Firstly, a rights-based system serves to protect minorities. As an exemple, freedom of speech serves technically to protect maginalized speech. Nobody want a tyranny of the masses. The real question is "should it be a right?" For me, it is a about blood and soil: so, it should be a right. I would be agree the extent the same courtesy to first nations.
Secondly, Alberta is province of also franco-albertans, but they are forced to learn english.
Thridly, how bilingualism block the majority to work for their own governance? Just learn french. English is already 40 % french words. Most melanined gentlemmen in Africa speak three languages without any education. Are anglos stupidier and lazier than africans? Seriously, I find it hard to excuse anglos when even in Quebec most of them are unilingual. Also, New-Brunswick is like 40 % french for your information.
Speaking of, fourthly, yes, the same courtesy is in fact extended in Québec even if they don't need any protection. Anglos in Québec have some of the best universities in the world, they overly represented in the elits and mist of them live their entire life without saying a word in french. They are welcomed by the infamous in Quebec's politics "Bonjour-Hi." Like in Alberta, British Columbia, and Manitoba, they have their own schools and their own educations system.