Charlie / penguinz0 / moistcr1tikal - Angry and bigtime Youtuber and Twitch Stream, going off rails

[Orc-Chud]

>Chud L's continue-
Josh, that implies that this fence sitting faggot has strong enough views to please the right wingers.

right wingers in 2024 are anyone who doesn’t want to troon out children

 

[Red flaming panda]

You'd be surprised

What do you mean moistcr1tikal's fencesitting was enough to please right wingers?

 

[fungus on wood]

>"Fuck you, libtard. I should be allowed to groom this kid into a femboi nazi wife while killing adult woman living white guys"
>"No fuck you, chud. You should be executed while I groom this little boy into becoming a proud trans ancom wife in front of your face"
Society moment.

What the fuck are you talking about, what is "adult woman living white guys". Are you a schizophrenic?

 

[Dyn]

Opinions about chopping kid's cocks off should probably warrant an even stronger reaction than that. To a deadly degree. We're just a cucked pussy faggot bitch ass joke of a society now for letting it go on.

No I don't think anybody should go out and murder an internet streamer because he has a very mainstream and widely acceptable opinion that you personally don't like. What's wrong with you?

 

[fungus on wood]

What do you mean moistcr1tikal's fencesitting was enough to please right wingers?

I've known a few who watch him despite his incessantly gay takes, so there's at least a small crowd of them who watch him.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

No I don't think anybody should go out and murder an internet streamer because he has a very mainstream and widely acceptable opinion that you personally don't like. What's wrong with you?

Somewhere along the line I fell to the dark side and figured those who support child grooming and mutilation should not feel safe, I apologize, don't cancel me on Twitter please!

 

[Red flaming panda]

No I don't think anybody should go out and murder an internet streamer because he has a very mainstream and widely acceptable opinion that you personally don't like. What's wrong with you?

What do you mean you don't wanna kill people you disagree with? You know society would be better off if I was allow to kill all those who disagree with me on everything.

 

[Chug Smuckle]

What do you mean you don't wanna kill people you disagree with? You know society would be better off if I was allow to kill all those who disagree with me on everything.

I disagree

 

[So It Goes]

I sat through the whole thing and to no one's surprise the guy who's spent the past 10 years spouting the most brand-safe opinions from the safety of edited prepared content YouTube videos with zero pushback is incapable of actually making a good argument in real time about it.

Sneako gives off boy-molesting faggot vibes, which is why he gargles the ballsack of a religion that promotes child rape as a moral good and somehow he managed to get ahead of Charlie in this conversation, if only by an inch. I don't know why Charlie thought this was a good idea. Maybe stick to opening Pokémon cards from now on champ.

 

[Dyn]

child grooming and mutilation

That's your opinion. Normal people call it 'gender-affirming surgery' and think it's a good thing that helps people.

What do you mean you don't wanna kill people you disagree with?

I think it's morally wrong to murder people because they said an opinion on youtube that upsets me. Maybe I'm just too oldfashioned for this crazy world.

 

[Terminal Coda]

Sounds like a flat out lie to me.

Urologists explain why you can't pee with an erection.

That just isn't true and while I'm not gonna sign up for a better look at your article, a cursory glance shows that even in the article the language used is "can be difficult" not "is impossible"
t. Morning wood haver and frequent pisser

 

[Dyn]

I pee with an erection all the time it's not that hard.

 

[Red flaming panda]

Are you a schizophrenic?

No, I'm a red panda.

 

[Minerva Mink]

Most content creators are terminally online, troons are law on Twitter and pissing them off can hurt your channel bigly. So I can see that he considers the middle of the road opinion to say the Twitter party line.

 

[Red flaming panda]

I think it's morally wrong to murder people because they said an opinion on youtube that upsets me.

Image thinking this, unironically.

 

[AltisticRight]

>"Fuck you, libtard. I should be allowed to groom this kid into a femboi nazi wife while killing adult woman loving white guys"
>"No fuck you, chud. You should be executed while I groom this little boy into becoming a proud trans ancom wife in front of your face"
Society moment.

About time for President Xi to nuke this society.

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

Permanently mutilating children, leaving them in a deformed state is wrong. Period.

I disagree

 

[Terminal Coda]

Most content creators are terminally online, troons are law on Twitter and pissing them off can hurt your channel bigly. So I can see that he considers the middle of the road opinion to say the Twitter party line.

I definitely think it's smart for him to play nice if he wants to keep his success (though the actual smart thing is not to start this debate at all) but Charlie has painted himself into a corner in which no matter his stance he will either look like a hypocrite or an idiot

 

[Dude Snakes]

Charlie you sold your soul to Satan, LEAVE THE KIDS ALONE YOU MENTALY SLOW FOOL!

 

[Minerva Mink]

I definitely think it's smart for him to play nice if he wants to keep his success (though the actual smart thing is not to start this debate at all) but Charlie has painted himself into a corner in which no matter his stance he will either look like a hypocrite or an idiot

Yes, the debate was a dumb idea in the first place.