4)= 40

Which using the FOIL method results in
(9+3x+3x+x^2)+(4x^2-8x-8x+16) = 40

Which then gets simplified:
(9+6x+x^2)+(4x^2-16x+16)= 40
5x^2-10x+25= 40
x^2-2x+5= 8
x^2-2x= 3

This was entirely done so that my life became easier (and also because I remember more the step to this point than solving most of these). So Dick was spot on when he mentioned (due to googling it) that x = 3 is one of the right answers, since using my simplified equation I'd be getting the following:



Which plays out with reality. Dick's second answer is demonstrably wrong and you already did the math to show why. The second answer, based solely on my own rusty napkin math, should be that x = -1. How?


Essentially, the negatives cancel out due to multiplying by themselves or the operation being used. Squaring negatives automatically make them positive, and subtracting a negative integer is addition.

So in conclusion, math can be cool when you do it right and Dickie got a 50% on his response, which means:

Though really I should be grading lower than that given that he didn't show his work to show where he got things wrong (which is a big no-no in math classes) and he likely cribbed the answer too.

I'm guessing that Brad thought he was a genius because he figured out the answers were at the back of the math book.