Charles Manson did nothing wrong

The best story about Manson is when he was trying to intimate some guy by wildly swinging a katana around him but he accidentally cut off the guys ear.
 
I knew a guy, a recovering addict and former drug dealer, who did time in the California prison system and met Tex Watson. Watson was a jailhouse preacher by then and--according to my friend--was a good one, too. Looking at him, meeting him, my friend said it was hard to imagine Watson doing all of the terrible things he did, but he did, and the other inmates tread carefully around him.

To the point of the thread, Charlie was batshit crazy evil. Defending him is nuts.
 
Why do you believe that he is batshit crazy and why do you think defending him is nuts?
We're still talking about Charlie Manson, right? The cult leader responsible for the Tate-Labianca murders, as well as the prime suspect in the disappearance of Susan Adkins' attorney (whose name escapes me), Shorty Shafer, and several others? The man convicted of prison rape in his younger days, as well as innumerable other violent crimes? The man who thought Terry Melcher still lived at the Polanski home? That Charlie Manson?

Look, when the bodies start piling up and pregnant women begging for the life of their child are hacked into pieces, I start thinking gee, maybe this Manson guy might have a few fucking mental problems. Defending his actions, in my view, is bizarre. There used to be a website (I forget its name) ran by a few of Charlie's remaining followers on the outside as well as some newer acolytes. They claimed it was all a big government frame job. Some tried to claim Tex Watson masterminded the murders, as I'm seeing in posts on here. Others got a little more esoteric in their theories and started bringing up MKULTRA and all that other shit--again, as I'm seeing here.

Notorious serial killers often have a fan base, people who are so fascinated by these dark and twisted fucks that they even write them and seek to protect and defend them. There was the case of one of the Moors murderers, Myra Hendley, who had a British MP in her corner; that is, until the MP was presented with irrefutable proof she was an active, even enthusiastic participant in the murder of children.

According to criminal psychologist and pioneer in the fields of psychopathy and sociopathy, Dr. Robert Hare, many of the more intelligent psychopaths are charming and charismatic. It's their camouflage. It lets them get close to their prey. so they can get what they want from their victim, whether money or sex or power or just the thrill of killing them. Psychopaths can't feel much but they do like the rush that comes with victimizing others.

If you find yourself unironically defending Charlie Manson, you need to do a self-assessment, along with a little soul-searching. Get well soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trad Cunt
That’s a lot of words, mostly bullshit.

It was Tex Watson’s idea for the murders and it was Tex who ordered them to do so (if you believe they even did).

You call Manson a “serial killer”. Really? When did he kill someone? Tell me, because I must’ve missed that.

You regurgitate the same lies from the media about how he’s the devil and pure evil, and I doubt you have ever taken time to really listen to anything he has said past the view of a insane man.
 
It's unfortunate for Mr Manson that he did not live in our Age. He would fit right in. Likewise, for all his faults, he's less objectionable than socialists, who are also trying to start a race war and kill random people, and with greater success.
 
It's unfortunate for Mr Manson that he did not live in our Age. He would fit right in. Likewise, for all his faults, he's less objectionable than socialists, who are also trying to start a race war and kill random people, and with greater success.
He did live up until 2017.
 
Lol nigga are you unironically doing the “ANTIFA ARE THE REEEAL FASCISTS!” meme?

Of course not, negro. Traditional Fascist Blackshirts has standards. I'm comparing them to the Sturmabteilung, who they were allied with in 1931, back when Antifaschistische Aktion was shilling for Joe Stalin and having street fights with the Weimar police.

Oh yeah. That's how long Antifa has been trying to kill police officers. Back then rival socialist groups were a lot more friendly.

"No accident is here involved, nor a bad joke of history. The duplication of systems here is not apparent but real. Everything points to the fact that we have to deal here with expressions and consequences of identical principles applied to different levels of historical and political development. Whether party “communists” like it or not, the fact remains that the state order and rule in Russia are indistinguishable from those in Italy and Germany. Essentially they are alike. One may speak of a red, black, or brown “soviet state”, as well as of red, black or brown fascism. Though certain ideological differences exist between these countries, ideology is never of primary importance."
-Otto Rühle, "The Struggle Against Fascism Begins with the Struggle Against Bolshevism"


Go compare the inherent racism of Critical Race Theory to National Socialist ideology. This isn't rocket science, kid.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Dire Dire Cocks
Oh this takes me back. I haven’t seen a teenage edgelord faggot waving pom poms for Charles Manson in many a year! Bet you think his drug hazed schizo rambling was just “too deep for the sheeple to understand maaaaaan!” right?
It's sort of comfy nostalgia.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Jason Wynn
Oh this takes me back. I haven’t seen a teenage edgelord faggot waving pom poms for Charles Manson in many a year! Bet you think his drug hazed schizo rambling was just “too deep for the sheeple to understand maaaaaan!” right?

Tell me about it. Raz Simone is a very poor substitute.

Speaking of similarities to groups in the today world, I just noticed this new highlighted Kiwi Farms thread:

This sounds an awful lot like the Spahn Ranch without the Spahn. Keep your doors locked, kids.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jason Wynn
I've done some pretty extensive study on Manson (watched an episode of Mindhunter) and it seems clear that he did fuck all and is entirely innocent.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Mothra1988
If we assume for a moment that Manson had nothing to do with the Tate/Labianca murders, we still have the following issues:

He cut off Gary Hinman's ear with a sword shortly before Hinman was murdered. Manson never disputed this.

He shot Bernard "Lotsa Poppa" Crowe in the gut, leaving him for dead. Manson never disputed this.

He may have helped murder and chop up Shorty Shea. Manson has disputed his involvement in the killing part, but has never disputed that he was present during the murder.

It was fun for edgelords in the 1990's to hail Manson as some kind of groovy, guitar-slinging philosopher-king/political prisoner, which made them about as smart as Squeaky Fromme. But he wasn't; he was a glib and grubby little hustler with a jailhouse mentality, who blew every opportunity handed to him and couldn't even last 2 years out of prison. If kiwifarms had existed in 1968-1969, there'd have been a thread on him.


As for Nikolas Schreck, he is a loser faggot nigger Jew turned scam artist. 90% of people who ordered his junky, overpriced Manson book still have not received it. His greatest talent was bellowing out-of-tune low-budget songs about werewolves and such in a schlocky band, very much like a Halloween-themed Mark Harris.

Want a fun read on Schreck? Here's one. It is written by a LaVey stan, so it is a little biased. However the details of the story really do ring true; the author really has his number:

 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Nurse Ratchet
Back