Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

[voiceguy]

Please tell us what exactly you feel is "dumb" about...

A Brief Analysis Of Time​

Spoiler: The Long Answer

6/7 aspects of regular time:

Are there 6 or 7? There can't be both.

(A) beginning - the Big Bang/Bit Bang

Time did not begin with the Big Bang, that is just the point from which we can start measuring time. In any action, t>0 is a basic premise. If time did not exist before the Big Bang, then t=0 or t<0 would have to be possible. Such a thing is clearly impossible, however, because in order for the Big Bang to happen time had to already exist. If time does not exist, then nothing can happen. Time has to be infinite, it cannot begin or end.

(B) end - the Big Crunch

Who can say what will happen after the Big Crunch or if anything will? A long-standing theory is that the universe constantly expands and retracts. What you refer to as the Big Crunch is simply the start of another Big Bang. We won't exist, but time always will.

(C) past

As in time that has already been measured? Okay, I can go along with that.

(D) present

An aspect, perhaps, but one so small it is immeasurable. Any moment of the present becomes the past in less than a dodecatillionth of a nanosecond.

(E) future

Too much of a variable to be measurable. How do you measure the infinite?

void - beyond the event horizon of the expanding Universe and beyond the event horizon of a black hole?

You're on tricky ground here. If time is void then nothing exists, and no one really knows what exists beyond the event horizon of the expanding Universe and beyond the event horizon of a black hole.

(G) a constant - the speed-of-light.

The speed of light is only a constant in a vacuum. Light is made up of a spectrum of colors traveling too fast for the naked eye to see. Shine the light through a crystal or a prism and it bends, slowing it down just enough for us to see the spectrum. "The only thing that affects the speed of light is the refractive index of the medium through which it moves, and for empty space, this number is 1.000000 and gives you the maximum possible speed of light. In glass, it is 1.3333 times smaller since c/n = c/1.333 = 300,000 km/sec/1.333 = 225,000 km/sec. The invariance of the speed of light in all uniformly moving reference frames is a postulate of special relativity, it does not derive from special relativity, which only then states how observers will experience/measure space and time given the invariance of the speed of light." (https://einstein.stanford.edu/content/relativity/q1917.html)

Spoiler: The Short Answer

You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

 

[bacterium]

This thread

Synchronism: Who Mourns for Adonis, Star Trek TOS.

Except He had actual power

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

@The Master,

Sure, you're sentenced to really shitty reincarnations for a few millennia.

Are there 6 or 7? There can't be both.

Wrong. At the present, both the proposition of singularities (majority ) and no singularities (Hawking and a few others)* exist. If this changes in the future, then the theory will be tweaked.

Time did not begin with the Big Bang, that is just the point from which we can start measuring time.

Wrong again. The Big Bang/Bit Bang was the beginning of time and the beginning of this video...uh, Universe.

Who can say what will happen after the Big Crunch or if anything will? A long-standing theory is that the universe constantly expands and retracts. What you refer to as the Big Crunch is simply the start of another Big Bang. We won't exist, but time always will.

Wrong. The Big Bang/Bit Bang - a supermassive white hole: explosion of energy & information - 13.8 billion years ago - was the result of a supermassive black hole in another universe. Our Universe & that SBH share the same event horizon. That SBH & SWH formed an Einstein-Rosen bridge... (See: Seal #1 http://7seals.blogspot.com )

An aspect, perhaps, but one so small it is immeasurable. Any moment of the present becomes the past in less than a dodecatillionth of a nanosecond.

Wrong again. The constantly moving forward present always stays the present.

Too much of a variable to be measurable. How do you measure the infinite?

Wrong. The future of this Universe is not infinite; it has an ending - the Big Crunch or ---.

planets are born, die and transform
stars are born, die and transform
galaxies are born, die and transform
universes are born, die and transform
humans and animals are born, die and transform​

You're on tricky ground here. If time is void then nothing exists, and no one really knows what exists beyond the event horizon of the expanding Universe and beyond the event horizon of a black hole.

Really wrong. (You are consistent.) What exists beyond the event horizon of this expanding Universe and beyond the event horizon of a black hole is a void of time. Every cosmologist/astrophysicist who recognizes these two singularities agrees that there is a void of time there.

The speed of light is only a constant in a vacuum.

No shit, Sherlock.

You are dedicated to having a negative bias towards Jesus son of Joseph being the Christ, reincarnation, and the 2nd Coming of the Christ. And now I've taken some of my valuable time to confirm that...

YOU don't know what the fuc you're talking about.​

*Synchronism: 19:55 "At the time being" - Images, M*A*S*H (S6/Ep10, 1977) on MeTV

Reincarna†ion †heory & its 26 Principles includes 11 ways to track an eternal7 soul4, i.e. scientific law of attraction + laws of energy, consciousness & information can’t be destroyed, only transferred. Life (like all matter & energy) is both waves & particles.

Natural selection/“survival of the fittest” assures that humans that help the global system (Gaia) will return as human (Mt 5:5).

Theory of Luck 100 = [karma 4 + modesty 1] × [desire 4 + actions 4 + ability 4 + contribution 4 + blessings 4]

FDR & Eleanor→Barack & Michelle Obama
Cromwell→George Washington→R.E. Lee→Ike
Nathaniel Greene→U.S. Grant→Omar Bradley
Jackson→TR
Abigail Adams→Mary Lincoln→Marilyn Monroe→Janet Jackson58/73
Thomas Paine→Frederick Douglass→MLK
Copernicus→Kepler→Newton→Gauss→ Schwarzschild→Hawking Monteverdi→Bach→Mozart→Berlioz→Ravel→Corea
Billie Holiday→Mariah Carey
Old Tom Morris→Arnold Palmer
Lenin→ Putin
Nero…John Wilkes Booth→Ronald6 Wilson6 Reagan6
King George III→George McClellan→Hitler→George Bush Jr
Mussolini→Trump666 (A=49, B50…)
Caesar→Jesus74…Muhammad74...St. Bernard→Fibonacci→Dante→Oresme→Joan of Arc→Da Vinci→Galileo→Carlos Sigüenza→Franklin→Lincoln→Einstein→

Richard ‘Brad’shaw Wa†son77 II - Chris† II​

“You are to contemplate the intellectual faculties and to trace them in their development through the paths of nature and science58 even to the throne of G7od4 Himself.” – a Masonic774 oath444

---------------------------------------------------------
​

I just tweaked Seal #7 Reincarnation Theory & its 26 Principles including Theory of Luck Equation (ex. Einstein returned as Watson). I've been telling alot of people in-person and online that Donald Trump = 666 when A=49, B50...) so I was able to add that to the front cover of the prophesied (Rev 5:1) "book/scroll sealed with 7 seals".

"It's Judgment Day." - ad for Easy-Off on WBFS 21:30

So how does one make a 'remote control' to operate the system?

I use my brain, so I guess you're out of luck.

 

[BlueArmedDevil]

I use my brain, so I guess you're out of luck.

Well yeah, who wants the gray matter of a delusional convinced felon with a coke habit rattling around in their skull.

I'll just stick with transcendental meditation for all my astral travel needs.

 

[Adamska]

I find it amusing that Brad admires Andrew Jackson, a man I rank as one of our worst presidents for being a man who institutionalized corruption with his spoils system, ignored the legality of the supreme court by forcibly evicting the Five Civilized Tribes from their land via the Trail of Tears, and induced our worst financial crisis in history by destroying our central financial institution.

Why he lumps him with Teddy Roosevelt I'll never know.

Actually, a lot of his idiot reincarnation spewings seem insulting as fuck to a lot of historic characters. Like Cromwell with Washington... holy shit that's an insult to our first president to compare him to the man who burned down Ireland. Also comparing George III to Hitler is equally bad, considering that a guy who was trying to enforce Parliament decisions on a bunch of whiny tax evaders is being compared to a man who caused millions of deaths, and that's just in war.

This all of course ignores the fact he is getting the concept of reincarnation utterly wrong, which I feel the need to bring back up. He has willfully ignored the basic concept of Samsara and the notion you actually can and should break the cycle of reincarnation by following specific doctrines and possessing certain virtues, but we all know what a repeat drop-out he is and how dishonest he is so whatever.

As for him pretending to be Gaius Julius Caesar, that's just further proof that he uses the lives of the most noteworthy to validate his own botch of a life.

 

[voiceguy]

The Big Bang/Bit Bang - a supermassive white hole: explosion of energy & information - 13.8 billion years ago - was the result of a supermassive black hole in another universe. Our Universe & that SBH share the same event horizon. That SBH & SWH formed an Einstein-Rosen bridge... (See: Seal #1 http://7seals.blogspot.com )

Obviously, Time must have existed before then or there would be nothing for the Einstein-Rosen bridge to attach to, since it essentially connects two points in spacetime. And once again, the only source he cites is himself. Typical Bradology.

planets are born, die and transform
stars are born, die and transform
galaxies are born, die and transform
universes are born, die and transform
humans and animals are born, die and transform​

And how does something transform if time no longer exists?

Every cosmologist/astrophysicist who recognizes these two singularities agrees that there is a void of time there.

Name ten.

You are dedicated to having a negative bias towards Jesus son of Joseph being the Christ, reincarnation, and the 2nd Coming of the Christ.

Just as you have a negative bias towards fact and logic. Of the two of us, I would say my bias is by far the more reasonable.

YOU don't know what the fuc you're talking about.​

You may be right, because when I Google "five united continents" (which is what you claim it means) the first link that comes up is this: http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/stor...eslyn-santos-wins-miss-united-continents-2016. I don't put much stock in beauty contests, so I tried "five united continents of u.n. security council" since that was what you said a few days ago, but came up with nothing relating to five continents. It's very confusing, I don't know what the "five united continents" ka-ka you're talking about.

I use my brain, so I guess you're out of luck.

If all Brad is using is his swiss-cheesed drug-addled brain, we aren't the ones who are out of luck.

 

[Kartoffel]

Caesar

*13 July 100 b.C. - 15 March 44 b.C by 23 stabs with a dagger, also one of the culprits was Brutus wo was like a son to him

→Jesus74

somewhere aroung 1 a.D. - thirty - fortyisch years later crucified

…Muhammad74..

c. 570-573 - 8 June 632 death by sudden illness, people where so shocked that they let his corpse laying around for one day

.St. Bernard

Which one exactly???

• Saint Bernard of Vienne (778-842), French bishop of Vienne 810–842
• Saint Bernard of Menthon (d. 100, Frankish founder of the hostel at Great St Bernard Pass
• Saint Bernard of Thiron (1046–1117), French founder of the Tironensian Order
• Saint Bernard degli Uberti (d. 1133), Italian abbot, bishop, papal legate, and cardinal
• Saint Bernard of Clairvaux (1090–1153), French abbot and reformer for the Cistercian order
• Saint Bernardo Tolomei (1272–134, Italian theologian and founder of the Olivetans
• Saint Bernard of Corleone (1605–1667), Sicilian friar
• St. Bernard (dog), a breed of dog

→Fibonacci

c. 1175 - 1250
No interresting accounts how he died, but it might be interresting to know, that the Indians found his famous numbers in the sixth century

→Dante

c. 1265 - 1321 death in exile; possibly malaria

→Oresme

c.1320–1325 – July 11, 1382

→Joan of Arc

6 January c. 1412 – 30 May 1431 burned for crossdressing

→Da Vinci

15 April 1452 – 2 May 1519 wanted beggars to follow his dead body

→Galileo

15 February 1564 – 8 January 1642 after fever and heart palpitations

→Carlos Sigüenza

August 14, 1645 – August 22, 1700 - insisted on an autopsy after his death: had a kidney stone the size of a peach

→Franklin

January 17, 1706 – April 17, 1790 severely obese, died by pleuritic attack

→Lincoln

February 12, 1809 – April 15, 1865 assassinated

→Einstein

14 March 1879 – 18 April 1955 internal bleeding caused by the rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm

→ Richard Bradshaw Watson

So Brad, as one can easily see, there are some quite short times between your lives. Why don't you tell us some about these, exspecially because you seemed to die quite young?

And of course I'm interrested in which death hurt you the most? Was it the crucification or the burning? Or did your assassinations hurt more? And in what horrific way do you plan to end this lifetime?

Also, why are you in this live so unsuccessful?

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

http://MichaelMolnar.com

This is the website of the astronomer who wrote the book The Star of Bethlehem: The Legacy of the Magi in 1999. Molnar discovered that Jesus was born on Saturday April 17, 6 BC (17.4.748 AUC / 29 Nissan 3755 HC). This date was subsequently a BIG part of the BBC documentary/DVD Jesus: The Complete Story. This discovery of April 17, 6 BC was referred to in two History Channel programs, Discovery Channel, CNN, FOX, and the CBS Christmas Special. There may have been other major media that reported it, but I saw all those stations.

Why would all these major media so eagerly report 4/17/6 BC as Jesus' Birthday? Because this has been known since 1119 when the Knights Templar excavated the Temple Mount in Jerusalem and found a scroll documenting that Y'shua bar Yosef and Mariamne were married and their birthdates of 29 Nisan 3755 HC and May 8, 2 BC / 8.5.752 AUC / --- 3759 HC. The Templars then shared this information and the http://JesusFamilyTomb.com with the Pope and received very special favors including not having to pay taxes. The Templars were wiped out on Friday Oct. 13, 1307, but some escaped and took their secrets with them.

Some Templars in Scotland were incorporated into the Freemasons who later encoded 4 London Lodges in 1717 formed the first Grand Lodge and July 4, 1776. 'Coincidentally', Benjamin Franklin died on April 17, 1790 and George Washington died on December 14, 1799.

 

[Kartoffel]

http://www.michaelmolnar.com/

This is the website of the astronomer who wrote the book The Star of Bethlehem: The Legacy of the Magi.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusion

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

Which one exactly???

Saint Bernard of Clairvaux (1090–1153), French abbot and reformer for the Cistercian order

@Kartoffel / sweet potato,

What problem do you have with astronomer Michael Molnar and his discovery of Jesus' birthdate of April 17, 6 BC? Did you read http://MichaelMolnar.com ? If not, please do. There's nothing "delusional" about this guy at all, but you, however...


Synchronism: 8:14 --- de Jesus --- is being extradited to Miami." - ticker on GMA, ABC

 

[Kartoffel]

Saint Bernard of Clairvaux (1090–1153), French abbot and reformer for the Cistercian order

How is it that this was your previous life? How do you determine which persons you were before you were you?
You probably don't just go through a list with famous people and pick some out that sound suiting, do you?

 

[BlueArmedDevil]

Joan of Arc

Does it burn you up inside with what happened to your bff Gilles De Rais after you got roasted?

 

[Kartoffel]

@Kartoffel / sweet potato,

Sweet potato? Are you hitting on me? Please, Brad, I've got standards, you're ridiculous.
Also I'm a normal potato, sweet potatoes are more of a curiosum over here. Because who does need these when your people already mastered the many ways to turn regular potatoes into pure deliciousness?

What problem do you have with astronomer Michael Molnar and his discovery of Jesus' birthdate of April 17, 6 BC? Did you read http://MichaelMolnar.com ? If not, please do. There's nothing "delusional" about this guy at all, but you, however...

I didn't need more than just a quick view to see that he didn't bother to properly cite any sources, except of references to his own book, which is terrible marketing at best.

Also I posted this link as a quick info about you (because when you can post links to stuff we should read, so can we); I don't care about this Michael Molnar. But I have to admit, that he seems at least more competent than you, you never finished your (laughably short) book.

But I'm interrested, in what ways do you think that I am delusional? Please enlighten me, you're always good for a laught.

 

[voiceguy]

What problem do you have with astronomer Michael Molnar and his discovery of Jesus' birthdate of April 17, 6 BC? Did you read http://MichaelMolnar.com ?

In a typical Bradism, he misspelled his source on page 818:

Brad has stated many times that he always admits when he make a mistake, but when I pointed out his link wasn't working:

Did he admit his mistake? No, he quietly went back and changed his post like nothing happened.

I can see why Brad likes Molnar's post so much, the man cites no sources except his own book just like Brad. He claims that he discovered that Aries was the zodiacal sign of the Jews, but gives no source. In his book Abraham Ibn Ezra and the Rise of Medieval Hebrew Science, Shlomo Sela of the Institut d'études avancées de Paris (Paris Institute of Advanced Studies) who is one of the leading world specialists of history of medieval astrology (Google that) states on page 292 "The Jews are governed by Saturn...since their Zodiacal sign is Aquarius, which is the [planetary] house of Saturn." Molnar also neglects to point out that the obverse side of the coin features Zeus, the Greek equivalent of Juno for whom Jupiter is named. Jupiter is the ruling planet of Sagittarius (Nov. 22 - Dec. 21), which is related to religion and philosophy. However, as I stated before, I do not believe in astrology and it is no longer accepted as science. Since most of Molnar's writing seems to hinge on astrology and proceeds from a false premise of Aries being the zodiacal sign of the Jews, I put little credence in what he has to say.

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

@voiceguy / Richard,

Molnar claims that he discovered that Aries was the zodiacal sign of the Jews

Abraham and his descendants including Joseph were shepherds. Moses was a shepherd. David was a shepherd. Y'shua bar Yosef is considered the "Lamb of GOD" and besides being born under the sign of Aries the Ram/Lamb, God-incarnate was crucified under the sign of Aries on the 1st Day of Passover Friday April 7, 30 AD / 7.4.783 AUC / 14 Nisan 3790 HC.

I do not believe in astrology and it is no longer accepted as science.

Who cares what you believe?! You're an ignorant professed antichrist and have admitted to having a negative bias. You're like Donald Trump 666; you'll say anything in trying to win an argument with me. You don't care if what you say is the truth or not and you don't care about your karma since you don't believe in reincarnation.

The Persian Magi/Zoroaster priests/wisemen astronomer/astrologers recognized the signs in the heavens that a great Hebrew king had been born. Herod I and his advisors weren't astronomers/ astrologers and it went right over-their-head. (Get it?)

@Kartoffel / Mr. Potato Head,

I'm a normal potato

I agree and I AM not trying to butter you up.

I didn't need more than just a quick view to see that he didn't bother to properly cite any sources, except of references to his own book, which is terrible marketing at best.

You're an 9491520. No author "cites any sources" on a promotional website of their book. The book itself has many sources listed. Why not buy a used copy on http://amazon.com ?

I don't care about this Michael Molnar.

And he doesn't care about idiots who aren't interested in knowing Jesus' real birthday.

But I'm interrested, in what ways do you think that I am delusional? Please enlighten me.

Under the dictionary definition of delusional, you meet the requirements. Sorry to throw some sour cream on you. Now you can take all your wrong beliefs and 'stick a fork in them'!

 

[Kartoffel]

@Kartoffel / Mr. Potato Head,


I agree and I AM not trying to butter you up.

I notice the stress on the present tense. You know, the kind of you use, when you in fact WERE something.

You're an 9491520. No author "cites any sources" on a promotional website of their book. The book itself has many sources listed. Why not buy a used copy on http://amazon.com ?

What if? is the website from the cartoonist of XKCD (Randall Munroe) that answers silly questions in a scientific way. Because there already is a book, which collected these, you can call this website promotional.
And look! He cites more than the second coming of Christ!
"NO author" eh?

I'm sure that others will be able to come up with examples; I just took the one that came to my mind first; I don't even read these kind of webpages normally, all in all the things a author writes about his own book are no solid measurement of it's content; reading the comments from actual buyers is much more insightful and not so heavily biased by narcism.

And no, I'm not signing up on a foreign Amazon to buy a book full of uninteresting brading just to satisfy YOUR ego.

And he doesn't care about idiots who aren't interested in knowing Jesus' real birthday.

Hey, Brad, I got a small hint for you: It doesn't matter. Christ has been living so long ago, that the exact year doesn't matter at all! He lived in a time where most things never were written down, so even if we knew his exact birth date, it wouldn't change anything, because the context would exactly the same. Nowadays the exact date of stuff is much more important, because nothing is too minor; so you can actually look at stuff and determine possible causations from that.
But I do think that fixating on purely administrative stuff like Jesus date of birth is only a sign of someone who never got what that guy did for humanity; neither on the Christian, nor in the non-Christian sense. Fixating on abitrary stuff just for self-gratification just lets you look like a giant sperg.

Under the dictionary definition of delusional, you meet the requirements. Sorry to throw some sour cream on you. Now you can take all your wrong beliefs and 'stick a fork in them'!

Did you even read my question? I wanted to exactly know what makes me in your mind delusional; instead of giving an answer you said "the dictionary says so" without even saying what dictionary said so.
So I come the conclusion that this is just another sign of your delusions, because you can't even go deep enough into the topic to prove that someone else is. The truth hurts you, doesn't it?

 

[RomanesEuntDomus]

You don't care if what you say is the truth or not and you don't care about your karma since you don't believe in reincarnation.

In stark contrast to you, @voiceguy always posts the source to his claims. And these sources would always withstand scientific scrutiny.
You, on the other hand, post "sources" that are neither scientific nor relevant.
You've been caught lying about the contents of your sources.
You've posted books that would hardly count as anecdotal evidence.
You cite your own unsourced ramblings.

In terms of believability and relevancy, not one of your posts has even come close to what @voiceguy posts regularly to dismantle your parlor trick shenanigans

Y'shua bar Yosef is considered the "Lamb of GOD" and besides being born under the sign of Aries the Ram/Lamb,

Circular logic, Brad.

No author "cites any sources" on a promotional website of their book.

Wrong. Scientists do so. They might even put a bibliography of their most used works on their personal website. When they do something "promotional" for a new book or study, they usually post an abstract so not only would they post their entire catalogue of sources for said work but also a short summary of the methodology and the basic question/conclusion that was worked on.

This just shows you've never had any kind of contact with scientific works at all.

 

[voiceguy]

Abraham was also a goat-herder (Capricorn), Moses was cast forth upon the waters of the Nile as an infant (Aquarius), David was known as "The Lion of God" (Leo). Brad doesn't study his kabbalah very much. Jesus is known as both the "lamb" and the "lion" of God because he believed in peace though directly descended from David. Jesus not living up to his leonine ancestry is one of the reasons most Jews do not accept him as the Messiah.

Like Brad, Molnar reads too much into things and ignores basic fact. BASIC FACT: The coin was used in Antioch, Syria, which is approximately 495 miles from Jerusalem. BASIC FACT: The coin was minted by the Roman Empire ca. 44 A.D. BASIC FACT: In 44 A.D. Christianity was still outlawed by the Roman Empire.

SO WHY WOULD THEY MINT A COIN CELEBRATING THE BIRTH STORY OF JESUS? They wouldn't! It's just another hole in Molnar's theory that he conveniently overlooks. Just examine Roman coins. They used oxen, wolves, elephants, horses, dragons -- what's the big deal if they used rams as well? The animals represented a locale, not an event. But this article sums it up better than I ever could. People should check it out and see if Molnar's behavior reminds them of anyone they know.

Michael Molnar is an ex-professor of astronomy from Rutledge University whose only claim to fame is this mystical "Star of Bethlehem" coin. I'll take the word of Sholom Sela, a world-renowned scholar in his field, over Molnar's ramblings any day.

In fine, I'll leave you all with a quote from a review of Molnar's book written by Richard Panek for the LinguaFranca Book Review:

"Is Molnar's case airtight? No. Is it convincing? Yes. Does it matter if he's right or wrong? Absolutely not."

 

[bacterium]

How is it that this was your previous life? How do you determine which persons you were before you were you?
You probably don't just go through a list with famous people and pick some out that sound suiting, do you?

He opens a book of important people, points and that is it. Brad previously claimed to be about three people who were alive at the same time.

I was banned from his forum because I asked how to figure out who I was in a past life, after he said he wouldn't ban me. But hey, remember Jesus' temper-tantrum phase in his fifties?

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

Donald Trump 666 went back on his promise to fight those who were suing him for fraud for Trump University and chose to settle out-of-court for $25 million! I don't understand why he himself hasn't been charged with fraud?! I tried to steal two photos of jazz vibraphonists that were claimed to be worth $300: the newly lowered minimum to be a felony in the State of Florida. Wow!

Ok, now all you antichrists, get ready to attack me - GO!