Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

Not sure it’s that retarded. Years of estrogen can fuck with their immune system and trigger autoimmune diseases. People with autoimmune diseases take steroids to dampen down their immune systems, leaving them more vulnerable to infection and serious illness, so their doctors are vigilant about keeping their vaccinations up to date. Elliott does have an autoimmune disease that, among other things, gives him scleritis which fucks up his eyes. I wouldn’t be surprised if Johnny here does too.

TL;DR estrogen doesn’t just give men moobs
If troons have "nature" on their side to justify their delusions, then it's pretty hilariously ironic that troons are litterally destroying the very central nervous systems they need to survive with the mutilating surgeries and drugs they claim they need to live.

"Lol, get fucked, troons" - God
 
I don't think anyone is asking "how" as much as "why", John.

chunk.png
 
So, retard alert, but is there a breakdown of the Moon Rocks saga? I'm trying to explain this shit to someone, but failing to sound rational in my efforts.
 
So, retard alert, but is there a breakdown of the Moon Rocks saga? I'm trying to explain this shit to someone, but failing to sound rational in my efforts.
Musk wanted to land on the moon and mine it or somesuch.
John said musk would terrorize and hold the world hostage by dropping moon rocks on the earth. John used to have a whole subforum and I'm not sure where it's been banished to.


Edit screenshot
1000004743.jpg
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't mind.

Here you go. Spoiler: To send a moon rock that would just explode in atmosphere like the big Russian metorite about 10 years go, you need 4 ICBM's worth of nukes. It'd be easier and cheaper to just send the nukes.

Lets put on our interesting physical deformities, grab our signature pets, head to the moon and hold the world ransom with our space rocks.

The Chelyabinsk object was estimated to be 11,000 tons. This didn't impact, it exploded in mid-air, and rattled some windows. But it should make a sufficient warning shot that will make the leaders of the United States, Britain, and the USSR sit up and take notice (and give into our ransom demands for cargo containers of diamonds to be dropped into the ocean so they can be collected and brought to our under-water base.) So as our opener, we need to send 11,000 tons of material to earth. Given the gravity on the moon is 1/6th the earth's , this would be like moving around 2,000 TON projectile on earth.
To give you an idea of the scale, that's like shifting around 3 Christ The Redeemer statues, or about 10 blue whales or your mom. And this is all just to rattle some windows and put on one hell of a light show, mind you.

We'll assume the moon rock is just an unguided projectile. I'm not even going to address the computational horsepower you'd need to put your moon rock onto a target even as small as a city, and the exacting level of calibration you'd need to be able to hit a moving target from a moving target over 300,000km. Because it doesn't matter.

Everyone is welcome to check or correct my math as its been a long time since I've had to do space physics, but accelerating 11,000 of mass to the 2.3Km/s for lunar escape velocity would require 26,394 Terrajoules, or 7,332 megawatts. That's over double capacity of the largest nuclear plant in the US. You could use a ~5-mega ton blast to propel your space rock as well - so about 4 nuclear missles worth of warheads - provided your space rock survives the blast intact and your launch area doesn't absorb any of the energy.

In short, people will notice. And unless you up that energy requirement even more, they're going to have a few days to do something about you and your little moon rock. (Like dispatch a suave MI-6 agent to infiltrate your moon base, seduce your chief scientist, and plant evidence that will turn you and your partners against each other. Or just use their own nukes to knock it off course/fragment it. Whatever feels right.)

Again, this is for a window rattler, not something that would actually impact on the surface.

Conclusion:
To weaponize space rocks, you're going to need nuclear energy. If you've got nukes, why wouldn't you just use those?

Yes, Mr. Bond. Why indeed? Ha. Ha ha. Muwahahahaha.
 
The Dons of the head of the Five Faggot Families finally had a sit down.
Unfortunately, unlike the traditional way such meetups are done, more than one of them left the venue unscathed.

Also:5394501-a780955c4dc92896a8f24dca29d82e9e.png
That test strip is defective. The result is meaningless - the "control" line should always show up. Proper procedure would be to repeat with a new strip.

Those tests aren't really very useful unless you've never had symptomatic COVID before - the symptoms are pretty distinctive, so you'll know when you get it again. (I'll admit we're discussing Brianna the Brain Donor, who thinks he looks like a woman in the mirror)
 
Last edited:
Don't these heartless KIKES have any basic decency??? They should demonstrate proportionality by setting fire to Gaza children instead.

View attachment 5409959
"It will devastate their moral credibility and leave them isolated."

It's amazing how he devastates his own credibility on a subject with a single sentence. It's some kind of super power.
 
@Ghostse wrote:
Here you go. Spoiler: To send a moon rock that would just explode in atmosphere like the big Russian metorite about 10 years go, you need 4 ICBM's worth of nukes. It'd be easier and cheaper to just send the nukes.

I don't know if you are aware of this, but even the whole idea of "having a moon base as a stockpile of nukes" was discussed to death and rejected during the International Geophysical Year proceedings back in 1958.

How it started was some sperg (I think he was from South America) proposed the fabulous idea that every member state with nuclear weapons donate some of them to the UN and that there then be a rush to build a base on the moon which would house these weapons (and staff to launch them).

Bear in mind that no human had yet set foot on the Moon at this point in time.

This base would "promote peace" in that any country trying to start shit could be nuked "from above" as it were, so obviously nobody would try anything on and we would have worldwide peace for ever.

Both American and Soviet (as well as a bunch of other) attendees completely shredded this proposition.

Some objections I remember:
  • We can knock those missiles off course and into the sea unless they're all used at once.
  • The base will be unable to withstand a siege (nobody sending them food) without threatening to use their nukes.
  • If one country gets a majority among the staff on that base there's the chance they will stage a coup and attack their enemies.
  • Nobody is capable of launching an entire ICBM into space for transport, they'll all have to be moved in pieces and reassembled.
  • What's to stop two or more belligerents from making a temporary alliance outside the UN for the purpose of blowing that thing off the moon?
  • Etc.
I hadn't even heard of Brainless Brianna's "moon rock throwing" variation on this tard theme before - it sounds like something Alex Jones would really want to feature on InfoWars but be too embarrassed to.
 
Back