Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How do you grade Brad Watson? This is an official poll that reflects the will of GOD.

  • Excellent A - Freedom from corporeal shackles and permitted audience with THE LORD.

    Votes: 167 13.5%
  • Passing B - Freedom from corporeal shackles and free attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Fair C - Freedom from corporeal shackles. Given limited, general attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Poor D - Reincarnated as Man to be given a second chance at attempting to earn GOD's graces.

    Votes: 39 3.2%
  • Fail F - Reincarnated as a non-human for 326 years, 221 days, and 14 hours.

    Votes: 76 6.2%
  • Fail F - Sentenced to eternal tortures in HELL for crimes against THE LORD GOD.

    Votes: 106 8.6%
  • Fail F - Forced to post on the kiwifarms.net for 24 years, 30 days, and 2 hours.

    Votes: 802 65.0%

  • Total voters
    1,234
Reincarnation has now been proven through the scientific method of hypothesis, collecting data, experimentation, and expressing the theory mathematically.
No peer review, no statistical analysis. Theories don't have to be mathematical either. Theories are an overarching group that explains many laws.

Edit: Just looked at his edit. He compared birthmarks and phobias.... that's not scientific and that data can't be expressed mathematically. Also he would declare cases genuine based on things that someone could easily research. Also the associates you mentioned, all of them admitted that everything they found was unconvincing.

One of the linguist (actually the linguist) had this to say about the experiment: He also wrote that most of Stevenson's collaborators were "fellow believers" in the paranormal, starting with a preconceived notion.

This is called having conformation bias. They already believed it so they made evidence fit. This means it was not scientific because in science you can't "prove" something you can only reject something. Also guess what, almost all of this when put to scrutiny through peer review (something you ignored in your version of the scientific method) failed to stand up or found some other fact. Take for one case mentioned in the paper of a women who claimed to be a Bengali in her past life. She spoke Bengli so Stevenson said she most have been reincarnated, however she lived in a town with over 9000 Bengalis, was raised on Marathi (a similar language), had bad pronunciation, and studied Sanskrit from which both languages are derived. Hmmmm... something seems fishy there Brad. Also Brad, he set up an experiment that was never finished to "prove" reincarnation. Nobody has yet to open his box. I don't think you read the scrutiny of the paper, or the paper itself, but I have read portions of both now, and I'm not impressed and no scientifically literate person would be either. Before you say it: No you're not scientifically literate.

To think I was starting to believe you. Also he didn't have a degree in a hard science. He was a Psychiatrist. Oh and hey, you know those journal articles they published? The journal is a pseudoscientific journal called the Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research. It frequently talks about how ESP is real, and the healing power of crystals. Similarly enough he's been published in Journal of Scientific Exploration which is not available on NCBI (a problem I have with several journals is they aren't open to the public) and has been called "An outlet for ufology". So I'm guessing it's not thought highly of in the scientific community.

Also, if you didn't know: Hi Brad, My name is Titty Master Ambrose, and when i'm not clotheslining people in the ring, i'm a biologist.
 
Last edited:
I'm curious what event Brad's avatar is supposed to be of, and why he chose it.

It's a picture of him with his church music group, though I don't think it's this exact event


@Brad Watson_Miami, does the rest of your congregation know that God-Incarnate is right there playing music with them? I'm sure they must be excited to play music with THE God-Incarnate himself, right?

So what was their honest reaction when you told then about all this GOD=7_4 business? Please answer my questions this time as you've ignored all my previous questions, a real God-Incarnate wouldn't do that.
 
Last edited:
You are a compulsive liar. Google that so you'll know what it means.

I AM not at home right now, so I can't reference college textbooks that I have that state that "74% of the elemental mass of this universe is hydrogen". But a quick google search produces a looooooooong list of sources...

https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=&oq=74% of universe is hydrogen&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4NDKB_enUS578US578&q=74% of universe is hydrogen&gs_l=hp....0.0.2.1180233...........0.XADH0IQM7rw

So rather than searching for 'how much hydrogen is in the universe' where you could receive a diversity of answers (I'm not saying you would), you inject the answer you want into the search?

You could NOT have provided a better example of confirmation bias. Is this how you do all your research?

You are literally saying 'Hey Google, only show me things that agree with my conclusion'.

Funniest part is I agreed with you on the 74%, you just bristled at me pointing out that new data is coming. For example the most recent data I could locate was from the Chandra X-Ray satellite. They're saying 75%.
 
Last edited:
So rather than searching for 'how much hydrogen is in the universe' where you could receive a diversity of answers (I'm not saying you would), you inject the answer you want into the search?

You could NOT have provided a better example of confirmation bias. Is this how you do all your research?

You are literally saying 'Hey Google, only show me things that agree with my conclusion'.

Funniest part is I agreed with you on the 74%, you just bristled at me pointing out that new data is coming.
That reminds me of when I tried to get him to read this article that discusses why reincarnation is illogical: http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=547 --- and he could not read it. All he could process was a line that reinforced his own beliefs. It is plain to us how faulty his logic is, but is there any way we could get him to see it? If he is unable to attend to anything other than his own delusion, is there any hope for him? It's one of those lose-lose situations. The more we tell him he's crazy, the more he thinks he is more like Christ because hey, people thought he was crazy, too! I think that in order for him to even begin to see how irrational he is, it's going to take a lot of medication and therapy.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Aspiring Artist
I AM not at home right now, so I can't reference college textbooks that I have that state that "74% of the elemental mass of this universe is hydrogen". But a quick google search produces a looooooooong list of sources...
There actually is variance in this from 73-75% and this is by weight not be amount of atoms. Also it mentions in the observable universe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aspiring Artist
There actually is variance in this from 73-75% and this is by weight not be amount of atoms. Also it mentions in the observable universe.

And I granted him the 74%. I've seen 73.8, which I'm fine with rounding up to 74. I've seen 74.2, which I'm fine with rounding down. I've mostly skipped 75 - even thought that was most current - because I don't know if they are just picking 75 because it's tidy.

I gave him the benefit of the doubt, conceded and agreed with him on that point... and he labels me a compulsive liar for doing so, ha ha.

...but is there any way we could get him to see it? If he is unable to attend to anything other than his own delusion, is there any hope for him? It's one of those lose-lose situations. The more we tell him he's crazy, the more he thinks he is more like Christ because hey, people thought he was crazy, too! I think that in order for him to even begin to see how irrational he is, it's going to take a lot of medication and therapy.

He's had moments of lucidity. He acquiesced, petulantly... but none the less... that his statement about 4 being the middle point of 7 (which it's not, it's 3.5). So he says 'I think it was clear I was referring to whole numbers' (which it also isn't, 3 and 4. 3 is too far to be called the mid point and 4 is to close to be called the midpoint). Finally he settled on this '4 is in the middle of the first 7 counting numbers: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7'. Which is correct in those terms... if you eliminate all numbers less than 1... it's in the middle.

So he is capable of modifying his statements, but we wind up with these... again, undignified... "4 is the middle point of 7 if you only use whole numbers and discount 0 as a number". It's the "Jupiter is the 4th planet if you don't count Earth" approach.
 
It's a picture of him with his church music group, though I don't think it's this exact event


@Brad Watson_Miami, does the rest of your congregation know that God-Incarnate is right there playing music with them? I'm sure they must be excited to play music with THE God-Incarnate himself, right?

So what was their honest reaction when you told then about all this GOD=7_4 business? Please answer my questions this time as you've ignored all my previous questions, a real God-Incarnate wouldn't do that.
I think this question deserves an answer as well, Brad. How does preaching to the choir go over?
 
OMG what a sick bastard! Janessa just told me that he told her it was okay to "abort" a baby as long as it hasn't taken it's first "holy breath" yet. That's just sick! Where did you even get the IDEA for "holy breath" !?
Brad, you are the exact opposite of everything Christ stood for. You even say killing FULLY DEVELOPED BABIES is okay, when the Bible is clear that "Thou shalt not kill." And you wonder why we don't believe you are Christ?
I have an assignment for you. Submit a list of GOOD QUALITIES that you actually possess to this board tomorrow. You have yet to demonstrate any good qualities that would lead us to believe that you are Christ. By good qualities I mean things like kindness, compassion, etc. and why you possess them. This is your opportunity to prove us wrong.
If you simply link us to something you have written before or copy and paste something from your website, it will be an instant FAIL F.
 

== Superbowl Scoreboard ==

New England 28 Seattle 24

Where did the GOD=7_4 algorithm appear?

The Patriots scored 7 + 7 + 7 +7.

Quarterback Tom Brady threw 37 completions in 50 attempts for 74.0% and 328 yards.
 
== Superbowl Scoreboard ==

New England 28 Seattle 24

Where did the GOD=7_4 algorithm appear?

The Patriots scored 7 + 7 + 7 +7.

Quarterback Tom Brady threw 37 completions in 50 attempts for 74.0% and 328 yards.

New England - 28
Seattle - 24

4+2 = 6
8-2 = 6
24 + 48 = 72
6 + 6 = 12
72/12 = 6

Superbowl = 666

You lose.
 
You're back here with this nonsense? With no proof?

We proved, son, without a shadow of a doubt, you ain’t got what it takes any more. You sit there and you thump your Bible and you say your prayers and it didn’t get you anywhere. Talk about your Psalms; talk about John 3:16—Austin 3:16 says I just whipped your ass.

Now give me a "Hell Yeah!"
giphy.gif
 
That wasn't me, but I saw the way you treated that poor girl ("Janessa Wagner")...
You are a liar; you are "Janessa Wagner" on Facebook.

New England - 28
Seattle - 24
The GOD=7_4 algorithm showed up in the Patriots scoring 28 points: 7+7+7+7 and Tom Brady's 74% passing completion. See http://GOD704.wikia.com .

Brady has now played in 6 Super Bowls and won 4. I predict he will play in one more Super Bowl and lose, thus ending his career with 7 Super Bowl appearances and 4 victories.

What was the color of Jesus' skin?
Light-brown with a suntan.

The Christ II is white with a little suntan.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
are you medicated?

edit: if i'm gathering correctly, you can grab the "god algorithm" from certain numbers yea? or is it sets of numbers?
 
Last edited:
Light-brown with a suntan.

The Christ II is white with a little suntan.
Acceptable answer.

Doesn't justify you taking so long to answer it to the point where I had to ask it thrice, but then again, Peter was asked thrice only to deny each time, so it probably fits this universe.

How do you get to Nestor?
 
Back