DiscoRodeo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2020
Canada is a failed state
- Thread starter Sweetpeaa
- Start date
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2023
only if the jeets and sikhs are first. I'm so tired of these rag head carpetbaggers shitting up the parties pretending to be Canadian.
Anyone else remember Air India Flight 182 ?
The single most deadly attack against Canadians.
The subsequent investigation and prosecution lasted almost twenty years. This was the most expensive trial in Canadian history, costing nearly C$130 million. The two accused, Ripudaman Singh Malik and Ajaib Singh Bagri, were both acquitted and found not guilty.
The Governor General-in-Council in 2006 appointed the former Supreme Court Justice John C. Major to conduct a commission of inquiry. His report, which was completed and released on 17 June 2010, concluded that a "cascading series of errors" by the Government of Canada, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) had allowed the terrorist attack to take place.[15]
The Canadian government had been warned by the Indian R&AW about the possibility of terrorist bombs aboard Air India flights in Canada, and over two weeks before the crash, CSIS reported to the RCMP that the potential threat to Air India as well as Indian missions in Canada was high.[47]
In June 1985, there was an Air India telex message that suggested planes could be targeted by "time delay devices." Lieutenant-Governor of Ontario James Bartleman also testified that, as a senior intelligence official in the federal Department of External Affairs, he saw a security "intercept" with a specific warning of a threat against the airline on the weekend of the bombing.[137]
In his verdict, Justice Ian Josephson cited "unacceptable negligence" by CSIS when hundreds of wiretaps of the suspects and other informants were destroyed.[142][143] Of the 210 wiretaps that were recorded during the months before and after the bombing, 156 were erased. These tapes continued to be erased even after the terrorists had become the primary suspects in the bombing.[144]
Because the original wiretap records were erased, they were inadmissible as evidence in court.[145] CSIS claimed the wiretap recordings contained no relevant information, but an RCMP memo states that "There is a strong likelihood that had CSIS retained the tapes between March and August 1985, that a successful prosecution of at least some of principals in both bombings could have been undertaken."[146] "The CSIS investigation was so badly bungled that there was a near mutiny by CSIS officers involved in the probe," said the agent who destroyed the tapes once he had been granted anonymity in January 2000 by Globe and Mail journalists.[143] One agent "said he felt compelled to destroy the tapes (that were in his possession) because he was morally obliged to do everything in his power to protect the safety of his sources. ' decided it was a moral issue... If their identity had become known in the Sikh community, they would have been killed. There is no doubt in my mind about that.''[143]
Tara Singh Hayer, the publisher of the Indo-Canadian Times and a member of the Order of British Columbia,[147] provided an affidavit to the RCMP in 1995 claiming that he was present during a conversation in which Bagri admitted his involvement in the bombings.[148] While at the London offices of fellow Sikh newspaper publisher Tarsem Singh Purewal, Hayer claimed he overheard a meeting between Purewal and Bagri in which Bagri stated that "if everything had gone as planned the plane would have blown up at Heathrow airport with no passengers on it. But because the plane was a half-hour to three quarters of an hour late, it blew up over the ocean."[citation needed] On 24 January that same year, Purewal was killed near the offices of the Des Pardes newspaper in Southall, England, leaving Hayer as the only other witness.[149]
On 18 November 1998, Hayer was shot dead while getting out of his car in the garage of his home in Surrey, British Columbia.[150] Hayer had survived an earlier attempt on his life in 1988, but was paralysed and used a wheelchair.[150] As a consequence of his murder, the affidavit was inadmissible as evidence.[151] This was later cited as a reason why the suspects in the bombing were eventually acquitted in 2005.
During an interview with Bagri on 28 October 2000, RCMP agents described Surjan Singh Gill as an agent for CSIS, saying the reason that he resigned from the Babbar Khalsa was because his CSIS handlers told him to pull out.[152]
After the subsequent failure of CSIS to stop the bombing of Flight 182, the head of CSIS was replaced by Reid Morden. In an interview for CBC Television's news program The National, Morden claimed that CSIS "dropped the ball" in its handling of the case. A Security Intelligence Review Committee cleared CSIS of any wrongdoing. However, that report remains secret to this day. As of June 2003, the Canadian government continued to insist that there was no mole involved.[153][154]
The Governor General-in-Council in 2006 appointed the former Supreme Court Justice John C. Major to conduct a commission of inquiry. His report, which was completed and released on 17 June 2010, concluded that a "cascading series of errors" by the Government of Canada, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) had allowed the terrorist attack to take place.[15]
The Canadian government had been warned by the Indian R&AW about the possibility of terrorist bombs aboard Air India flights in Canada, and over two weeks before the crash, CSIS reported to the RCMP that the potential threat to Air India as well as Indian missions in Canada was high.[47]
In June 1985, there was an Air India telex message that suggested planes could be targeted by "time delay devices." Lieutenant-Governor of Ontario James Bartleman also testified that, as a senior intelligence official in the federal Department of External Affairs, he saw a security "intercept" with a specific warning of a threat against the airline on the weekend of the bombing.[137]
In his verdict, Justice Ian Josephson cited "unacceptable negligence" by CSIS when hundreds of wiretaps of the suspects and other informants were destroyed.[142][143] Of the 210 wiretaps that were recorded during the months before and after the bombing, 156 were erased. These tapes continued to be erased even after the terrorists had become the primary suspects in the bombing.[144]
Because the original wiretap records were erased, they were inadmissible as evidence in court.[145] CSIS claimed the wiretap recordings contained no relevant information, but an RCMP memo states that "There is a strong likelihood that had CSIS retained the tapes between March and August 1985, that a successful prosecution of at least some of principals in both bombings could have been undertaken."[146] "The CSIS investigation was so badly bungled that there was a near mutiny by CSIS officers involved in the probe," said the agent who destroyed the tapes once he had been granted anonymity in January 2000 by Globe and Mail journalists.[143] One agent "said he felt compelled to destroy the tapes (that were in his possession) because he was morally obliged to do everything in his power to protect the safety of his sources. ' decided it was a moral issue... If their identity had become known in the Sikh community, they would have been killed. There is no doubt in my mind about that.''[143]
Tara Singh Hayer, the publisher of the Indo-Canadian Times and a member of the Order of British Columbia,[147] provided an affidavit to the RCMP in 1995 claiming that he was present during a conversation in which Bagri admitted his involvement in the bombings.[148] While at the London offices of fellow Sikh newspaper publisher Tarsem Singh Purewal, Hayer claimed he overheard a meeting between Purewal and Bagri in which Bagri stated that "if everything had gone as planned the plane would have blown up at Heathrow airport with no passengers on it. But because the plane was a half-hour to three quarters of an hour late, it blew up over the ocean."[citation needed] On 24 January that same year, Purewal was killed near the offices of the Des Pardes newspaper in Southall, England, leaving Hayer as the only other witness.[149]
On 18 November 1998, Hayer was shot dead while getting out of his car in the garage of his home in Surrey, British Columbia.[150] Hayer had survived an earlier attempt on his life in 1988, but was paralysed and used a wheelchair.[150] As a consequence of his murder, the affidavit was inadmissible as evidence.[151] This was later cited as a reason why the suspects in the bombing were eventually acquitted in 2005.
During an interview with Bagri on 28 October 2000, RCMP agents described Surjan Singh Gill as an agent for CSIS, saying the reason that he resigned from the Babbar Khalsa was because his CSIS handlers told him to pull out.[152]
After the subsequent failure of CSIS to stop the bombing of Flight 182, the head of CSIS was replaced by Reid Morden. In an interview for CBC Television's news program The National, Morden claimed that CSIS "dropped the ball" in its handling of the case. A Security Intelligence Review Committee cleared CSIS of any wrongdoing. However, that report remains secret to this day. As of June 2003, the Canadian government continued to insist that there was no mole involved.[153][154]
I also recall Jeetmutt Singh donating food and money and supplies to this groups charity front. You don't hate them enough
last whitey in Toronto
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2024
People keep bringing up the pension thing about Jagmeet but these people fail to realize the Jagmeet is motivated to help his own kind first. Pajeets are super nepotistic. It's why India is a shithole cause of the caste system. These people divide themselves even though they all the same shit. Jagmeet just cares about importing more of his kind. He is constantly fighting against the deportations of the "international students". I never trust any shitskin in power as they are either a puppet or just only gonna work for their own kind. It's not about the money for Jagmeet but to completely change the country to Khalsastan.
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2022
This is how you can tell places like Canada or America are under occupation governments. Any non-occupation government would crack down hard on anyone actively calling for an end to their power or for the death of their nation, which is exactly what "death to canada" is.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2021
Yknow for once I agree with the pro Palestine people, we have proven incapable of governing ourselves. Cede our lands to the US so that some semblance of sanity comes back to these lands
Lobster Cult High Priest
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2021
Was it really against Canadians. Since no sane White Canadian would decide to fly to India.
The US would instead use Canada as a dumping ground for Haitians
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2020
The Air India bombing was the single most deadly attack against """Canadians."""
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2023
I just hate how softly it was handled because it was "Canadian Sikh terrorist group"
according to wiki and totally not just Babbar Khalsa.
Can't let people realize how deranged these jeets and sikhs we let in are and what they bring with them.
wiki also says it was them who did it on their page. despite claiming a Canadian Sikh group did it, not a cell of Babbar Khalsa in Canada. Fun with semantics
Lobster Cult High Priest
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2021
Almost 25% of the official number of Canadians now need to have a side hustle (Does Gig work even count as a Hustle since when you crunch the numbers it's not worth it to drive Uber)
I wonder how many of the 7 million are Pajeets and other forms of Shitskins? Probably all of them if not 90% minimum.
Probably going to be a Conservative narrative that White Canadians refuse to get a side hustle to further grow the economy (and are thus unproductive since we aren't driving for Uber) like Based Pajeet Small Business Entrepreneurs.
It's a telltale sign of a third world economy when everyone is a Entrepreneur running some kind of Hustle (nee Scam).
I wonder how many of the 7 million are Pajeets and other forms of Shitskins? Probably all of them if not 90% minimum.
Probably going to be a Conservative narrative that White Canadians refuse to get a side hustle to further grow the economy (and are thus unproductive since we aren't driving for Uber) like Based Pajeet Small Business Entrepreneurs.
It's a telltale sign of a third world economy when everyone is a Entrepreneur running some kind of Hustle (nee Scam).
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2023
So are we closer to a snap election or no? I don't have the spoons to watch the reality tv show that claims it is canadian political news in order to parse what scraps of factual information it contains.
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2023
Nothing ever happens in Canadian politic. Nothing.
Yttrium
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2022
We have to wait and see.
The Bloc was supporting the Libs in as much as they could suck the LPC of all benefits it can before the LPC inevitably becomes an empty, dried out husk. They thought it could go on for another year, but as soon as the LPC turned around and refused to support the Bloc on a senior pension bill, the Bloc decided to play ball on trying to topple the government.
Then comes the bit about the brewing scandal about the LPC using the Green Tech company funds for their own desires. I guess that's why Trudeau is so eager to raise the carbon tax across Canada - to continue to pay for vacations to Tofino and Jamaica.
So Parliament is ground to a halt because the Conservatives are filibustering until the Libs hand over the documents which will expose government corruption to the highest degree. The Libs are burying their head in sand and pretending they can't hear anything, so now we're going on 9 days where absolutely nothing has been done in Parliament. No new legislation heard, no issues beyond the corruption documents brought up, and most importantly - no votes of non-confidence can happen, if I'm understanding the situation correctly.
EDIT:
upon closer inspection, it seems what happened was that the Conservatives speak, Andrew Scheer (for all those who remember him), raised a question of privilege, to which he initiated the debate on having the government hand over said documents.
"From the moment the motion is brought forward, all MPs are allowed 20 minutes to speak to it followed by 10 minutes of questions and comments (the only exception are the prime minister and leader of the Opposition, who have unlimited time) ... If the 119 Conservative MPs wanted to clog the House of Commons as long as possible, quick napkin math by Bloc Québécois House Leader Alain Therrien suggest they could theoretically do so until Christmas … of next year."
"Proroguing Parliament allows the government to suspend the House for a certain period, then hopefully “reset” the agenda with a new throne speech...Obviously, Trudeau asking the Governor General to dissolve Parliament and launch an election would also end the debate on privilege."
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 24, 2020
Yeah, when they mean "side hustle" they mean being a gigger, since it enriches the kikes that own those companies, that money also gets taxed which allows the gov't to misuse it and it serves as an excuse for turd world infinimmigration. Because when I think "side hustle" I don't think schemes, scams and giggers. I'll be the first to admit that I'm a Balkanigger and that I don't live in Canada but it's only invitable until the Poojeet floodgates open here since it already happened in Croatia. A "side hustle" where I'm from means cutting firewood for some old grandpa in the village, or fixing TVs, or tutoring schoolkids in subjects they suck at. Any nuWestern government sees those as problematic because money changes hands without some kike middleman being involved and the state getting its cut. That's why they'd rather have 300k Poojeets disrespecting the laws of the road while delivering slop with their stinky hands through UberJeets.
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2020
Yeah, go vote!
And I'm the crazy one.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2021
seeing this made my consciousness flash red because even though Pierre on his worst day will be a better manager than Justin on his best, this virtue signaling is absolute cancer and if this is a preview of the next however long then emigration is the play
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2017
What I find most humorous about Trudeau proroguing Parliament is that it would hurt him more than it would the opposition. Sure, it would kill the parliamentary investigations, but it will also kill legislation like Bills C-63 and C-293 on the floor so they would have to start over. What's more is that it makes the Liberals look more corrupt and presumption of innocence means jack shit in the court of public opinion. Was it scummy of Harper to prorogue Parliament to get himself out of hot water? Sure, but the Harper government scandals amounted to a $16 glass of orange juice and the overblown Duffy scandal. Trudeau government scandals involve hundreds of millions (possibly billions) given to Liberal insiders so we're working on a completely different scale.
They can tout dental and pharmacare to their heart's content, but the fact still remains: they took a sledgehammer to the economy during Covid-19 and this is their feeble attempt to "fix" it. That and flood the country with pungent Punjabis to stretch housing and job markets to their breaking point. No one with functioning cognitive abilities believes that they are better off now than they were in 2019.
Word has it that the LPC is rushing the Pharmacare bill to the Governor-General for royal assent so Trudeau can prorogue Parliament until the new year. I honestly urge him to do so because his chief bootlicker, Jagmeet Singh, won't have any reason to keep him in power after he gets his pension and bails with his golden parachute. Even if he calls an election or the governments when Parliament sits once more, the LPC is cooked because they had no intention of changing their agenda or adapting to the changing political climate.
EDIT: I was mistaken. The government could force the bills back on the docket according to MP Michelle Rempel Garner. However, this is still the "nuclear option" so the Liberals could potentially hurt themselves in using it. Susan Delacourt of the Toronto Star recently wrote an article advocating prorogation to test the waters. It is utterly hilarious that she believes that it would temper down cynicism in Canadian politics. Trudeau's reasons for doing if would be solely out of self-interest.
Last edited:
OutInTheRain
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 6, 2022
The best part of the $16 orange juice, is that was the max the treasury board would compensate for breakfast when government employees travel. You had to produce a receipt to get it. So of course if you are staying in an expensive hotel for work travel, the food is going to be expensive. After that the receipt requirement went away and they would just give you the max meal rate.
As for Duffy, it was a loophole in the rules that allowed him to do it. One that most Senators and Parliamentarians were probably making use of. I don't blame him for not wanting to be a part of the PEI healthcare system. I mean look at him, I'm shocked he still has both feet.
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2021
I moved back to the area of the city I grew up in about a year ago and it is all Indians there now. All the businesses such as the restaurants, grocery stores, etc. are all owned or operated by Indians. There's this one strip mall where there is three Indian Restaurants all right next to each other. How the fuck they are able to stay open with so much competition I'll never know, but if I had to guess then I'd say they are all working together. The grocery store I used to go that was there since I was a kid recently had to close down a couple months ago due to thieves and too much competition. I bet my bottom dollar that it'll be bought up by brown people and turned into an international grocery store with all the ingredients for the slop they eat.
Totallyunknown
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2021
I asked my landlord to stop feeding the homeless on the front porch because of an increase in thefts and harassment. I told a couple neighbors about the homeless hanging out on the front porch and the landlord had a lawyer send me a cease and desist letter telling me to stop talking about how she feeds the homeless on the front porch and that she certainly never invited them except for when she invited them to use the water hook up freely. She then claims I caused her harm by talking about how she feeds the homeless on the front porch because now the neighbors don't like her. She's sent me so many incriminating messages she has no grounds for proper eviction through the actual courts so I think she also missed the part where she cannot coerce or harass a tenant either.
People wonder why the rental laws are so strict and it's because of the massive ridiculous entitlement either party can have. This is so ridiculous to me that it sounds like a rage bait post on Facebook because what kind of fucking property owner does this? This is how brain broken liberal Canadians have become they are literally ready to give away their property to the homeless to prove some point.
People wonder why the rental laws are so strict and it's because of the massive ridiculous entitlement either party can have. This is so ridiculous to me that it sounds like a rage bait post on Facebook because what kind of fucking property owner does this? This is how brain broken liberal Canadians have become they are literally ready to give away their property to the homeless to prove some point.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2017
The short answer is that Liberal Canadians are stuck in an outdated and highly ideological way of thinking. One of their central tenets is that people are A) inherently good, and B) blank slates for them to write on. As such, many believe if they show compassion to someone, that person will reciprocate or pay it forward when humans are still animals driven by primal instincts like hunger. The homeless in case recognize your land lady as a preferable source for food than diving in a dumpster. They may not be actively looking to harass tenants, but are definitely being as opportunistic as any other animal foraging for food.
On that note, displays of charity can definitely be interpreted as displays of social status via virtue signaling. Think like a peacock that fans out its train to impress a potential mate despite its coloration and loud mating calls making it a tempting target for predators. Pointing out the negative impacts of their behavior typically elicits a defensive response because "much good intentions". They often forget what paves the road to Hell.