- Joined
- Jun 21, 2021
I had to look up who this faggot is...From what I gathered, he sexted/groomed a fan who was 17 when Carson himself was 19? Doesn't seem like a problem to me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I had to look up who this faggot is...From what I gathered, he sexted/groomed a fan who was 17 when Carson himself was 19? Doesn't seem like a problem to me.
A 19 year old cannot groom a 17 year oldHe's done it multiple times and refused to stop. He had numerous friends all supporting him who tried to help him get over it (instead of reporting him to the police, like they should have) and he purposefully lied to them about stopping for months on end, until they completely cut him off.
He's complete scum. Ten minutes of his content and you can see exactly the kind of person he is. Weak willed, no personality, serial grifter, inveterate liar. Grooming is absolutely the tip of the iceberg here.
There is nothing wrong with 19 year olds banging 17 year olds. Society is just retarded about almost everything nowHe's done it multiple times and refused to stop. He had numerous friends all supporting him who tried to help him get over it (instead of reporting him to the police, like they should have) and he purposefully lied to them about stopping for months on end, until they completely cut him off.
He's complete scum. Ten minutes of his content and you can see exactly the kind of person he is. Weak willed, no personality, serial grifter, inveterate liar. Grooming is absolutely the tip of the iceberg here.
also nothing wrong with stars banging starstruck fans as well, so long as they're above the age of consent, which 17 is in most places even within the USThere is nothing wrong with 19 year olds banging 17 year olds. Society is just retarded about almost everything now
Prove it.A 19 year old cannot groom a 17 year old
Don't you understand! He is a white teenage male that publicly showed symptoms of heterosexuality. That's a high crime on the internet.Nah, donating “100 % profits” will be easy. After he figures out what all his business expenses and living expenses are he can then throw whatever amount he likes at charity calling that the “profit” and pretend everyone watching his streams is helping a charity (aka his bank balance and career).
His whole scandal was stupid. A teenage guy using the only status leverage he has (e-fame) to get sexy photos of other teen girls seems so fucking generic and vanilla. Unless there was a 13 year old he was asking to send him nudes that I missed, I couldn’t believe there was any outrage. A 19 year old guy using his tiny bit of power or fame to get titty pictures is so mundane.
Prove it.
Sorry for fucking what? That the laws are at least 5 years behind what is now normal? 17 and 19 is fair game in most countries in the world, and I think the majority of states in the USA. The fact that every hormonal idiot teenager has a cellphone and throbbing privates means they will flirt, sext and exchange nudes if they find someone they find attractive. It's laughable that he could've fucked her sore, done any consensual, depraved sexual act, and everything would've been legal. But if she sends him a picture and her nipples are visible it's child pornography, and both parties are now in trouble.
This is something that has boggled my mind for a long time. Whatever happened to responsibility for one's actions. Why is it always the fault of the desirable?also nothing wrong with stars banging starstruck fans as well, so long as they're above the age of consent, which 17 is in most places even within the US
Statutory rape - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
What authority did he have over her? The perceived one she gave him freely because she admires him for what he does? Nigger, you're outright retarded."Such laws generally apply to a couple whose ages differ by less than a specified number of years. They are, however, generally unavailable in any case where the older participant has an authoritative position over the younger regardless of relative age, such as a teacher/student, coach/player or guardian/ward relationship, or if any physical force was used or serious physical injury resulted."
Oh look, a clause specifically inserted to cover situations like this.
What authority did he have over her? The perceived one she gave him freely because she admires him for what he does? Nigger, you're outright retarded.
Answer. What authority did he have over her? Is he her boss? A colleague? Her guardian? A parent? Being a fan of his does not make him authority. That's not how authority works in law. At least not yet.I can't imagine what authority a very popular (somehow) streamer and internet personality could possibly be argued to have over an impressionable teenager in court.
if you think a 19 year old has enough agency and wits to groom someone, you have to give a 17 year old enough agency to know who she wants to be sexual with.
settle down okNo. One is underage. One isn't. It's that simple. I don't understand why this is so hard to comprehend. It absolutely fucking disgusts me that people want to turn this into a game of semantics. There is no debate here. He tried to have sex with a minor. One year underage. One day underage. One hour underage. It's still the same thing. Why can't you get that through your thick skull?
So you mean to tell me that it’s completely and totally disgusting and utterly immoral for a 19 year old to be with a 17 and 364 day year old, but it’s totally morally cool to wait until tomorrow? Nigga what kind of weirdo number magic voodoo bullshit are you operating on? If you want to assign any age as being the magical cut off point for instant maturity, 18 is terrible. If you’re younger than 26 you’re still an immature irresponsible kid.No. One is underage. One isn't. It's that simple. I don't understand why this is so hard to comprehend. It absolutely fucking disgusts me that people want to turn this into a game of semantics. There is no debate here. He tried to have sex with a minor. One year underage. One day underage. One hour underage. It's still the same thing. Why can't you get that through your thick skull?
Bro, afaik he didn't even try to have sex with her. If he fucked her that'd habe been okay. Romeo and Juliet laws and all. Perfectly legal, no matter how much you reeee at that.No. One is underage. One isn't. It's that simple. I don't understand why this is so hard to comprehend. It absolutely fucking disgusts me that people want to turn this into a game of semantics. There is no debate here. He tried to have sex with a minor. One year underage. One day underage. One hour underage. It's still the same thing. Why can't you get that through your thick skull?
So you mean to tell me that it’s completely and totally disgusting and utterly immoral for a 19 year old to be with a 17 and 364 day year old, but it’s totally morally cool to wait until tomorrow?