Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

How do you grade Brad Watson? This is an official poll that reflects the will of GOD.

  • Excellent A - Freedom from corporeal shackles and permitted audience with THE LORD.

    Votes: 168 13.6%
  • Passing B - Freedom from corporeal shackles and free attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Fair C - Freedom from corporeal shackles. Given limited, general attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Poor D - Reincarnated as Man to be given a second chance at attempting to earn GOD's graces.

    Votes: 39 3.2%
  • Fail F - Reincarnated as a non-human for 326 years, 221 days, and 14 hours.

    Votes: 76 6.2%
  • Fail F - Sentenced to eternal tortures in HELL for crimes against THE LORD GOD.

    Votes: 106 8.6%
  • Fail F - Forced to post on the kiwifarms.net for 24 years, 30 days, and 2 hours.

    Votes: 802 64.9%

  • Total voters
    1,235
Does her relationship status say she's in a relationship?
Cause at this point, I wouldn't put it past Brad that he claims that Sivabruntha is his gf even though he told him to fuck off years ago.
Brad and reality mixes about as well as water and oil.

It's sketchy. They only solid confirmation we have is that Brenda confirmed it on a forum post years ago... but that doesn't account for what might have happened since then. It's possible (albeit pure speculation) that the relationship ended, and if Brenda's FB refers to a boyfriend, it's someone other than Brad).

Having said that, it's clear that Brenda's standards for a guy are "he's funny and he doesn't hit me". Since Brad continues to fit that description, I see no reason to doubt the longevity of their romance.
 
Does her relationship status say she's in a relationship?
Cause at this point, I wouldn't put it past Brad that he claims that Sivabruntha is his gf even though he told him to fuck off years ago.
Brad and reality mixes about as well as water and oil.

Nope, but she does talk about him and have photos with him. They are seeing each other, I can verify that.


It's sketchy. They only solid confirmation we have is that Brenda confirmed it on a forum post years ago... but that doesn't account for what might have happened since then. It's possible (albeit pure speculation) that the relationship ended, and if Brenda's FB refers to a boyfriend, it's someone other than Brad).

Having said that, it's clear that Brenda's standards for a guy are "he's funny and he doesn't hit me". Since Brad continues to fit that description, I see no reason to doubt the longevity of their romance.
February 14, 2017
2764.png
2764.png
2764.png
My love of my life, Brad
2764.png
2764.png
2764.png
 
If Sivabruntha wasn't so dismissive about Brad's clear need of medical attention, I would feel sad for her...

Yeah, I got over that hump myself a while back. Either she's a full enabler, completely dismissing Brad's very real need for help, she's a vulture and somehow benefits from it, or she's codependent and is as far gone as he is. Only the latter can get any sympathy from me, and the fact that Brenda is cognizant of the fact that Brad is nuts really makes the third option a long shot.

I mean, real talk, Brad is at an age where he will be struggling to maintain his mental and physical health regardless. Time is doing him no favors. To not get him help in something that might actually be treatable is really, really shitty.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RomanesEuntDomus
Yeah, I got over that hump myself a while back. Either she's a full enabler, completely dismissing Brad's very real need for help, she's a vulture and somehow benefits from it, or she's codependent and is as far gone as he is. Only the latter can get any sympathy from me, and the fact that Brenda is cognizant of the fact that Brad is nuts really makes the third option a long shot.

I mean, real talk, Brad is at an age where he will be struggling to maintain his mental and physical health regardless. Time is doing him no favors. To not get him help in something that might actually be treatable is really, really shitty.

I'd say this was all a ploy to troll people online since people know Brad and her are together, but they share no friends so she can hide his crazy ramblings on his Facebook page.
 
Optimistic take: maybe she has managed to keep all his crazy confined to online stuff. If he's not going batshit about 7s and 4s in public he might be tolerable.
 
I mean, real talk, Brad is at an age where he will be struggling to maintain his mental and physical health regardless. Time is doing him no favors. To not get him help in something that might actually be treatable is really, really shitty.
Yeah, just compare his older photos with this one, that I assume is more recent:

 
We don't have anything recent. I'm hoping she's reined him in over the years. I think I've said before, but posting in KF is wayyyy better than yelling on a street corner. We are too lazy and apathetic to actually harm Brad.
I want to believe this, but Brad (by his own admission) screamed at Jehovah's Witnesses at a political event not even two years ago. Problems like this get worse, not better, when left unattended.
 
Scientists now say, "Everything is energy and information".​

Actually real scientists don't say that at all, pseudo-scientists do. Such as this article https://www.consciouslifestylemag.com/everything-is-energy-illusion-reality/
Notice how the author doesn't know when we first started thinking of quantum mechanics (it wasn't a hundred years ago, more like over 300). That article is also from 2006. Planck didn't even receive his Nobel prize until 1918, 1919 to get something actually physical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RomanesEuntDomus
@ChurchOfGodHippo,

What an idiot. Jehovah Witnesses don't attend political events - they don't vote.

--------------------------​

@Anonymus Fluffer,

Actually, real scientists like Dr. Seth Lloyd of MIT refers to "Everything is information" in his book, Programming the Universe. "Particles not only collide, they compute".

Programming the Universe.jpg
 
Last edited:
@Anonymus Fluffer,

Actually, real scientists like Dr. Seth Lloyd of MIT refers to "Everything is information" in his book, Programming the Universe. "Particles not only collide, they compute".


Oh? You can cite a single book but you cannot be bothered to cite the page? That's pretty lazy of you Richard. I remember you saying you always cite your sources.

By the way, you claimed "scientists" as in plural. In science you would actually need the majority for it to be agreed on. A book written in 2006 as just a theory doesn't count.

This should also be mentioned (This is the MIT Technology Review site)
Why The Universe Is Not a Computer After All
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/508246/why-the-universe-is-not-a-computer-after-all/
In case anyone is interested in the 10 page paper
https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.7081v2
 
Last edited:
Actually, real scientists like Dr. Seth Lloyd of MIT refers to "Everything is information" in his book, Programming the Universe. "Particles not only collide, they compute".
Just like your insistence about the day of Christ's birth, you've found a single source that says what you want to hear. That being done, you've stopped looking for others to back it up. Basing your entire idea on a single data point is unscientific, but we already know you're not a scientist.
 
Just like your insistence about the day of Christ's birth, you've found a single source that says what you want to hear. That being done, you've stopped looking for others to back it up. Basing your entire idea on a single data point is unscientific, but we already know you're not a scientist.

More scientists disagree with the universe being a quantum computer than those that do. Scientist who believe in it ignore a lot of little things.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RomanesEuntDomus
The spoken word is linked to the written word which is based on its alphabet which is phonetic, pictographic, and has a numerical order connected to the Bible30, Nature and science.
Wow, it's like you went for some sort of record on how many mistakes you could make in one sentence.
 
Back