- Joined
- Jul 22, 2020
It's amusing because it's probably the most famous bit of military science fiction that isn't Star Wars/Trek nor a vidya game original. I've heard that Haldeman's Forever War is supposed to be even better, with Heinlein praising it as well.As usual, any and every form of authoritarianism post 20th century, even in fiction is supposed to be seen directly or indirectly as National Socialism. Are people supposed to be taking this seriously? This isn't academic study. The book and the movie are very different of one another - Starship Troopers. Robert Heinlein wrote it as a science fiction mystery and I believe the movie was made as a "parody" as a way for it either be made and not to be seen as a "fascist/authoritarian propaganda" or to make a whole joke of the mess. Whichever it is the case, it could be seen as a "analogous to a futuristic case to something like Futuristic Authoritarianism", as the doctrine of Fascism had futuristic undertones in it (according to Giovanni Gentile). Yet associate it with National Socialism and say "poor bugs" is lunacy.
Good thing she got a C-.
But yeah, everything nowadays is boiled to formulas for brainlets. It doesn't matter as long as you toe the "party line" and asskiss.
I hear the movie's fun at least, in a goofy way.If I'm not completely mistaken, the director/screenwriter for the movie only read a few chapters into it and decided he didn't like the federation because he's the type of soyboy who thinks that a relatively free, functional society with healthy amounts of nationalism is "fascist."
The type of leftist who is eternally butthurt about the Soviet Union losing the cold war.
The type of bugman who is filled with so much irrational hatred for his own society, or even own species, that they'd simp for literal fucking bugs over humanity.
weren't these types of leftists also mad over Helldivers having the same kinda stuff as Starship Troopers?
HuhAh, I see. So it was meant to subvert the film then, apparently - and ruin the story (potentially). It's what I think too, personally. Some butthurt retard that decided to demonize the Federation akin to the NSDAP in Hogan's Heroes (let's make them retarded instead of evil). And once you read the book you'll see you've been lied to by the movies.
So it happens.
It occurs to me that classic old-school SF/F groups have been gatekept reasonably well because you're expected to be able to talk about the books. I've been in a few groups where retards trying to shill an agenda on either side have been assblasted.
Starship Troopers is on the list of ones to read, but I think my first Heinlein book is very likely going to wind up being The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
Anyways, I'm surprised at how many shitlibs are filtered by Heinlein's influence alone. Every time some work has Heinlein influences that get noted in the reviews, I will then I keep hearing them screech and rant about "muh nationalism" "muh libertarianism" "wah wah it's all bad because wrongthink".
"Wah wah the bugs are literally me" says the shitlib as he then goes on to say that Orcs in DnD are actually all black people.
God, these people only ever view the world as a narrow surface level list of viewpoints.