Can there actually be an ethnostate?

It's inbuilt instinct. Infants display preferences for people of their same skin color when they are mere months old. Rather than admitting that maybe people are naturally biased towards their own kind, the authors of the study used this to declare that we need "interventions from a younger age."
The myth of multiculturalism is dead, and we are the failed experiment.
There's having biases towards your own kind and then there's being a grown adult who hates people of other races. I have a bias towards hispanics and a little bias against the chinese, but that doesnt mean i talk shit about chinese people. It doesn't take much cognitive function to realize that you can have a preference for your own race while not hating on people of other races. You dont have to hate them. Or love them. Just treat them like you would want to be treated.
 
does this apply to babies adopted by people of a different race, or biracial babies? otherwise how do you know they aren't just preferring people who look like their primary caretakers
Well that's the point. It's instinct to prefer people who look like your primary caretaker because they're more likely to take care of you, because you have higher percentage of genes in common. Conversely, an "other" is more likely to harm you because you are both competing for the same resources, and don't share as many genes.
 
There's having biases towards your own kind and then there's being a grown adult who hates people of other races. I have a bias towards hispanics and a little bias against the chinese, but that doesnt mean i talk shit about chinese people. It doesn't take much cognitive function to realize that you can have a preference for your own race while not hating on people of other races. You dont have to hate them. Or love them. Just treat them like you would want to be treated.
:agree: but groups are never going to blend successfully without interbreeding. It's easy to see that today, where literally everyone is out to get the evil white male for "oppressing" them. Hence the concept of an ethnostate. So you don't have to deal with all the segregation and tension that comes up in multiculturalism.
 
:agree: but groups are never going to blend successfully without interbreeding. It's easy to see that today, where literally everyone is out to get the evil white male for "oppressing" them. Hence the concept of an ethnostate. So you don't have to deal with all the segregation and tension that comes up in multiculturalism.
Well like I said, we're already relatively segregated(in the us). There's plenty of white-majority towns, black-majority towns, mexican majority towns, etc. Sure, there are places that are more mixed, but no one is being forced to live anywhere.

The reason I believe people are out to blame other races for their own personal problems is stupidity, not "multiculturism" itself. None of the black people I know blame wypipo for the downfall of the black race because all of the black people I know are educated, normal people. And they do reside in black neighborhoods, but we get along because we're not cretins.

Something you'll notice about racists(particularly the "wypipo reee" ones) is that they can't hold an argument. Make a good point and they'll either insult you or refuse to engage with you further. This is because they're stupid. Either the education system or their families failed them in teaching them 1. Tolerance and 2. Open mindedness towards new ideas. You could remedy this by not allowing schools to push the idea that white people are the devil and not allow students to encourage that idea. Encourage families to teach their children the values of tolerance and kindness. Don't give racist people the time of day.

Even if we don't all live in a literal melting pot, we can still learn to get along with each other when we have to.
 
It's inbuilt instinct. Infants display preferences for people of their same skin color when they are mere months old. Rather than admitting that maybe people are naturally biased towards their own kind, the authors of the study used this to declare that we need "interventions from a younger age."
The myth of multiculturalism is dead, and we are the failed experiment.
infants also display preferences for shitting themselves so I don't think they're the best example.
 
one of the black people I know blame wypipo for the downfall of the black race because all of the black people I know are educated, normal people. And they do reside in black neighborhoods, but we get along because we're not cretins.

Honestly my uncle was one of those "WYPIPO be killin us with crack and shit" until he moved into an all white area and had an epiphany that white people didn't care about him at all. Maybe him laying off the crack helped with that as well.
 
You forget about smallpox blankets and the fact chugs were killing each other for years anyway.

I did not, that's why I wrote, "unless you take Jared Diamond at face value", who wrote the book Germs, guns and steel.
 
Honestly my uncle was one of those "WYPIPO be killin us with crack and shit" until he moved into an all white area and had an epiphany that white people didn't care about him at all. Maybe him laying off the crack helped with that as well.
Probably both. When you're not in a right state of mind its easy to blame other people for your problems. Especially people of other races. I'm glad your uncles doing better now, though.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Kyria the Great
Well like I said, we're already relatively segregated(in the us)

It is common in Europe too for different people to self-segregate.

What do people here think is the cause for this? Is it because people prefer to be with their own kind, or is it because of media-induced racism, or something else?
 
It is common in Europe too for different people to self-segregate.

What do people here think is the cause for this? Is it because people prefer to be with their own kind, or is it because of media-induced racism, or something else?

Probably abit of column A and column B, which is fine as long as it doesn't turn to violence and murder. While I think an Ethno-State would lead to the serious sacrifice of one's soul to the point it would cost too much in the department, at the same time a country needs some unified ideal that isn't just government benefits as they eventually will disappear as not having a unified ideal is one of the things that lead to division and thus possible Ethnonationalism that consumed Germany, Japan, the Balkans, most Middle-Eastern countries, most of Africa, etc.
 
Ethnic cleansing is the systemic forced removal of an ethnic or racial group from a given territory (by means of violence or persecution). No goalpost moves needed.

It seems I have made a serious mistake. I've always been under the impression that ethnic cleansing was synonymous with genocide. I had no idea that deportations only could constitute ethnic cleansing. That invalidates some of the earlier points I've made in this thread.

Then I'd like to rise to your earlier challenge: Your challenge was:

How about you find me an example of a nation state with the ethnic diversity of France or Germany successfully making the transition to a country with the ethnic diversity of say, Japan, without resorting to violence or persecution. I don't think you can do it, and I think you know it.

I think the reverse is mostly true too: you don't turn a nation state with ethnic diversity of say japan into a country with the ethnic diversity of france or germany without resorting to violence or persecution either.

If you get technical, anything that a state chooses to do, including raising a tax or creating a new one, is rested on the implicit monopoly of violence that the state has. If people go along with it peacefully, it may seem non-violent, but that is as much the case for deportations. And if resisted, then it leads to employing state violence.


We are living in one of the most peaceful times in history. Certainly there are many deep problems and there are war and conflict ridden places in the world, though compared to nearly any point in history, people are far less likely to die as a result of conflict.

This would mean that peaceful solutions to problems are more likely than they have been at any point in the past.

Take for example catalonia. They declared independance after a referendum last year. Spain did not agree, imprisoned several former ministers on charges of rebellion.

Now if the spanish government had not challenged this claim of independance, it would have been a violent-free creation of a new state. Now, I don't think it's very likely for any state to just let an independance movement go (militarily) unchallenged, but any such violence is the result of denial of people's desire or right for self-governance. And independance movements or rebellions become more likely the more that a state does not address the things that people desire the most from their government.

And if the desire and willingness to defend their independance in the case of catalonia was bigger (the referendum's result weren't clearcut from my limited knowledge about the subject), or maybe if they had gotten the backing of a foreign state that would promise to protect their independance, spain could have decided not to challenge the independance claim.

Now then, Catalonians, if they still desire independance, are forced to figure out a military way to get their independance, because a peaceful path would not be accepted.

I think a similar thing would be true for any would be ethnostate, whether currently existing state or result of an independance movement. If sufficient people desired it (and I don't think anything close to enough people desire it to have any appear in the next 3 decades at least) and they prepared for it and sufficiently powerful support, there would be a peaceful path. Of course people are unlikely to give up their power and any country that loses a part would immediately fear for losing a second part and would try to make an example, the way spain made an example of catalonian leadership.

And this refusal of accepting peaceful means, means that when the desire for an ethnostate has grown in any area to sufficient critical mass, it can only be violent and it is more likey to have a genocidal ethnic cleansing rather than a peaceful one.
 
Back