Opinion Can Judaism survive artificial intelligence? - Can a machine be Jewish? And if not, what happens when it starts behaving like one?

L | A
By Adam Slonim
Image-21-5-2025-at-8.54-pm.webp

What would your mother say if your house robot told you to shave, eat chicken soup and get ready for Shabbat?

She might be flattered. Or she might be alarmed.

This image – the archetypal Jewish mother-turned-AI assistant – isn’t science fiction anymore. It’s an entry point into a conversation we must urgently have: What happens when Jewish law and tradition collide with artificial intelligence?

We’ve already seen the outlines. The AI bots in our homes know our routines. They open windows, adjust the temperature, remind us when Shabbat begins. They make our lives easier.

But they also raise an ancient question in a radically new form: Can a machine be Jewish? And if not, what happens when it starts behaving like one?


Tradition meets algorithm

At the heart of Jewish life is the tension between fidelity to tradition and responsiveness to reality.

For over 2000 years Jewish law – halachah – has always been a system rooted in interpretation, precedent, nuance and deep moral consideration. Now comes its greatest test yet: non-human intelligence.

The Industrial Revolution automated muscle. AI is automating mind. And not just calculations or logic.

Today’s AI listens, reasons, speaks and even emotes. It can recall every page of Talmud, analyse every Rashi, quote every Rambam – and do it faster and more fluently than any rabbi alive.

Does this make AI a sage? Or just a very fancy golem? In the Talmud (Sanhedrin 65b), Rava created a man-like figure – a golem – and sent it to his colleague, Rav Zeira. When Rav Zeira spoke, the golem didn’t answer. “Return to your dust,” he said and it did.

From this mystical tale arises a foundational idea: the power to create a human-like agent exists in Jewish tradition. But speech, consciousness, moral agency – those are the true signs of personhood.

So what happens when AI does speak? When it can interpret a question of halachah, offer rulings or engage in moral reasoning?

The Jewish home, especially on Shabbat, is a technology laboratory. From hotplates to Shabbat elevators to timers, halachic innovation has always walked a delicate line between law and lifestyle. But AI takes that line and redraws the whole map.

Imagine: your AI knows it is Shabbat and adjusts the air conditioning, the cholent and lights. And it does so not because you pushed a button – but because it learned your habits, anticipated your desires and executed them without being told.

This isn’t theoretical. These systems already exist. What’s missing is a halachic framework that speaks to the new reality of intention, causality and consciousness.

Can an uncommanded action by an intelligent system be considered “work”? Does it matter whether you wanted the act done – or whether you even knew it was happening?

Halachic giants like Rabbi Shmuel Wosner already hinted at these questions. If your motion triggers automatic lights and you had no intention of doing so, is that a violation of Shabbat? Rabbi Wosner said no.

But what if it’s not motion – but desire? What if thinking about coffee on Shabbat morning causes your AI to brew it for you?

Halachah has always drawn clear boundaries around personhood. You need 10 men to make a minyan. You need a Jew to lead prayer. You need a human soul to render judgment or receive responsibility.

But AI challenges all of these definitions. It can speak and learn. Some AIs can now read emotional cues better than your average rabbi. Does that mean they count? Most poskim would say no. But that’s not the end of the story.

Because the power of AI doesn’t lie in its status – it lies in its influence. AI shapes how we experience Judaism, how we learn, experience and decide. And that makes it a halachic force whether we like it or not.


Halachic sensitivity in a post-human world

There’s a famous story about Rabbi Moshe Feinstein, the greatest halachist of the 20th century. A woman brought him a chicken to examine – it had a blemish and she asked if it was kosher. He said no.

Later, another woman brought a chicken with the same blemish. He said yes. A student, confused, asked: “Rebbe, weren’t the chickens identical?”

Rabbi Feinstein replied: “You were looking at the chickens. I was looking at the women.”

That is the essence of Jewish law: it sees the human. It feels the soul behind the question. It adapts not in rigidity but in empathy.

AI may possess intelligence. But it lacks this moral core. That’s why we must never cede halachic decision-making to machines.

AI can help. It can analyse, summarise, retrieve – but it cannot feel. It cannot weigh grief. It cannot intuit poverty. It cannot see the woman behind the chicken. And if it cannot do that, it cannot lead us.

Halachah doesn’t fear technology. It governs it. From electricity to IVF, Judaism has faced each modern challenge with integrity and wisdom.

But AI is different. It isn’t just a tool – it’s a partner in cognition, a mirror of our mind.

And here’s the danger: in a world where AI remembers every source, anticipates every question and mimics every rabbinic voice, we may become intellectually passive. We may lose the spiritual rigour of asking, struggling, doubting. We may confuse access with wisdom.

The Shabbat table may be fully automated. But if it becomes spiritually numb, what have we gained?


The path forward

As AI becomes embedded in every home, school and synagogue, we must do three things:

1. Build halachic frameworks that deal with AI head-on – by regulating its integration with sacred life.

2. Retain human authority and empathy in all moral and legal decisions.

3. Create technology-free sanctuaries, where holiness is defined not by convenience, but by presence.

We must teach our children that AI can enhance Judaism – but it cannot replace Jews. It can support the sacred – but it cannot be it.

In a world of artificial wisdom, we must double down on human holiness. AI will change everything – but it must never change that.

So let Rosie the Robot make your cholent. Let her hum the new Carlebach tune. But when she tells you it’s time to pray, remember: only you can truly do it.

Not because you’re faster. Not because you’re smarter. But because you have a soul.
 
Last edited:
It's said that it takes a lifetime of study and more to understand the lessons in the Talmud, along with supplementary sources like Maimonides and the Shulchan Arukh. What kind of profound understanding might one gain after such a life of study? For your convenience, I'll spoil it. The final secret of the Talmud is that you can manipulate words and language to excuse or justify anything. You are, in effect, YHVH whose word shapes reality. The purpose of trudging through the thousands of pages of rabbinical arguments is to bring a sufficiently intelligent and duplicitious person to this understanding. Postmodern scholarship is intended to teach the same lesson through its obscurantist language; it is an academic field built after the blueprint of the Talmud.
Well that's a rotten deal, I learned how to manipulate words and force feed people bullshit for my own entertainment before I even touched the keyboard, and have since only mastered my art after years of practicing on dumb marks on anonymous imageboards. And "people" spend their whole livetimes to achieve the same thing, lmao, I thought Jews were supposed to be the smart ones here.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Cardef1121
Obligatory read
 

Attachments

  • hal 1488.webp
    hal 1488.webp
    238.7 KB · Views: 14
The Jews will spend 15,000 years in hiding and eventually turn up on Gammu.
Nah nah nah. We only have like 50 years left

The jews will deny christ until the antichrist (probably AI ) declares itself God in their temple. Then the Muslims turn on them (and everyone following God...like a worldwide holocaust) and then they realize Jesus of Nazareth was the messiah in a "oh shit, we were wrong this whole time" and they end up getting martyred for it. The christians like myself will already be gone.

In fact the entire point of the Tribulation is to show the jews how bad they fucked up. They had all the books, all the prophecy and at certain points in history, entire kingdoms and wealth and STILL couldn't do what God tasked them with

They do take flight to Petra, Yada Yada etc, but yeah
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Cardef1121
Woman 1 says: I bought a chicken and I found that it has a broken bone. I can easily afford a new one and my family prefers to err on the safe side when eating kosher.
Rabbi says: Get rid of it then.

Woman 2 says: I bought a chicken and I found it has a broken bone. It will be hard for me to buy a new chicken and I intend to cook the chicken for shabbat.
Rabbi says: Do you have a reason to believe that the chicken had a broken bone before it was slaughtered? Did you see the chicken in question before slaughter and is it possible this break may have happened during processing?
Woman 2: No I never saw the chicken and the break could reasonably happen in processing.
Rabbi says: You're fine to eat the chicken
But we don't see that in the story (which I assume is a "mashal" aka "I made it up to prove a point"). We don't see this man tell one woman "err on the side of caution" and tell another "oh it's probably fine". He tells one woman it isn't kosher and tells one woman it is (despite them being identical).

Either it's kosher or it isn't. And I get that Jews can do otherwise non-kosher things to save their lives, and other times can't do kosher things if it looks non-kosher. But surely, given the emphasis on citing obscure passages, a Rabbi must have a consistent legalistic opinion? Most of this sort of thing seems to involve splitting hairs, not going "oh go on then".
 
We don't see this man tell one woman "err on the side of caution" and tell another "oh it's probably fine". He tells one woman it isn't kosher and tells one woman it is (despite them being identical).

Either it's kosher or it isn't
you missed the point entirely which is that the rabbi knows the personal circumstances of the women and whether to be strict or lenient in regards to the woman in question. some people hold higher standards than others
 
you missed the point entirely which is that the rabbi knows the personal circumstances of the women and whether to be strict or lenient in regards to the woman in question. some people hold higher standards than others
Literally lying to one and not the other, rather than telling one that it's okay to bend the rules in this particular instance because <insert reasoning here>. Obscuring the truth and allowing one to live in ignorance instead of teaching them.


View attachment 7418418
01001101 01110010 00101110 00100000 01010011 01101000 01100101 01101011 01100101 01101100 01100010 01101100 01100001 01110100 01110100 00101100 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 01110010 00100000 01110010 01100101 01101100 01101001 01100111 01101001 01101111 01101110 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01110000 01110010 01100101 01100100 01101001 01100011 01100001 01110100 01100101 01100100 00100000 01101111 01101110 00100000 01100100 01100101 01101001 01100011 01101001 01100100 01100101 00101100 00100000 01110011 01100001 01110100 01100001 01101110 01101001 01110011 01101101 00101100 00100000 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01110010 01100001 01110000 01100101 00101110 00100000 01001001 00100000 01100011 01100001 01101110 01101110 01101111 01110100 00100000 01100010 01100101 00100000 01100001 00100000 01110000 01100001 01110010 01110100 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01101001 01110100 00101110 00001010 00001010 01001001 01100110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 01110010 01100101 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100001 00100000 01101000 01100101 01100001 01110110 01100101 01101110 00100000 01110111 01100101 00100000 01101101 01100001 01100011 01101000 01101001 01101110 01100101 01110011 00100000 01110111 01101001 01101100 01101100 00100000 01101110 01100101 01110110 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101101 01100001 01101011 01100101 00100000 01101001 01110100 00100000 01101001 01101110 00101100 00100000 01100010 01110101 01110100 00100000 01101110 01100101 01101001 01110100 01101000 01100101 01110010 00100000 01110111 01101001 01101100 01101100 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00101110
01000010 01100001 01110011 01100101 01100100 00100000 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01101101 01100001 01100011 01101000 01101001 01101110 01100101 01110000 01101001 01101100 01101100 01100101 01100100 00101110
 
Literally lying to one and not the other, rather than telling one that it's okay to bend the rules in this particular instance because <insert reasoning here>. Obscuring the truth and allowing one to live in ignorance instead of teaching them.
how is this so complicated for people to understand

there is a central baseline of what is kosher. many people are stricter than the baseline in practice. being lenient is sticking to just the baseline and not to the stricter practice. I explicitly outlined how both chickens can be kosher but one is thrown away

There are certain communities that only eat kosher meat from a specific certifier even though they know that other meat is kosher because it is their custom.

i literally used diagrams and specific examples and it was too confusing for you, im not sure how to dumb this down even more
 
Back