ChatGPT - If Stack Overflow and Reddit had a child

[MirrorNoir]

and nothing of value was lost

Not exactly; it basically means coomers will move to rival chatbots or chatbots set up exclusively for the insanely rich, who are furious as fuck that, like with the Internet as a whole, AI creation ended up in the hands of poor fags and the middle class rather than staying the exclusive plaything of the wealthy elite

 

[DeadwastePrime]

Not exactly; it basically means coomers will move to rival chatbots or chatbots set up exclusively for the insanely rich, who are furious as fuck that, like with the Internet as a whole, AI creation ended up in the hands of poor fags and the middle class rather than staying the exclusive plaything of the wealthy elite

 

[MirrorNoir]

View attachment 8761391

Just remember that bon motte and keep it close to your heart and hoste when you are dragged to a tree to be (to close to fed posting) because a member of the elite thinks you smell bad and has you (fed posted) for offending their delicate nostrils.

Anything that strips a toy out of the greedy no sharing ever hands of the elite is good and you know damn fucking well that the same faggots up top screaming "AI is ruining the arts" are secretly using it to ghost writing shitty novel, making memes making fun/dehumanizing the poor white males, and trading AI video clips/songs with each other in secret and only pissed that said tech is in the hands of poor fags whk are using it for their own joy abd to mock said elites.

 

[Something Awful]

Not exactly; it basically means coomers will move to rival chatbots or chatbots set up exclusively for the insanely rich, who are furious as fuck that, like with the Internet as a whole, AI creation ended up in the hands of poor fags and the middle class rather than staying the exclusive plaything of the wealthy elite

I promise you "the insanely rich" do not give a fuck if retards on Twitter can make epic memes or have an AI girlfriend. It's bread and circuses, not fire brought by Prometheus.

 

[StacticShock]

Claude code just FOOKEN LEAKED.
Github has two versions of the code being hosted (Ver1) (Ver2)

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

Claude code just FOOKEN LEAKED.

Shift down a few gears, this is just the Typescript source code for the command line interface

 

[Something Awful]

Are we about to achieve AGI? Signs point to "yes".

 

[SIMIΔN]

I've been using ChatGPT to code and the most annoying thing is how much it writes.
I provided the code for a custom control, it was around 45 lines of markup, 35 lines of codebehind. I asked ChatGPT to make something like it, but with a different enum, and an additional exposed property. The codebehind rocketed to almost 200 LoC, because it assumed things I didn't ask for.

 

[debristar]

because it assumed things I didn't ask for

tell it to not assume things you don't ask for

 

[Paul Revere Pantry Raider]

I've been using ChatGPT to code and the most annoying thing is how much it writes.

Claude writes rings around GPT- at least up through GPT 5.2; I don't use it anymore. It took too much damn time with GPT. Claude, on the other hand, helped me migrate a 20+ year old platform and helped me learn twig in a couple of hours. I couldn't get GPT to reliably edit a damn document with placeholders.

 

[Something Awful]

OpenAI came out with "ChatGPT Images 2.0". It's supposed to be good at things like internal logic and consistency across different panels. But I asked it to generate a bird rolling down a hill, and it just gave me this:



Looks pretty crap imo, and the bird can't figure out how many legs or wings it has. Then I asked it to do it again in a more realistic style, and it made it darker, I guess.





Also, yikes. Rough landing there, bird.

Anyway, it is what it is. It's also supposed to be much better at generating text in images, but I didn't experiment with that as I hit my free tier limit. Since switching to Claude I feel like paying for GPT is a waste of money. Claude has its own problems, but at least it doesn't outright disgust me like ChatGPT does nowadays.

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

but I didn't experiment with that as I hit my free tier limit.

Wanna share the exact and complete wording of the prompt so I can check on a paid plan?

 

[Something Awful]

Wanna share the exact and complete wording of the prompt so I can check on a paid plan?

Just what I said pretty much. My exact prompts were:

1) "Generate a bird rolling down a hill"
2) "same bird, 4-frame sequence rolling down the hill like a storyboard, and make it not suck unlike the first image"
3) "Do it again in realistic style this time"

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

Generate a bird rolling down a hill

Interesting, I used that prompt and then went to examine the data in that image. Under "Actions" I saw

Actions Software Agent Name : GPT-4o

It's entirely possible that they failed to update the tooling or internal naming, but still, weird!

same bird, 4-frame sequence rolling down the hill like a storyboard, and make it not suck unlike the first image

Do it again in realistic style this time

Goes to show how consistent outputs are when you use the exact same prompt!
But I'd say this is significantly better than what free users get

 

[SchizoDaemon]

It writes code in a super defensive manner. I can always tell when the code is generated since it will check for empty/nil values when there is no need to.

 

[No-Eyed Square Guy]

Man who actually knows things asks ChatGPT about them. The likely ensues:

I know how it works so I don't use it, so I had no idea how annoying its "voice" is. How can anybody stand this Reddit-ass shit?

 

[Something Awful]

I know how it works so I don't use it, so I had no idea how annoying its "voice" is. How can anybody stand this Reddit-ass shit?

Yup, it's quickly grown to be fucking insufferable and why I said in a previous post it makes me outright disgusted to use it. It's even worse seeing it out in the wild, now that it's entered the normie-sphere.

 

[debristar]

ffmpeg has done more damage to history than chatgpt, you are barking up the wrong tree.

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

ffmpeg has done more damage to history than chatgpt, you are barking up the wrong tree.

How so?

 

[debristar]

when you upload a video to youtube they re-encode the video.

when someone downloads a video from youtube, it is not the original which was uploaded.

then a video is re-uploaded and quality degrades further.

youtube does this because a valid mp4 file might have key frames missing which is required for seeking, and they want guaranteed uniformity.

chatgpt is exactly the same but on a longer multi-year time frame instead of instantly degrading it will degrade over time.

no one is putting in effort into anything anyway, current solution is death, war, famine.

no oil, no tech. we're going back in time about 50-60 years. Iran only delays the consequences of building out a civilization like this.

chatgpt will become so expensive they'll just shut it down because no one will sign up.

only few requests direct to the API and no automation usage will be profitable.

gpt5.4-pro is $180per million, so expect to be paying north of $10000 every year for access to tokens directly.

chatgpt makes no sense. how much context can chatgpt fit? not much.