Science Calling sickos "sickos" stigmatizes sickos - CNN objects to calling the sicko a sicko

Trump's language on school shooter's mental health could be harmful, experts say
Story highlights
  • President Trump called the Parkland high school shooter a "sicko"
  • Studies show that most people with mental illness are more likely to be victims, not perpetrators
(CNN)In a tweet Thursday, President Donald Trump described someone who would shoot up a school as a "savage sicko." At CNN's town hall on the Parkland, Florida, school shootings on Wednesday, NRA spokeswoman Dana Loesch described the gunman as "an insane monster" who is "nuts" and crazy." And at a White House briefing Thursday, the President again used the term "sicko."

The shooter, Nikolas Cruz, struggled with depression, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism, according to a 2016 Florida Department of Children and Families report. But having a mental health diagnosis does not mean he would become violent, many experts say. And although Trump has said he wants to focus on mental health to stop school shootings, calling Cruz a "sicko" doesn't help, those experts claim.

"When it comes to mental health, language really matters. This is not about being politically correct. It's about wanting to do everything we can to encourage people to get health treatment that works," said Ron Honberg, senior policy adviser with the National Alliance on Mental Illness.

Getting treatment is a challenge for the majority of people. Though 25% of the world's population has at one time experienced a mental or behavioral disorder, the

World Health Organization
says, only 44% of adults with diagnosable mental health problems and less than 20% of children and adolescents get the needed treatment, according to

MentalHealth.gov.
Studies have shown that people do not get help, in part, due to the stigma.


"Hearing language like this is a punch to the gut, particularly if we have a goal as a nation to increase access to mental health care," Honberg said. "This is about the worst thing you can do."

MentalHealth.gov, a federal website, cautions against using stigmatizing labels like "crazy."

"How helpful is calling a black person the n-word? Not only is it disrespectful, it fans racism," said Pat Corrigan, a distinguished professor of psychology at the Illinois Institute of Technology who manages the National Consortium on Stigma and Empowerment.

"Using such language when it comes to people with mental illness is the height of disrespect and the height of ignorance, as it reduces some hugely complex person down to a diagnosis."

Corrigan also points out that it's wrong for a politician to use someone like Cruz -- or Sandy Hook shooter Adam Lanza or any other school shooters -- to imply that someone with a mental illness diagnosis is more likely to be dangerous or violent.

"You have these people living on the streets, and I can say in many cases throughout the country, they are very dangerous and shouldn't be there," Trump said Thursday.

But studies show otherwise. The greater majority of people with a mental illness will never be violent, research has found; in fact, people with mental illness are much more likely to be victims of violence.

"Countless studies have shown that if you were going to predict who is most likely to be violent, mental illness falls way down the list. Age, gender, ethnicity is a much greater factor, and we wouldn't lock people up based on these qualities," Corrigan said.

One of the solutions, Trump suggests, is to institutionalize more people with mental illness.


"Part of the problem is, we used to have mental institutions, and I said this yesterday, we had a mental institution where you take a sicko, like this guy, he was a sick guy, so many signs, and you bring him to a mental health institution," he said. "We've got to get them out of our communities."

Evidence shows the contrary, however. Locking up people with mental illness for a long time is counterproductive, studies have found. "The best care is not locking someone away in a hospital. It's done in the community, where you can have treatment that will help you get back to school or to work," Corrigan said.

The American Psychological Association cautions that it is important to keep gun policy and mental health policy in distinct categories.

"Science shows the most consistent and powerful predictor of future violence is a history of violent behavior, not a diagnosable -- or diagnosed -- mental illness. The mental health needs of the country are separate from the issue of mass shootings," association CEO Arthur C. Evans Jr. said.

"People with mental illness account for a very small portion of incidents involving gun violence, and research has shown that individuals with mental illness are no more likely to become violent than individuals without mental illness," he said. "Involuntarily committing people with mental illness will not address our public health crisis of gun violence."

Violent murders by people with a mental diagnosis did not go up when large institutions in the United States and the UK were closed, said Diana Rose, a professor of user-led research who studies mental health at King's College London. "You cannot solve the problem by locking people up. It is just nonsense, and it destroys lives and is a deep form of social control, rather than provide people the support they need."

Rose said that calling the shooter a "sicko" is "insulting" and "mean-minded." She added that "it is almost impossible to predict, even if someone has a diagnosis, if they are going to be a risk" for violence.

"Evidence shows you would have to lock up thousands and thousands of people to prevent a very rare crime," Rose said. "It's a completely ridiculous solution."
Click to expand...
http://archive.fo/RCI0i
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Horrifying
  • Informative
Reactions: vertexwindi, Positron, frozenrunner and 6 others
Click to expand...
When a mass shooting happens, people make themselves feel better by saying, "that guy must have been crazy." There's no thought behind it except, "somebody who does something like that must be defective, because if I'm wrong I'm surrounded by potential killers all the time." It's stupid and reductive, sure, and there's often a childlike underlying belief that human beings in CURRENT YEAR no longer have the capacity for violence. But this article is still retarded.

Xerxes IX said:
If mental illness truly wasn't the problem and evil white men with guns were the real problem, why isn't there a mass shooting every day? There are far more white men with guns than people wrong enough in the head to commit mass murder.
Click to expand...
And why weren't these shootings more common in the past when there were actual rifle clubs in high schools?

It's not just mental illness, though. The biggest part of the puzzle is wall-to-wall media coverage. That's the biggest difference between now and then (America's past), and it explains a lot about the motivations for these shootings. It's usually not hard to find evidence of these shooters, pre-act, daydreaming about how famous they'll become for shooting up their schools or openly idolizing past shooters. And isn't it interesting how often there are attempted copycat shootings after one of these things happens? Really makes you think.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Marvin and KimCoppolaAficionado
frozenrunner said:
When a mass shooting happens, people make themselves feel better by saying, "that guy must have been crazy." There's no thought behind it except, "somebody who does something like that must be defective, because if I'm wrong I'm surrounded by potential killers all the time." It's stupid and reductive, sure, and there's often a childlike underlying belief that human beings in CURRENT YEAR no longer have the capacity for violence. But this article is still exceptional.


And why weren't these shootings more common in the past when there were actual rifle clubs in high schools?

It's not just mental illness, though. The biggest part of the puzzle is wall-to-wall media coverage. That's the biggest difference between now and then (America's past), and it explains a lot about the motivations for these shootings. It's usually not hard to find evidence of these shooters, pre-act, daydreaming about how famous they'll become for shooting up their schools or openly idolizing past shooters. And isn't it interesting how often there are attempted copycat shootings after one of these things happens? Really makes you think.
Click to expand...
I suppose in the end, we're no different than any other animal on the planet.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Informative
Reactions: Dynamite Ninja, Chiang Kai-shek, Uncanny Valley and 1 other person
Trilby said:
I suppose in the end, we're no different than any other animal on the planet.
Click to expand...
Well, we're a lot smarter. We created the rule of law, which regulates and redirects our natural destructive impulses. And it's really effective, because murder rates keep dropping, despite what the news media would have you believe. We're living in the safest time in human history, at least in the West.

But some people will always stamp their feet and demand perfection. If they can imagine a world with no murders, then it's possible, right? There are a lot of people out there who are that stupid and delusional, and they're smugly self-righteous about it to boot. They lack perspective and, indeed, refuse to consider any perspective but their own. And for this, they congratulate themselves.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Trilby
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back