People would migrate to an alternative to Patreon. Thousands jumped to that Russian scam site SubscribeStar after all. It's literally impossible to create an alternative of Patreon that would have anywhere near the same market share. See: SubscribeStar.
And yeah, it is bad for businesses when you're getting smeared by the media and targeted by NGO's, etc - it's not so much free market as it is extortion. But in the case of Patreon it's not even that. When Master Card and Stripe tell you that you shouldn't host somebody on your service or else your payment processing will get fucked into the dirt - you do what they tell you. And please spare me the 'just start your own global financial system bro' lolbertarian arguments.
The intellectual dark web is a bunch of dumb boomers who are looking for a quick racket, and Carl is too exceptional to focus on the big problems the internet is facing. And we're how many videos on Patreon on his main channel?
He'd rather sperg out on twitter about Ralph, some pastebin, and Negro Joe.
I'm someone of the muh free marketz mindset and yeah I have to agree with you. The concept of a "free market" must be protected. These fucking companies get so big in a market that's regulated to begin with, they get so fucking powerful to a point that allows them to just Jew their way into both parties, and does anyone really expect them to play fairly?
It's in their interest to get rid of the free market and enslave everyone for their own to milk. They want more and more to sustain their growth. Many lolberts love to pilpul on the word monopoly, factually stating that Google and Facebook aren't monopolies, just market dominant.
We are in need for a new word to describe these companies. They aren't a monopoly, they are equally as bad if not worse than a monopoly. When companies reach a certain size, they must be forced to abide by the amendments. They can't just hide under this "me a private company" umbrella and do whatever the fuck they want. Getting banned off Kikebook means one is denied access to their friends and family, digitally. If that's not a violation of freedom, I don't know what is. A Christian baker not wanting to bake a faggot cake, the fag can just go to another bakery which will be more than happy to take his AIDS riddled cash. We aren't seeing this however. We're seeing a case of "every bakery in the country doesn't want to bake the fag cake, and the ones that do doesn't have the rainbow dildo cake he wants to purchase". This is a blatant violation of the most basic rights.
Like individuals, they are allowed to play in the market and kike up ZOG politicians with shekelz. However, they aren't humans and don't have to play by the most basic laws and amendments that individuals however must abide by. It's time to force them to play by the rules that every powerless pleb has to live under. If they dare to circumvent by breaking themselves down, massive fines should be imposed. They can be a private business, they just have to play fairly.
Or introduce special laws for social media companies since it wasn't a phenomenon back then. I don't mind discriminating against any of these putrid trash social media sites.
This is going to be a lot more complicated than keyboarding. Some of these companies will circumvent such laws by moving the HQ to buttfuck nowhere. IKEA is registered as a fucking charity in many countries, allowing them to pay absolutely no taxes, outcompeting every single local hardworking men and women with their cheap Chinese trash. Somehow this is allowed. Commies would say big companies are a threat to liberty, harsdcore ancap and minarchist types would say the state is, I'd say -- both fucking are.
I don't even think Patreon is at fault here. It wouldn't surprise me if it's some kike payment processing company moaning about white niggers.