- Joined
- Sep 29, 2018
Not mine, but always willing to share.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
if I didn't associate it with Tariq Nasheed's fucked-up raceplay fantasies, I'd think Buck Breaking was a dance style from New Orleans or Houston. like "buck" just meaning a guy, "breaking" like breakdancing, and every local variation on how people move their legs to an 808 kick drum has to be a micro-genre of dance. like breakdancing that has a lot of flexing your arms, crotch thrusts, throwing kicks and punches, a more aggressive vibe.I don't know why the words in the title feel like they should be reversed. Saying "Breaking Buck" sounds like it's parodying Breaking Bad, but it just rolls off the tongue better. I can't bring myself to saying Buck Breaking unironically.
The Chinese though can fall back on the “we invented gunpowder, the printing press, etc.” because they were more advanced than much of humanity for a very long time, which is part of the reason they were caught off guard when the Europeans did surpass them.Kangz niggos, and indeed chinks and kebabs and other ethnic group supremecists,
It’s esoteric if all you know is the United States or adjacent cultures. For me I broke out of the mindset when I lived abroad and I realized that skin color did not equate shared culture. I met white people who had nothing in common with me and black people who were way different from black Americans. I also got to see Americans who would likely hate each other back home, get along when surrounded by a even more dissimilar other.This is why refuting white supremecy requires a decent bit of somewhat esoteric historical/geographic context and contrast to explain why africa was in a real bad shape even before the whites/kebabs turned up and why shit is still miserable there, and indeed why the whole 13/50 fact is a thing, wheras refuting black supremacy simply requires me to ask "nigger have you fucking SEEN the state of africa?"
This is what I notice. I’ve grown some instinct for bad arguments, not that it’s necessary for afrocentrism, and one of the hallmarks is overwrought and exaggerated externalization onto a dreaded other.Problem with this with regards to narrative is that even the dumbest and most schizo white supremacist at least has the easy fallback position of "white people and white nations invented/created/advanced/conquered/discovered far more shit than every other race" which creates some vague surfice level cohesion in rhetoric and worldbuilding as this fact is nicely compatable with the "we am master race n sheeit" claim.
“What can be said about that Hotep style that hasn’t been said about Africa? It looks bombed out and depleted.”The one thing I just can't stop thinking is that you could just put the whole thing as a skit on Chapelle Show and it would fit perfectly
apparently after Moses taught white people the magical technology of "clothing", the feral whites somehow learned "tricknology" (unclear whether from Moses or stolen or given from elsewhere) which was what enabled the white takeover. so either it was immediately forgotten after whitey got power, or there are some kind of white people midichlorians that are like the opposite of their melanin.This is what I notice. I’ve grown some instinct for bad arguments, not that it’s necessary for afrocentrism, and one of the hallmarks is overwrought and exaggerated externalization onto a dreaded other.
I don’t wanna sound like an enlightened skeptictard but demonization (literally, they’d have to be demons) over simple, descriptive otherizing is hard to take seriously.
Basically because they have to go big and overstate reality to even seem like their worldview is plausible.
These arguments have rarely if ever been genuinely intended to persuade skeptics or sway mass opinion. Almost invariably, the root motivation behind hyperbolic demonization and explicitly genocidal/eliminationist demagoguery is simply for those spewing this bullshit to gain favour and prestige with whichever group is making hay off scapegoating and agitating against the outgroup in question.This is what I notice. I’ve grown some instinct for bad arguments, not that it’s necessary for afrocentrism, and one of the hallmarks is overwrought and exaggerated externalization onto a dreaded other.
I don’t wanna sound like an enlightened skeptictard but demonization (literally, they’d have to be demons) over simple, descriptive otherizing is hard to take seriously.
Basically because they have to go big and overstate reality to even seem like their worldview is plausible.
Very true. But the caveat is that this actually requires you to have power already. Which in turn requires some stability of thought. Ideologues put the cart before the horse on this point a lot. Really they just wanna shout and holler.However, despite not actually being an effective way of radicalising the average german with its content, it was unfortunately very effective in making hitler's subordinates a whole lot more willing to aggressively push for nastier and more radical measures themselves since they saw how well being seen by hitler to push for this shit worked out for streicher, and this was one of many factors that kickstarted the spiral of competetive extremism at the expense of the war effort and of germany itself that consumed the nazi leadership during the war.
Oh yeah, that example was just the most obvious one, and one that illustrated just how and why this shit is dangerous when it is openly embraced by a national leadership, but the same basic pattern holds true even for the lowliest of professional demagogues. They become a source of "edgy" rhetoric that is consumed by autists and attention whores who want some "edgy" pedigree for various petty reasons, as well as the mentally ill who just want to scream nasty shit in public in order to get negative attention for their own gratificationVery true. But the caveat is that this actually requires you to have power already. Which in turn requires some stability of thought. Ideologues put the cart before the horse on this point a lot. Really they just wanna shout and holler.
Its not exactly suprising that kangs have reached this point though, the very fact we have an entire month dedicated to the miniscule contributions that thier race outside of water pistols and peanut butter must be pretty fucking disheartening. Turks and chinks mythicise thier own histories but theres a great deal of truth, the ching dynasty and sucessive sultantes of the ottomans achieved much and contributed a great deal to world culture.Thing is Afrocentrism either directly or indirectly lifts a huge amount of its material directly off of white supremacists, and has done so for a solid century at this point, with the OG kangz groups existing at the same time as the 2nd era KKK, the literal pre-power nazis, and a whole bunch of other racial mysticism groups of varying degrees of batshit, but wheras these other groups either died out or became infinitely marginalised and thus forced to rapidly throw out and change up their "lore" as it were, kangz shit still hangs on to bizzare ass mysticism from this era which is where shit like the mad scientist yakub and "ice vs sun" schizo shit derives from.
Problem with this with regards to narrative is that even the dumbest and most schizo white supremacist at least has the easy fallback position of "white people and white nations invented/created/advanced/conquered/discovered far more shit than every other race" which creates some vague surfice level cohesion in rhetoric and worldbuilding as this fact is nicely compatable with the "we am master race n sheeit" claim.
Kangz niggos, and indeed chinks and kebabs and other ethnic group supremecists, decidedly lack this useful factoid which necessitates either declaring that all that shit was achtchully sekritly done by sekrit black people/stolen from super-wakanda, or saying it was utterly unimportant because black people have literal fucking magical powers that will be reawakened any day now.
Or as is usually the case, both.
This is why refuting white supremecy requires a decent bit of somewhat esoteric historical/geographic context and contrast to explain why africa was in a real bad shape even before the whites/kebabs turned up and why shit is still miserable there, and indeed why the whole 13/50 fact is a thing, wheras refuting black supremacy simply requires me to ask "nigger have you fucking SEEN the state of africa?"
Basically the entire kangz mythology and lore is a frankensteins monster of a century of scuffed white supremecist talking points run through a white-to-black word replacer along with all manner of assorted mysticism/new age/conspiracy theory shit grafted on over the years and given an afrocentric facepaint.
However, this is kinda moot as nobody involved save the literal schizos actually gives a shit about any of the lore they profess to believe as its either an "edgyness" totem for dumb autistic niggers looking for edgy prestige or a grifting opportunity for cynical hustlers looking to bilk said autists along with schizos and any other dumb black person who fears they are not seen as "black enough" by other dumb niggers
Much of what Judge Joe Brown says in this movie is actually pretty based. That is a weird thing you will note. The "documentary" veers from absolutely batshit insanity which is so crazy you'll laugh until your eyes pop out of your skull, to actually based, true shit, sometimes even from the very same person.But "Boy Lesbians" is still one of the best lines.
Rockwell meant it as a compliment, of course.George Lincoln Rockwell once called Elijah Muhammad "the Hitler of the Blacks", it is unfortunate that the Nation of Islam degraded to those ridiculous (albeit extremely funny) displays.
And this can be chalked down singularly to geography.Its not exactly suprising that kangs have reached this point though, the very fact we have an entire month dedicated to the miniscule contributions that thier race outside of water pistols and peanut butter must be pretty fucking disheartening. Turks and chinks mythicise thier own histories but theres a great deal of truth, the ching dynasty and sucessive sultantes of the ottomans achieved much and contributed a great deal to world culture.
Problem is, measured perspectives on history and context dont sell to loudmouthed retards looking for clout and asspats for being edgy woke.The thing that fucks me off with afrocentrists though is that there are figures in thier racial history that have had a really impressive impact but the american negro must follow his instincts and steal from others rather than be proud of the achievements of say Thomas-Alexandre Dumas, general of the french revolution or even the nation of ethiopia which was the only African nation to successfully resist European invasion at the battle of Adowa, but nah man, WE WUZ SHAKESPEARE N SHIET.
Well at least they would have finally invented something instead of trying to take credit from things made by other civilizations.The only thing that could make this entire thing more hilarious is if the porn industry starting pushing black cuck porn & everybody started calling it buck porn. The amount of seething he would do on twitter if his film was forever known as the black cuck movie. Or maybe he'll finally come out & say he likes gay shit idk.