- Joined
- Apr 20, 2021
That's because prostitution has a history of scams and is usually illegal.
Canada is a failed state
- Thread starter Sweetpeaa
- Start date
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2017
well which is it? are Canadians stupid dipshits or are they smart people? If they're stupid people why does matter that they are laughing at the convoy?
As for hundreds of local communities laughing at truckers, there are probably many with silent support. Anyone with working class sympathizes would likely at least understand it.
As for "no one else cares because it only affected a small portion of the population" even if true, most causes are like this. Unions exist to protect the workers in a specific industry and most political causes are parties appealing to various segments of the population. It's a hundred niche causes all uniting to get a party elected.
No, I was just reading what you are actually saying.
>it was rich capitalists who organized the trucking convoy
>it was Russia who propagandized Canadians into disagreeing with Trudeaus covid policies
>they ruined our precious reputation look at what domestic and foreign media are saying about us!
Edit: It's likely gonna be the last response from me, it's clear you didn't really reason your way into this as much as you want to fit in with some imaginary group you believe all think x. You can't really talk someone out of something when they desperately want to fit in with such a group.
To put it this way: It's a lot like a teenager refusing to wear a raincoat, because he believes it will make him look uncool, his own individuality and comfort goes after wanting to fit in. Of course most of the time it's all in his head. He didn't reason himself into freezing in the rain, and you didn't reason your way into hating the convoy people, it's all in your head wishing to please a group that might not even know you exist. The convoy people were there because they wanted the best, for themselves, for their family and for their friends, all of which likely approves of what they did, regardless of what some person in a city far away think. They have developed their own individuality first and foremost and realizes what truly matters. Hopefully one day you decide to fight battles you care about even if people you don't really care about look down on you. Until then, you'll be stuck appealing to group consensus.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2018
Canadian Nationalism. The same people that brought you Nortel!
Totallyunknown
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2021
lmfao which is it are they capitalists or grass roots working class men? What are owner operators to you? The capitalist class took on the feds? Why the fuck would you care then? Either a bunch of what you called rich capitalists (I called them owner operators in the quote, not fucking trucking fleets) sat at Parliament to cry about what they weren't getting. I said owner operators. Those can very well be considered small businesses. YOU called them capitalists and the only person who has said that is you. You literally cannot comprehend anything that does not fit your world view because you were inducted into a cult. Only cults speak in terms like you have. Only religious organizations speak like that. You were indoctrinated to believe things that aren't even accurate to political processes and refuse to read any piece of news anywhere by anyone because it is all misinformation and the only people who know anything are the convoy folks. That's a cult. I can never change your mind because you are brainwashed into a cult. I theorized Russia had involvement (they did, as there are several dozen articles from recent weeks that back this up but you can't read the news because it's all fake so..) because I don't want to believe the convoy people are this stupid. I think you are this stupid and you got got by Russian bots which is fucking hilarious.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2017
Well, the Liberal caucus meeting ended not too long ago with the expected results: Trudeau is not resigning. If I had to guess on what happened, I agree with Northern Perspective and would say that the dissident MPs got to say their piece, but the dear leader responded with the typical condescending platitudes. Essentially this:
"Thank you for your input we're glad that you feel that you speak up and we're all one big happy family. We all need to stand together because it's Poilievre who's the existential threat to the country so let the cabinet handle this. Oh, and don't you lowly backbenchers dare talk to the media."
Cue the cabinet members coming out and repeating the party line while the backbenchers slink out with scowls on their faces. I imagine this isn't over because if Trudeau is going to ignore or patronize the back bench, they could abstain or vote against the government come the next confidence vote.
"Thank you for your input we're glad that you feel that you speak up and we're all one big happy family. We all need to stand together because it's Poilievre who's the existential threat to the country so let the cabinet handle this. Oh, and don't you lowly backbenchers dare talk to the media."
Cue the cabinet members coming out and repeating the party line while the backbenchers slink out with scowls on their faces. I imagine this isn't over because if Trudeau is going to ignore or patronize the back bench, they could abstain or vote against the government come the next confidence vote.
Lobster Cult High Priest
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2021
Reminder to the BackBenchers them slinking away and doing nothing will get them on lists for the Day of the Rope too.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2017
Liberal backbenchers are pretty much impotent because the party removed leadership reviews from its constitution in 2016 so there is no mechanism to oust Trudeau unless he leaves of his own volition. You see have how other parties in other Commonwealth nations like the UK and Australia can force an unpopular leader to resign (e.g. Boris Johnson) and the Conservatives here forced out Erin O'Toole after the convoy. The most the backbenchers can do is refuse to support the government by abstention or voting with the opposition on a confidence motion.
People know Canada for things like maple syrup, mounties, poutine... oh and Canadians being nice. Never heard anyone say Canada is diverse. I don't think that impression exists outside of Canada. But I could be out of touch. It sounds to me like your boomers are repeating some propaganda they've been fed from TV.
The socialized healthcare thing is kind of true but other countries have that too so it's only really special when compared directly with the US. Which makes for a lame "feature" for the country.
I dunno, I always thought Canada was nice and unique, but not because of "diversity" or "healthcare"
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2023
Or leave the party or cross the floor. I wouldn't be surprised to see a few doing that soon, they are going to lose their jobs as soon as an election is called anyway might as well try a hail mary.
Lobster Cult High Priest
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2021
Up to the early and mid aughts Canada was actually "The Great White North"
How far it has fallen.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2021
Canadian "Conservative" cries about trump for about an hour
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2021
Canada is where the smart have no power and idiots run everything. Trudeau being the most incompetent douche bag of all.
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2019
It’s actually sillier/worse than that.
McKinsey isn’t a law firm, it’s a business consulting firm.
You have been turned into an economic zone by Trudeau.
They used your country as a business case experiment. Clearly, it didn’t work.
If it makes you feel any better, they were also partially responsible for the US opioid crisis and the diversity epidemic here too.
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2015
Trudyboy keeps on making soyjack meme templates, as if he himself wants to be the main example of the meme:
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2022
And its private!
How many suicides do you think Canada will have when Trump wins? I hope a couple progies take themselves out. There isn't any real difference between the Canadian and American species. Maybe Canada version is more smug.
Lobster Cult High Priest
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2021
Best part of McKinsey Consultants is that they are all retarded 23 year olds with MBAs whose main piece of advice is “Increase revenues and decrease costs”
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2019
This is actually a huge problem in soft science fields in academia such as sociology and economics. An experiment will be carried out and on paper, it follows the scientific method and gets peer reviewed and stuff, but subsequent experiments that follow the scientific method with the same set of inputs do not reach the same conclusion. You could draw your own conclusions from that. Personally, I think it shows many studies in the soft sciences are not incredibly useful unless the result is overwhelmingly in one direction or the other.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2023
A common problem in academia, particularly in the harder to prove areas of study, is the researchers get very emotionally invested in their little theories to the point where they stop applying common sense to any of their reasoning around such theories. Often attempts they make to refute any such criticisms are based on some issue of semantics.
Like with UBI, anyone who thinks it would cause inflation will inevitably run into someone who says "Inflation means printing more money. Simply tax the rich instead."
This, of course, is retarded since it focuses on definitions of specific terms rather than the effects of inflation (i.e. more money in circulation, diluting the power of a dollar, increased demand for goods leading to price increases, etc.). Call it what you want: inflation, an economic buttfucking, bankers making an oopsie. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a fucking duck.
This is why researchers make terrible policy makers.
Last edited:
TJT
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2017
In the case of the McKinsey DEI conclusion it is obvious what the conclusion was if you were not a progressive DEI type yourself.
The most successful businesses (full of no nonsense white people) could afford to employ diversity with lower qualifications to "support equal opportunity" and not be too negatively impacted by it. Or imperceptible negative issues caused by it due to the scale of the organization. This was again simply a byproduct of the Pareto Principle. If 90% of the actual profit creating work is done by 10% of the workforce you can subvert a large amount of the workforce with DEI before the organization suffers from it.
However when you reorient your entire organization to diversity because you thought that the diversity itself was the cause of the high profits the result is a collectivist organization. Any communist/collectivist organization is more concerned with being in the in group than they are with anything else. This is in direct conflict with the idea that all actual ideas for change (in the context of making money) in the organization to make more profit will be ideas that rock the boat. Which is now no longer acceptable.
So you create an organization run by grifters for grifters that don't understand why they have run out of things to grift.
The most successful businesses (full of no nonsense white people) could afford to employ diversity with lower qualifications to "support equal opportunity" and not be too negatively impacted by it. Or imperceptible negative issues caused by it due to the scale of the organization. This was again simply a byproduct of the Pareto Principle. If 90% of the actual profit creating work is done by 10% of the workforce you can subvert a large amount of the workforce with DEI before the organization suffers from it.
However when you reorient your entire organization to diversity because you thought that the diversity itself was the cause of the high profits the result is a collectivist organization. Any communist/collectivist organization is more concerned with being in the in group than they are with anything else. This is in direct conflict with the idea that all actual ideas for change (in the context of making money) in the organization to make more profit will be ideas that rock the boat. Which is now no longer acceptable.
So you create an organization run by grifters for grifters that don't understand why they have run out of things to grift.
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2022
It's days like this where I think Trudy can actually see the writing on the wall - he's apparently cutting the Yearly Immigration Targets
Do you feel that? It feels like Trudy's starting to panic, as reality sets in.
Unfortunately, everyone else who wants the job is also retarded.
OTTAWA - Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is expected to announce a major drop in the number of new permanent residents Canada will accept in 2025.
As first reported by The National Post, the government's immigration levels are expected to drop to 395,000 in 2025, a huge decrease from the 500,000 that had previously been set as the target.
The information was provided by a government official with knowledge of the plan.
Trudeau and his immigration minister will also announce reduced targets for number of temporary residents for the first time.
The government's goal is to reduce the number of temporary residents to five per cent of the population over the next three years, down from 6.5 per cent in March.
The moves come after years of rapid increase to the number of new permanent residents in Canada and a ballooning number of people coming to Canada on a temporary basis, which federal ministers have conceded put pressure on housing and affordability.
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has accused the Liberals of destroying the national consensus on immigration.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 24, 2024.
As first reported by The National Post, the government's immigration levels are expected to drop to 395,000 in 2025, a huge decrease from the 500,000 that had previously been set as the target.
The information was provided by a government official with knowledge of the plan.
Trudeau and his immigration minister will also announce reduced targets for number of temporary residents for the first time.
The government's goal is to reduce the number of temporary residents to five per cent of the population over the next three years, down from 6.5 per cent in March.
The moves come after years of rapid increase to the number of new permanent residents in Canada and a ballooning number of people coming to Canada on a temporary basis, which federal ministers have conceded put pressure on housing and affordability.
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has accused the Liberals of destroying the national consensus on immigration.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 24, 2024.
Do you feel that? It feels like Trudy's starting to panic, as reality sets in.
Unfortunately, everyone else who wants the job is also retarded.