This is the first time he's said something of interest.
"Boring fence sitter commentary youtuber with no opinions makes a video on more popular boring fence sitter commentary youtuber with no opinions".
I'd rather watch paint dry.
Honestly, I'm not surprised Moistcr1tikal lost this badly to Sneako to all people. Hell, he's already coping with the fact that he failed so badly and deleted videos.
For one, he overly relied on the American views on the Law, thinking that alone would disprove Sneako's arguments.
However, Sneako brings up the fact that the laws are different in other countries and that the age of consent can range from 16 to 14.
As a consequence, Moistcr1tikal stumbles on this subject constantly.
This keeps happening because despite Moistcr1tikal having around 15 million subscribers, he has a sheltered view of the world and thus struggles with the idea that other countries would justify lowering the age of consent.
Hell, as much of a degenerate Sneako is, he was able to so quickly counter Moistcr1tikal arguments.
He brought in the question, "What if both parties, both the parents, approve of the marriage?" and keep this in mind because this question will end up screwing Charlie over down the line.
Second, he went into thinking he would automatically thinking he would win this debate simply because Sneako's view on consent is considered horrid to the rest of America.
What he fails to understand is that you still need to prove why it's a bad thing to marry someone so young.
Using the moral argument "It's bad" is not good enough.
You need to prove why it isn't good and what consequences can come from it.
Moistcr1tikal is just ill-equipped to explain any of his points and thus looks like a fool.
Even when Moistcr1tikal got to the part when they were discussing incest, he still failed to explain himself.
That should have been the easiest subject to explain because of the biological consequences of incest, yet he still failed to argue against Sneako and just went, "Well, I believe it's bad." Again, that's not good enough, Charlie.
You have to be able to explain why incest is bad to the other party and the consequences that can come from such an act because, guess what, Charlie, they're not going to share your values.
Third, and this was the one I knew he would fuck up on, is when he got into the cutting kids' dicks off debate.
Because Moistcr1tikal is a lefty cuck who blindly goes along with what everyone says is right, Sneako was able to trap him by simply asking him this question, "Can you believe that someone can go through hormone therapy? Can they change their gender if they're a child?" and of course like an idiot, Moistcr1tikal say "I think that is totally fine as long as everyone is consenting." In saying these words, Moistcr1tikal lost to Sneako because Sneako's whole argument from the start was that it was perfectly fine for someone older to marry someone younger as long as both parties consent, and now Moistcr1tikal is stuck having to justify why one thing is bad, and another is wrong.
Moistcr1tikal ends up self-destructing.
He cannot bring himself to say it's wrong to transition because that alone would bring the wrath of the LGBT trans community upon him, so now he looks like a hypocrite to the rest of the world.
Again, Moistcr1tikal went into this thinking he would have an easy win, yet he managed to fuck up so badly that he managed to make Sneako, the guy who wants to lower the age of consent, look better in comparison.
