Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

How do you grade Brad Watson? This is an official poll that reflects the will of GOD.

  • Excellent A - Freedom from corporeal shackles and permitted audience with THE LORD.

    Votes: 168 13.6%
  • Passing B - Freedom from corporeal shackles and free attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Fair C - Freedom from corporeal shackles. Given limited, general attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Poor D - Reincarnated as Man to be given a second chance at attempting to earn GOD's graces.

    Votes: 39 3.2%
  • Fail F - Reincarnated as a non-human for 326 years, 221 days, and 14 hours.

    Votes: 76 6.2%
  • Fail F - Sentenced to eternal tortures in HELL for crimes against THE LORD GOD.

    Votes: 106 8.6%
  • Fail F - Forced to post on the kiwifarms.net for 24 years, 30 days, and 2 hours.

    Votes: 802 64.9%

  • Total voters
    1,235
Mary Mother of God-incarnate did not have a "virgin birth" - that's a myth. I thought everybody knew this by now.

You claim to be the reincarnation of Jesus and you deny THIS? That's one of the founding principles of Christianity's backstory. Besides, it's kinda hard to be a God incarnate reincarnation when your previous incarnations obviously were not in any way.
 
You claim to be the reincarnation of Jesus and you deny THIS? That's one of the founding principles of Christianity's backstory. Besides, it's kinda hard to be a God incarnate reincarnation when your previous incarnations obviously were not in any way.

He wouldn't be the first "Christian" to completely contradict the Bible. I'd like to see him math his way out of that.

Also: 200 fucking pages and this guy is still here?
 
To my new 'friends' on this forum,

With GOD's constant help, I've fulfilled the prophecy of The Revelation 5:1-10:10 by having produced the "book/scroll...sealed with 7 seals"/'beyond Einstein theories'. Please see http://7seals.blogspot.com . This 74-page booklet is entitled, There Are No Coincidences - there is synchronism, design and alignment and it plus much more can be found at http://7seals.yuku.com . According to the Bible, only the 2nd Coming of the Christ can accomplish this.
Do you have maybe a Cliff's notes version, please? Also, would you please sum up the previous 190 pages of this thread because I don't like happy sphenic deficients?
 
Ravenor,

I AM not a numerologist so any points of reference you use wouldn't hold any meaning to me. I am not being antagonistic with you in that last statement, I was just explaining my reasoning.

You're apparently too mentally lazy and too committed to being an atheist to take two minutes to read http://GOD704.wikia.com . Therefore...


Today is your Judgment Day: you FAIL F.

Sentence: Postponed while I review your case. It would be in your eternal soul's best interest to either do your homework on the GOD=7_4 algorithm/code or disappear from this thread.

I AM truly here to try to help you and others.


Hey rember when Brad claimed to not be a Numerologist? Good times, good times.
 
59b7950913aa9a3a93e356554ddbf514.png
 

Very good computation, friend, though I trust that Brad will naturally ignore it because it (a) flies in the face of his autistic belief system and (b) is irrefutable.

I'll say this: I would sooner run away screaming if I saw any lolcow coming towards me from the other end of the street, but I would love sit down and have a chat with Brad if I could. Hey @Brad Watson_Miami , are we ever going to get a livestream Q&A? It would be a hit!
 
I'm the Antichrist and a good boy. That is just so Brad of you
And it's part of the definition of synchronism.
And it is just so Brad of you.
heaven: 1. the expanse of space that seems to be over the earth like a dome : firmament —usually used in plural - heavens, 2. a. often capitalized : the dwelling place of the Deity and the blessed dead - Heaven. b. a spiritual state of everlasting communion with God. 3. capitalized God, 4. a place or condition of utmost happiness. 5. Christian Science, a state of thought in which sin is absent and the harmony of divine Mind is manifest.

Uh, antichrist voiceguy, what was you source for that? And why are you so mean all the time? It's one harsh attack after another. Take-it-down-a-notch. Find another outlet for your anger. Play some loud drums and/or hit some golf bols.
I am happy to give you my source, even though you rarely gives yours (unless your source is yourself). That definition comes from the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, which is the dictionary of choice for nearly every school in this country. What is your source for saying bols instgead of balls? Not the mystic mumbo-jumbo crap you made up before (by the way, I found no reference for 0810 meaning Moon in Hindi, the Hindi word for moon is Chandra -- google that!) When you google bols, nothing about balls comes up, so give me link to your source so I know you're not just pulling my leg because that would be just so Brad of you.

You said I deserved for my wife to die, my mother to be dying, and my daughter to be leaving me -- and yet you say I'm the mean one? THAT'S SO BRAD!!!!!
 
I’d be glad to perform some experiments. For one thing, your math sucks, so let’s clean that up:


luck 100 = [karma 4 + modesty 1] x [desire 4 + actions 4 +abilities 4 + contributions 4 + blessings 4]


First, let’s get rid of that “1”. It’s understood, so no need to have it in there.

luck 100 = [karma 4 + modesty] x [desire 4 + actions 4 + abilities 4 + contributions 4 + blessings 4]

Now let’s distribute that 4 in the second quantity.

luck 100 = [karma 4 + modesty] x 4 [desire + actions + abilities + contributions + blessings]

With that, we can really start. Hmm, seems we can easily invert that 100 and turn this into fractions. Percentages, even!

luck = ([karma 4 + modesty]/100) x (4 [desire + actions + abilities + contributions + blessings]/100)

So then, we just cross-multiply.

luck = ([karma 4 + modesty]*100) /( 100*4 [desire + actions + abilities + contributions + blessings])

100s cancel out.

luck = (karma 4 + modesty) / ( 4 [desire + actions + abilities + contributions + blessings])

4s cancel out.

luck = (karma + 1/4 modesty) / (desire + actions + abilities + contributions + blessings)

Which basically gives us either a 1/x or an x/1 function. The former has a limit of zero, the latter has a limit of infinity. So, if I want to have good luck, I need to try to have tons of karma and modesty, while minimizing my desires, actions, contributions, or blessings.

So basically, I have to be an entitled shit and not actually do anything, just wait for good things to happen to me. According to you, Chris Chan is the luckiest person on the planet. How do all you cows end up having the same outlook on life?

Let's try this again.

luck 100 = [karma 4 + modesty 1] x [desire 4 + actions 4 +abilities 4 + contributions 4 + blessings 4]

Dropping the one is sensible, as is pulling the 4 out to the front.

luck 100 = [karma 4 + modesty] x 4 [desire + actions + abilities + contributions + blessings]

For ease of notation, karma will be referred to as A, modesty as B and the [desire + actions + abilities + contributions + blessings] term will be referred to as C.

luck 100 = [4A + B] x 4C

Dividing both sides by 100 as you've done

luck = [4A+B] x 4C /100

Looks different doesn't it? That's because you divided both terms on the right side by 100 to yield

luck = [4A+B]/100 x 4C/100

Which of course reduces to

luck = [4A+B] x 4C/10000

And does not equal the original equation

I have no idea how you decided the following two things were equal to one another because you said they were both equal to luck

(4A +B)/100 x 4C/100 = 100(4A+B) / 100*4C

But that is just plain untrue. There's no way to make this adjustment without also multiplying luck (which would mean they are no longer equal to each other so this problem would not exist), which you left unchanged during this transformation. You can't just decide a term that was multiplied is now divided because you really want to, that's silly. An algebraic equation cannot be rearranged so that when all terms are on the same sides which they began a different result is obtained, it just means you fucked up.

I'm not sure why people endorsed this conclusion of yours, I thought making the math fit your answer was to be discouraged. Numbers are our friends and we shouldn't be dishonest with them.
 
Let's try this again.

luck 100 = [karma 4 + modesty 1] x [desire 4 + actions 4 +abilities 4 + contributions 4 + blessings 4]

Dropping the one is sensible, as is pulling the 4 out to the front.

luck 100 = [karma 4 + modesty] x 4 [desire + actions + abilities + contributions + blessings]

For ease of notation, karma will be referred to as A, modesty as B and the [desire + actions + abilities + contributions + blessings] term will be referred to as C.

luck 100 = [4A + B] x 4C

Dividing both sides by 100 as you've done

luck = [4A+B] x 4C /100

Looks different doesn't it? That's because you divided both terms on the right side by 100 to yield

luck = [4A+B]/100 x 4C/100

Which of course reduces to

luck = [4A+B] x 4C/10000

And does not equal the original equation

I have no idea how you decided the following two things were equal to one another because you said they were both equal to luck

(4A +B)/100 x 4C/100 = 100(4A+B) / 100*4C

But that is just plain untrue. There's no way to make this adjustment without also multiplying luck (which would mean they are no longer equal to each other so this problem would not exist), which you left unchanged during this transformation. You can't just decide a term that was multiplied is now divided because you really want to, that's silly. An algebraic equation cannot be rearranged so that when all terms are on the same sides which they began a different result is obtained, it just means you fucked up.

I'm not sure why people endorsed this conclusion of yours, I thought making the math fit your answer was to be discouraged. Numbers are our friends and we shouldn't be dishonest with them.
I stand corrected. Thank you.
 
You're an admitted antichrist. You're obviously not thee Antichrist. STOP being such a 421385217.

Ronald(6 letters) Wilson(6) Reagan(6) was the "666 1st Beast"/Antichrist.

George Walker Bush Jr. was the "2nd Beast"/Antichrist.

United(6) States(6) Dollar(6) is the "666 mark of the Beast".

I, the Christ have returned; see the "7seals" revealed as 'beyond Einstein theories' at http://7seals.blogspot.com .


Now you can't tell GOD, "I didn't know!"

Mr. @Brad Watson_Miami, are you 55378008?
Am I EECGHOOH? Uh. WTF?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You're an admitted antichrist. You're obviously not thee Antichrist. STOP being such a 421385217.

Ronald(6 letters) Wilson(6) Reagan(6) was the "666 1st Beast"/Antichrist.

George Walker Bush Jr. was the "2nd Beast"/Antichrist.

United(6) States(6) Dollar(6) is the "666 mark of the Beast".

I, the Christ have returned; see the "7seals" revealed as 'beyond Einstein theories' at http://7seals.blogspot.com .


Now you can't tell GOD, "I didn't know!"

Forgive me if someone has already asked this, but I see that these are both Republican presidents. Back in 2008 there was a big deal about Obama potentially being the anti-Christ. Do you also share in this belief or have we been spared another satanic president?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adamska
201219

President Obama is excellent and he's a true Christian. Therefore, he gets attacked alot by antichrists.

There Are No Coincidences - there is synchronism, nonlocal cause-and-effect, design and alignment.

See the GOD=7_4 algorithm/code at http://GOD704.wikia.com .

See the prophesied "7 Seals" revealed as 'beyond Einstein theories' at http://7seals.blogspot.com .

If you read those two links, you'll kinda be caught up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Dumb
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. X and Bernard
Wait this shit is still going?
I thought that by not believing enough and tampering with Lorkhan's heat, I could make this false god unexist.

ALMSIVI
 
  • Winner
Reactions: cromit
Back