Buck Breaking (2021) - We was ass raped and shiet! Featuring "Beefsteak Pete" the black troon!

This guy is amazing.
View attachment 2262412

Nothing can stop the Buck Buster 9,000!
View attachment 2262408
hahaha oh wow.jpg
 
When was the last time you saw a white person running a hotel, staffing a 7-11, driving a taxi or pumping gas?
For me today. Hotels tend to have a lot of hispanics but I still see whites in most places, even when they’re a minority.

The only states I’m aware of that requires others to pump your gas for you are Oregon and New Jersey. I can’t speak of the latter but when I was visiting Oregon the vast majority of people who pumped my gas were white. Funny enough one was clearly smoking pot..😂 I always get a kick out of that.
These kids are being taught ‘how it be’ instead of going out into the real fucking world and discovering the wonders of experiential learning.
Conservatives tend to be drawn to trade schools and K-12 is way more pozzed than the average university. There are a lot of college woketards but they’re usually not the best students which is why they take the cupcake courses. There are tenured professors who get their jollies by pissing off students too. Most teachers in public schools can’t speak their mind unless they’re far left.
I know I'm late, but how many of those neets do you think have actually had their IQ tested as an adult as opposed to just jerking off to their fantasy of being a genius tragically not living up to their potential.
Can’t say, but probably not the majority. Still, Mensa isn’t exactly full of Chads leading envious lives.
 
I'm not arguing with you or shitting on your point here, but there's a difference between "IQ fetishism" and acknowledging the data that does exist on average IQ variance by race. The fact that people mostly refuse to discuss this variable honestly and seriously, even anonymously on the internet, is a big reason why there are so many insane people with weird, extreme ideologies built around it instead of well-developed, evidence-based, rational stances. Nobody is there to debate the true believers in this stuff because the genuine conversations are so rare.

IQ is not everything and wouldn't explain all differences in group outcomes. But it's a big factor, and it's hard to take people seriously who avoid the topic by exclusively focusing on culture (a huge factor as well), geography, etc.
I agree that it's not good that they've completely marginalized any race and behavior discussion. We already know that a large portion of behavior is genetic and a "race" is a group of people with similar genes (coming from shared ancestry). It follows that there should be racial effects on behavior. The question should be in what ways it effects behavior, but in the mainstream they refuse to even consider it as a possibility.

I think that geography and history play a larger role in determining culture/behaviors. One bit of evidence for that is I remember reading (correct me if I'm wrong, it was a long time ago) that Chinese have the "Warrior Gene" much more than the Maoris do, but the Maoris developed a far more warlike culture than the docile Chinese. All other things being equal, maybe a Chinese would be more likely to be violent, but the weight of all their other circumstances outweighs it.

I know I'm late, but how many of those neets do you think have actually had their IQ tested as an adult as opposed to just jerking off to their fantasy of being a genius tragically not living up to their potential.
50% of the population has less than a 100 IQ.

When was the last time you heard somebody tell what their IQ is and it be less than 100?
 
50% of the population has less than a 100 IQ.

When was the last time you heard somebody tell what their IQ is and it be less than 100?
I don't think I've ever had someone tell me their IQ, other than just saying it's high as a way of calling themselves smart. There just isn't really a reason for someone to get their IQ tested (and childhood IQ tests don't count for shit), unless it is so low you are actually disabled and need tard bucks.
 
I know I'm late, but how many of those neets do you think have actually had their IQ tested as an adult as opposed to just jerking off to their fantasy of being a genius tragically not living up to their potential.
Who the fuck even goes out of their way to do a legit IQ test that isn’t a bullshit Internet quiz? It’s not something that’s normally administered (I dunno anyone who’s actually taken one at least) so you REALLY have to be a super nerd to know your own IQ.
 
I don't think I've ever had someone tell me their IQ, other than just saying it's high as a way of calling themselves smart. There just isn't really a reason for someone to get their IQ tested (and childhood IQ tests don't count for shit), unless it is so low you are actually disabled and need tard bucks.
It's rare in person, but common to see dipshits online post the IQ scores they got from taking fake tests on the Internet.
 
>Average IQ is 100
>Half of the population is less than 100


What are averages?
Johnny has 1 IQ. Timmy has 3 IQ. Sally has 5. Jimmy has 7. Mary has 10. Sarah has 12.

Average = 6.3

That's three people below average, Johnny, Timmy, Sally.

Math isn't hard.


Actually, I should correct myself. The average IQ happens to also be the same as the median IQ just because it's distributed normally, if it wasn't, the two wouldn't necessarily be the same number. A median is the number that, by definition, half are below or equal to.
 
IQ tests have known issues, and intelligence is by its nature somewhat hard to measure as it covers a bunch of different fields.

I encourage you to actually look at the vast body of research that has been done over the decades regarding IQ and how it relates to race and societal factors, because this just looks like the same canned response you'd get from a popular science presentation or the heavily curated Wikipedia page on the topic which essentially amounts to "the fact that language or culture has any relationship whatsoever to IQ completely invalidates the hundreds of carefully conducted studies that specifically control for things like linguistic proficiency, childhood family environment, education and lifestyle which consistently find that race is the singe biggest predictive factor in a persons IQ"

Colonialism was a mistake motivated by pure greed, and the idea that any race is anyway better than any other is idiotic.

Racial and ethnic groups all over the world from Asia, the Middle East and a large portion of Europe have been the victims of what could only be described as colonialism, some much more brutally and more recently than black Africa. Yet none of those groups even at their worst have descended into pure barbarism and perpetual retardation that blacks in both developed and undeveloped nations do.

Egypt was and still is the greatest power that has ever existed in Africa aside from maybe white ruled South Africa. It remained that way from it's first recorded development and throughout the millennia during which it was ruled by various foreign powers from the Persians, Romans and Ottomans before modern Europeans took over, by which point the racial/ethnic makeup of the region had change several times until eventually being mostly Arab.

Throughout all of this black Africa remained an intellectual and developmental abyss where nothing of note was created. It still is aside from places where Arabs replaced the natives or Europeans had control for a time.

By the time modern archaeologists were revolutionizing our understanding of what niggers are capable of by forwarding the theory that the 30ft high walls of Great Zimbabwe were constructed by Bantu rather than Arabs, The Arab population of Egypt had already attained semi-independence from European colonial powers.
 
This guy is amazing.
View attachment 2262412

Nothing can stop the Buck Buster 9,000!
View attachment 2262408
We wuz ass raped by steampunk dildo robots n sheeeeeeit.
PLEASE tell me that these tweets are genuine and not doctored to make K-Flex look like the mooniest of moon crickets.
Probably not unless he deleted it and he doesn't seem to be the sort to realize when he's made a (buck broken) ass of himself. The word "compliance" only appears in two of his tweets that can be currently searched.
 
Johnny has 1 IQ. Timmy has 3 IQ. Sally has 5. Jimmy has 7. Mary has 10. Sarah has 12.

Average = 6.3

That's three people below average, Johnny, Timmy, Sally.

Math isn't hard.


Actually, I should correct myself. The average IQ happens to also be the same as the median IQ just because it's distributed normally, if it wasn't, the two wouldn't necessarily be the same number. A median is the number that, by definition, half are below or equal to.
Median is a separation from lower and higher halves in statistics, not below or equal. Median = middle. I'm of the opinion that mode should be used to determine the average intelligence since IQ is a subjective statistic that's always changing. Calling something an average implies "this is the representative majority." If 51% of a populace have an IQ of 90, then the average should be regarded as 90.
 
Median is a separation from lower and higher halves in statistics, not below or equal. Median = middle. I'm of the opinion that mode should be used to determine the average intelligence since IQ is a subjective statistic that's always changing. Calling something an average implies "this is the representative majority." If 51% of a populace have an IQ of 90, then the average should be regarded as 90.
Okay, I get you. Interestingly, the normal distribution's mode is also equal to the median and the average. In a continuous distribution, the probability of selecting a specific value is infinitesimally small, but we can still say that the high of the distribution function measures the relative likelihood of one of those infintesimally small probabilities against another, so the highest likelihood outcome is where the curve peaks. Which on a Bell Curve is right in the middle, but you can definitely construct a distribution where that's not the case. And of course with IQ we don't actually have a continuous distribution, but we have such a large discrete distribution that it's reasonable to approximate it with a continuous one.

There's lots of cases where I think mode isn't that useful. You have to look at the graph of the distribution to really tell what's the best way of explaining it.
 
Racial and ethnic groups all over the world from Asia, the Middle East and a large portion of Europe have been the victims of what could only be described as colonialism, some much more brutally and more recently than black Africa. Yet none of those groups even at their worst have descended into pure barbarism and perpetual retardation that blacks in both developed and undeveloped nations do.
Africa is a resource poor, parasite infested shithole where you can't even get water in most places. Is it really surprising to anyone that the people who live there aren't exactly scholars?
 
Back