But that's not what happened at the Rio Olympics last month. I watched both the Men's & Women's Olympic Golf. They announced the golfers at the 1st Tee in English and Portuguese ONLY!
on BBC America 9/19/16 11-12 am
Oh my fuckin god did you admit you pull out everything from your ass"He advanced several theories on time." - We'll Always Have Paris, Star Trek: TNG (S1/Ep24, 198
Let me pull out my anal ysis of time...
Yeah, sure he does. (*cue links to his own websites*)
Being the curious sort, I checked out several sites and forums on reincarnation. The over-whelming consensus was if you commit suicide you a) have to sit out the rest of your natural life span in limbo (surely much more than four years in Marilyn's case); and b) you return as a lower life form (which would make your declaration a form of bigotry). So which is it, Brad? Ae you wrong or are you a bigot? Either way, you fail!
There you go again, citing yourself a a source. You are truly a bane to the concept of scientific theory and science in general.
That's definitely the funniest thing you've ever said. I laughed for five minutes.
Most of my friends are Jewish, as is my Rabbi. They all say you don't know what you're talking about.
So you have a source book that you conveniently can't find. Hey, Brad, how are you reading it if you can't find it?
7+4+7+4=22, you math prodigy, you.
First: There is no such thing as Unified Strings Theory (google that) other than what you have made up in you own little obtuse mind. There is Unified Field Theory (or the Theory of Everything) and String Theory. They are two different fields of physics. Second: You seem to think that asymmetry and symmetry breaking are the same thing. They are not. When you have a symmetry, symmetry breaking will will reduce (or "break") it down into 2 or more subgroups. Each subgroup is still symmetrical. This breaking can occur explicitly by the introduction of one or more terms into the symmetry equation. There are three possible origins for these terms: a) they can be introduced into the equation by hand on the basis of theoretical/experimental results; b) they can appear because of quantum-mechanical effects; or c) they can appear because of non-renormalizable effects. Spontaneous symmetry breaking occurs in a situation where, given a symmetry of the equations of motion, solutions exist which are not invariant under the action of this symmetry without any explicit asymmetric input (whence the attribute “spontaneous”). But it must be one of these two. There is no such thing as non-explicit/non-spontaneous symmetry breaking. Your claim to have done so is proof that you have no idea what you are talking about.
And again, the pot calls the kettle black.
Mathematics is a language, you 121209192093 moron! The primary language of mathematicians is mathematics!
Hypertime isn't something that actual scientists have ever proposed. Not even in jest.
You fucking up the number of days in your retarded disasterthon spit in the face of this claim boyo.
Yes, everybody knows that.
Wrong. I was watching the live broadcast of the Olympic Golf that the official 1st Tee announcer was making that went through the PA system for those in attendance.
That's just excuses to assuage your ego son...
Well, with how "accurate" you are with your mumbo jumbo, I could take my sweet time and reply in 47 days and it would still be less blatant goal post shifting than what you do here constantly.
"You obviously didn't just a couple hours ago.
Rest assured, it won't take much to make your pet gematria project look like dog shit. It's not like you'll ever aknowledge it and it's not like anyone doubts it.
Brad, there is no "correct theory" and that's what this is all about. We've been over this already. When you only look for proof in favor of a theory while neglecting everything that disproves it, you'll always "validate" it, no matter how asinine or moronic that theory is. It's called a confirmation bias and you're again showing your inability to grasp what the scientific method is about.
