Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

How do you grade Brad Watson? This is an official poll that reflects the will of GOD.

  • Excellent A - Freedom from corporeal shackles and permitted audience with THE LORD.

    Votes: 168 13.6%
  • Passing B - Freedom from corporeal shackles and free attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Fair C - Freedom from corporeal shackles. Given limited, general attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Poor D - Reincarnated as Man to be given a second chance at attempting to earn GOD's graces.

    Votes: 39 3.2%
  • Fail F - Reincarnated as a non-human for 326 years, 221 days, and 14 hours.

    Votes: 76 6.2%
  • Fail F - Sentenced to eternal tortures in HELL for crimes against THE LORD GOD.

    Votes: 106 8.6%
  • Fail F - Forced to post on the kiwifarms.net for 24 years, 30 days, and 2 hours.

    Votes: 802 64.9%

  • Total voters
    1,235
Wrong, the global norm is to measure the speed-of-sound at freezing - 32 degrees F/0 degrees C. At freezing, sound travels at 741 mph.

Wrong, my data is correct.

I AM God-incarnate and I've never lied to myself or to GOD.
No, you've been very upfront about how you don't care about minorities.
 
@RomainDunceDufus,

Adam's right forearm = 1 common cubit of 6 palms x 4 fingers = 24 digits. But the ancient Sumerians/Babylonians, Egyptians, and Hebrews recognized the sacred combination of 7 & 4 in the heavens and added a palm to make sacred royal cubits of 7 palms x 4 fingers = 28 digits. "As Above, So Below".

http://Wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubit

@[V A P O R W A V E]

The D'evil is Donald Trump = 666. How do you imagine yourself hanging out with him?

Donald Trump opposite of the Christ.jpg

At 0C, (sound) would be traveling at 741.096mph (741.1 mph).
Finally, you got something right. GOD knows it took you two years, but doesn't it feel GOOD?
the rest of the world doesn't use American systems
No shit, Sherlock, hence the term 'American System'. But the rest of the world is well aware of using the measurement of mph and often have signs in non-US countries in both kilometers and miles.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The letter U was first used in the 14th century as a distinct letter. Before that we used v's.
Everybody knows that. Your use of v's is wrong - there's no possessive. It should be Vs or just V.
Hell, W was originally double V's
You mean double Vs.
and why it's called a "doo-bluh-vay" literally meaning double V's. Not that I would expect Richard here to know something as simple as the French alphabet.
Douche (originally a French word), the English and French alphabet are identical. Yet, it was the 1629 Cambridge King James Bible that established the letter J, the modern 26-letter alphabet, and Simple6,74 English7,74 Gematria8,74.
 
Wrong, the global norm is to measure the speed-of-sound at freezing - 32 degrees F/0 degrees C. At freezing, sound travels at 741 mph.

Wrong, my data is correct.

I AM God-incarnate and I've never lied to myself or to GOD.

If your data is correct why can't you cite your sources Richard? Face it, you're a failure of a man who never amounted to anything so you come up with a lie that you're god and famous people throughout history who have actually done something with their lives.

Average speed of sound is 1130ft. per second at room temperature. Temperature, humidity and gas present will change those speeds (https://www.school-for-champions.com/science/sound_speed_gas.htm, that formula is pretty easy to understand.). You really need to either stop talking nonsense or stop talking about science all together. It's obvious to people here it wasn't one of of your good grades.


Finally, you got something right. GOD knows it took you two years, but doesn't it feel GOOD?

No shit, Sherlock, hence the term 'American System'. But the rest of the world is well aware of using the measurement of mph and often have signs in non-US countries in both kilometers and miles.
I've been on this forum for little more than a year Richard, keep on proving how bad you are at math.

Way to quote mine Richard to try and prove you're right, too bad people can read my full comment.

No we don't here we just use Km (kilometers) or m for meters. Any time you see m here on a sign it's meters. Maybe leave your country once and a while Richard, you'll actually learn something about others.

Oh wait, you have a hard time understanding English, what hope would you have in another country?
 
Last edited:
If your data is correct why can't you cite your sources?
http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_Sound

There are many other sites that list the speed-of-sound at freezing (32F/0C) as 741 mph. It's funny how you didn't even know this fact until yesterday and I first pointed it out on the Internet over 12 years ago. Yet, you act like you're a expert on the subject. "Room temperature"? Whose room?! How unscientific of you. What a dumb ass and that's a dumb ass at room temperature in any room!

I had an email exchange with the infamous* atheist Michael Shermer editor of Skeptic Magazine around 12 years ago about GOD=7_4 Theory and its existensive evidence. He ignored all the data but a couple examples that needed to be more exactly referenced. He pointed out how the SOS changes with temperature and I replied that the standard measurement for SOS was at freezing which produced 741 mph. He didn't respond to that.


*Synchronism: 6.4.2018 20:18 "Companies prefer data from Watson" - IBM ad on CNN
 
Last edited:
http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_Sound

There are many other sites that list the speed-of-sound at freezing (32F/0C) as 741 mph. It's funny how you didn't even know this fact until yesterday and I first pointed it out on the Internet over 12 years ago. Yet, you act like you're a expert on the subject. What a dumb ass!

As always you fail to read the whole page and stop soon as you see 7's and 4's.

In common everyday speech, speed of sound refers to the speed of sound waves in air. However, the speed of sound varies from substance to substance: sound travels most slowly in gases; it travels faster in liquids; and faster still in solids. For example, (as noted above), sound travels at 343 m/s in air; it travels at 1,484 m/sin water (4.3 times as fast as in air); and at 5,120 m/s in iron (about 15 times as fast as in air). In an exceptionally stiff material such as diamond, sound travels at 12,000 metres per second (26,843 mph);[1] (about 35 times as fast as in air) which is around the maximum speed that sound will travel under normal conditions.

(I already linked a site that tells you the difference depending on gases in the air, and the difference humidity can make)

You of course fail to see that it depends on substance to substance.

Your reading comprehension is worse than a preschooler's.

By the way, Michael Shermer probably didn't respond because he has a life like most writers or because you got his name wrong (like you always do).
 
Last edited:
As always you fail to read the whole page and stop soon as you see 7's and 4's.
I first read the Wikipedia article on the Speed of Sound over 12 years ago. When did you first read it? And 7's and 4's is incorrect - they are not possessive* - it's 7s and 4s. Your grammar is not as good as many 5th graders.


*Synchronism: 21:06 "Numbers?" - ST: TNG, The Ensigns of Command (S3/Ep2, 1989) on H&I
 
Last edited:
I first read the Wikipedia article on the Speed of Sound over 12 years ago. When did you first read it? And 7's and 4's is incorrect - they are not possessive* - it's 7s and 4s. Your grammar is not as good as many 5th graders.


*Synchronism: 21:06 "Numbers?" - ST: TNG, The Ensigns of Command (S3/Ep2, 1989) on H&I

Well I read the Handbook of the Speed of Sound in Real Gases in 2003 in school. Good read, but 1000 pages is probably too much for you, not to mention probably too expensive for you to buy but you really should try and read books instead of relying on Wikipedia all of the time.
 
The issue isn't that people could predict 20th Century U.S. English. The issue is that they would only predict 20th Century U.S. English. Why? Why predict that specific language for that specific time? There's dozens of widely-used languages and they all transform very rapidly. English 200 years ago is borderline unreadable to modern English, and modern English is probably going to be borderline unreadable 200 years from now. What's so special about now? Why do the people only a few hundred years ago, or people in any other place in the world, get ignored? Or perhaps we have no future and the rapture is coming to murder us all so we can never invent or modify language ever again. I'll accept that excuse.
 
So after the Memorial tournament Tiger Woods came in with a spectacular finish of 23 place 9 under par.
Don't call it a come back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adamska
Oh, just wait for Brad to "prove" his nonsense by pointing out someone had a 7 somewhere in their scores.

"Lowest Price $174" - ad for TripAdvisor on BBCAmerica 6.5.18 9:33

Wow, brad couldn't have proved your point harder if he were trying.

Brad, since you seem reluctant to discuss your prior and possible current drug habits, here's another question. What do you make of the fact that the definition for synchronism is "coincidence?"

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/synchronism
 
Back