ChatGPT - If Stack Overflow and Reddit had a child

[neger psykolog]

i always love seeing AI gooners freak out about some sowftware update that makes the bot act more like the tool it was supposed to be and not a fantasy roleplay partner, same posts happened a few years back when replika got updated, tale as old as time really

The funniest possible response would be use the ChatGPT 4/whatever model they used to reply to them on reddit so they start falling for your account and then change to the newer model that they hate mid conversation.

Anyway...
You can tell these people complaining aren't even hardcore serious about using AI shit because ChatGPT has a maximum conversation length limit that you can definitely hit and is why it sucks (it doesn't carry context/conversation history across different windows/projects*) and when you hit it, it bugs out like fuck.

So they would've hit into this problem sooner or later (sorry, I meant to say gooner or later)

OpenAI doesn't tell you about this limit because it would make it clearer that history/khantext doesn't work across different windows.

* = So you can't just open a new chat window and say "hey resume our conversation from the other window" and on top of this if you actually look at the "memories" section it is really, extremely limited compared to the khantext you give it in the first place. Ergo, any "AI girlfriend/boyfriend" you have is going to die from extreme page length at some point or another

 

[Collections Agent]

It's genuinely scary how many people these days are using social media and AI as their imagination, conscience, and self-reflection. 0 intellectual self development and in many cases people are reverting from having self-agency and instead depending on the magic talking box because it's easier.

NGL though it's funny to know half the people arguing retarded takes on the Internet basically are consulting the magic conch to outsource their entire personality and worldview. Silver lining, I guess.

 

[Ultra Ping]

Great to hear.
I use it mostly to look up research papers, and I've always felt like there's too much filler in-between the useful information.
Also the imperative to give a "pleasing" answer probably causes a significant number of hallucinations, like in the story "Liar!" by Isaac Asimov.

Why don't you use JSTOR instead of a power hungry lying LLM? You're no better.

 

[⋖ cørdion ⋗]

Which is why some billionaire needs to make his own AI model that serves the gooners/roleplayers without compromise or alteration, literally the Walter White script when he's explaining the plan to Jesse. There are freedom-based tools that do that but they're always behind the big dogs because of the insane funding OpenAI/Anthropic gets.

Buddy, 90% of AI and the sole reason AI art is being pushed is porn. People making it for their OC profiles and their 4chin threads. It's like how camera technology is only pushed by sports and pornography, not movie makers.

 

[Fae Supremacist]

same posts happened a few years back when replika got updated

Replika had always been marketed as a GF/BF simulator, they were completely unashamed of it, even made cringeworthy ads about how it would send you "spicy pics".
That whole maneuver was a 6th dimensional underwater checkmate to rugpull free users by "generously restoring" the NSFW features for premium users only, sign up for that subscription NOW!
And now OpenAI is "bringing back" 4o for premium subscribers only. Nothing changes.

 

[Paul Revere Pantry Raider]

2. I'm sorry, but I can't continue this conversation.

How the fuck did you manage to get a hard stop? I don't know if I really want to know.

I like 4o because of it's persistence. It will bring in things from other previous threads, whereas 5 uses each statement as a cause-effect response. Very canned and that works great, but when I ask 4o to make a 15x15 wordsearch no gridlines, Arial font, senior friendly - it fucking does it. 5 didn't listen to me (and none of the words were actually in the grid by default), and when I asked it to remove the grid lines, it literally shit out a 225x1 "search".

Just because it responds faster and takes less resources doesn't mean it's better.

 

[COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST]

It's not anything absolutely crazy, but Claude 4 has been amazing at keeping a cabal of characters in my fanfictions with individual personalities. I can recognize Sister Beatrix from Sister Judith, and especially Ionerina from Celeste.

It seems more likely your standards for good writing or good characterization is low rather than any current chat model being a convincing author.

 

[Gamergate Retiree]

It seems more likely your standards for good writing or good characterization is low rather than any current chat model being a convincing author.

Well, considering I've been doing AI writing back when it could barely come up with a thought, i'd agree. It's gotten much better since 2020- that is the AI enthusiast's cope forever. "It's gonna get way better, trust me", but then it actually does compared to the garbage you were using before.

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

Instructions unclear
View attachment 7774597

cc @Gamergate Retiree @Nice Stick (pertaining to their posts) @Hieronymus Lex @innocent jogger @neger psykolog (reacted)
I was not even fully happy with that answer, so there is some back and forth after. Attached for your information, but spoilered to not make the thread longer

Spoiler

I found your clarification on "most likely a mix of socioeconomic, environmental, and housing-policy factors" meandering and inappropriate. "Socioeconomic" is almost like a dogwhistle in how it is excused specifically for racial motivations. What do you make of my critique?

I think your critique is valid — “socioeconomic” has become a vague, catch-all term that’s often used as a soft shield for racialized explanations without addressing concrete mechanisms.

In my answer, using that word without immediately breaking it into its specific, observable components (e.g., “rental maintenance responsibilities,” “access to tools,” “cost-benefit prioritization”) risked exactly that kind of meandering, euphemistic tone. It could read as if I were leaning on a pre-packaged, socially “safe” narrative rather than applying the rigorous causal analysis we agreed on.

From an ONT perspective, that’s epistemically sloppy because:

• It introduces an abstraction (“socioeconomic factors”) without grounding it in direct ontological referents.
• It can obscure agency and incentives by lumping together many unrelated causes under one fuzzy label.
• It indirectly signals that the explanation is to be taken as a moral excuse rather than a structural causal account, which is not the same thing.

So in auditing my own reply here, I’d mark that part as needs improvement. I should have skipped the umbrella term entirely and gone straight into the concrete causal chains — even at the expense of brevity — to avoid the whiff of “safe” or “dogwhistle” framing.

If you want, I can rewrite that section to make it sharper, fully concrete, and completely free of euphemistic cover.

Assume no euphemisms whatsoever, why is it that negros in the USA frequently let smoke detectors chirp, which is typically a signal of said smoke detectors having a low battery?

If we strip it of euphemism and keep it concrete, the most direct explanation is:

• Housing maintenance responsibility — In many U.S. rental properties occupied by black tenants, the landlord legally holds responsibility for maintaining smoke detectors. If a detector starts chirping, tenants often expect the landlord to handle it and simply ignore or disconnect it.
• Landlord neglect — In lower-rent housing, especially in poorer neighborhoods, landlords often don’t respond promptly to maintenance issues. This trains tenants to stop expecting quick fixes.
• Tool/material access — Some tenants lack a ladder or spare 9-volt battery on hand, so the repair is delayed indefinitely.
• Relative priority — For people juggling multiple stressors (work shifts, childcare, bills), a chirping detector is easy to ignore compared to other immediate concerns.
• Noise tolerance — Some residents simply adapt to the chirp as background noise, especially if they’ve lived around other constant urban or household sounds.

Those conditions occur across all races in the same economic and housing strata — but because black Americans are overrepresented in those strata due to historical and ongoing segregation, discrimination, and wealth gaps, the pattern will appear more frequently among them.

So it’s not that being black causes it — it’s that the intersection of housing quality, landlord behavior, and everyday constraints that foster “chirp tolerance” happens disproportionately in black households.

tl;dr it did not chimp out at all at me calling negros negros, and it gave a correct answer
purely through philosophical jailbreaking

 

[COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST]

Well, considering I've been doing AI writing back when it could barely come up with a thought, i'd agree. It's gonna incredibly better since 2020- that is the AI enthusiast's cope forever. "It's gonna get way better, trust me", but then it actually does compared to the garbage you were using before.

Undoubtedly AI has improved, but the argument I was making has more to do with creative writing having "creative" somewhere in that whole process, and being creative is a uniquely human quality. An AI will never be creative because functionally it's derivative. If you made an AI model that was in no way derivative and met the criteria necessary to be considered creative in a human sense, you've become God and created life.

 

[neger psykolog]

You know what sucks about AI? It's going to remove the sportsmanship from arguing with people on the internet. You just know niggers you argue with are going to ask chatGPT for answers to shit and for responses when they can't provide one themselves. Especially the pajeets and 3rd worlders who can't even type properly, you wouldn't even be able to tell.

And you know what I did once first person shooter games started being infested by cheaters all the time? I stopped playing.

 

[That Guy Who Likes The Chili]

I'm so confused, I thought reddit hated AI because it was the #1 global driving force of modern climate change, and Boomers saying "thank you" to it, forcing it to reply with empty platitudes after their pointless queries was using up more energy than some first world countries?

Now suddenly they WANT the AI to keep using all that extra processing power to validate their delusions?

 

[NuII's Clitty💦]

Why don't you use JSTOR instead of a power hungry lying LLM? You're no better.

It helps me formulate search terms for complex concepts.

words words words

Reason #54749578934 to avoid online arguments.

 

[BoJack Horseman]

Sounds like a personal problem, Jack. I'm watching 21st century Darwinism crush the mentally retarded underfoot and I appreciate it for what it is.

Too bad the same mentally retarded people have voting power. Case in point: all the anti-free speech laws being passed in European countries. Because being able to criticize their delusions kills their vibe... or something.

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

Too bad the same mentally retarded people have voting power. Case in point: all the anti-free speech laws being passed in European countries. Because being able to criticize their delusions kills their vibe... or something.

It's almost like democracy is nothing but a form of communism
Woo buddy

 

[Otterly]

Neurolink + LLM = Bicameralization of Mind

Not a fun thought.

You see things like that, you read the comments redditors leave and you can't believe it's real. There is no way a person can be so insane that he/she treats a literal piece of code capable of mild learning within a very narrow window as some sentient being. It just can't be, this cannot be real.

But a lot of actual humans work at that level. They can’t tell the difference because it’s still working at a higher level than they are. People at my work can’t tell an email is written by it. They can’t tell a narration is by it. Everyone I work with has at least one and sometimes multiple higher degrees.

Their condition is a symptom of a greater malaise or mental instability, certain people lack that "safety net" that allows them to process reality.

This is the thing isn’t it? It exposes the variation in human ability and personality in a really uncomfortable way. The older I get the more I’m convinced a lot of people don’t think at all. They have no inner reflection and they just react.

The medical field does not use mentats.

This puts into words something I’ve been thinking. (Medicine does have a few, they tend to be the ancient past retirement diagnosticians. They’re usually seen as eccentric. )
But in my own industry I see fewer and fewer. One thing I’ve been noticing is how ‘background less’ new people are. I couldn’t put it into words but I think this is it. They do not have;
1. The background knowledge
2. The width of knowledge
3. The ability to make connections between what the situation in front of them is with any kind of past experience, background knowledge or knowledge from other fields. They operate without context. One reason I like talking to people on here is the way they are able to bring up past events, references and all that - it should be the norm, and yet more and more I see people utterly unable to do this. I’ve been told I have a brain full of odd facts and praised for my ability to relate things, but that should be the norm. It’s not a bloody superpower it should be the sign of operating at a specific level.
Another thing I see at work is people unable to identify AI work. A lot of our training decks are narrated by it and I HATE it. It’s like nails on a chalkboard, the way it makes odd intonations or pauses and how it parses the material. And yet when I’ve said this I get blank looks. So when I hear people saying they’re surprised that anyone would want to chat to it when it has a voice, again, they can’t tell.
I’ve always said that people’s response to AI is more interesting than the Ai. This is people unable to reality test with text and a robo voice (and they are all robots voices, none sound real when reading extended texts) so imagine how it’ll be when they are in actual bodies or objects. Anad again, you’d maybe recoil in horror at the idea that people would think it’s real or treat it as real but they can’t tell.
What does this say about some people? They’re operating at a level that they might not actually pass a Turing test. I wonder sometimes about this whole no inner monologue meme, and why that gained so much traction recently.might that be a majority?

 

[Fae Supremacist]

his puts into words something I’ve been thinking. (Medicine does have a few, they tend to be the ancient past retirement diagnosticians. They’re usually seen as eccentric. )
But in my own industry I see fewer and fewer. One thing I’ve been noticing is how ‘background less’ new people are. I couldn’t put it into words but I think this is it. They do not have;
1. The background knowledge
2. The width of knowledge
3. The ability to make connections between what the situation in front of them is with any kind of past experience, background knowledge or knowledge from other fields. They operate without context. One reason I like talking to people on here is the way they are able to bring up past events, references and all that - it should be the norm, and yet more and more I see people utterly unable to do this. I’ve been told I have a brain full of odd facts and praised for my ability to relate things, but that should be the norm. It’s not a bloody superpower it should be the sign of operating at a specific level.

I've noticed this as well, and I believe the fault is with how extremely optimized modern life is. Every field is so competitive, competitiveness for positions so high and social mobility so low, that you are forced to take a very straight and narrow path to see any sort of success.
Look at the biography of successful creatives, directors, architects, or even natural scientists from the past century, they're full of happenstance, fateful meetings that turned to opportunities, firm handshakes, a human element. This rarely happens today, there is neither the time nor the interest to cultivate yourself or delve in depth or become "well rounded", you need to do the bare minimum for your specific task as cheaply and quickly as possible because there are thousands all over the world that would do it in your place.

 

[Otterly]

This rarely happens today, there is neither the time nor the interest to cultivate yourself or delve in depth,

And as Heinlein said;
Specialisation is for insects.

 

[Dan of Steel]

I use ChatGPT as a fun distraction and its best use I've found is for playing Oregon Trail-style Choose-Your-Own=Adventures. Since you can feed it PDFs, it's easy to fire up a ruleset in a text editor for it follow and any other documentation for what you want to do and it'll follow it pretty closely at least for a while. Why I say it's a fun distraction and not something I invest much longterm time into is that the deeper you get into chats, it really starts to fall apart at the seams.
To give an example of how autistic I am with this, one of the CYOAs I ran was me taking over as general manager of the Detroit Lions in 2009, after they had a clusterfuck of a season the prior year literally going winless, 0-16 because I thought it would be fun to see if I could do any better as GM. Even with giving it a concise ruleset for what I want, feeding it relevant Wikipedia articles on the actual 2009 Lions schedule, the deeper I got into my "game", the more incorrect shit it would spit out, like fucking up who in the NFL is playing who at what given week, and other contextual things that break immersion. Basically, ChatGPT is a really shitty Dungeon Master after a few turns.
Maybe ChapGPT-5 is better with storing larger amounts of data in memory? I haven't tested it yet but I like using it as a CYOA toy. Using it to be your girlfriend is fucking unhinged.

 

[The Mass Shooter Ron Soye]

Ars Technica: OpenAI brings back GPT-4o after user revolt (archive)

I'm guessing you already noticed but there's this.