Canada is a failed state

kawaiikat420 said:
I wouldn't say a nobody. Daniel is the former executive director of the PPC. He's basically a failed career-politician that realized that tweeting earns him more cash than actually doing stuff.
Click to expand...

Of, that's interesting, I didn't know that.

Now that you mention it, I think I recall him running some livestreams for Maxime Bernier after the 2021 election.

I suppose that proves my point that he's a nobody in that I, someone at least with somewhat of a finger on the pulse in these circles, had no idea who he is/was.
 
Last edited:
kawaiikat420 said:
I actually think the opposite. To rob something, it has to exist in the first place. There was never a "Canadian" identity, only British, Canadien, and Indigenous. When the federal government moved away from Britain in the mid-20th century, they co-opted the Canadien identity but they also stifled the creation of a singular unified identity and aborted any chance of it. I think a unified Canadian identity would be predicated on an actual merging of the core three identities, and that's yet to happen. I suspect that it will never happen because it would require actual honest insight into Canada's past, and most Canadians are too ignorant and delusional to analyze that kinda stuff.


Basing identity on: an old person that rules you, another old person that rules you, and a company that works for the first old person, is kind of laughable. A national identity is more than just politics, religion, and department stores.
Click to expand...

Japan's identity is literally based around the Emperor, who is also the head priest of the native Japanese religion, and his power is supported by an aristocracy that now make up the bulk of Japan's corporations (Honda, Toyota, Sony, Nintendo, etc.). Your last point is just plain ridiculous. The next time you see a Toyota on the road, that car was built by descendants of the Minamoto clan, a branch of the Japanese Imperial Family.

National identities are fundamentally based on ethnogenesis, a common ancestral heritage, and the institutions that shape it, and these are primarily the family, the government, religion, and economy. In classical terms, it's called oikonomia, literally household management, and gnatio, meaning family.

The Canadian identity was already being defined as English and French, Canada had a whole royal commission for it, it was called the Royal Commission On Biculturalism. This was entirely replaced by Pierre Trudeau with multiculturalism.

Please go read books or something, and I'm being generous here.
 
Last edited:
kawaiikat420 said:
Japan and Canada are two different countries. What works for one country won't work for another country because they're different.
Click to expand...

Same principles. In classical philosophy these are called oikonomia, gnatio, and pieta. The economy rooted in household management, nation rooted on familial ties, and pieta based on loyalty to the state, or monarch.

This is literally basic politics and philosophy based on Ancient Greece and Rome, and I applied it on Japan and Canada.

I didn't just come up with this stuff, literally books are written on it. Go read books.
 
BeetleBug242 said:
They won and replaced a first world country. Now all they have to do is make sure the entire place doesn’t literally burn under us incompetency.
Click to expand...
And that's where those globo-homo traitors are wrong.

France, Spain, Italy, the UK and more are all experiencing more riots and instability because of this bullshit. Poiticians, judges, and gloablist execs are all getting d0xxed and even attacked at an increasing pace.

Sure, it will take a little bit longer to get the ones insulated by their wealth. Galen Weston I"ve heard has extensive security for his villa in Caledon, Ontario. But they will get what they deserve.

All empires fall, and so do their kings. But for the rest of us, we still need to have a survival plan.
 
Speaking of Quebec.
Never change Canadian judges. Never change.
Screenshot_20250722_101713_X.webp

On a bright side, we won't be paying her hundreds of millions of dollars.
 
InteracialBowelSyndrome said:
All empires fall, and so do their kings. But for the rest of us, we still need to have a survival plan.
Click to expand...
At this point I'll just give everything I have to my sister that has kids. Makes far more sense then holding on to what little I have. In the worst case scenario we may be looking at a massive involuntary population reduction and we'll need to prioritize protecting the next generation.
 
The ethos of a country is always something that’s hard to define unless you leave it or are exposed to another culture.

Canada has always had the problem of isolation and also being an extremely young country lying to itself about its history, kind of like China with their 6000 years of history bs. I’d argue that you guys weren’t even a country by the time of the Confederation. I’d argue the largest problem is Ottawa trying to dictate culture and that culture being a vague nothing built upon being not American.

I think it’s ultimately the issue of like every Anglo colony that isn’t America. Just a loss of identity because the ruling class themselves don’t like ruling what they see as a step-down from the Imperial and hereditary past.

It’s a huge problem I see in New Zealand and Australia. The native culture is diminished because the ruling class don’t want to participate in it. They don’t see value and want a new better class to rule over that’s more exotic.
 
HodgePodgeRogerDodger said:
I’d argue the largest problem is Ottawa trying to dictate culture and that culture being a vague nothing built upon being not American. I think it’s ultimately the issue of like every Anglo colony that isn’t America.
Click to expand...
A lot of countries that started as colonies also confuse their points of origin. A person that came to Canada in the 1600s had different motives, background, and beliefs than a person that came in the 1800s, or a person that came in the 1900s. There are a few books that look into this, Albion's Seed comes to mind, but most of the literature is focused on the USA rather than commonwealth countries like Canada. Plus, geography and distance play a role too: an Albertan, a Quebecker, and a Newfoundlander all have different views on Canada and Canadian culture. It's like that adage about three blind men trying to describe an elephant.

HodgePodgeRogerDodger said:
The ethos of a country is always something that’s hard to define unless you leave it
Click to expand...
Definitely. Canada made a lot more sense to me once I left Canada and I was exposed to other ways of living and other cultural mindsets. When I lived in Canada full-time, I knew that I didn't like it, but only when I left and experienced life in different countries was I able to actually understand the reasons for my dislike. Different perspectives can be really helpful when gleaming the nature of something.
 
kawaiikat420 said:
Definitely. Canada made a lot more sense to me once I left Canada and I was exposed to other ways of living and other cultural mindsets. When I lived in Canada full-time, I knew that I didn't like it, but only when I left and experienced life in different countries was I able to actually understand the reasons for my dislike. Different perspectives can be really helpful when gleaming the nature of something.
Click to expand...
What places were you happiest?
 
Betonhaus said:
What places were you happiest?
Click to expand...
When I lived in Canada full-time, I was happiest in Montreal. I've always been more of a city person, even though I come from a rural background. I'm happiest when I'm around a lot of people; I really value being able to disappear into crowds and having the chance to meet new people. I've lived in 4+ provinces, and I've spent prolonged periods of time in 2 more, but Quebec was always my favourite place to be in Canada.

I can appreciate rural places too, but there's always this small-town political undercurrent that I dislike - everyone is always in everyone else's business and gossiping. It can be hard to describe it to someone who hasn't lived in a rural place before, but small-towns (at least the one's I'm familiar with) are kinda suffocating. I wouldn't want to live in one again.

It's always fun talking with people that have lived in many different provinces and asking them what their rankings are. Almost everyone that I've met has ranked New Brunswick the most miserable place and I always agree.
 
kawaiikat420 said:
When I lived in Canada full-time, I was happiest in Montreal. I've always been more of a city person, even though I come from a rural background. I'm happiest when I'm around a lot of people; I really value being able to disappear into crowds and having the chance to meet new people. I've lived in 4+ provinces, and I've spent prolonged periods of time in 2 more, but Quebec was always my favourite place to be in Canada.

I can appreciate rural places too, but there's always this small-town political undercurrent that I dislike - everyone is always in everyone else's business and gossiping. It can be hard to describe it to someone who hasn't lived in a rural place before, but small-towns (at least the one's I'm familiar with) are kinda suffocating. I wouldn't want to live in one again.

It's always fun talking with people that have lived in many different provinces and asking them what their rankings are. Almost everyone that I've met has ranked New Brunswick the most miserable place and I always agree.
Click to expand...
What place did you dislike the most?
 
HodgePodgeRogerDodger said:
The ethos of a country is always something that’s hard to define unless you leave it or are exposed to another culture.

Canada has always had the problem of isolation and also being an extremely young country lying to itself about its history, kind of like China with their 6000 years of history bs. I’d argue that you guys weren’t even a country by the time of the Confederation. I’d argue the largest problem is Ottawa trying to dictate culture and that culture being a vague nothing built upon being not American.

I think it’s ultimately the issue of like every Anglo colony that isn’t America. Just a loss of identity because the ruling class themselves don’t like ruling what they see as a step-down from the Imperial and hereditary past.

It’s a huge problem I see in New Zealand and Australia. The native culture is diminished because the ruling class don’t want to participate in it. They don’t see value and want a new better class to rule over that’s more exotic.
Click to expand...
I think you're mostly right. Pearson who was PM in the 60s resented being PM of Canada and did so much to astro-turf a culture upon us. He changed the flag and so many things that are basic to the culture and identity of the nation, and his successor Trudeau senior went even further. Pearson wanted to go back to UN Ambassador gig and live back in New York. Trudeau was resentful of the rural character of the nation and the English part of the country. In fact he really only cared for Montreal, having a personal distaste for rural Quebecers.

On top of that, most Commonwealth nations spent decades still under British Dominion on the world stage which has lead to Federal governments looking inward and meddling as much as possible. Canada only had something like 17 years when it could dictate it's own foreign policy. Post Charlottetown conference to WW2. After WW2 we became a vassal of the US, whether we like to admit it or not. That had led to a government obsessed with Federalism.

Furthermore, out leftist politicians want to be American politicians. They parrot Democrat talking points, in hope that the US will notice them, and then tell them they are a good boy. Trudeau junior and Jagmeet Singh both exemplify this. With the NDP larping as the DSA.
 
As if Canadian healthcare wasn't bad enough...

The Canadian Nurses Association’s 2025 Code of Ethics for Nurses denounces what it calls the “white, European-centric” foundations of modern medicine and compels nurses to adopt a broad set of radical, progressive political beliefs as part of their professional duties.

Regulated Canadian nurses are now required to align their conduct with a detailed set of political values — among them, social justice, gender ideology, Indigenous belief systems, and climate activism.

Nurses are now required to acknowledge “the historical and continuous impact that White, European-centric models of nursing and health have on the perpetuation of anti-Indigenous racism, anti- Black racism, and other types of racism.”
https://www.junonews.com/p/new-ethics-code-tells-nurses-to-denounce

https://nurses.ab.ca/media/pgzfycnz...nd-natural-health-products-standards-2022.pdf

Yup, time for the old western ideals of medicine to move aside for the more proven and historical processes of the indigenous folks of the world. Where eating worms and getting tattoo's are used as a method to treat ailments and to ensure that every troon, pooner and in between is treated and honoured for the individual they are...or else kiss your license good bye.

Hope you bleeding heart Liberal party voters don't get sick anytime soon. You might not get the care you thought you would since your a (presumable) white person and thus a second class citizen in your own country and treated as such. Maybe the best bet is to troon out and that way you at least get some level of respect from the darkies and woke folks running things. Well that is until your healthcare costs get too high and they just MAID your lilly white ass out of existence.


How's voting Liberal doing for you now Canada?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom