Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

[RomanesEuntDomus]

Would Brad even want to seek treatment? In his delusions he's this really big deal. In real life he's kinda just a drummer past his prime.

Let me put it like this:
He can either live in a happy bubble where he is the smartest person alive, the incarnation of God and every major historical figure that has ever lived, blissfully unaware that his live is an endless, depressing circle of reposting crazy, meaningless nonsense into the void of the internet
-or-
He can be a dude in a Pedovan, that scrapes by hiring out his instruments and doing a gig every once in a while, who has obvious daddy-issues - but he would be sane and might improve his lot in life.

Everything that needs to be done to switch from one state to the other is going to a professional and getting help.
I can't blame him for not seeking help. He has the choice between being Lincolnstein or just a random bum.
I can, however, blame Sivabruntha, cause if she truly gave a shit about him, she'd encourage him to seek help. Seems to me, she just settled for someone who's comparatively nice at best and somewhat negleting at worst.
Let's just hope she doesn't leave him any time soon (even though I wouldn't know why she would waste her time with a jagoff like Dick Jr.), since that would undoubtedly have some grave consequences.
They would be grade A entertainment, though.

Brad's concept of enumeration is limited to the concept of Cardinal Numbers. That is to say that Brad has a concept in the usage of only 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. As 0 is a place holder, we do not count Zero itself as a Cardinal Number primarily because the abstract thought that nothing is there must be represented. In reality, the amount of numbers you can use between all Cardinal Numbers is literally infinite as described by Cantor's Diagonal Argument. There are more numbers in between 0 and 1 then there are on an infinite scale of Cardinal Numbers. Why is this important? Because it proves that there are different sizes of infinite numbers. But how does the proof of a multiple sizes of different infinite numbers correlate with the idea that there are 2 specific Cardinal Numbers that have special properties.

That paragraph alone contains more wisdom and shows off more mathematical knowledge than anything Dick Jr. has ever written in print-form or online, on this or any other forum. Combined.

 

[Y2K Baby]

How and Why Brad is Legit exceptional and Cannot Understand Math: An Autistic Mathematicians Essay on an Autistic Drummer

Brad's concept of enumeration is limited to the concept of Cardinal Numbers. That is to say that Brad has a concept in the usage of only 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. As 0 is a place holder, we do not count Zero itself as a Cardinal Number primarily because the abstract thought that nothing is there must be represented. In reality, the amount of numbers you can use between all Cardinal Numbers is literally infinite as described by Cantor's Diagonal Argument. There are more numbers in between 0 and 1 then there are on an infinite scale of Cardinal Numbers. Why is this important? Because it proves that there are different sizes of infinite numbers. But how does the proof of a multiple sizes of different infinite numbers correlate with the idea that there are 2 specific Cardinal Numbers that have special properties.

In truth, they don't. Cardinal Numbers in of themselves are placeholders, much like 0 is for nothing, for infinity itself.

Brad's argument is the belief that the Cardinal Numbers of 4 and 7 are primary and applicable to whatever he's making up. In any situation, let's say there are exactly nine outcomes (a). Let's also say that for every seven negative outcomes (b, c, d, e, f, g, h), there are two positive outcomes(i, j). Let's additionally add the idea that it does not matter in which outcome or series of outcomes matter (x).

We'll call it "Watson's Universal Bijection" and it would look like this:

a = (b+c+d+e+f+g+h)(i+j) / x

In exactly nine outcomes, seven negative aspects and two positive aspects will arrange themselves in order no matter the series of outcomes.

You could also liken this to having a 9-sided die. In Brad's mind, you would need to roll the die, exactly 9 times and each time, in any order, you would definitively and not statistically or theoretically roll a 4 or a 7. If you rolled the die 9 times for each 9 outcomes, Brad states that in each block of 9 rolls as a set, a 4 and a 7 will and must appear.

This is mathematically incorrect and incoherent. Cantor's axiom proves the existence of infinite inconsistent sets of infinite numbers. While 4 and 7 will appear, they of themselves hold no other place than to be the pillars to the previous set of an infinite set of numbers and thereby cannot hold any sort of metaphysical power by their random appearance in the every day world.

tl;dr: Brad has a 1/5 chance of being "right" in finding the numbers 4 and 7 together while simultaneously not meaning a fucking thing.

You didn't need to do any of this to prove that a golf announcer saying 7 doesn't necessarily mean you're Jesus.

 

[RomanesEuntDomus]

You didn't need to do any of this to prove that a golf announcer saying 7 doesn't necessarily mean you're Jesus.

But where's the fun in that?
In this thread, disproving Dick Jr. isn't really about showing off that one is more educated than Dick, that would be like trying to show off you've got a better hygiene than ADF. It really is a moot point and anyone who needs to do that in order to boost his confidence is truly worthy of his own thread on KF.
Sometimes, it's just fun to sperg around and shine a light on exactly how wrong Dick is or why his theories fail so hard that he doesn't even have a single person believing them.

 

[Y2K Baby]

he doesn't even have a single person believing them

Wrong.

 

[Adamska]

Yeah, the matter that Dick is using a similar logic to the frauds who claim to predict earthquakes is pretty nice to just see get torn down in detail. It's like taking a spotlight and looking at a particularly inept statue; you can't help but show where and why the sculptor fucked up.

 

[RomanesEuntDomus]

Wrong.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

At this point I just tune into this thread to see what mockumentary/ aliens documentary Brad has watched the night before. The terrible math and "judgement's" have become repetitive.

 

[NobleGreyHorse]

Bijection

I feel like this should mean something else. Like a woman saying, "No, I will absolutely not have a threesome with you and your girlfriend," thus issuing a bijection. Sorry. I like words more, although your mathematical proof was far more elegant than this thread deserves. Carry on!

 

[bbpoison]

Too bad Brad doesn't watch Twin Peaks. There is so many numbers on that show. Escpecially 7. That's David Lynch's favourite number. On reddit, people were even trying to apply gematria to the characters' names.

 

[Y2K Baby]

Candle lit bedroom... Soft lavender sheets... The stereo playing the gentle ambience of the numbers station... Brad gently strokes Count von Count's head until he pulls him in to whisper sweet nothings into his ear.... 1056 pages worth....

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

So someone finally responded to Brad's bullshit on Facebook and I quote
"please stop talking I am running out of clean clothes because I keep pissing myself laughing.
I have seldom seen someone spew so much idiocy"

Brad's response was the typical judgement we've seen here.
Response "really, you can tell all that just by me typing that? here is the thing, if repenting means I will be stuck with you and your ilk, any other place will be like heaven. So since you are saying I am going to hell that means you'll be stuck with me forever. Might want to give that a though"


Even people on his Facebook are getting tired of his shit.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

So someone finally responded to Brad's bullshit on Facebook and I quote
"please stop talking I am running out of clean clothes because I keep pissing myself laughing.
I have seldom seen someone spew so much idiocy"

Brad's response was the typical judgement we've seen here.
Response "really, you can tell all that just by me typing that? here is the thing, if repenting means I will be stuck with you and your ilk, any other place will be like heaven. So since you are saying I am going to hell that means you'll be stuck with me forever. Might want to give that a though"


Even people on his Facebook are getting tired of his shit.

That honestly really surprises me... that anyone is reading at all, I mean. Brad's FB posts are shockingly bereft of responses. No likes, no replies, no acknowledgement of any kind. Fuck, I can post a photo of my morning coffee and get two likes. Brad's lack of FB engagement is basically more evidence that HE HAS NO PEOPLE IN HIS REAL LIFE TO SOCIALIZE WITH. Even the people on his FB feed either ignore him or systematically unfollow him, because despite being his "friend" they know better than to waste their time reading this.

It echoes when he admitted that he doesn't enjoy friendly dinner conversation with his peers, and that most of the people in his social group are actually friends of Brenda's.

And it again echoes when he had to invent a friend who 'won the lottery' so it could seem like anyone took him seriously.

I'm not surprised by the fact that someone told Brad to STFU, but I'm shocked that it's only happened now.

 

[RomanesEuntDomus]

Even the people on his FB feed either ignore him or systematically follow him, because despite being his "friend" they know better than to waste their time reading this.

If he has some form of social contacts, I would assume they only stick around in the swamp of his FB madness to check when he's about to snap and intervene in time.

I like to imagine Brad standing with a couple of old friends on the golf course and as someone is getting ready to strike the ball, Brad suddenly launches into a rant about the only topic that he's capable of regurgitating ad infinitum with his friends sighing, hanging their heads low, waiting for Brad to be done so they can actually proceed to play the game while they wonder just what went wrong... and why they still spend time with him even though they know good times are over.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

That honestly really surprises me... that anyone is reading at all, I mean. Brad's FB posts are shockingly bereft of responses. No likes, no replies, no acknowledgement of any kind. Fuck, I can post a photo of my morning coffee and get two likes. Brad's lack of FB engagement is basically more evidence that HE HAS NO PEOPLE IN HIS REAL LIFE TO SOCIALIZE WITH. Even the people on his FB feed either ignore him or systematically unfollow him, because despite being his "friend" they know better than to waste their time reading this.

It echoes when he admitted that he doesn't enjoy friendly dinner conversation with his peers, and that most of the people in his social group are actually friends of Brenda's.

And it again echoes when he had to invent a friend who 'won the lottery' so it could seem like anyone took him seriously.

I'm not surprised by the fact that someone told Brad to STFU, but I'm shocked that it's only happened now.

I get more likes from my posts on Facebook with 1/20th of the amount of people that Brad has, which is sad.

That being said. Most of the people on his friends list aren't active. Those that are probably don't see his posts because they get swamped by other posts from real friends.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

If he has some form of social contacts, I would assume they only stick around in the swamp of his FB madness to check when he's about to snap and intervene in time.

I like to imagine Brad standing with a couple of old friends on the golf course and as someone is getting ready to strike the ball, Brad suddenly launches into a rant about the only topic that he's capable of regurgitating ad infinitum with his friends sighing, hanging their heads low, waiting for Brad to be done so they can actually proceed to play the game while they wonder just what went wrong... and why they still spend time with him even though they know good times are over.

I, in turn, imagine that Sivabruntha has a decent circle of friends who want to go out with her socially, and Brad is the fifth wheel they need to bring along out of decency. I also picture Brad being the clubhouse pick for groups who are one short of a full game. No one really wants to take him, per se, but it's pretty much understood that he's the local tard and hauling him along will be your good deed for the day.

I want to believe that Brad has actual friends in his life, I really do. I just see zero evidence of it.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I, in turn, imagine that Sivabruntha has a decent circle of friends who want to go out with her socially, and Brad is the fifth wheel they need to bring along out of decency. I also picture Brad being the clubhouse pick for groups who are one short of a full game. No one really wants to take him, per se, but it's pretty much understood that he's the local tard and hauling him along will be your good deed for the day.

I want to believe that Brad has actual friends in his life, I really do. I just see zero evidence of it.

Best I've seen of "friends" are just people he works with for gigs.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

Best I've seen of "friends" are just people he works with for gigs.

Indeed. And I'm not even sure he understands the difference. Brad's delusions are likely a full substitute for a social life... his brain is so engaged at looking for "patterns" that he never tries to just have fun. Hence, he'll rattle off every 7 and 4 in a Star Trek episode (usually fucking even that up) but have no ability to discuss what about the show he actually LIKED.

 

[Batman VS Tony Danza]

Indeed. And I'm not even sure he understands the difference. Brad's delusions are likely a full substitute for a social life... his brain is so engaged at looking for "patterns" that he never tries to just have fun. Hence, he'll rattle off every 7 and 4 in a Star Trek episode (usually fucking even that up) but have no ability to discuss what about the show he actually LIKED.

The man's knowledge of the actual stories from the shows he's quoting is fucking terrible. He can remember some lines and some basic plot elements but he seems to gloss over moral conflict and smaller actions that represent bigger ideas. He either purposely ignores the subtext or just isn't capable of grasping it sometimes. I'm leaning more toward the former because Brad has a habit of ignoring any information that conflicts with his delusion or doesn't serve it.

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

Capt. Kirk asked her, "How long has it been?" "4 years, 7 months and..." - Star Trek, Court Martial (S1/Ep20, 1967)

"All one can do is find which mathematical models describe the universe we live in." - Stephen Hawking

GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4 is thee mathematical model. Trekkies recognize that the combination of 4 & 7 came into use in The Next Generation and has continued since. But it started in the pilot of the Original Series and subtley continued throughout its three years.

 

[RomanesEuntDomus]

GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4 is thee mathematical model.

Care to elaborate how it applies to the relationship of metallicity of stars and their luminosity, please?