Carson King / CallMeCarson / CallMeCarsonYT - Minecraft YouTuber, trades nudes with underage fans

Next Highlight
Not saying the situation is not creepy. But in my state a 17/19 isn't illegal.

Also in my state a 16 banging 25 year old=OK
A 17 texting noodz to a 18= jail time sex offender registry.

Also the "Romeo Juliet" law makes 3 year old splits legal no matter what age. So 15/18 would be legal.
No I don't live in the South.
458e9efc91999c5b7f11169369cae1fe.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: NoFeline, From The Uncanny Valley, Pink Puppy and 1 other person
Snuffed Kin said:
I see a lot of debate in this thread, so I’d like to offer this piece of advice: When in doubt, use the creep calculator. Take your age, divide by two, then add seven. The result is the minimum age of who you can date before it’s creepy (round up for odd numbers). You’re 16? Youngest is 15. If you’re 40, the youngest is 27. It’s not like it overrides the law of consent or anything, it’s just a general rule of them for how the public is going to feel about your relationship.

Going by the calculator, homeboy checks out. That being said, his sexting is utterly creepy and my panties are dry, and moreover, he’s in the violation of the Don’t Fuck Your Fans rule. So I’d say his best option is to just fuck off the internet for a while. By the time he comes back everyone will have forgotten.

Fuck this bitch for minimizing actual legitimate grooming though.
Click to expand...
Spare us your roastie math, we're all gonna lift and get 23 year old Asian girls who look 16 like Hitler intended.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: George Geef, Brown Bricks, Ensign Faggot and 16 others
Jump said:
Not saying the situation is not creepy. But in my state a 17/19 isn't illegal.

Also in my state a 16 banging 25 year old=OK
A 17 texting noodz to a 18= jail time sex offender registry.

Also the "Romeo Juliet" law makes 3 year old splits legal no matter what age. So 15/18 would be legal.
No I don't live in the South.
View attachment 1829980
Click to expand...
damn upper peninsula got flooded 2020 hitting everyone out here
 
  • Feels
Reactions: AStupidMonkey
Jump said:
Not saying the situation is not creepy. But in my state a 17/19 isn't illegal.

Also in my state a 16 banging 25 year old=OK
A 17 texting noodz to a 18= jail time sex offender registry.

Also the "Romeo Juliet" law makes 3 year old splits legal no matter what age. So 15/18 would be legal.
No I don't live in the South.
View attachment 1829980
Click to expand...
For some funny reason I don't think you should listen to this chart.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Mister Loser, HitchWunter, unclejeb1861 and 2 others
biggest big boy said:
As has been said there's no grey area - it is illegal nationwide to send/receive nudes of people under 18. Age of Conset and Romeo & Juliet don't factor into it.

Maybe there should be exceptions for situations like this but 1. idfk what kind of politician is ever going to try to pass that shit. none obviously and 2. the law's policy on cp is scorched earth for a good reason so it's hard to make anything else work in that framework
Click to expand...
Perhaps I should rephrase that the relationship was protected, not the nudes. Like I said at the end of that post; when in doubt, throw it out. If you can't guarantee that a woman is of age then don't interact beyond "hi, how are you?".
Better still is to never put yourself in a situation where you need to worry about getting nudes from minors.

The fact that this is, what, the 6th or 7th YouTube sex scandal in 4 months is unbelievable. How hard is it to make haha funny meme videos and keep your dick in your pants?
 
Aryanne said:
Why 21? Why not 25? Are you sure that people aren't ready until they're 30? This American puritanical attitude about alot of shit is honestly brain dead, if you educate children well enough and make sure parents talk to them about it then there's no issue with the AoC being in the 16-18 range (which is when people reach sexual maturity anyways), and even if you did raise it to 21 you'd just be criminalising people for absolutely no good reason plus you really think people would take any notice? Hell even in Denmark where the AoC is 15 you still get people ignoring it 21 is just absolutely unenforceable. Plus if you're old enough to die in a war you're old enough to had sex.

Edit: just reread the quoted post, ignore my autism I read too far into one section of it while ignoring the rest
Click to expand...
I know you retracted but let me clarify, I think people under 21 are lacking a lot in the way of life experience and mental development, too much in order to be fucking or getting in relationship with anyone 21 or over. I'm not saying 16-18 year old's shouldn't be allowed to fuck, I'm saying they should only be allowed to on their side of the the age of consent which is anybody under 21 and I say 21 specifically because your mental development starts to stagnate around that age before totally ending at around 25.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Disagree
  • Autistic
Reactions: Gaia Soraka, Aryanne, M0JY0 and 2 others
chudley_wetlegs said:
American puritanism around sex is so bizarre.
Click to expand...
it's not even american puratism. if this was an IRL matter, between her parents and the two of them, she would probably have a job and a car and be near-graduated if not graduated and her parents would see a dumbfuck kid who's just as stupid as her and wouldn't care. if anything they'd think "what are you doing with this loser". only in 2021 twitter spergland is this anything close to "grooming".
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: George Geef, From The Uncanny Valley, SHITTAHS CLOGGED! and 3 others
Haram Exercise said:
A 19yo dating a 17yo isn't a big deal. You people are massive retarded faggots for caring about this at all.
Click to expand...
There's nothing wrong with dating, but this concerns about the exchange of sexually explicit photos, which is illegal.

Aryanne said:
Why do people even touch these girls with fluorescent hair dye and shitty makeup, I thought bright colors in nature were supposed to indictate danger.
Click to expand...
Natural Selection.

Jump said:
Not saying the situation is not creepy. But in my state a 17/19 isn't illegal.

Also in my state a 16 banging 25 year old=OK
A 17 texting noodz to a 18= jail time sex offender registry.

Also the "Romeo Juliet" law makes 3 year old splits legal no matter what age. So 15/18 would be legal.
No I don't live in the South.
View attachment 1829980
Click to expand...
Honestly it should be 16+ for Age of Consent across the board, and I live in a state that 16+, but the parents have the authority to decide who the person sees if they are underage, if violated the person can get charged with statutory.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Clarence Big Boss and Uncanny Valley
I think what a lot of people are reacting to is the overreaction and people trying to cancel Carson. Those SJW-like people are ridiculous as hell. But it's also wacko to act like this kinda thing is total justifiably normal, youtubers who get exposed for this kinda thing have a big reaction against it for a good reason.
It's shitty as fuck to pressure somebody underage who idolizes you into producing nudes, however is that "cancel" worth? No. I just don't think people should under or over react when the situation isn't entirely clear.

Carson should only be absolved when he properly addresses the situation like an adult rather then putting his ex-coworkers and friends into an incredibly awkward situation.
 
  • Disagree
  • Like
  • Dumb
Reactions: ProfDongs, Mister Loser, Purin Chan and 17 others
A girl accuses another youtuber based on the Carson situation, deletes her account an hour later. Posted screens of her having an awkward conversation with him, but she was initiating all the sexual things. She said she’s autistic, called it ‘traumatizing’, and doubled down bc he... sent her among us porn? Keeps calling herself “a whole ass child that was... manipulated” when she was literally 17. Don’t have archives of her tweet but her @ was @losingline and the general consensus was that she’s overblowing a situation to get clout
321C169B-B662-40F7-84A2-2C0019922741.jpegD3C5E40D-CB0C-4051-B5BF-6A2818F4DDB1.jpeg7662071A-C0C8-41DD-9CA3-7667A69932F4.jpeg5A8DCE03-0EBF-4CD2-AE1E-4CBCCD957B62.jpegBC3A58E8-A9E5-427C-BF7A-5D8ECF8345D4.jpeg7DAF2876-492C-4D58-ABC5-B878B0D69CC8.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Lunacy
  • Horrifying
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Telespergy, George Geef, Brown Bricks and 21 others
Arm Pit Cream said:
It's shitty as fuck to pressure somebody underage who idolizes you into producing nudes, however is that "cancel" worth? No. I just don't think people should under or over react when the situation isn't entirely clear.
Click to expand...
Though I agree with you that some of these allegations are over the fucking board, I disagree that pressurizing an underage person into producing nudes is "not cancel-worthy." It definitely is but it depends on some circumstances. If they lied about their age, then yeah it's not fucking cancel worthy, still an asshole thing to do. If Carson knew her age was under 18, then yeah that cancellation is quite justifiable.
 
Last edited:
  • Dumb
  • Disagree
  • Agree
Reactions: Apis mellifera, Deodar, KimCoppolaAficionado and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back