Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

How do you grade Brad Watson? This is an official poll that reflects the will of GOD.

  • Excellent A - Freedom from corporeal shackles and permitted audience with THE LORD.

    Votes: 168 13.6%
  • Passing B - Freedom from corporeal shackles and free attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Fair C - Freedom from corporeal shackles. Given limited, general attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Poor D - Reincarnated as Man to be given a second chance at attempting to earn GOD's graces.

    Votes: 39 3.2%
  • Fail F - Reincarnated as a non-human for 326 years, 221 days, and 14 hours.

    Votes: 76 6.2%
  • Fail F - Sentenced to eternal tortures in HELL for crimes against THE LORD GOD.

    Votes: 106 8.6%
  • Fail F - Forced to post on the kiwifarms.net for 24 years, 30 days, and 2 hours.

    Votes: 802 64.9%

  • Total voters
    1,235
@BlueArmedDevil,

Tell us about the Serpent Mound. When? What did the guide tell you? Was "7 coils" mentioned? Was the Draco constellation mentioned? Did they have a nice gift shop and did you get a t-shirt or souvenir coffee cup?

@Graffiti canvas,

Be careful.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Perhaps, but that doesn't mean it wasn't "designed in accord with the pattern of stars composing the constellation Draco. The star pattern of the constellation Draco fits with fair precision to the Serpent Mound, with the ancient Pole Star, Thuban ('head of the serpent') (α Draconis), at its geographical center within the first of 7 coils from the head."
http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Draco_(constellation)

"As Above, So Below."
Whoever wrote that into the Serpent Mound article was an imbecile Brad; Thuban couldn't have been the Pole Star under which the mound was built, as Thuban stopped being the star in favor of two others; Kochab and Pherkad by the time the mound was being constructed. Even then, it was commonly considered around that time that there was no ship star or pole star, at least in the west.

So... wrong again.
 
@RomanesEuntDomus / RomanesCuntDufus,

Fuck you. From now on, just imagine that that is the reply you get from me every time you comment.
Dude, calm down, I was merely asking how you got to your conclusions...

You want people to belief you, you want people to know of your "discoveries". However you never want to be questioned at all. Not even in the slightest, you demand blind trust and obedience and are an ass towards everyone that dares pointing out how flimsy your claims are due to being entirely unsupported.

That is not the behaviour of a scientist and it is not the behaviour of a Messiah, Brad.

Why don't you see it like this: You don't just give us your discoveries, you also let us know how you discovered them...
 
@BlueArmedDevil,

Tell us about the Serpent Mound. When? What did the guide tell you? Was "7 coils" mentioned? Was the Draco constellation mentioned? Did they have a nice gift shop and did you get a t-shirt or souvenir coffee cup?
It's a big pile of dirt in the shape of a dragon. Didn't take the guided tour and I don't go for cheesy knick knacks.
 
Dude, calm down, I was merely asking how you got to your conclusions...

You want people to belief you, you want people to know of your "discoveries". However you never want to be questioned at all. Not even in the slightest, you demand blind trust and obedience and are an ass towards everyone that dares pointing out how flimsy your claims are due to being entirely unsupported.

That is not the behaviour of a scientist and it is not the behaviour of a Messiah, Brad.

Why don't you see it like this: You don't just give us your discoveries, you also let us know how you discovered them...
That's the thing; the Bible makes a point to show that Jesus would go out of his way to remove doubt from people; he did so with Thomas after all. And yet Brad can't even be arsed to try; all he can do is repeat, ignore, and tantrum, in about that order.
 
That's the thing; the Bible makes a point to show that Jesus would go out of his way to remove doubt from people; he did so with Thomas after all. And yet Brad can't even be arsed to try; all he can do is repeat, ignore, and tantrum, in about that order.
We've actually created a much more predictable "5 Stages of Brad" system in the past week. It's more reliable than the "theories" Brad has spent years tweaking. BTW, he again started the day at Stage 1 and is already at Stage 3.
 
It's no "arbitrary equation". It took me years to get it correctly and after many years of experimentation.

You can either accept it or dismiss it, but it's how GOD/Nature works.

---------------------------------------------------​

Pittsburgh 21 points - Georgia Tech 20 points

STOP THE GAME! AND DON'T RESTART IT UNTIL KIWIS DETERMINE EXACTLY WHAT A 'POINT' IS!
It took you years to figure out 5 x 20 = 100? You really are stupid, aren't you? And Kiwis understand points, Brad, we just don't understand your point.
My obligation of being the 2nd Coming of the Christ and my obligation of being a scientist and sharing my discoveries that are causing a paradigm shift.

Everyone,

If you want to be an antichrist, than fight me and fight everything I AM teaching. If you don't want to be an antichrist, than follow my teachings.
You are neither the Second Coming of Christ (we have proven that a number of times) nor are you a scientist (as you have proven in every post you've made). Not blindly believing everything you say doesn't make us antichrists, it makes us antiBrads.
@RomanesEuntDomus / RomanesCuntDufus,

Fuck you. From now on, just imagine that that is the reply you get from me every time you comment.
"Fuck you! And fuck you! And fuck you!" Brad seems to honestly believe this is a proper scientific response to requests for proper scientific evidence.

Intermission's over, back to the opera.
 
@BlueArmedDevil,

About 10 times in this thread I've explained that the Apostle Judas was no traitor - that was all Roman propaganda crap. WAKE UP!

That's about the most shallow description I can imagine for having visited the Serpent Mound. Why am I surprised?

What exactly do you hold sacred? Seriously. Who do you look up to? Can you give me a serious answer to these questions?
 
Why am I surprised?
I don't know, why are you?

What exactly do you hold sacred?
Well I was raised Lutheran, but now I subscribe to a more agnostic/taoist pointof view.

Who do you look up to?
Really no one tbh, great people are just people after all, with the same failing and weaknesses as the rest of us.

Can you give me a serious answer to these questions?
Happy?
 
Everyone - @voiceguy , @ChurchOfGodBear , @Adamska, @YankeeTrader , @bacterium , @RomanesEuntDomus - calling all demons,

In football, what exactly is a point? Who arbitrarily decided that a touchdown gets 6 points, a kicked extra point is 1 point, a run or throw is 2 points, a field goal gets 3 points, a safety 2, and grabbing the referee's groin is 4 points. Ok, I determined that last one. But if a substantial number of people want that to become part of football's rules, the point structure can be arbitrarily changed.

I AM watching Tennessee vs. Texas A&M where each team currently has 7 points. Everybody just accepts football's point structure without questioning it. WTF?! And these are all college-educated participants.

What is a point? What's the point?


Synchronism: 16:25 "That's the BIG question here." - Tennessee vs. Texas A&M on CBS

@BlueArmedDevil,

Ok, so you're an antichrist that holds nothing to be sacred and looks up to no one.

I already knew that, I guess I just wanted it to be part of the record.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
God Dammit, Brad. I've been very nice and civil to you while engaging in a perfectly reasonable line of questioning and expectation of learning.

Why you gotta be that way?

Everyone - @voiceguy , @ChurchOfGodBear , @Adamska - calling all demons,

In football, what exactly is a point? Who arbitrarily decided that a touchdown gets 6 points, a kicked extra point is 1 point, a run or throw is 2 points, a field goal gets 3 points, a safety 2, and grabbing the referee's groin is 4 points. Ok, I determined that last one. But if a substantial number of people want that to become part of football's rules, the point structure can be arbitrarily changed.

I AM watching Tennessee vs. Texas A&M where each team currently has 7 points. Everybody just accepts football's point structure without questioning it. WTF?! And these are all college-educated participants.

What is a point? What's the point?


Synchronism: 16:25 "That's the BIG question here." - Tennessee vs. Texas A& M on CBS
The point is, at the end of the game, whoever has the most points wins. It doesn't matter what the point structure is, so long as its structured and has clear rules for gaining a point or points.

However, your Theory of Luck is more like bowling with a curtain between the bowler and the pins. You know you're supposed to throw the ball to get points, but you don't know what you're throwing them at or how to do it effectively or even how the points are tabulated in the first place.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Everyone - @voiceguy , @ChurchOfGodBear , @Adamska, @YankeeTrader , @bacterium , @RomanesEuntDomus - calling all demons,

In football, what exactly is a point? Who arbitrarily decided that a touchdown gets 6 points, a kicked extra point is 1 point, a run or throw is 2 points, a field goal gets 3 points, a safety 2, and grabbing the referee's groin is 4 points. Ok, I determined that last one. But if a substantial number of people want that to become part of football's rules, the point structure can be arbitrarily changed.

I AM watching Tennessee vs. Texas A&M where each team currently has 7 points. Everybody just accepts football's point structure without questioning it. WTF?! And these are all college-educated participants.

What is a point? What's the point?


Synchronism: 16:25 "That's the BIG question here." - Tennessee vs. Texas A& M on CBS
In 1897, the touchdown scored five points, and the goal after touchdown added another point. In 1900, the definition of touchdown was changed to include situations where the ball becomes dead on or above the goal line. In 1912, the value of a touchdown was increased to six points. The end zone was also added.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touchdown

It's not like this information was hard to find. If you're questioning the point values, it's easy enough to satisfy that curiosity.
 
Everyone - @voiceguy , @ChurchOfGodBear , @Adamska, @YankeeTrader , @bacterium , @RomanesEuntDomus - calling all demons,

In football, what exactly is a point? Who arbitrarily decided that a touchdown gets 6 points, a kicked extra point is 1 point, a run or throw is 2 points, a field goal gets 3 points, a safety 2, and grabbing the referee's groin is 4 points. Ok, I determined that last one. But if a substantial number of people want that to become part of football's rules, the point structure can be arbitrarily changed.

I AM watching Tennessee vs. Texas A&M where each team currently has 7 points. Everybody just accepts football's point structure without questioning it. WTF?! And these are all college-educated participants.

What is a point? What's the point?


Synchronism: 16:25 "That's the BIG question here." - Tennessee vs. Texas A&M on CBS
What does this have to do with anything, though?

All I asked for was an explanation on how you even discovered your Luck equation. You said it took you a long time to discover and verify it, so I wanted to hear how the world's smartest head worked in order to come to these conclusions...

Again, you want people to believe you and to take this seriously, but you do nothing but demand obedience without ever trying to convince people. Posting claims without explaining their significance means they are meaningless to others. It's kind of :autism: to post some random thing and expect everyone to be on the same page as you, y'know...
 
What does this have to do with anything, though?

All I asked for was an explanation on how you even discovered your Luck equation. You said it took you a long time to discover and verify it...
Precisely.

@Brad Watson_Miami

If you took the time to verify it, you should be able to at least give some idea of how you verified it. That's not an unreasonable expectation for anyone trying to teach a method.
 
Back