Brianna Wu / John Flynt - DEAGLE NATION STILL LIVES

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How long will Revolution 60 come to Steam?


  • Total voters
    610
Status
Not open for further replies.
image.jpeg
image.jpeg


And yet, when someone gives you an opinion...

image.jpeg
 
Why does everything have to be about feminism? Purely rhetorical because I know the answer - it's because feminism doesn't really seem to exist anymore outside of a marketing buzzword because of shitheads.

Can't a movie just suck?

Feminist critique = "sexy women are haram"

Says the MAN whose entire "game" is his fetishized, scrotum-haired versions of his autogynephilic self-image fantasy.
 
Although it was about 2009 that 3rd wave feminists started fetishising Harley.

go figure.
Please, Wu is just preaching to the choir, hoping she can either ride or cause the next dumb wave of feminist outrage to pour some money into her tug boat and give her some likes on Twitter.
If the next big movie after Ghostbusters would have been a documentary about the life of Mother Theresa she would complain about it being not trans-inclusive, or something like that.
 
That was one of the only pics she was happy with for years definitely the only pic she thought she "passed" in, it's on all her old profiles, it was on her twitter forever. But it was clearly an old photoshop from years ago (Look closely at her mouth, she's used the liquify tools to shrink her chin down so it's like a Rev60 characters) and she no longer had the source files because it was always super low res.

Looking at it now it's a shame there isn't more pics from that era, we can see the Goggles of Patriarchy, a rare precursor to the Wu classic cosmetic DLCs: Gutbelt of Fail, Boots of Harassment and Beats By Dre of Lies and Bullshit

The source of that photo appears to be ConStellation SF convention from April 16th, 2010, as Brianna is wearing the same outfit as in the selfie - although it's quite hard to tell at first because the selfie has been so aggressively photoshopped and recompressed to shit that in addition to gaining carrot-coloured skin, the colour of Brianna's top was changed from slate to blue.

Not only do we see the Goggles of Patriarchy on full display (which incidentally, appear to just be regular sunglasses and not goggles, sadly), but possibly one of, if not the only time, Brianna has been photographed *not* wearing the Boots of Harassment. A must for your grimoires!

XPYbLiV.jpg


Something was bothering me about the pics of John from the stain-leggings-goblin saga, and I just figured out what it is: John's head is too long, like he has acromegaly, like Andre the giant or Richard Kiel.

Anyone else notice this?
Yeah, for sure, it's definitely not just you.
YD4Ddih.jpg

Even on a regular cisgendered guy, that long-ass oval face would be weird as fuck. Brianna Wu basically looks like when Ash tried to open the Necronomicon in Army of Darkness.

OyrbSxy.jpg
 
Dr. Wu is your husband, John.

drwu.png


I'm not even bothered to cap the rest of this because you can guess how it goes: Harley was not sexy in the cartoon and now she is, therefore #GamerGate. Mostly I just want to say that if it were someone who had a contrary opinion who started a tweetchain like that, John would demand that they be beheaded in public and thrown off a building.

Anyway thanks for "schooling" us on Harley Quinn, John, I'm glad that your triple PhDs in journalism, engineering, and computer science finally found good use. Someone call the Nobel committee and tell them to literally rape any available candidates to death before killing themselves because John Flynt has solved all of humankind's questions.
 
Dr. Wu is your husband, John.

View attachment 121941

I'm not even bothered to cap the rest of this because you can guess how it goes: Harley was not sexy in the cartoon and now she is, therefore #GamerGate. Mostly I just want to say that if it were someone who had a contrary opinion who started a tweetchain like that, John would demand that they be beheaded in public and thrown off a building.

Anyway thanks for "schooling" us on Harley Quinn, John, I'm glad that your triple PhDs in journalism, engineering, and computer science finally found good use. Someone call the Nobel committee and tell them to literally rape any available candidates to death before killing themselves because John Flynt has solved all of humankind's questions.
Yes, please, Ms Brianna "No Diploma" Wu, enlighten us how Harley Quinn wasn't sexualized at all in her first incarnation.

 
Harley Quinn has been twisted into some sort of feminist icon lately. People claim she's not a sexual character, that she's a genius with a degree in psychology and that she totally needs no man, when that is basically the opposite of what the character has been from the start.

1994 - Mad Love - 010.jpg
 
I always preferred the original Animated Series portrayal of Harley, but there's no way I'm gonna try and pretend she didn't have sexuality in that show. Hell, a major part of her character was how the Joker twisted her into an obedient lovesick lackey, and was a really good example of an abisive relationship.

But of course, Wu knows everything about everything and can do no wrong, blah blah blah, ect ect
 
I always preferred the original Animated Series portrayal of Harley, but there's no way I'm gonna try and pretend she didn't have sexuality in that show. Hell, a major part of her character was how the Joker twisted her into an obedient lovesick lackey, and was a really good example of an abisive relationship.

But of course, Wu knows everything about everything and can do no wrong, blah blah blah, ect ect
@Jaimas had it right: Wu wants to have the last word on everything. She wants to dictate the trends, make the final pronouncements, and if she is ever questioned she resorts to tone-policing to avoid an actual argument about canon or logic, managing to "hide" her lack of nerd cred AND inability to logic. Why do people with opposing views bother tweeting her about her "film reviews"? It's like banging your head against a wall.
 
Harley Quinn has been twisted into some sort of feminist icon lately. People claim she's not a sexual character, that she's a genius with a degree in psychology and that she totally needs no man, when that is basically the opposite of what the character has been from the start.

View attachment 121942

Dont get me wrong i like Harley and all but shes hardly a strong woman. Since the start of the new 52 all shes done is fuck around with deadshot, poison ivy and anyone she can use to her advantage whilst occasionally walking back into the jokers life to tell him how strong she is and how shes moved on before getting her ass handed to her. Even the recent suicide squad reboot pointed out she was basically there for brand awarenessand because they simply couldnt get the joker.
At best shes a homicidal maniac hiding behind her sexuality at worst shes the jokers creeper stalker determined to make sure he cant move past her whilst building a personal army of adoring fans.

When you think about it modern harley is the embodyment of Wu feminism.
A "strong sex positive women" who is basically a bisexual cum dumpster, a women whos strong and independent but constantly needs to be rescued. A woman who refuses to be mansplained to but is dumb as shit and is basically the female version of a much better male product.
 
Last edited:
I always preferred the original Animated Series portrayal of Harley, but there's no way I'm gonna try and pretend she didn't have sexuality in that show. Hell, a major part of her character was how the Joker twisted her into an obedient lovesick lackey, and was a really good example of an abisive relationship.

To say nothing of the fact that even though TAS really pushed the envelope for what you could show in kid's shows at the time, you can only push the envelope so far in terms of depicting sexual manipulation in a fucking Saturday morning cartoon.

@Jaimas had it right: Wu wants to have the last word on everything. She wants to dictate the trends, make the final pronouncements, and if she is ever questioned she resorts to tone-policing to avoid an actual argument about canon or logic, managing to "hide" her lack of nerd cred AND inability to logic. Why do people with opposing views bother tweeting her about her "film reviews"? It's like banging your head against a wall.

John is a giant baby and there's no reason to make any serious evaluation of anything he says, least of all because he's nearly always parroting the views of the clique anyway. I already know it's my mistake for even beginning to think about how stupid John's opinions are in this post.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back